Localization of Bmi1 during tooth development
Bmi1 was detected immunohistochemically in osteoblasts on the surface of the alveolar bone but not in cells in the tooth germ at the bud (E15) stage (Fig. 1A). At the cap stage (E17), some cells in the enamel organ including the inner or outer enamel epithelium and stellate reticulum showed a positive reaction (Fig. 1B–C). In the dental mesenchyme, Bmi1-positive cells were scarce in the dental papillae, but this reactivity was seen in some cells in the dental follicle (Fig. 1B, D).
At the bell stage (P2), at which time a thin layer of dentin and enamel had appeared at the upper crown, odontoblasts and preodontoblasts demonstrated intense immunoreactivity for Bmi1 (Fig. 1E–F). This localization was also confirmed in all cell types within the enamel organ and was particularly strong in ameloblasts (Fig. 1E). Some cells in the dental follicle and around the alveolar bone also displayed the immunoreactivity (Fig. 1G). However, the dental papillae hardly showed any immunoreactivity (Fig. 1F–G).
At the stage of root formation (P28), odontoblasts at the apical root and preodontoblasts near these odontoblasts showed strong immunoreactivities for Bmi1. The intensity gradually decreased in the more upwardly located odontoblasts (Fig. 2A–C). This immunoreactivity was also detected in some cells within the apical subodontoblastic cell-rich layer and in the Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath (Fig. 2D). Some cementoblasts, cementocytes, and periodontal ligament fibroblasts were also immunoreactive with antibodies against Bmi1 (Fig. 2B).
Localization of Bmi1 in the rodent incisor
Since the rodent incisors erupt continuously throughout the life of the animal, odontoblasts at all differentiation stages can be compared in one tooth at the same time (Hosoya et al., 2006). In addition, undifferentiated mesenchymal cells exist around the labial cervical loop (Harada and Ohshima 2004). Bmi1 was not detected in the dental papillae around the cervical loop nor in the layer of preodontoblasts (Fig. 2E). As the odontoblast differentiation progressed, Bmi1 expression appeared in the preodontoblast and odontoblast layers (Fig. 2F–H). Some cells in the subodontoblastic layer were also immunopositive for Bmi1 (Fig. 2H). Most cells in the cervical loop as well as preameloblasts and ameloblasts displayed the immunoreactivity (Fig. 2E–G).
Localization of Bmi1 during the process of dentin regeneration
Next, to clarify whether Bmi1 participates in dentin regeneration, we examined the localization pattern of Bmi1-positive cells in the dental pulp after cavity preparation. In the coronal pulp chamber of a P28 rat molar, columnar odontoblasts were aligned on the surface of the predentin (Fig. 3A). Immunoreactivity for Bmi1 hardly detected in these odontoblasts. Dental pulp cells also did not show any immunoreactivity (Fig. 3B–C). At 1 day after cavity preparation, the pulp tissue beneath the cavity was necrotic, as evidenced by scattered pyknotic nuclei of odontoblasts and dental pulp cells (Fig. 3D). The expression of Bmi1 was not visible in the necrotic pulp (Fig. 3E–F). At 4 days after cavity preparation, when the necrotic region had been repaired, numerous blood vessels and pulp cells were observed beneath the cavity. A little eosin-stained matrix was formed on the original dentin (Fig. 3G). Cells close to the newly-formed matrix were positive for Bmi1 (Fig. 3H–I). By 1 week after cavity preparation, reparative dentin was formed beneath the cavity by reparative odontoblasts (Fig. 3J). These cells that actively formed the reparative dentin were immunopositive for Bmi1 (Fig. 3K–L), whereas this immunoreactivity was not seen in reparative odontoblasts after 8 weeks (Fig. 3M–O).
Bmi1 function in odontoblast differentiation
To clarify the role of Bmi1 in odontoblast differentiation, we carried out functional assays by both overexpression and knockdown of Bmi1 in KN-3 cells.
Western blotting analysis revealed that Bmi1 antibody reacted with the lysate of KN-3 cells before the induction of hard tissue-forming cells (data not shown). At 2 days after the induction, Bmi1 expression was slightly elevated in the cells transfected with the control vector. KN-3 cells transfected with Bmi1 DNA showed enhanced expression of Bmi1 at 2 days (Fig. 4A). No ALP activity was detected in cells before the induction or in those treated with control vector at 2 days. However, this activity was markedly enhanced in cells transfected with Bmi1 DNA (Fig. 4B). Consistent with the results of the ALP activity analysis, expression levels of odontogenic markers such as TNALP, Runx2, Osterix, and Osteocalcin (Thesleff 2003; Chen et al. 2009; Hosoya et al. 2007; Hosoya et al. 2008b; Zhang et al. 2024) were elevated in KN-3 cells transfected with Bmi1 vector. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in expressions of these 4 markers between non-treated cells and cells transfected with the control vector (Fig. 4C). At 4 days after the induction, Bmi1-overexpressing cells produced more alizarin red-positive mineralized matrix than did the control cells (Fig. 4D).
Bmi1 expression in KN-3 cells transfected with control siRNA was clearly detected by Western blotting at 4 days after the induction; whereas transfection with siRNA against Bmi1 robustly reduced the Bmi1 protein level to one similar to that seen in the non-treated cells (Fig. 4E). The cells transfected with control siRNA exhibited clear ALP activity and increased expression of 4 differentiation markers at 4 days after the induction, but this up-regulated expression was reduced in Bmi1-knockdown cells to almost the same level as seen in the non-treated cells (Fig. 4F–G). Alizarin red-positive matrix, indicating mineralization, was formed by KN-3 cells transfected with the control siRNA at 7 days after induction. However, Bmi1-knockdown cells showed much weaker staining (Fig. 4H). These findings indicate that Bmi1 positively regulated the odontoblast-lineage cell differentiation in KN-3 cells.
Regulation of Wnt and BMP signaling by Bmi1
Bmi1 knockdown has been shown to inhibit gene expression of several signaling molecules including those in the Notch, Hedgehog, Wnt, and BMP/TGF-β pathways (Wiederschain et al. 2007; Douglas et al. 2008). Among them, since Wnt and BMP signaling pathways are related to odontoblast differentiation (Balic and Thesleff 2015; Zhang et al. 2024; Fu et al. 2023), we further examined whether the regulation of Wnt and BMP signalings by Bmi1 was a common phenomenon in odontoblast differentiation.
Nuclear localization of β-catenin and P-Smad1/5/8, respectively indicating the activation state of canonical Wnt and BMP signaling pathways, was confined to apical odontoblasts and their adjacent preodontoblasts as well as to some cells in the apical subodontoblastic layer (Fig. 5A, C, D, F). The nuclear localization of β-catenin and P-Smad1/5/8 in the odontoblasts gradually decreased in the more upwardly located odontoblasts (Fig. 5B, E). Therefore, these localization patterns were similar to that pattern of Bmi1 in the P28 molar (Fig. 2A–D).
Next, β-catenin localization was examined in KN-3 cells after transfection of them with plasmid vectors or siRNAs. Immunoreactivity of β-catenin was seen within the cytoplasm of most KN-3 cells under normal culture conditions (Fig. 5G). At 1 hour after the induction of odontoblast-lineage cells, nuclear transition of β-catenin was observed in some cells transfected with control vector or control siRNA (Fig. 5H, J). On the other hand, most cells transfected with Bmi1 DNA showed the nuclear localization of Bmi1, whereas Bmi1-knockdown decreased this transition (Fig. 5I, K).
KN-3 cells transfected with expression vectors or siRNAs were treated with the induction medium for 1 h and then checked for the phosphorylation of Smad1/5/8 by Western blotting analysis. As shown in Fig. 5L, the phosphorylation level of Smad1/5/8 was enhanced by Bmi1-overexpression and suppressed by Bmi1-knockdown compared with their control levels.