procedure
To detect the presence or absence of DKV, overhead squat test was performed. Each subject performed five squat tests in a standing position on both legs in a standard condition (feet shoulder-width apart, toes straight forward, hands above the head with elbows locked in extension, knees up to 90° flexion), while the examiner observed them from the front. To minimize the learning effect, no training was allowed before the squat test. If during the movement and performance of 3 squat tests out of 5, the examiner visually observes from the front view that the middle point of the patella of dominant leg passes through the inner part of the big toe, then that subject has DKV. If DKV was observed in this test and after placing a board 5 cm high under the subject's heel, there was still valgus in the squat test, it would be confirmed that the origin of DKV is from the knee area29 (Fig. 1). The validity and reliability of this test were reported as 78% and 73% respectively.30
- please insert Fig. 1 here -
Stork test was used to assess the static balance, such that the subjects stood on their dominant leg and placed toes of the other foot on the knee of the dominant leg while their hands were on their waist. Then, with the command "ready" and then "go", the subjects raised the heel of the dominant leg and while standing on the toes of one foot, they tried to maintain their balance without moving the legs or leaving hands from their waist (Fig. 2). The test was performed 3 times and the best time was recorded as a score.31
- please insert Fig. 2 here -
YBT was used to assess the dynamic balance. The method of conducting the test was such that the subject was informed about the implementation of the test through the researcher’s explanation and in order to minimize the learning effects, each subject performed this test six times in three directions as a practice before the main performance. Then, in main performance, the subjects stood on their dominant leg in the center of intersection of the lines, while standing on the dominant leg, the subjects were asked to reach with their free leg in anterior, posterior-internal, and posterior-external directions. The test was performed in such a way that the subject stands on his dominant leg and performed the act of reaching three times in three directions. The distance from the contact point to the center was considered to be the reach distance, measured in centimeters (Fig. 3). This test was repeated twice for each subject and the average was taken; Then, the obtained average was used as leg length. The length of individuals' legs had an effect on their reaching distance. Therefore, to normalize this test, the average reaching distance was divided by the leg length of each subject and multiplied by 100 to calculate the dependent variable and the reaching distance was obtained as a percentage of the leg length.32
- please insert Fig. 3 here -
Score: Reaching distance/leg length * 100
A manual strength test (MMT, North coast) was used to measure the isometric strength of the muscles (made in USA, unit of measurement is kg, reliability 95–98%). All muscle tests were performed using the method presented by Kendall, (2005).33 For each strength test, the subject was asked to get into a proper position and was trained to maintain this position. With the help of a strap, the examiner applied a suitable pressure to dynamometer against the force generated by the subject. The maximum generated force was recorded. Each test consisted of 3 contractions of 5 seconds with 30 seconds of rest for each contraction, and the average of repetitions was used for statistical analysis.33
To measure the strength of hip external rotators, the subject was placed in a sitting position with the hip and knees at 90 degrees. The dynamometer was located 5 cm proximal to the medial malleolus. To control the movements of the upper limbs, the subjects were asked to cross their arms on their chest. In this situation, the subjects performed the external rotation of the hip and the amount of strength in this movement was recorded. The strength of hip abductors was also measured in a position where the subjects were lying on their side on the examination bed while the hip joint of the subject's leg was in extension and the dynamometer was on the side of the hip, at a point of 5 cm above the lateral joint line of the knee. The subject held edge of the bed with his upper hand and the lower hand was under his head in a comfortable position (Fig. 4). They were asked to move their leg upwards with maximum effort 3 times, and 15 seconds rest was considered between each time. The average of all three isometric contractions was recorded in kilograms of force.33
- please insert Fig. 4 here -
A goniometer was used to measure the range of motion. To this end, to measure hip abduction, the subjects were asked to lie on their back on examination table (supine position). The pelvis was in neutral position and legs were in anatomical position. The examiner fixed the pelvis on the subject's side with one hand and took the distal inner side of the bone with the other hand and gave the hip abduction movement and taught the subject how to abduct the hip. Then, the subject was asked to actively perform hip abduction. The center of the goniometer was placed on the ASIS on the side to be measured, the fixed arm was in line with the line that connected the right and left ASIS, and the movable arm was parallel to the longitudinal axis of the hip towards the mid-line of the patella. At the starting point, the goniometer showed 90 degrees, which was taken as zero.34 In assessing the hip external rotation range of motion, the subjects were asked to sit on edge of the examination table, while the knee was in 90 degrees flexion and hip was in zero degrees abduction and adduction and 90 degrees flexion. Then, they actively performed external rotation. The center of the goniometer was above the anterior part of the patella, the moving arm was along the midline of the leg, and the fixed arm was perpendicular to the ground 34 (Fig. 5).
- please insert Fig. 5 here -
The training program used in this study was the Stop X training program.28 This program consists of running, balance training, landing-jump pattern and strength training. It was carried out for 8 weeks, 30 to 40 minutes and 3 times a week. Athletes started with simple exercises, and the level of difficulty of individual exercises increased over time.
Descriptive and inferential statistical methods were used to analyze the collected data. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check normality of data distribution. Analysis of covariance and dependent t-tests were used to compare the mean of research variables between and within groups, respectively. All statistical operations were performed by SPSS version 24 software.