Rice tiller number
There was a significant interaction of T × N × Zn on tiller number at WAR 2-WAR 4 (Table 1). Low temperature significantly suppressed the number of tillers, which were 23.66% (P < 0.05) and 42.03% (P < 0.05) lower under normal and high N conditions, respectively (Fig. 1). Increasing Zn application increased the rice tiller number by 5.54% under normal N conditions, while rice tiller decreased by 19.43% (P < 0.05) under high N conditions.
Table 1
Results of multiway ANOVA analyses of rice tiller growth, Zn absorption, N absorption, MDA concentration and antioxidase activities.
Parameters
|
Stage
|
Factors
|
T
|
N
|
Zn
|
N×Zn
|
T×N
|
T×Zn
|
T×N×Zn
|
Tiller number
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
|
WAR 1
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
*
|
|
WAR 3
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
*
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
*
|
ns
|
**
|
*
|
Tiller growth rate
|
BTT-ALT
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
|
ALT-WAR 2
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2-WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
Zn shoot concentration
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
*
|
Zn root concentration
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
*
|
**
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
*
|
ns
|
*
|
N accumulation
|
ATT
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
*
|
N content
|
ALT
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
*
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
*
|
**
|
ns
|
MDA
|
ATT
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
|
WAR 4
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
SOD
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
*
|
ns
|
CAT
|
ATT
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
POD
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
|
WAR 4
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
BTT represents before temperature treatment, ATT represents after temperature treatment, WAR represents weeks after recovery to normal temperature. * and ** represent significance at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, and ns represents no significance. |
At WAR 2, low temperature still had a significant effect on the rice tiller number. Compared with the normal temperature treatment, the number of tillers decreased by 16.29% (P < 0.05) under normal N levels and by 38.84% (P < 0.05) under high N levels. Under normal N levels, reducing the Zn supply decreased the tiller number by 12.81% (P < 0.05), while increasing the Zn level had no significant effect on the tiller number. There was an opposite trend under high N conditions: when increasing the application of Zn, the rice tiller number was still 14.19% (P < 0.05) lower than the normal N level.
At WAR 3, low temperature still decreased the rice tiller number by 6.75% (P < 0.05) under normal N conditions, and the rice tiller recovered until WAR 4, but with increased Zn application it recovered to the normal level at WAR 3. Under high N levels, the rice tiller number recovered to normal levels at WAR 3 even without increasing the Zn supply. However, the rice tiller number at WAR 4 was still significantly lower than the normal level if the Zn application was reduced at both N levels.
The dry matter accumulation in the shoot and root of rice under different temperature, N and Zn treatments had similar trends with the rice tiller number during these three periods (Fig. S1). At WAR4, shoot dry matter could recover to normal level under normal N conditions, which was still significantly lower than normal temperature for high N treatments. Increasing Zn application could help the accumulation of rice dry matter, while rice shoot and root dry matter weight significantly decreased when reducing the supply of Zn.Tiller growth rate
There were significant interactions of T × N × Zn on the tiller growth rate at ATT-WAR 2 and WAR 2-WAR 4 (Table 1). Low temperature significantly decreased the rice tiller growth rate. Under the normal N level, increasing the Zn concentration was beneficial and increased the rice tiller growth rate; however, the rice tiller growth rate was significantly decreased with an increase of the Zn concentration under a high N level (Fig. 2).
During ATT-WAR 2, under normal N levels, increasing the Zn application increased the rice tiller growth rate, while the rice tiller growth rate decreased by 29.85% (P < 0.05) if the Zn concentration was decreased. Increasing the N supply reduced the rice tiller growth rate after the low temperature treatment, and increasing the Zn application further inhibited the rice tiller growth rate, with the rice tiller growth rate decreasing by 44.44% (P < 0.05), while decreasing the Zn supply increased the rice tiller growth rate by 14.29%.
During WAR 2-WAR 4, the rice tiller growth rate after the low temperature treatments was higher than that after the normal temperature treatments, and the rice tiller growth rate increased by 39.34% (P < 0.05) and 135.71% (P < 0.05) for the normal and high N levels, respectively. Increasing the Zn supply level increased the tiller growth rate by 29.41% (P < 0.05) and 10.91% (P < 0.05) under normal and high N levels, respectively.
Shoot and root Zn concentration
T × N × Zn had significant interaction effects on the shoot zinc concentration at ATT and WAR 4, and on the root Zn concentration at all stages (Table 1). Low temperature stress increased rice shoot and root Zn concentration by 13.12% (P < 0.05) and 34.59% (P < 0.05), respectively at normal N level; and by 62.83% (P < 0.05) and 70.14% (P < 0.05), respectively at high N level (Fig. 3). Under low temperature stress, increasing Zn application had little effect on rice shoot Zn concentration at normal N condition, but significantly elevated root and shoot Zn concentrations at high N level. At WAR 2 and WAR 4, the shoot and root Zn concentrations of rice were lower than ATT, and high N treatments showed higher Zn concentration than that at normal N level. Additionally, increasing Zn application significantly increased shoot and root Zn concentration both at normal and high N conditions.
In order to identify the relationship between shoot Zn concentration and rice tiller numbers at different temperature and N conditions, the correlation of Zn concentration and tiller was analyzed. At normal N level, there was significant positive correlations between shoot Zn concentration and tiller number both under normal and low temperature conditions (Fig. 4). At high N level, significant negative correlation at ATT and positive correlation at WAR2 and WAR4 was observed under normal temperature conditions. However, there was negative correlations between rice tillers and shoot Zn concentration at ATT and WAR2 under low temperature conditions. And quadratic curve relationship was observed at WAR4, the Zn concentration with the highest rice tiller number was 32.62 mg kg− 1 (Fig. 4f). N absorption
T × N × Zn had a significant interactive effect on N concentration at ATT and WAR 2 (Table 1). Increasing the N levels significantly increased the shoot N uptake not only under normal but also under low temperature conditions (Fig. 5a). The N concentration of rice treated with high N levels decreased by 8.26% (P < 0.05) under low temperature treatment and increased by 7.63% (P < 0.05) under normal N levels. Under low temperature, increased Zn application increased N uptake by 4.39% (P < 0.05) at the normal N level but decreased N uptake by 5.94% (P < 0.05) at the high N level. At WAR 2 and WAR 4, there was little effect of N and Zn on the rice shoot N concentration.
T × N × Zn all had significant interactive effects on N accumulation in all stages (Table 1). Low temperature significantly decreased the rice N accumulation, but there was no significant difference between N levels. Under low temperature conditions, increasing the application of Zn increased the N accumulation by 16.61% (P < 0.05) at normal N levels. However, increasing the Zn supply under a high N level decreased the N accumulation by 20.90% (P < 0.05), which increased by 20.55% (P < 0.05) with decreased Zn application (Fig. 5b).
A negative effect of low temperature on N accumulation remained at WAR 2, which was more severe under high N levels. N accumulation under high N levels recovered to 50.04% (P < 0.05) of normal conditions at WAR 2, while N accumulation under normal N levels recovered to 75.04% (P < 0.05). Reducing the Zn supply reduced the N accumulation by 39.18% (P < 0.05) at normal N levels, which could recover to 89.64% (P < 0.05) of the normal levels when increasing the Zn application. Under high N levels, increased Zn application reduced the N accumulation by 15.84% (P < 0.05) and 42.11% (P < 0.05) under normal conditions.
At WAR 4, the low temperature treatment still significantly inhibited N accumulation under high N levels, while N accumulation under normal N levels had recovered to normal levels. Increasing the Zn supply increased the N accumulation by 24.20% (P < 0.05) at normal N levels, but Zn had no significant effect on N accumulation under high N levels. Decreasing the Zn application significantly inhibited the recovery of N accumulation. The correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between N accumulation and tiller increment during ATT-WAR 2 and WAR 2-WAR 4 (Fig. 6), and there was also a significant positive correlation between the Zn application and the N accumulation increment under normal N levels (Fig. 7However, there was a significant positive correlation between the Zn application level and the N accumulation increment only during WAR 2-WAR 4 at high N level (Fig. 7).
MDA concentration and antioxidase activities
There was a significant interactive effect of T × N × Zn on MDA concentration and SOD, CAT and POD activities during the ATT period and on POD activity at WAR 2 (Table 1). Low temperature caused significant MDA accumulation, with increases of 19.00% (P < 0.05) and 47.32% (P < 0.05) at normal and high N levels, respectively (Table 2). An increased Zn supply reduced the rice MDA concentration by 21.29% (P < 0.05) at the normal N level, while it increased the MDA concentration by 21.82% (P < 0.05) at the high N level. Under low temperature stress, the activities of POD and CAT in rice leaves at the normal N level increased by 11.44% (P < 0.05) and 19.43% (P < 0.05), respectively. SOD activities at high N levels increased by 23.32% (P < 0.05). Increasing Zn supply enhanced the SOD, POD and CAT activities at normal N levels, which only increased SOD activity by 10.42% (P < 0.05) at high N levels while inhibiting the other enzyme activities.
Table 2
MDA concentration and antioxidase activities in rice under different temperature, N and Zn application levels.
Stage
|
Temperature
|
Treatment
|
MDA concentration
(µmol g− 1 FW)
|
SOD activity
(U g− 1 FW)
|
CAT activity
(Δ240 min− 1 g− 1 FW)
|
POD activity
(U min− 1 g− 1 FW)
|
ATT
|
22℃
|
N1Zn1
|
4.4 ± 0.1
|
1006 ± 62
|
48 ± 1
|
340 ± 12
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
3.8 ± 0.3
|
1149 ± 39
|
52 ± 1
|
347 ± 3
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
3.1 ± 0.2
|
1259 ± 49
|
52 ± 1
|
352 ± 11
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
3.2 ± 0.0
|
985 ± 20
|
57 ± 1
|
372 ± 6
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
3.4 ± 0.1
|
1012 ± 11
|
58 ± 1
|
378 ± 2
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
3.6 ± 0.0
|
1068 ± 10
|
53 ± 3
|
358 ± 9
|
|
12℃
|
N1Zn1
|
5.1 ± 0.3
|
1142 ± 33
|
59 ± 4
|
341 ± 12
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
4.5 ± 0.1
|
1218 ± 33
|
62 ± 2
|
387 ± 18
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
3.6 ± 0.3
|
1368 ± 24
|
83 ± 2
|
445 ± 16
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
3.7 ± 0.1
|
1151 ± 11
|
66 ± 1
|
440 ± 13
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
5.0 ± 0.1
|
1248 ± 26
|
61 ± 1
|
397 ± 0
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
6.0 ± 0.1
|
1378 ± 15
|
56 ± 2
|
368 ± 9
|
LSD (0.05)
|
|
|
0.5
|
91
|
5
|
29
|
WAR 2
|
22℃
|
N1Zn1
|
3.8 ± 0.6
|
697 ± 19
|
51 ± 1
|
164 ± 19
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
3.5 ± 0.1
|
770 ± 21
|
51 ± 1
|
175 ± 23
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
3.1 ± 0.1
|
887 ± 49
|
59 ± 2
|
252 ± 18
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
3.5 ± 0.0
|
583 ± 7
|
52 ± 1
|
180 ± 9
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
3.4 ± 0.0
|
693 ± 8
|
51 ± 1
|
215 ± 4
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
2.8 ± 0.0
|
793 ± 5
|
48 ± 0
|
288 ± 0
|
|
12℃
|
N1Zn1
|
4.2 ± 0.1
|
896 ± 69
|
51 ± 3
|
309 ± 18
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
3.6 ± 0.1
|
954 ± 22
|
56 ± 2
|
314 ± 9
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
3.4 ± 0.2
|
1050 ± 60
|
63 ± 4
|
344 ± 13
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
3.9 ± 0.1
|
786 ± 13
|
50 ± 1
|
296 ± 5
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
3.7 ± 0.1
|
897 ± 23
|
52 ± 1
|
384 ± 4
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
3.4 ± 0.0
|
990 ± 9
|
56 ± 2
|
442 ± 12
|
LSD (0.05)
|
|
|
0.6
|
94
|
6
|
40
|
WAR 4
|
22℃
|
N1Zn1
|
3.1 ± 0.3
|
465 ± 62
|
31 ± 4
|
257 ± 10
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
2.5 ± 0.3
|
645 ± 38
|
39 ± 4
|
328 ± 13
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
2.3 ± 0.0
|
657 ± 56
|
43 ± 1
|
372 ± 18
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
3.3 ± 0.0
|
871 ± 18
|
45 ± 1
|
336 ± 25
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
3.2 ± 0.1
|
972 ± 10
|
47 ± 1
|
395 ± 30
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
2.9 ± 0.1
|
1007 ± 14
|
49 ± 3
|
391 ± 37
|
|
12℃
|
N1Zn1
|
3.1 ± 0.1
|
909 ± 50
|
39 ± 1
|
275 ± 28
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
2.7 ± 0.0
|
987 ± 33
|
44 ± 2
|
302 ± 26
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
2.3 ± 0.3
|
1056 ± 30
|
44 ± 5
|
374 ± 8
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
3.4 ± 0.1
|
991 ± 9
|
51 ± 1
|
336 ± 3
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
3.3 ± 0.0
|
1018 ± 15
|
51 ± 1
|
344 ± 14
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
2.9 ± 0.1
|
1094 ± 14
|
53 ± 1
|
372 ± 13
|
LSD (0.05)
|
|
|
0.5
|
96
|
7
|
63
|
N1 and N2 represent normal (1.43 mM NH4NO3) and double solution N (2.86 mM NH4NO3) level, respectively; Zn1, Zn2 and Zn3 represent half (0.08 µM ZnSO4·7H2O), normal (0.15 µM ZnSO4·7H2O) and double solution Zn (0.30 µM ZnSO4·7H2O) level, respectively. 22°C represents the normal temperature, and 12°C represents the low temperature. ATT represents after temperature treatment, and WAR represents weeks after recovery to normal temperature. Values are the means ± standard errors for three biological replicates. LSD (0.05) is the least significant difference between treatments at P < 0.05. |
During the WAR 2 stage, the MDA concentration of the low temperature treatment had recovered to normal levels, and the SOD and POD activities were significantly higher than those of the normal temperature treatment at both N levels. Regardless of the normal or high N level, increasing the Zn supply could improve the SOD, POD and CAT activities, but N had no significant effect on MDA accumulation. At WAR 2 and WAR 4, an increased Zn supply was beneficial in reducing the MDA concentration at both normal and high N levels, but there was no significant difference. At WAR 4, there was little difference in enzyme activities among the treatments.
Tiller bud IAA and CTK concentration
There was an interaction of T × N× Zn on tiller bud IAA concentration (Table 4). Low temperature treatment increased the tiller bud IAA concentration under normal N levels by 29.63% (P < 0.05) compared with normal temperature treatment, while CTK/IAA ratio decreased by 17.42% (P < 0.05); the IAA and CTK concentrations under high N levels increased by 105.52% (P < 0.05) and 94.05% (P < 0.05), respectively, but CTK/IAA ratio was not significantly different from that under normal temperature conditions (Table 3). Although increasing the Zn supply had no significant effect on the tiller bud CTK and IAA concentrations at normal N levels, the CTK/IAA ratio increased by 7.03%. Increasing the Zn application at a high N level increased the IAA concentration by 30.54% (P < 0.05) but had no effect on the CTK concentration, and the CTK/IAA ratio decreased by 27.13% (P < 0.05).
Table 3
The concentrations of IAA, CTK and CTK/IAA ratio in tiller buds.
Stage
|
Temperature
|
Treatment
|
IAA
(ng g− 1 FW)
|
CTK
(ng g− 1 FW)
|
CTK/IAA ratio
|
ATT
|
22℃
|
N1Zn1
|
87 ± 3
|
134 ± 4
|
1.5 ± 0.1
|
|
N1Zn2
|
279 ± 4
|
116 ± 9
|
1.6 ± 0.0
|
|
N1Zn3
|
90 ± 6
|
162 ± 12
|
1.8 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
95 ± 3
|
122 ± 4
|
1.4 ± 0.1
|
|
N2Zn2
|
90 ± 3
|
120 ± 4
|
1.3 ± 0.1
|
|
N2Zn3
|
126 ± 2
|
162 ± 6
|
1.2 ± 0.0
|
12℃
|
N1Zn1
|
89 ± 5
|
119 ± 16
|
1.1 ± 0.0
|
|
N1Zn2
|
102 ± 5
|
130 ± 2
|
1.3 ± 0.1
|
|
N1Zn3
|
107 ± 4
|
146 ± 17
|
1.4 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
113 ± 3
|
152 ± 4
|
1.4 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
185 ± 5
|
232 ± 6
|
1.3 ± 0.7
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
242 ± 6
|
227 ± 7
|
0.9 ± 0.1
|
LSD (0.05)
|
|
|
12
|
27
|
0.2
|
WAR 2
|
22℃
|
N1Zn1
|
208 ± 12
|
232 ± 16
|
1.1 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
200 ± 5
|
165 ± 10
|
0.8 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
194 ± 10
|
210 ± 15
|
1.1 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
183 ± 8
|
113 ± 11
|
0.6 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
213 ± 9
|
129 ± 4
|
0.6 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
223 ± 5
|
146 ± 6
|
0.7 ± 0.0
|
|
12℃
|
N1Zn1
|
179 ± 15
|
165 ± 14
|
0.9 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
132 ± 15
|
151 ± 4
|
1.2 ± 0.2
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
126 ± 15
|
130 ± 5
|
1.1 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
213 ± 8
|
134 ± 6
|
0.6 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
133 ± 9
|
116 ± 1
|
0.9 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
101 ± 8
|
135 ± 1
|
1.4 ± 0.1
|
LSD (0.05)
|
|
|
30
|
28
|
0.3
|
WAR 4
|
22℃
|
N1Zn1
|
213 ± 11
|
143 ± 8
|
0.7 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
175 ± 17
|
144 ± 8
|
0.8 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
151 ± 15
|
155 ± 16
|
1.0 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
166 ± 7
|
137 ± 5
|
0.9 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
160 ± 3
|
144 ± 1
|
0.9 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
127 ± 6
|
143 ± 0
|
1.1 ± 0.1
|
|
12℃
|
N1Zn1
|
106 ± 5
|
150 ± 7
|
1.4 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N1Zn2
|
127 ± 25
|
149 ± 3
|
1.3 ± 0.2
|
|
|
N1Zn3
|
79 ± 1
|
149 ± 4
|
1.9 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn1
|
134 ± 5
|
142 ± 9
|
1.1 ± 0.0
|
|
|
N2Zn2
|
144 ± 2
|
145 ± 8
|
1.0 ± 0.1
|
|
|
N2Zn3
|
186 ± 1
|
150 ± 8
|
0.8 ± 0.1
|
LSD (0.05)
|
|
32
|
23
|
0.2
|
N1 and N2 represent normal (1.43 mM NH4NO3) and double solution N (2.86 mM NH4NO3) level, respectively; Zn1, Zn2 and Zn3 represent half (0.08 µM ZnSO4·7H2O), normal (0.15 µM ZnSO4·7H2O) and double solution Zn (0.30 µM ZnSO4·7H2O) level, respectively. 22°C represents the normal temperature, and 12°C represents the low temperature. ATT represents after low temperature, and WAR represents the weeks after recovery to normal temperature. Values are the means ± standard errors for three biological replicates. LSD (0.05) is the least significant difference between treatments at P < 0.05. |
Table 4
Results of multiway ANOVA for analyses of differences in the content of IAA, CTK, CTK/IAA ratio and the expression of key genes involved in hormone metabolism.
Parameters
|
Stage
|
Factors
|
|
|
T
|
N
|
Zn
|
N×Zn
|
T×N
|
T×Zn
|
T×N×Zn
|
IAA
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
ns
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
CTK
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
|
WAR 4
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
ns
|
CTK/IAA ratio
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
ns
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
*
|
**
|
*
|
|
WAR 4
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
OsPIN1b
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
OsYUCCA1
|
ATT
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
OsYUCCA2
|
ATT
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
ns
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
OsYUCCA4
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
**
|
*
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
OsIPT1
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
OsIPT2
|
ATT
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
ns
|
|
WAR 2
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
**
|
ns
|
**
|
*
|
ATT represents after temperature treatment, and WAR represents weeks after recovery to normal temperature. * and **present significance at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, and ns means no significance. |
There was an interaction of T × N × Zn on tiller bud IAA and CTK concentration and CTK/IAA ratio at WAR 2, and IAA concentration and CTK/IAA ratio at WAR 4 (Table 4). At WAR 2, the tiller bud IAA concentration after the low temperature treatment decreased significantly, but there was little change in the CTK concentration (Table 3). The effect of Zn on the CTK concentration of the low temperature treatment was not significant; reducing the Zn supply significantly increased the tiller bud IAA concentration at normal and high N levels, but increasing the Zn supply under high N level decreased the IAA concentration by 23.74% (P < 0.05) and increased CTK/IAA ratio by 53.41% (P < 0.05). However, Zn had little effect on CTK/IAA ratio under normal N conditions. N and Zn had no significant effect on the CTK ratio concentration at WAR 4. Increasing the Zn supply decreased the IAA concentration by 38.16% (P < 0.05) and increased CTK/IAA ratio by 27.59% (P < 0.05) at a normal N level; increasing the Zn supply at a high N level significantly increased the IAA concentration by 29.14% (P < 0.05), which had no significant effect on CTK/IAA ratio.
Genes expression related to hormone metabolism
T × N × Zn had an interaction effect on the expression levels of the key IAA and CTK metabolism genes, except OsIPT2. At WAR 2, T × N × Zn had an interaction effect on OsIPT2 expression (Table 4). Low temperature inhibited the expression of OsYUCCA1 but triggered the expression of OsYUCCA2, OsYUCCA4, OsIPT1 and OsIPT2 (Fig. 8a). Increased Zn application significantly promoted the expression levels of OsPIN1b, OsYUCCA2 and OsYUCCA4 under normal N conditions, but the expression levels of the three genes were significantly reduced under high N concentrations. In addition, increasing the Zn supply significantly inhibited the expression of OsYUCCA1 at both N levels and promoted the expression of OsIPT1 and OsIPT2. At WAR 2, increased Zn application significantly promoted the expression of OsYUCCA2, OsPIN1b, and OsIPT2 at normal N levels but decreased the expression of OsYUCCA1, OsYUCCA4, and OsIPT1 (Fig. 8b). Increasing the Zn concentration inhibited the expression of OsYUCCA1, OsYUCCA4, and OsIPT1 at high N levels but promoted the expression of OsPIN1b, OsYUCCA2 and OsIPT2.