This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
Guang-Shu Yu
fu zhou second hospital affiliated to xiamen university
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-8758
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Femoral nonunion is mainly caused by factors such as instability of the fracture end, insufficient blood supply, or infection. However, these factors are mainly related to the different fracture types and inappropriate treatment plans. It is important to analyze the etiology of femoral nonunion and use a simple and effective treatment method to resolve it. The purpose of this study was to divide femoral nonunion into different types and give corresponding treatment strategies.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients with femoral nonunion. Patients were divided into six groups and each group was treated with a different strategy. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically every month until fracture healing.
Results: All 50 patients were followed up with an average follow-up time of 17.44 ± 5.48 months. Based on the type of primary femoral fracture and the factors causing nonunion, we divided the femoral nonunion into six types. These included Type I: nonunion caused by instability of simple fracture (AO classification 32-A); Type II: nonunion caused by stress shielding at fracture ends of a simple fracture (AO/OTA classification 32-A); Type III: nonunion in femoral fracture with third fragment (AO/OTA classification 32-B); Type IV: nonunion in femoral fracture with segmental femoral fracture (AO/OTA classification 32-C2); Type V: nonunion in comminuted femoral fracture (AO/OTA classification 32-C3); and Type VI: nonunion caused by infection. Based on these classifications, the following methods are used to treat femoral nonunion. Type I femoral nonunion will achieve fracture healing by blocking screws, exchanging intramedullary nails, or adding plates. Type II femoral nonunion can be addressed through dynamitization or bone graft (possibly in combination with plate fixation) to achieve fracture healing. Type III femoral nonunion requires a treatment plan of bone graft or bone graft combined with plate fixation. The treatment plan for Type IV femoral nonunion is to add a plate, and autogenous bone graft if necessary. Type V femoral nonunion treatment is bone graft combined with plate fixation, or external fixation with subsequent bone segment transport or lengthening. Type VI requires placement of antibiotic bone cement or external fixation added to fix the fracture end.
Conclusions: There are several factors associated with failure of femoral fracture treatments by intramedullary nailing. We need to carefully analyze the causes of fracture treatment failure. Our six classifications and corresponding treatment strategies resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes.
Keywords
Femoral fractures nonunion, Intramedullary nailing, Treatment strategy, Revision
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 05 Aug, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedic Surgery
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
Guang-Shu Yu
fu zhou second hospital affiliated to xiamen university
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-8758
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 05 Aug, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Orthopedic Surgery
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Femoral nonunion is mainly caused by factors such as instability of the fracture end, insufficient blood supply, or infection. However, these factors are mainly related to the different fracture types and inappropriate treatment plans. It is important to analyze the etiology of femoral nonunion and use a simple and effective treatment method to resolve it. The purpose of this study was to divide femoral nonunion into different types and give corresponding treatment strategies.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients with femoral nonunion. Patients were divided into six groups and each group was treated with a different strategy. All patients were followed up clinically and radiologically every month until fracture healing.
Results: All 50 patients were followed up with an average follow-up time of 17.44 ± 5.48 months. Based on the type of primary femoral fracture and the factors causing nonunion, we divided the femoral nonunion into six types. These included Type I: nonunion caused by instability of simple fracture (AO classification 32-A); Type II: nonunion caused by stress shielding at fracture ends of a simple fracture (AO/OTA classification 32-A); Type III: nonunion in femoral fracture with third fragment (AO/OTA classification 32-B); Type IV: nonunion in femoral fracture with segmental femoral fracture (AO/OTA classification 32-C2); Type V: nonunion in comminuted femoral fracture (AO/OTA classification 32-C3); and Type VI: nonunion caused by infection. Based on these classifications, the following methods are used to treat femoral nonunion. Type I femoral nonunion will achieve fracture healing by blocking screws, exchanging intramedullary nails, or adding plates. Type II femoral nonunion can be addressed through dynamitization or bone graft (possibly in combination with plate fixation) to achieve fracture healing. Type III femoral nonunion requires a treatment plan of bone graft or bone graft combined with plate fixation. The treatment plan for Type IV femoral nonunion is to add a plate, and autogenous bone graft if necessary. Type V femoral nonunion treatment is bone graft combined with plate fixation, or external fixation with subsequent bone segment transport or lengthening. Type VI requires placement of antibiotic bone cement or external fixation added to fix the fracture end.
Conclusions: There are several factors associated with failure of femoral fracture treatments by intramedullary nailing. We need to carefully analyze the causes of fracture treatment failure. Our six classifications and corresponding treatment strategies resulted in satisfactory clinical outcomes.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Loading...