Background: Bleeding or thromboembolism prevention is important in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulants, including non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Asians have higher risks of bleeding complications when taking anticoagulants. However, evidence that considers laboratory parameters is lacking.
Objective: We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness between non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.
Setting: Retrospective design using hospital-based data.
Method: This propensity score-matched cohort study included data extracted from the electronic medical records of the En Chu Kong Hospital Research Database.
Main outcome measure: Outcome measures were major bleeding and thromboembolism. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for evaluating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Among 1,075 patients with atrial fibrillation, 687 and 388 were administered non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin, respectively. After propensity score matching, 264 patient pairs were selected. Compared with warfarin use, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant use was associated with similar risks for major bleeding and thromboembolism; however, the latter was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks (adjusted hazard ratio 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-11.39). Notably, an approximately 10-fold increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 0-6-month non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant users (adjusted hazard ratio 10.13, 95% confidence interval 1.27-80.89).
Conclusion: Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant use was not associated with major bleeding and thromboembolism occurrence in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. However, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant use was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks, especially when used within 0-6 months.

Figure 1

Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Posted 11 May, 2021
Invitations sent on 10 May, 2021
Received 09 May, 2021
On 07 May, 2021
On 05 May, 2021
On 05 May, 2021
Posted 11 May, 2021
Invitations sent on 10 May, 2021
Received 09 May, 2021
On 07 May, 2021
On 05 May, 2021
On 05 May, 2021
Background: Bleeding or thromboembolism prevention is important in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulants, including non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Asians have higher risks of bleeding complications when taking anticoagulants. However, evidence that considers laboratory parameters is lacking.
Objective: We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness between non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation.
Setting: Retrospective design using hospital-based data.
Method: This propensity score-matched cohort study included data extracted from the electronic medical records of the En Chu Kong Hospital Research Database.
Main outcome measure: Outcome measures were major bleeding and thromboembolism. Cox proportional hazard models were applied for evaluating hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals.
Results: Among 1,075 patients with atrial fibrillation, 687 and 388 were administered non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants and warfarin, respectively. After propensity score matching, 264 patient pairs were selected. Compared with warfarin use, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant use was associated with similar risks for major bleeding and thromboembolism; however, the latter was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks (adjusted hazard ratio 3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-11.39). Notably, an approximately 10-fold increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 0-6-month non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant users (adjusted hazard ratio 10.13, 95% confidence interval 1.27-80.89).
Conclusion: Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant use was not associated with major bleeding and thromboembolism occurrence in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. However, non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant use was associated with increased gastrointestinal bleeding risks, especially when used within 0-6 months.

Figure 1

Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...