The socio-demographic characteristics and injury prevalence of the children interviewed have been partially outlined in a previous publication 16. In brief, out of 1025 households visited, a non-response rate of 9% was observed, and the target sample size of 918 was achieved. In 90% of cases, the mother of the child served as the respondent. The surveyed children, totaling 918, had a mean age of 8.0 years (SD 5.0), with the majority (29%, n = 915) falling within the 5-9-years age group. Gender distribution among the children was nearly equal. Approximately 60% of families (n = 904) reported an average monthly household expense of 10,001–20,000 Bangladeshi Taka (BDT) (Table 1). Major injuries were observed in 22 children, yielding a prevalence of 2.4 (95% CI 1.5–3.6), while minor injuries were reported in 68 children, resulting in a prevalence of 7.4 (95% CI 5.8–9.3). Two children suffered from both major and minor type of injuries. Fall injuries were the highest reported pattern for both types.
Table 1
Socio-demographic characteristics of the children
Sociodemographic characteristics | Categories | Total |
f | % |
Age (Years) (n = 915) | Infant | 45 | 4.9 |
1–4 | 235 | 25.7 |
5–9 | 268 | 29.3 |
10–14 | 249 | 27.2 |
15–17 | 118 | 12.9 |
Sex (n = 917) | Female | 458 | 49.9 |
Male | 459 | 50.1 |
Birth order (n = 918) | ≤ 2 | 629 | 68.5 |
> 2 | 289 | 31.5 |
Father's age (years) (n = 888) | ≤ 40 | 576 | 64.9 |
> 40 | 312 | 35.1 |
Father's education (n = 890) | Primary or below | 506 | 56.9 |
Secondary and above | 384 | 43.1 |
Father's occupation (n = 890) | Farmer | 248 | 27.9 |
Businessman | 205 | 23.0 |
Others | 437 | 49.1 |
Mother's age (Years) (n = 900) | ≤ 30 | 478 | 53.1 |
> 30 | 422 | 46.9 |
Mother's education (n = 911) | Primary or below | 411 | 45.1 |
Secondary and above | 500 | 54.9 |
Mother's occupation (n = 911) | Housewife | 828 | 90.9 |
Other than housewife | 83 | 9.1 |
Household members (n = 918) | ≤ 5 | 659 | 71.8 |
> 5 | 259 | 28.2 |
Total children in household (n = 918) | < 3 | 668 | 72.8 |
≥ 3 | 250 | 27.2 |
Number of existing siblings (n = 917) | < 3 | 723 | 78.8 |
≥ 3 | 194 | 21.2 |
Living status of child (n = 915) | With father | 8 | 0.9 |
With mother | 157 | 17.1 |
With both | 710 | 77.7 |
With others | 40 | 4.3 |
Monthly Expenditure (BDT) (n = 904) | ≤ 10,000 | 235 | 26.0 |
10,001–20,000 | 546 | 60.4 |
≥ 20,001 | 123 | 13.6 |
Regarding the father's background, 65% (n = 888) of the children had a father aged ≤ 40 years, 57% (n = 890) fathers had an educational level equal to or below primary, and 28% fathers were farmers and 23% businessman (n = 890). Concerning the mother's background, 53% (n = 900) of the children had a mother aged ≤ 30 years, 45% (n = 911) mothers had an educational level equal to or below primary, and 91% (n = 911) mothers were housewives. Nearly 78% (n = 915) of the children lived with both parents, and the majority (72%, n = 918) had ≤ 5 family members in the household. There were ≥ 3 total children in only 27% (n = 918) households, and ≥ 3 existing siblings of the interviewed child in 21% (n = 917) households. Almost one-third (31.5%, n = 918) of interviewed children held a birth order greater than two (see Table 1).
Among children with major injuries, 77% (n = 22) promptly took measures after the event, while a higher proportion, 90% (n = 68) did so for minor injuries (Table 3). After occurrence of two major and three minor fall injury events, the injured children did not receive any first-aid care. Of all the injuries observed during data collection, one female child aged 13 years with a minor transport injury did not receive any sort of treatment. Her both parents were illiterate, had a monthly household expense below 10,000 BDT per month and > 5 household members. She suffered for five days due to the injury.
Table 3
Sequelae of health seeking behaviour after a child gets injured with major or minor injuries
Attributes | Major injuries f (%) | Minor injuries f (%) |
First aid measures after injury | Yes | 17 (77.3) | 61 (89.7) |
No | 2 (9.1) | 4 (5.9) |
Don’t know | 3 (13.6) | 3 (4.4) |
Total | 22 (100) | 68 (100) |
Type of first aid care provider | Relatives | 8 (47.1) | 32 (54.2) |
Doctor/ Trained HCW | 7 (41.2) | 9 (15.3) |
Traditional healer/ village doctor | 1 (5.9) | 8 (13.6) |
Pharmacy-person | 1 (5.9) | 7 (11.9) |
others | - | 3 (5.1) |
Total | 17 (100) | 59 (100) |
Practices after getting first aid measures from a doctor/ trained HCW | seeking other treatment | 3 (42.9) | 2 (22.2) |
no other treatment | 4 (57.1) | 7 (77.8) |
Total | 7 (100) | 9 (100) |
Practice after getting first aid measures from persons other than a doctor/ trained HCW | seeking other treatment | 5 (55.6) | 25 (50) |
no other treatment | 4 (44.4) | 25 (50) |
Total | 9 (100) | 50 (100) |
Other treatment apart from first aid measures | Yes | 14 (63.6) | 41 (60.3) |
No | 8 (36.4) | 27 (39.7) |
Total | 22 (100) | 68 (100) |
Requirement of hospitalization | Yes | 4 (18.2) | 2 (2.9) |
No | 18 (81.8) | 66 (97.0) |
Total | 22 (100) | 68 (100) |
Duration of illness (days) | Median (IQR) | 35 (30–75) | 7 (4–15) |
Outcome | Recovery | 22 (100) | 68 (100) |
Total | 22 (100) | 68 (100) |
Out of total 78 injuries where first aid measures were taken, 37% were related to fall injuries. Cut, burn, transport injury, blunt injury, animal source injury, and near drowning constituted 20.5%, 14%, 11.5%, 10%, 4%, and 1%, respectively. A diverse range of practices in seeking treatment or providing first aid care after a specific type of injury was observed. For first aid treatment after any type of injury (excluding transport injury and drowning), the use of various substances was a prevalent practice, albeit with variations in the substances used. In 19% of instances, the child was promptly taken to a doctor or trained Health Care Worker (HCW) after an injury, and in 13% of cases, to a non-qualified HCW (such as a pharmacy person, village doctor, traditional healer, etc.) (Table 2).
Table 2
First aid practice of immediate care provider after occurrence of a particular type of injury in a child
Pattern of injury | Major injury (n = 17) f (%) | Minor injury (n = 61) f (%) | Total injury (n = 78) f (%) | First aid practice of immediate care provider |
Practices | f (%) |
Fall | 5 (29.4) | 24 (32.8) | 29 (37.2) | Use of different substances without massage (oil/water/ointment/leaves) | 10 (34.5) |
Visit a doctor/trained HCW* | 6 (20.7) |
Massage with different substance (oil/water/kerosene/ointment) | 4 (13.8) |
Visit an non-qualified HCW (traditional healer) | 3 (10.3) |
Use wet cloth to cover injured part | 2 (6.9) |
Use antiseptic | 1 (3.4) |
Unknown | 3 (10.3) |
Cut | 5 (29.4) | 11 (18) | 16 (20.5) | Use different substances (tooth paste/wet cloth/non-specific ointment) | 5 (31.3) |
Visit an non-qualified HCW (pharmacy person/village doctor) | 4 (25) |
Visit a doctor/trained HCW | 3 (18.8) |
Use antiseptic | 3 (18.8) |
Unknown | 1 (6.3) |
Burn | 3 (17.6) | 8 (13.1) | 11 (14.1) | Use different substances (engine oil/coconut oil/toothpaste) | 4 (36.4) |
Visit an non-qualified HCW | 2 (18.2) |
Use ice in water | 2 (18.2) |
Wash with running water | 1 (9.1) |
Use non-specific home remedy | 1 (9.1) |
Unknown | 1 (9.1) |
Transport | 2 (11.8) | 7 (11.5) | 9 (11.5) | Visit a doctor/trained HCW | 4 (44.4) |
Use antiseptic | 2 (22.2) |
Apply bandage | 1 (11.1) |
Unknown | 2 (22.2) |
Blunt | 2 (11.8) | 6 (9.8) | 8 (10.3) | Use different substances (water/wet cloth/non-specific ointment/coconut oil) | 5 (62.5) |
Visit a doctor | 1 (12.5) |
Visit a non-qualified HCW | 1 (12.5) |
Use antiseptic | 1 (12.5) |
Animal source | - | 3 (4.5) | 3 (3.8) | Use different substances (lime, holistically treated salt) | 2 (66.6) |
Visit a doctor | 1 (33.3) |
Near drowning | - | 1 (1.6) | 1 (1.3) | Twirling overhead | 1 (100) |
*HCW (Health Care Worker) |
After a child suffered from a fall injury (n = 29), diverse substances such as oil, water, leaves, and ointment were applied over the injured area, either with massage (14%) or without (34.5%), and approximately 21% of children were taken to a doctor or trained HCW. In the case of a cut injury (n = 16), apart from using various substances (31%) over the affected area, 19% of children were treated with antiseptic creams. Regarding burn injuries (n = 11), only one child had the burnt area washed with water, while the rest were treated with engine oil, coconut oil, toothpaste, ice and water, or non-specific home remedies. Following a transport injury (n = 9), the predominant practice was taking children to a doctor or trained HCW (44%). For blunt and animal source injuries, the common approach involved applying different substances over the injured area. In the only recorded event of near-drowning, the child was twirled overhead (Table 2).
Following the occurrence of an injury, the majority of individuals received first aid measures, and in most cases, the initial treatment or care was administered by relatives of the injured child (47%, n = 17 for major injuries and 54%, n = 59 for minor injuries). For children with major injuries, more than one-third (41%) were first treated by a doctor/trained HCW, whereas for children with minor injuries, a non-qualified HCW (pharmacy person, village doctor, traditional healer, etc.) was the primary caregiver in one-fourth (25.5%) of cases.
The study analyzed practices of seeking additional treatment for both major and minor injuries beyond first aid care (Table 3). In the case of major injuries, when first aid measures were provided by a doctor/trained HCW (n = 7), 43% sought additional treatment from specialist doctor, traditional healer or both for injured children. When relatives (n = 7) provided first aid, 71% sought additional treatment from either only doctors and traditional healers, or in combination along with village doctors. However, no additional treatment was sought after getting first aid from pharmacy and traditional healer (n = 2). Regarding minor injuries, when first aid measures were taken by a doctor/trained HCW (n = 9), 22% looked for additional treatment from other doctors. When relatives or others (n = 35) provided first aid, 69% sought additional treatment from either only doctors/trained HCWs, pharmacy persons, village doctors, and traditional healers, or in combination. Half of those getting first aids from traditional healers (n = 4) looked for pharmacy persons, but those from village doctors and pharmacy persons (n = 11) did not seek any additional treatment. Approximately 18% (n = 22) children with major injury and 3% (n = 68) children with minor injury required hospitalization. Median (IQR) duration of suffering for a child with major injury was 35 (30–75) days, and 7 (4–15) days for a minor injury. All children were in the recovered state at time of data collection.
Half of the family or caregiver of children with major injury (n = 16) chose to complete the treatment given by a doctor and half by a non-qualified HCW. For a minor injury (n = 49), nearly three-fourth (71%) adhered exclusively to the treatment provided by a non-qualified HCW (Fig. 1). Regarding adherence to the treatment of a child with a major injury, father’s level of education did not vary between the choices of doctor/trained HCWs and non-qualified HCWs, but that of mothers were different. Over one-third (38.5%, n = 13) mothers with educational level of secondary and above continued treatment from non-qualified HCWs. In households with monthly expenses ≤ 15000 BDT, 67% (n = 12) of those continued treatment of non-qualified HCWs, whereas no household with expenses > 15000 BDT chose non-qualified HCWs (n = 3). When the child had a minor injury, majority followed treatment of a non-qualified HCW irrespective of level of education of parents or household expenses. Nevertheless, practices were slightly different with education of a father and a mother, and higher monthly household income. Around 78% fathers (n = 18) and 88% mothers (n = 25) with education of primary or below, as well as 86% fathers (n = 28) and 79% mothers (n = 24) having education secondary and above chose to continue treatment of non-qualified HCWs (Fig. 2).