Despite the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 and World Health Organization (WHO) reports (18), and coupled with the high prevalence of low back pain and neck pain in Africa (19), LBP and other musculoskeletal conditions remain less prioritized in LMICs, due to more pressing health issues like HIV/AIDS, enteric infections, tuberculosis, and the recent Coronavirus-19 pandemic (18). Of concern is that due to various epidemiologic challenges faced in various LMICs in Africa and the subsequent lack of accurate data, the true burden of low back and neck pain is still not well known.
The prevalence of LBP and NP is high among healthcare students. A study examined musculoskeletal pain (MSP) prevalence among Chinese medical and dental students, and revealed high rates of NP at 44.4% and LBP at 30.6%. Despite limited trauma history, moderate pain frequency and severity were noted, significantly impacting daily life. Compared to earlier studies, the current research suggests an increased prevalence of NP in modern medical students, attributed to factors like reduced physical activity and prolonged smartphone use. Notably, senior-year medical students reported higher LBP rates, possibly linked to changes in study and work modes during clinical years (20).
Dental students exhibited significantly higher MSP rates compared to medical students across NP, LBP, and joint pain (JP). This aligns with findings from international studies on dental professionals, attributing this trend to prolonged seated positions and fixed postures during clinical work. Risk factors for MSP encompassed age, sex, academic year, psychological conditions, and major, with joint pain notably affected by alcohol consumption. However, lifestyle factors like extended study hours and computer or phone usage didn't exhibit significant associations with MSP (20). Another cross-sectional study by Du et al conducted at an American medical school accredited by the LCME revealed a notably high prevalence of NP and LBP among medical students, reaching 54% (21). This prevalence is substantially higher when compared to the general population, where Strine et al. reported an NP prevalence of 1.8–3.7% and LBP prevalence of 15.0-15.9% in individuals aged 18–34 (21). Medical students reported various quality of life (QOL) issues associated with NP and LBP, including headaches and pain during activities like reading, standing, and sitting (21).
There is a dearth of data addressing the prevalence of low back pain and/or neck pain and their associated risk factor in Africa. Studies have reported the prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in undergraduate medical students of Serbia, France, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Ethiopia, and Nigeria (22–26). However, just a few studies from these explored the prevalence of neck pain and low back pain
This study paid attention to the prevalence and risk factors of these musculoskeletal pains among medical students within our locality. The prevalences of low back pain and neck pain during the past one year in this study were 66.1% and 60.8% respectively, and these prevalence rates were higher than those reported in Serbian, Malaysian, Arabian, and Zimbabwean medical students, with a range of about 30% (22–26). The broad range could be attributed to differences in study sample size formula used, sampling technique as well as recall bias. Females had a higher preponderance to both low back pain and neck pain as this could be due to heightened pain sensitivity ubiquitous among the female counterparts (27).
For the low back pain, we found no correlation between it and factors like age, gender, marital status, year of study, tribe, religion, seats without back support, prolonged study time, using the computer, engaging in physical activities, smoking, posture assumed during practicals, prolonged sitting, carrying heavy backpacks. This is similar to the findings reported by Vujcic et al (11) and Alshagga et al (26). Age, marital status, department, year of study, religion, seats without back support, prolonged study time, using the computer, posture assumed during lectures, prolonged standing, engaging in physical activities, smoking, posture assumed during practicals, prolonged sitting, carrying heavy backpacks, have no associations with the development of neck pain. In contrast, Ayanniyi et al (28) reported seats without back support during lectures, long reading hours, and posture assumed during lectures as the most perceived causes of neck pain among respondents.
In this study, although the prevalence of neck pain across all years was fairly constant, the prevalence of low back pain was least in the third year, which is the most junior class of clinical school. Prevalence increased in the fourth and fifth years and then declined in the sixth year. This finding is consistent with the study conducted among medical and dental students at Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China by Lin Y et al., which reported an increasing prevalence of MSP with increasing student class grade but contrasted the results of a study conducted at Harvard among medical students by Jerry et al. where there is no significant difference between MSP among medical students of different grades (20). While the exact cause for such a trend is difficult to be identified, we believe that the already increasing curriculum pressure, along with hectic clinical rotations and preparation for medical board exams might be responsible. The decrease in prevalence among the finalists could be attributed to better stress-coping strategies; however, this requires further investigation.
Associated Risk Factors with the Prevalence of Neck Pain and Low Back Pain
The finding that smartphone use was significantly associated with both low back pain and neck pain among the respondents in this study highlights an important aspect of modern lifestyle contributing to musculoskeletal discomfort. It is noteworthy that a substantial percentage (68%) of participants perceived smartphone use as a risk factor for these pains, indicating a growing awareness of the potential impact of technology on their well-being. However, it is interesting to observe that while computer use was perceived as a risk factor for pain, its association was not statistically significant. Similar findings were reported by Lin et al in their cross sectional study amongst Chinese medical and dental students (20). The diverse range of postures associated with smartphone usage, including prolonged and awkward positions like bending the head forward, can strain the neck and back muscles. This is in contrast to computer use, often in ergonomic setups, which may offer more structured support. Additionally, the widespread and frequent use of smartphones in daily life intensifies strain due to longer durations and greater frequency, potentially contributing to the cumulative burden on neck and back muscles over time (29).
Gender has been identified as a potential risk factor for neck pain in various studies (30, 31). In this study, the prevalence of neck pain differed between genders, with a higher percentage of females (39.8%) experiencing neck pain compared to males (25.3%) in the last 7 days. The data showed that 39.8% of females reported neck pain within the last 7 days, while the corresponding percentage for males was 25.3%. Moreover, low back pain has a predilection for females, although not statistically significant in this study. This gender difference could be attributed to various factors such as differences in biomechanics, hormonal influences, and probable possibly variations in daily activities or postures. Further research could delve into the specific mechanisms underlying this gender-based disparity in neck pain prevalence and explore strategies for tailored intervention and preventive measures.
Indeed, the department in which students are enrolled, along with their posture during lectures and prolonged standing, have been identified as risk factors for low back pain in this study. The data showed that certain departments, such as dentistry, had higher prevalence rates of low back pain. This was found by Lin Y et al., where they found higher prevalence of neck and low back pain among the dental students compared to medical students NP (49.1 vs. 41.4%, P = 0.01), LBP (34.6 vs. 28.1%, P = 0.02. This might have been exaggerated because of their small class size, compared to respondents in medicine and surgery. This could potentially be attributed to the occupational characteristics of dental students, who frequently find themselves required to sit or stand for extended periods while maintaining a consistent posture, particularly during the clinical practice. Additionally, poor posture during lectures and prolonged standing were associated with increased prevalence of low back pain. These findings suggest that academic and occupational factors, as well as ergonomics and postural habits, play a significant role in the development of low back pain among college students. Addressing these factors through awareness campaigns, ergonomic interventions, and educational programs could potentially mitigate the risk of low back pain in the student population.
The inclusion of a large sample size of 420 college students (response rate of 80%) enhances the study’s generalizability to the entire students of the College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, and perhaps, what it is obtainable amongst healthcare students in the southwestern zone of Nigeria because of the shared educational characteristics. The study's comprehensive data collection and sampling technique, encompassing factors like demographics, risk variables, prevalence rates, and the consequences of pain on disability and mental health, furnishes a detailed and multifaceted perspective on the issue at hand. This holistic approach enriches the study's insights by encompassing a range of dimensions crucial to understanding pain prevalence among college students.
The study's strengths also extend to its diversified participant composition from different academic departments, a trait that bolsters the representation of various student populations. Moreover, the study's longitudinal analysis, which examines pain prevalence across different temporal periods, provides nuanced insights into the evolving patterns of pain experiences. This dynamic perspective enriches the understanding of pain's fluctuations over time. Lastly, the study's integration of statistical analysis fortifies the robustness of its findings by identifying associations between risk factors, demographics, and pain prevalence. Together, these strengths collectively underscore the study's credibility and enrich the understanding of the prevalence and implications of neck and low back pain among college students.
The study's limitations are also important to consider. Its cross-sectional design prevents the establishment of causal relationships between risk factors and pain outcomes, limiting the ability to determine whether identified factors directly contribute to neck and low back pain development or are merely correlated. Self-reported data reliance introduces the potential for recall and social desirability biases, possibly leading to inaccuracies in pain and risk factor reporting.
Sample selection from specific departments could introduce selection bias, restricting the findings' generalizability to other disciplines or institutions and potentially underrepresenting diverse student experiences. Moreover, the study's focus on a single institution limits external validity, as the findings may not universally apply to students from different universities or cultural contexts within the country. Variances in institutional policies, cultural norms, and unaccounted environmental factors may affect neck and low back pain prevalence differently.
Considering these limitations is crucial when interpreting the study's outcomes. Future research should explore causal relationships with longitudinal designs, address biases through objective measurements, broaden participant diversity, and include multiple institutions to yield a more comprehensive understanding of pain prevalence among college students. Also, further research should investigate the consequences of these MSP on the disability, mental health and academic performance of students as well as looking into the various coping strategies use by the students.