This study showed that the magnitude of medically confirmed chronic liver diseases among adults was 231 (60.2%), which was in line with a study conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, where there is a high burden of cirrhosis and more than 50% of patients are admitted to hospitals with end-stage chronic liver disease [31]. Of 231 (60.2%) males, 143 (37.26%) were male, while 88 (22.93%) were medically confirmed to be female adults, which is in line with a study conducted in Europe and Mexico [32, 34]. Even if it is difficult to conclude that males are more at risk of developing CLD than females, studies have described that, due to the protective effect of estrogen hormone, females are less likely to develop medically confirmed chronic liver disease than males [35, 36].
This study shows that those who have a family history of chronic liver disease are more likely to develop medically confirmed CLD than those who do not. From a scientific perspective, numerous hereditary disorders may cause liver damage and contribute to the development of chronic liver disease, rather than chronic liver disease invariably being a hereditary disease [37].
According to this study, those who drink more than 20 ml of alcohol per day have a noticeably higher chance of acquiring chronic liver disease (CLD), which has a medically verified prognosis, than those who abstain from alcohol. This outcome is in line with those of other research conducted in areas such as sub-Saharan Africa and central India [13, 23, 25, 26]. Drinking alcohol for a long time can increase the risk of alcoholic liver disease, which damages the liver cells and causes scar tissue. According to numerous studies [38–40], this might therefore result in the development of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The observed discrepancy may be in the classification parameters used to separate alcohol consumers from nonconsumers. Regardless of the actual amount of alcohol consumed, the threshold for daily alcohol intake in this study and previous scientific investigations was at least 20 milliliters. In contrast, some studies have utilized the length of alcohol usage and the amount drank as criteria for classifying people as drinkers or abstainers [41]. The conventional Cut Down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-Opener (CAGE) instrument was utilized in the prior research, which might not have taken into consideration the precise amount of alcohol drunk. According to research, the main factor influencing the development of chronic liver disease (CLD) is the quantity of alcohol taken, regardless of the kind of alcohol consumed. Intake of more than 60 to 80 grams per day for males and more than 20 grams per day for women for a decade enhanced the chance of acquiring this condition [42]. Therefore, it is conceivable that this underlying element is what causes the observed fluctuation.
The findings of this study showed that, compared to nonsmokers, those with a history of smoking were more likely to have medically proven chronic liver disease. This result is in line with research conducted in several regions, including Sub-Saharan Africa, Central India, Copenhagen, and China [13, 26, 28, 29]. The occurrence of liver damage due to nicotine ingestion is due to the physiological process in which nicotine is absorbed through inhalation and rapidly metabolized in the liver. The observed discrepancy may result from variations in the classification standards used to separate smokers from nonsmokers [43]. The baseline for smokers in this study was when the patient smoked cigarettes of any dosage every day, regardless of how many cigarettes they smoked. In contrast, several studies have utilized consumption volume as a criterion for classifying people as smokers or nonsmokers. For smokers, previous studies have indicated that intakes of more than 10 grams per day increase the chance of developing chronic liver disease. Therefore, it is plausible to believe that this underlying element is what causes the observed variability [44].
According to this study, there is a statistically significant link between a patient's history of khat use and their propensity to develop chronic liver disease. This discovery lends more support to the causal link between khat use and the onset of chronic liver disease since it is similar to results previously reported in a study carried out in Ethiopia [14, 36].
According to this study, people who frequently consume a diet high in animal fat have a higher risk of developing chronic liver disease than people who do not. This finding is consistent with research conducted in the US [44]. A notable association was found about cholesterol consumption, which may lead to the unrestricted accumulation of cholesterol in liver parenchyma cells and affect the cell physiology of hepatocytes [13, 44].
According to this study, individuals who tested positive for the hepatitis B and C viruses had a much higher risk of developing medically recognized chronic liver disease than those who did not. This study supports the findings of other studies that were carried out in places such as India, sub-Saharan Africa, Togo, and Ethiopia, as reported in the literature [31, 33, 34, and 36]. The rationale provided by science for why viral hepatitis, especially hepatitis B and hepatitis C, can cause cellular necrosis, an inflammatory response, cytokine production, and hepatic fibrosis As a result, chronic hepatitis can result in life-threatening conditions such as cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular cancer [16]. Nevertheless, this study is not exempt from its inherent limitations, despite the findings' important importance to the field of chronic liver disease. The lack of access to reviewable medical records significantly hindered the collection of a history of chronic viral hepatitis for most individuals. Consequently, the influence of this important variable was not evaluated in this study.
According to this study, those who had comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, HIV/AIDS, heart disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and hypertension had a higher risk of developing medically diagnosed chronic liver diseases than those who did not have these conditions. This result is in line with other research from Ethiopia and central India as well as the overall prevalence of NAFLD and NASH [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. The typical spectrum of NAFLD, which includes hepatic steatosis without any obvious secondary sources of liver fat accumulation, may be the reason for this connection. The medication used to treat the illness and its comorbidities may harm liver cells by impairing their ability to operate [44, 45].
According to this study, those who had ever taken herbal drugs had a greater likelihood of developing medically verified chronic liver disease than people who had not. This result is in line with research conducted in China [35]. The liver is a key organ for filtering toxins, which explains why there is a link between the two. By engendering deleterious compounds during the metabolic process, certain herbs can harm liver cells.
In line with a study performed in Ethiopia and central India, it has also been discovered that people with a body mass index (BMI) in the range of 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2 (classified as a healthy weight) are less likely to develop medically confirmed chronic liver disease (CLD) than those with a BMI in the range of 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 (classified as overweight) [29, 32]. Body mass index (BMI) and the chance of acquiring chronic illnesses linked to the buildup of adipose tissue are positively correlated, which is the fundamental reason for this phenomenon [45]. The fundamental reason for this phenomenon is linked to the buildup of adipose tissue, which increases the chance of acquiring chronic illnesses [45].