Synthesis of the Target Probe CY
Synthesis of the target probe CL was accomplished as showed in Scheme 2. Compound 1 was synthesized by using Vilsmeier-Haack reaction according to literature procedure [43]. Probe CY was formed by protecting the formyl group in compound 1 through the condensation reaction with 1,2-ethyldimercaptan catalyzed by BF3·Et2O, and the yield was 74%. The chemical structure of probe CL was confirmed by 1H NMR (Fig. S1), 13C NMR (Fig. S2), FT-IR (Fig. S3), and high-resolution mass spectrum (HR-MS, Fig. S4). The spectral data were consistent with the structure of probe CL.
Fluorescence Emission Spectra of CY in Different Solvents
Fluorescence emission spectra of probe CY (20 µM) were tested in different solvents including ethanol (EtOH), acetonitrile (MeCN), DMF and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), as showed in Fig. 1. It was observed that probe CY exhibited two emission peaks at 450 nm and 540 nm, respectively. When different solvents were used, the corresponding wavelengths of the two peaks did not change much, and the fluorescence intensity was slightly different. It could be seen that CY displayed the maximum fluorescence intensity in ethanol. Therefore, we used ethanol as the solvent for the follow-up test.
Fluorescence Spectra of Probe CY in EtOH/H2O with Different Water Content
In order to explore the applicability of probe CL in the environment closer to realistic conditions, we tested the fluorescence emission spectra of probe CY in EtOH/H2O with different water content from 10–90% (Fig. S5). The fluorescence intensity change at 530 nm within 30 min was monitored to determine the performance of the probe. When the water content increased from 10–50%, the fluorescence intensity of CY at 530 nm did not change significantly. When the water content was 60%, it was found that the fluorescence intensity of CY at 530 nm decreased slightly and a slight blue shift occurred for the fluorescence emission wavelength. The emission peak of CY in EtOH/H2O with 70–90% water content shifted from 530 nm to about 500 nm. Moreover, the fluorescence intensity decreased with the increase of water content. Based on these results, a water content of 50%, namely, EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) was selected for testing.
Specific Recognition of Hg2+ by Probe CY
Changes in the color of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) after adding 5 eqivalents of different metal ions (Li+, Na+, K+, Ag+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Hg2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Mn2+, Sr2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Cr3+, Fe3+) or biothiols (Cys, Hcy, GSH) were recorded as showed in Fig. 2a. Addition of Hg2+ caused distinct color change from light green to yellow, while other metal ions and biothiols did not bring about noticeable color change. Under the irradiation of 365 nm UV light, probe CY solution emitted blue-green fluorescence which was quenched upon addition of Hg2+. UV-Vis absorption spectra of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) before and after addition of different metal ions or biothiols were showed in Fig. 2b, which revealed that the absorption peak of probe CY shifted from 425 nm to 474 nm after Hg2+ was added. Changes in the fluorescence emission spectra of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) after adding different metal ions and biothiols (Li+, Na+, K+, Ag+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Hg2+, Zn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Mn2+, Sr2+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Al3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, Cys, Hcy, GSH) were showed in Fig. 2c. After the addition of Hg2+ the fluorescence intensity at 482 nm reduced sharply and the fluorescence was almost quenched due to the hydrolytic deprotection of thioacetal induced by Hg2+. No significant change was observed after the addition of other competitive ions, indicating that probe CY had good selectivity to Hg2+. Therefore, CY can be used as a fluorescent chemosensor for the detection of Hg2+ and can realize the naked eye recognition of Hg2+.
Anti-Interference Test of Probe CY to Detect Hg2+
In order to further verify whether probe CY is highly selective to Hg2+ in the presence of common competitive metal ions and biothiols, fluorescence emission spectra of probe CY (20 µM) with 5 eqivalents of different metal ions and biothiols were tested in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v). Changes in fluorescence intensity at 482 nm of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) after addition of 5 eqivalents of different competitive ions and biothiols and additional 5 eqivalents of Hg2+ were showed in Fig. 3. Obviously, the addition of different competitive metal ions and amino acids to the solution containing probe CY and Hg2+ did not cause significant changes in fluorescence intensity at 482 nm. The results demonstrated that probe CY had good anti-interference ability and could be utilized for highly selective detection of Hg2+ in the presence of excessive competitive metal ions and biothiols.
Detection Limit of Probe CY to Identify Hg2+
In order to test the detection limit of probe CY, fluorescence titration experiments were carried out. Fluorescence emission spectra of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) after adding different concentrations of Hg2+ were measured and the changes in fluorescence intensity at 482 nm with the concentration of Hg2+ were plotted (Fig. S6). The results showed that the fluorescence intensity of probe CY first significantly decreased and then tended to be flat with the increase of Hg2+ concentration. The fluorescence intensity exhibited a good linear relationship with Hg2+ concentration (20–60 µM). The linear fitting equation was Y = − 494550.6X + 3.1 × 107 with R2 = 0.9706. The detection limit of probe CL for Hg2+ ions was calculated to be 6.8 nM according to the formula L = 3S/K, where L denotes the detection limit, S represents the standard deviation of fluorescence intensity of blank, and K is slope of the calibration curve. The results revealed the high sensitivity of probe CL for detection of Hg2+.
Response Time of Probe CY to Hg2+ and Effect of pH
Considering response time is an important factor affecting probe sensitivity, we studied the response time of probe CY to Hg2+ by measuring the changes in fluorescence intensity at 482 nm of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) with time after addition of 5 equivalents of Hg2+, as showed in Fig. 4a. Probe CY could react with Hg2+ completely within 180 seconds, achieving a transient quenching effect, indicating that probe CY had a high sensitivity for the detection of Hg2+. At the same time, the influence of different pH environments on the recognition of Hg2+ by probe CY was also investigated. Fluorescence intensities at 482 nm of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) under different pH values (1–13) were determined and showed in Fig. 4b. Probe CY could exist stably in the range of pH value 1–12 and the specific recognition of Hg2+ could be achieved in the range of pH 5–10.
Possible Sensing Mechanism
Plausible sensing mechanism of probe CY for detection of Hg2+ was proposed as showed in Scheme 3. It was concluded that the thioacetal moiety of probe CY was hydrolyzed to form an acyl group after adding Hg2+ due to the thiophilic nature of Hg2+ [22 − 32]. To further prove this deprotection mechanism, HR-MS of probe CY after addition of Hg2+ was obtained (Fig. S7). The spectrum clearly indicated that the molecular ion peak of probe CY located at m/z 382.0690 (Fig. S4) disappeared and the quasi-molecular ion peak at m/z 306.0884 corresponding to compound 1 (M+ + H, calcd. for C16H17ClNO3 306.0897) was visible after Hg2+ was added. This provided definitely evidence for the deprotection of the thioacetal moiety in probe CY to form compound 1 in the presence of Hg2+.
Detection of Hg2+ in Real Water Samples
The potential of probe CY in detecting Hg2+ in tap water and Jingyue Lake water was demonstrated. To the samples containing probe CY were added different concentrations of Hg2+ in tap water and Jingyue Lake water. Changes in color and fluorescence emission of probe CY (20 µM) in EtOH/H2O (1:1, v/v) after addition of different concentrations of Hg2+ in tap water and Jingyue Lake water under natural light and 365 nm UV lamp were showed in Fig. 5. Bright green fluorescence was observed for the sample obtained from probe CL in the tap water under the 365 nm UV lamp. After adding different concentrations (40–100 µM) of Hg2+, the color of the solution gradually changed from light green to yellow, while the blue-green fluorescence gradually darkened, till the fluorescence quenching occurred. Similar changes were observed when different concentrations of Hg2+ were added to samples prepared from probe CL in Jingyue Lake water, indicating that probe CY had the potential to detect Hg2+ in real water samples by the fluorescent and colorimetric dual-mode.
Performance Comparison of Probe CL with Other Fluorescent Probes for Detection of Hg2+
To compare the sensing performance of probe CL with other reported fluorescent probes for detection of Hg2+, several related parameters including sensing medium, limit of detection (LOD), response time, and applicable pH range were listed in Table 1. It could be found that very few probes exhibited LOD lower than 10 nM. Probe 1 displayed a low LOD of 1.34 nM and a wide applicable pH range of 2.0–9.0, but its response time was 15 min thus could not qualify for rapid detection of Hg2+ [26]. Probe Ag/r-GO@RhB showed a low LOD of 2 nM in water, yet it could not be used in alkaline conditions [44]. Aa a comparison, probe CL featured the following advantages: (1) Highly specific for Hg2+ detection, immune from the interference of competitive metal ions and biothiols; (2) Highly sensitive to Hg2+, with a low LOD of 6.8 nM and a short response time of 3 min; (3) Stable in environments of pH 1–12 and applicable for fluorogenic and chromogenic dual-modal Hg2+ detection in real water samples over a broad range of pH 5–10.
Table 1
Performance comparison of probe CL with other fluorescent probes for detection of Hg2+
Probe | Medium | LOD for Hg2+ | Response time | Applicable pH range | Reference |
K1 | H2O | 0.16 µM | 0.5 min | 7–11 | [16] |
L3 | DMSO/H2O (9:1) | 14.94 nM | – | 2.0–9.0 | [17] |
L1 | EtOH | 3.96 µM | – | 3–11 | [19] |
DW | HEPES | 6.53 nM | – | 7–10 | [21] |
CY1OH2S | HEPES | 0.32 µM | 5 min | 5–10 | [24] |
probe 1 | CH3CN/buffer (1:3) | 1.34 nM | 15 min | 2.0–9.0 | [26] |
TPEH | EtOH/HEPES (2:8) | 81.7 nM | < 100 s | 6–8 | [28] |
AIE-COOH | DMSO/PBS (5:95) | 22 nM | ~ 100 s | 5.8–7.8 | [29] |
TzAr-Nap-Hg | DMF/HEPES (1:3) | 0.253 µM | 80 min | 7.4 | [34] |
DCM-Hg | DMSO/PBS (1:1) | 3.35 µM | 30 min | 7–9 | [36] |
Coa-SH | DMF/PBS (1:9) | 0.63 µM | 10 min | 7–12 | [42] |
Ag/r-GO@RhB | H2O | 2 nM | 7 min | 4–7 | [44] |
IQ | CH3CN/H2O (1:99) | 0.86 µM | – | 7–8 | [45] |
Nibt | H2O | 8.7 nM | 30 s | 4.0–11.0 | [46] |
yCQDs | PBS | 45.0 nM | – | 6.0–8.0 | [47] |
CY | EtOH/H2O (1:1) | 6.8 nM | 3 min | 5–10 | this work |