Background: Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) as the main effective substances from P. notoginseng with low bioavailability could be bio-converted by human gut microbiota. In our previous study, PNS metabolic variations mediated by gut microbiota have been observed between high fat, high protein (HF-HP)-diet and low fat, plant fiber-rich (LF-PF)-diet subjects. In this study, we aimed to correspondingly characterize the relationship between distinct gut microbiota profiles and PNS metabolites.
Methods: Gut microbiota were collected from HF-HP and LF-PF healthy adults, respectively and profiled by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PNS were incubated with gut microbiota in vitro. A LC-MS/MS method was developed to quantify the five main metabolites yields including ginsenoside F1 (GF1), ginsenoside Rh2 (GRh2), ginsenoside compound K (GC-K), protopanaxatriol (PPT) and protopanaxadiol (PPD). The selected microbial species, Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, were employed to metabolize PNS for the corresponding metabolites.
Results: The five main metabolites were significantly different between the two diet groups. Compared with HF-HP group, the microbial genus Blautia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Dorea, Enhydrobacter, Lactobacillus, Roseburia, Ruminococcus, SMB53, Streptococcus, Treponema and Weissella were enriched in LF-PF group, while Phascolarctobacterium and Oscillospira were relatively decreased. Furthermore, Spearman’s correlative analysis revealed gut microbiota enriched in LF-PF and HF-HP groups were positively and negatively associated with PNS metabolites yields, respectively.
Conclusions: Our data showed gut microbiota diversity led to the personalized bioconversion of PNS.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure S Figure 1: Typical MRM chromatograms of blank substrate (a) and blank substrate spiked with IS or with analytes (b) in positive ion mode. b1, b2, b3, b4, b5 and b6 were typical MRM chromatograms of blank substrate spiked with GF1, PPT, GRh2, GC-K, PPD or IS Digoxin, and a1, a2, a3, a4, a5and a6 were the corresponding chromatograms of blank substrate. Time marked on the peak was the retention time of corresponding analytes. S Figure 2: Mass scan spectra and fragmentation pathways of GF1(a), PPT(b), GRh2(c), GC-K(d) , PPD(e) and Digoxin(f) in positive ion mode. S Figure 3: Typical TICs of mixed standards (including GF1, PPT, GRh2, GC-K, PPD and Digoxin) (a) and samples transformed PNS by gut microbita collected from LF-PF(b) and HF-HP(c) diet groups at 37 ◦C for 0h and 48 h in positive ion mode. S Figure 4: Rarefaction curve based on Shannon index (a) and observed OTU numbers(b).
Additional file 2: Supplementary Table Supplementary table 1 MRM parameters of detected compounds Supplementary table 2 Precision of five main metabolites(mean, RSD<15%)
Loading...
Posted 11 May, 2021
On 12 Jun, 2021
Invitations sent on 18 May, 2021
On 06 May, 2021
On 06 May, 2021
On 06 May, 2021
On 05 May, 2021
Posted 11 May, 2021
On 12 Jun, 2021
Invitations sent on 18 May, 2021
On 06 May, 2021
On 06 May, 2021
On 06 May, 2021
On 05 May, 2021
Background: Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) as the main effective substances from P. notoginseng with low bioavailability could be bio-converted by human gut microbiota. In our previous study, PNS metabolic variations mediated by gut microbiota have been observed between high fat, high protein (HF-HP)-diet and low fat, plant fiber-rich (LF-PF)-diet subjects. In this study, we aimed to correspondingly characterize the relationship between distinct gut microbiota profiles and PNS metabolites.
Methods: Gut microbiota were collected from HF-HP and LF-PF healthy adults, respectively and profiled by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PNS were incubated with gut microbiota in vitro. A LC-MS/MS method was developed to quantify the five main metabolites yields including ginsenoside F1 (GF1), ginsenoside Rh2 (GRh2), ginsenoside compound K (GC-K), protopanaxatriol (PPT) and protopanaxadiol (PPD). The selected microbial species, Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, were employed to metabolize PNS for the corresponding metabolites.
Results: The five main metabolites were significantly different between the two diet groups. Compared with HF-HP group, the microbial genus Blautia, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Corynebacterium, Dorea, Enhydrobacter, Lactobacillus, Roseburia, Ruminococcus, SMB53, Streptococcus, Treponema and Weissella were enriched in LF-PF group, while Phascolarctobacterium and Oscillospira were relatively decreased. Furthermore, Spearman’s correlative analysis revealed gut microbiota enriched in LF-PF and HF-HP groups were positively and negatively associated with PNS metabolites yields, respectively.
Conclusions: Our data showed gut microbiota diversity led to the personalized bioconversion of PNS.

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure S Figure 1: Typical MRM chromatograms of blank substrate (a) and blank substrate spiked with IS or with analytes (b) in positive ion mode. b1, b2, b3, b4, b5 and b6 were typical MRM chromatograms of blank substrate spiked with GF1, PPT, GRh2, GC-K, PPD or IS Digoxin, and a1, a2, a3, a4, a5and a6 were the corresponding chromatograms of blank substrate. Time marked on the peak was the retention time of corresponding analytes. S Figure 2: Mass scan spectra and fragmentation pathways of GF1(a), PPT(b), GRh2(c), GC-K(d) , PPD(e) and Digoxin(f) in positive ion mode. S Figure 3: Typical TICs of mixed standards (including GF1, PPT, GRh2, GC-K, PPD and Digoxin) (a) and samples transformed PNS by gut microbita collected from LF-PF(b) and HF-HP(c) diet groups at 37 ◦C for 0h and 48 h in positive ion mode. S Figure 4: Rarefaction curve based on Shannon index (a) and observed OTU numbers(b).
Additional file 2: Supplementary Table Supplementary table 1 MRM parameters of detected compounds Supplementary table 2 Precision of five main metabolites(mean, RSD<15%)
Loading...