Our investigation employed data-independent acquisition (DIA) coupled with label-free quantification to comprehensively analyze T. annulata-induced cellular signaling in lymphocytes. This approach enabled identifying and quantifying proteins from infected (TA) and non-infected (BL3) cells (Supplementary Fig. 1). The high quality and reproducibility of the data were confirmed by a strong correlation coefficient (R = 0.83) between biological replicates (Fig. 1a). Analysis of the host phosphoproteome indicated a substantial enrichment of phosphoserine (pS) residues (86.81%), with phosphothreonine (pT, 12.06%) and phosphotyrosine (pY, 1.15%) present at lower levels (Fig. 1b). The web logo (Fig. 1c) further visualizes the frequency of these modifications at specific amino acid positions (S/T/Y). Interestingly, most proteins (65%) harbored modifications at a single site, with a decreasing proportion exhibiting modifications at multiple sites (Fig. 1d). The analysis identified a total of 616 and 383 phosphorylated proteins in TA and BL3 cells, respectively (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Table 1). Notably, 364 proteins were unique to TA cells, suggesting parasite-induced phosphorylation events. Gene ontology analysis of these uniquely phosphorylated proteins highlighted potential pathways specifically regulated during infection, including negative regulation of apoptosis and positive regulation of telomere maintenance (Fig. 1.f). These findings suggest T. annulata may manipulate host cell survival and telomere integrity. We leveraged posttranslational modification (PTM) scores to elucidate differentially phosphorylated events. Stringent criteria were implemented to define a high-confidence set of class I phosphosites (n = 934) corresponding to 400 proteins based on a localization probability threshold of ≥ 0.75 (Fig. 1g). Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed distinct clustering patterns between BL3 and TA samples based on these phosphosites (Fig. 1h). An additional filter was incorporated, requiring the presence of the modified site in at least 50% of the samples within each group. This resulted in 433 class I phosphopeptides qualifying for further analysis. Subsequent analysis using ANOVA identified 147 significantly altered phosphopeptide (Supplementary Table 2). A heat map (Fig. 1i) visualizes the expression patterns of these differentially phosphorylated peptides. Examples of upregulated protein in TA cells include E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (TRIP12), Nucleophosmin (NPM1), Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 1 (LCP1), Pinin (PNN), and dual-specificity kinase (DYRK1B). For example, the phosphorylation intensity of NPM1 at serine 70 is depicted in Fig. 1j. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of the dynamic phosphorylation landscape induced by T. annulata infection. Identifying differentially phosphorylated proteins paves the way for further investigation into their functional roles during infection.
We leveraged the established DIA-LFQ workflow for a comparative phosphoproteomic analysis. This approach aimed to identify changes in phosphorylation patterns and expression levels of individual phosphopeptides in both host and parasite proteomes. Four replicates per condition were used to ensure robust statistical analysis. A total of 616 host proteins with 1427 phosphorylation sites were identified in TA cells. Upon BPQ treatment, 244 proteins (533 phosphorylation sites) exhibited a loss of phosphorylation, while 34 gained new phosphorylation sites (Fig. 2c and 2d, Supplementary Table 3). Functional enrichment analysis on dephosphorylated host proteins revealed diverse cellular processes impacted by BPQ treatment, including DNA replication, apoptosis regulation, protein modification, RNA splicing, signal transduction, and symbiosis regulation (Supplementary Fig. 2). Interestingly, some of these processes, like regulation of CAMKK-AMPK signaling and negative regulation of apoptotic processes, were also enriched in the phosphoproteome unique to T. annulata-infected cells compared to uninfected controls (BL3). Furthermore, differential expression analysis identified 57 host cell phosphosites significantly regulated upon parasite clearance (Fig. 2e, Supplementary Table 4). Key downregulated proteins included RNA-binding motif protein 15 (RBM15), nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1), ubiquitin-specific peptidase 8 (USP8), FOSL2 (FRA2), hepatocyte growth factor (HDGF), and BCL2-associated factor 1 (BCLAF1). Notably, NPM1, previously observed to be upregulated in TA cells, displayed a decrease in phosphorylation (Y-67 and S-70) and protein expression upon parasite clearance, (Fig. 2f 2g). This suggests that these phosphorylation events might be crucial for NPM1 stabilization.
We also analyzed all three datasets (BL3, TA, and TA-BPQ) and revealed a distinct population of 465 phosphosites unique to TA cells (Fig. 2h). These infection-specific phosphorylation events likely represent the parasite's crucial regulatory mechanisms to manipulate host cell processes and establish a favorable environment for survival and replication. To unravel the functional significance of these unique phosphorylation events, we performed gene enrichment analysis on the corresponding proteins (n = 334) utilizing the DAVID bioinformatics tool. This analysis yielded critical insights into the biological processes potentially modulated by T. annulata infection (refer to Supplementary Fig. 3). The top five significantly enriched KEGG pathways included Nucleocytoplasmic Transport, Spliceosome Machinery, Cellular Senescence, MAPK Signaling Pathway, and mRNA Surveillance Pathways. The enrichment of these pathways suggests that T. annulata infection disrupts a multitude of cellular processes critical for host cell function. This orchestrated manipulation likely creates an environment conducive to parasite persistence within the host cell.
The parasite phosphoproteome exhibited a comparable overall profile to host, though with distinct phosphorylation site distribution. Phosphoserine residues constituted the predominant phosphorylation type (80%), followed by phosphothreonine (17.33%) and phosphotyrosine (2.66%). A comparative analysis revealed a significant downregulation of 48 phosphorylation sites across 32 parasite proteins following BPQ treatment (Figure i, Supplementary Tables 5 and 6). Notably, several key parasite proteins demonstrated a concurrent loss of phosphorylation and expression, including a microneme-rhoptry antigen (TA08425), cyclophilin (TA14055), splicing factor (TA06100), probable ATP-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase (TA13950), and RNA helicase (TA04765) (Fig. 2i). The decreased peptide intensity of TA08425 (104 kDa microneme/rhoptry antigen) in TA-BPQ compared to TA cells is depicted in Fig. 2j. For broader context, we compared our parasite phosphoproteomic data with the study by Wiens et al. (2014), which focused specifically on parasite proteins (Fig. 2k). Notably, our analysis of whole-cell lysate revealed some unique proteins compared to their schizont-enriched dataset. While potential sequence variations precluded a direct site-by-site comparison, we identified phosphorylation on the parasite protein TA08425 at six distinct sites. Four of these sites (S634, S640, S775, and S808) corroborated findings by Weins et al. (2014). Importantly, our data revealed two novel phosphorylation sites for this protein: S589 and S592 (Fig. 2.l).
These findings highlight the comprehensiveness of our phosphoproteomic analysis, encompassing both host and parasite components. This approach provides a more holistic understanding of the complex phosphorylation landscape during T. annulata infection, offering valuable insights into potential therapeutic targets and furthering our understanding of host-parasite interactions.
Phosphoproteomics-Guided Kinome Analysis: A Computational Approach Identifies Key Kinase Families in Host and Parasite
Infection with T. annulata significantly disrupts various host cell signaling pathways, as reflected by the enrichment of distinct signaling pathways within the identified phosphoproteome. Kinases are well-established master regulators of these pathways, and their dysregulation is implicated in numerous human diseases, including cancer. We employed in-silico kinase prediction utilizing the group-based prediction system (GPS) with the interaction filter (iGPS) to gain deeper insights into the upstream regulatory mechanisms governing these phosphorylation events. This computational tool leverages two complementary approaches: analysis of known kinase recognition motifs and protein-protein interaction databases. This combined strategy allows iGPS to predict kinases with the highest likelihood of phosphorylating specific protein sites. Next, we analyzed the regulatory landscape of kinases during T. annulata infection by leveraging phosphoproteomic analysis of both host and parasite components.
Specifically focusing on the host phosphoproteome, we investigated proteins exhibiting dephosphorylation following BPQ treatment. Using iGPS 1.0.1 predicted the kinases likely responsible for the observed phosphorylation events across 533 sites on 244 distinct proteins (Supplementary Table 7). Subsequently, we mapped these predicted kinase-substrate interactions onto the human kinome tree. This analysis revealed a diverse array of potentially involved kinase families, encompassing CMGC (e.g., CK2A, ERK1/ERK2, CDK2), CAMK (e.g., AMPKα1, AMPKα2, PKD1), AGC (e.g., AKT1, AKT2), CK1 (e.g., TTBK1, TTBK2, CK1α2), STE (e.g., MEK1, MEK2, YSK1), TKL (e.g., RAF1, BRAF1), TK (e.g., LTK, Fyn, Fgr), Atypical kinases (e.g., FRAP, DNAPK) and others (complete list). Interestingly, the CMGC family emerged as the most overrepresented group among the predicted kinase regulators (Fig. 3.a).
Given the considerably smaller kinome repertoire of T. annulata compared to the human host (52 reported kinases versus a much larger human kinome), a homology search was conducted to identify potential human counterparts for these parasite kinases. Notably, no tyrosine kinases were identified within the T. annulata kinome. The GPS 6.0 tool and its curated kinase-substrate relationship data were employed to predict upstream regulators responsible for parasite phosphoproteome modifications. A weightage score reflecting the potential importance of each predicted T. annulata kinase was assigned based on the number of predicted phosphorylation targets (lower score indicates higher potential significance). This data was then visualized using the CORAL kinome visualization tool (Fig. 3.b, Supplementary Table 8). The analysis revealed a diverse array of potential kinase families influencing parasite signaling pathways, including: CMGC (e.g., CLK2, ERK7, CDC2), CAMK (e.g., CaMK2α, CASK) and atypical kinases (e.g., RIOK3). Like the host analysis, the CMGC family emerged as the most prominent group among the predicted parasite kinase categories (Fig. 3.b). This intriguing observation suggests a potentially conserved role for CMGC kinases in regulating host and parasite signaling during T. annulata infection.
In conclusion, this phosphoproteomic exploration underscores the critical role of kinase families, particularly those belonging to the CMGC group, in regulating the intricate interplay between host and parasite signaling pathways during T. annulata infection.
T. annulata Infection Modulates Host Transcriptional Response by Phosphorylation of Key TFs
Building on our phosphoproteomic analysis that revealed a multitude of phosphorylated proteins, we delved deeper into their functional implications. Given the critical role of transcription factors (TFs) in gene regulation and the established effects of phosphorylation on TF activity, we specifically investigated phosphorylated TFs within T. annulata-infected cells. We identified a total of 19 transcription factors (TFs) within T. annulata-infected cells (TA) compared to the uninfected control group (BL3). Notably, twelve of these TFs exhibited distinct phosphorylation patterns upon infection, including MED14, SIN3A, BCL6, cJUN, NFATC1, STAT3, RUNX3, GTF2F1, MED1, JUNB, TLE3, and FOSL2 (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, subsequent treatment with BPQ resulted in the dephosphorylation and concomitant downregulation of seven of these TFs (MED14, SIN3A, BCL6, cJUN, NFATC1, STAT3, and RUNX3, but not JUNB). This observed correlation between phosphorylation status and protein abundance suggests a potential regulatory role for phosphorylation in governing TF functionality during T. annulata infection. To delve deeper into the downstream consequences of dysregulated TF activity, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was performed on both BPQ-treated (72h & 96h) and control cells (Supplementary Table 9). Given the limited availability of established target genes for bovine TFs, human databases such as ENCODE, CHEA, and MotifMap4 were employed to identify potential downstream targets for eight of the identified TFs (STAT3, BCL6, RUNX3, cJUN, NFATC1, SIN3A, FOSL2, and GTF2F1) (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 4). Subsequent gene enrichment analysis utilizing DAVID revealed that cell cycle regulation emerged as a prominent pathway commonly impacted by all TFs except SIN3A (Fig. 4c). Differential expression analysis identified a significant downregulation in the transcripts of genes known to be regulated by these TFs (STAT3, BCL6, RUNX3, cJUN, NFATC1, FOSL2, and GTF2F1) after parasite clearance (Figs. 4d-i). Further investigation identified cMYC as a shared downstream target gene regulated by all seven TFs, with its expression gradually decreasing upon parasite clearance. RNA-Seq analysis confirmed these results, showing a gradual time dependent decrease in cMYC expression after BPQ administration. (Figs. 4j).
Although the phosphoproteomic analysis did not identify parasite-specific transcription factors (TFs), the RNA-Seq data provided valuable information (Supplementary Table 10). By interrogating the parasite transcriptome for genes annotated with the Gene Ontology (GO) term "sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity" (GO:0003700), twelve putative parasite TFs were identified. Notably, eight of these TFs belonged to the ApiAP2 family, characterized by the presence of the AP2 domain (Fig. 4k). Interestingly, treatment with the anti-Theilerial drug BPQ resulted in differential expression patterns among these parasite TFs. Five members of the ApiAP2 family were downregulated, while three exhibited upregulation. The remaining four TFs, not belonging to the ApiAP2 family, all displayed downregulation upon BPQ treatment (Fig. 4.k).
This integrated phosphoproteomic and RNA-Seq approach sheds light on a novel regulatory mechanism employed by T. annulata. The parasite manipulates host cell signaling through targeted phosphorylation of TFs, potentially influencing the cell cycle pathway and cMYC expression. Additionally, the identification of parasite TFs opens avenues for future investigations into their role in parasite biology and potential therapeutic targets 19.
ERK1/2 Signaling Pathway Mediates Host Transcriptional Response During T. annulata Infection
In-silico analysis predicted ERK1/2 kinases as potential regulators of five transcription factors (TFs): FOSL2, cJUN, JUNB, RUNX3, and BCL6 (Fig. 5.a). This finding contrasted with prior studies suggesting no role for ERK1/2 in Theileria infection 14,20–22. To reconcile this discrepancy, we employed commercially available antibodies specific for the activated form of ERK1/2(phosphorylated threonine 202/204). Both immunoblotting and immunofluorescence assays (IFA) confirmed the presence and activation of ERK1/2 kinases within T. annulata-infected cells (Fig. 5.b-c). Furthermore, treatment with U0126, a well-established inhibitor of MEK, the upstream activator of ERK1/2, resulted in dephosphorylation of ERK1/2, validating the predicted role of these kinases in infected cells. We subsequently investigated the regulatory influence of ERK1/2 on the identified TFs. Antibodies targeting each TF (FOSL2, cJUN, phospho-cJUN (S73), JUNB, RUNX3, STAT3, and phospho-STAT3 (Y705)) were employed to assess protein expression and phosphorylation status. To strengthen the association between infection and TF regulation, we introduced additional experimental conditions: U0126 treatment to inhibit ERK1/2 and BPQ treatment to eliminate parasites.
Immunofluorescence analysis revealed prominent nuclear localization of FOSL2, RUNX3, JUNB, cJUN, and phospho-cJUN (S73) in T. annulata-infected cells (Fig. 5.d-m). Notably, inhibition of ERK1/2 with U0126 resulted in a significant decrease in the expression of these TFs. Similarly, parasite clearance via BPQ treatment mirrored the effect of U0126, demonstrating a reduction in all aforementioned TFs. Both STAT3 and phospho-STAT3 (Y705) were detected in infected cells; however, consistent with our in-silico predictions and prior observations, ERK1/2 inhibition did not affect STAT3 expression or phosphorylation (Supplementary Fig. 5). These findings bridge the gap in the existing literature and establish ERK1/2 as critical regulators of specific TFs during T. annulata infection. The activation of ERK1/2 appears to influence either directly or indirectly the expression and/or phosphorylation of FOSL2, cJUN, JUNB, and RUNX3, potentially impacting their transcriptional activity and the subsequent host cell response. To elucidate the functional role of FOSL-2, a key AP1 transcription factor, we employed siRNA-mediated knockdown (Fig. 5n-o). This approach revealed FOSL-2's critical role in both host cell proliferation and survival (Fig. 5p). These observations collectively suggest that FOSL-2 plays a vital part in the parasite's life cycle. Furthermore, inhibiting FOSL-2 likely disrupts a crucial pathway for parasite proliferation, potentially leading to a diminished parasite burden. To validate the in silico and transcriptome data suggesting a link between c-Myc and ERK1/2 signaling, we treated cells with U0126, an ERK1/2 inhibitor, and monitored c-Myc expression. U0126 treatment resulted in reduced c-Myc levels, supporting the hypothesis that ERK1/2 signaling plays a role in activating c-Myc (Fig. 5q). These findings demonstrate that host ERK1/2 signaling is necessary for c-Myc activation.
Our study highlights the crucial role of ERK1/2 signaling in Theileria survival. This pathway plays a central role in regulating parasite physiology by orchestrating directly or indirectly the phosphorylation of key transcription factors, including RUNX3, FOSL2, BCL6, c-JUN, JUNB, and c-Myc.
ERK1/2 Inhibition Impairs T. annulata Proliferation and Triggers Host Cell Apoptosis
To delineate the functional consequences of ERK1/2 inhibition, we assessed its impact on both Theileria annulata (TA) cell proliferation and host cell viability. A trypan blue exclusion assay revealed that U0126 treatment effectively halted TA cell proliferation by 24 h compared to untreated controls with sustained growth (Fig. 6a). This confirms U0126's ability to suppress TA cell expansion. Western blot analysis of PCNA, a marker of ongoing cellular proliferation, further corroborated this effect. U0126 treatment caused a time-dependent decrease in PCNA expression, solidifying its role in suppressing TA cell proliferation (Fig. 6b). Immunoblotting the parasite-specific protein TaSP showed a time-dependent reduction following U0126 treatment (Fig. 6b), suggesting a decline in parasite burden within infected cells. Additionally, cell death assays revealed a significant increase in dead TA cells within 48 h of U0126 treatment, reaching nearly 40% by 72 h (Fig. 6c). This aligns with the observed upregulation of cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175), a marker of apoptosis. Immunofluorescence analysis confirmed U0126-induced apoptosis, with cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) levels substantially increased in treated cells at 48 h post-treatment compared to undetectable levels in untreated cells (Fig. 6d-e). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that U0126 disrupts ERK1/2 signaling, leading to a multi-pronged effect: (1) inhibition of TA cell proliferation, (2) reduction in parasite burden and (3) induction of host cell apoptosis. This highlights the critical role of ERK1/2 in promoting survival and proliferation pathways within TA cells.