Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test
In this study, 479 HIV-1-infected and 487 HIV-1-uninfected individuals from northern China were genotyped for 22 SNPs in NHEJ genes. The success rates were > 98 % for all SNPs and a mismatch rate of 0% detected in 50 replicate samples. As shown in Table 1, all 22 SNPs did not deviate from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control group (P > 0.05).
Table 1
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test for the 22 NHEJ SNPs in controls
gene
|
Chra
|
SNPs
|
Major/Minor allele
|
P for HWETb
|
XRCC7
|
8
|
rs7830743
|
A/G
|
0.248
|
|
8
|
rs7003908
|
A/C
|
0.78
|
XRCC6
|
22
|
rs5751129
|
T/C
|
0.677
|
|
22
|
rs2267437
|
C/G
|
0.178
|
|
22
|
rs132770
|
G/A
|
0.468
|
|
22
|
rs132774
|
G/C
|
0.568
|
XRCC5
|
2
|
rs828907
|
G/T
|
0.307
|
|
2
|
rs705649
|
G/A
|
0.185
|
|
2
|
rs16855458
|
C/A
|
0.762
|
|
2
|
rs3770502
|
C/T
|
0.501
|
|
2
|
rs9288516
|
T/A
|
0.504
|
|
2
|
rs3835
|
G/A
|
0.529
|
|
2
|
rs1051677
|
T/C
|
0.92
|
|
2
|
rs2440
|
A/G
|
0.055
|
XRCC4
|
5
|
rs6869366
|
T/G
|
0.936
|
|
5
|
rs2075685
|
G/T
|
0.476
|
|
5
|
rs10040363
|
A/G
|
0.247
|
|
5
|
rs963248
|
C/T
|
0.127
|
|
5
|
rs35268
|
T/C
|
0.397
|
|
5
|
rs1056503
|
G/T
|
0.051
|
LIG4
|
13
|
rs1805388
|
G/A
|
0.81
|
|
13
|
rs1805389
|
G/A
|
0.994
|
a Chr: chromosome. |
b Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test. |
Associations of NHEJ gene polymorphisms with HIV-1 infection
To explore the possible associations, the genotype distribution of the 22 SNPs was investigated and the differences of genotype frequencies between cases and controls were analyzed under three genetic models (codominant model, dominant model and recessive model). As shown in Fig. 1, a significant association was found for XRCC6 rs132770 under the codominant (P = 0.005, OR = 10.51, 95% CI 2.000-55.251) and recessive (P = 0.006, OR = 10.45, 95% CI 1.986–54.933) inheritance models. Consistent with the aforementioned findings, for the XRCC4 rs1056503, the TT genotype significantly increased the risk of HIV-1 infection compared with GG genotype under the codominant model (P = 0.035, OR = 1.698, 95% CI 1.037–2.779), and the TT genotype increased the risk of HIV-1 infection compared with TG and GG genotypes under the recessive model (P = 0.028, OR = 1.707, 95% CI 1.060–2.750). However, no association with HIV-1 infection was observed in any genetic models for the rest 20 SNPs (P > 0.05).
Analysis of the SNP-SNP interaction
Then, the GMDR method was used to study the association of 10 SNPs within XRCC6 and XRCC4 gene with high-order interactions on HIV-1 infection. Through the 10-fold cross-validation, the best four-locus model involving XRCC6 (rs2267437) and XRCC4 (rs10040363, rs963248 and rs1056503) was found. The model had the testing balanced accuracy of 53.42%, the maximum cross-validation consistency of 10/10, and a sign test P-value 0.010 (Fig. 2). In order to obtain the ORs for the joint effects of the four SNPs on HIV-1 infection, traditional statistical methods were applied to this four-locus model to aid in interpretation, which identified three significant genotype combinations from all possible high-risk genotype combinations. In this four-locus (rs1056503-rs2267437-rs10040363-rs963248) model, the ORs for the three significant high-risk genotype combinations (TT)-(CC)-(AG/GG)-(TC/CC), (TT)-(CC)-(AA)-(TC/CC), and (TT)-(CC)-(AA)-(TT) were 6.667 (P = 0.035), 7.333 (P = 0.026) and 6.667 (P = 0.035), respectively (Table 2).
Table 2
Combined effects of rs1056503, rs2267437, rs10040363 and rs963248 on HIV-1 infection
rs1056503
|
rs2267437
|
rs10040363
|
rs963248
|
P value
|
OR (95% CI)
|
TT
|
CG + GG
|
AG + GG
|
TC + CC
|
-
|
1.000
|
TT
|
CC
|
AG + GG
|
TC + CC
|
0.035
|
6.667 (1.145–38.833)
|
TT
|
CG + GG
|
AA
|
TC + CC
|
0.848
|
1.200 (0.185–7.770)
|
TT
|
CG + GG
|
AG + GG
|
TT
|
1.000
|
1.000 (0.125–7.995)
|
TT
|
CC
|
AA
|
TC + CC
|
0.026
|
7.333 (1.272–42.294)
|
TT
|
CC
|
AG + GG
|
TT
|
0.756
|
0.667 (0.051–8.639)
|
TT
|
CG + GG
|
AA
|
TT
|
0.642
|
24.556 (1.991-302.866)
|
TT
|
CC
|
AA
|
TT
|
0.035
|
6.667 (1.145–38.833)
|
Bold italic indicates statistical significance. |
Analysis of haplotype associations
Analysis of LD between the SNPs in NHEJ genes was performed with HaploView software. There was strong LD between the four SNPs in XRCC6 gene, eight SNPs in XRCC5 gene, six SNPs in XRCC4 gene and two SNPs in LIG4 gene. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of all haplotypes between HIV-1-infected individuals and healthy cohorts and no association with the susceptibility to HIV-1 infection (P > 0.05). Table 3 shows all blocks and haplotypes identified and the frequencies of these haplotypes.
Table 3
The frequency of haplotypes of the NHEJ genes in cases and controls
gene
|
Haplotype
|
Frequency
|
Haplotype frequencies
in the cases
|
Haplotype frequencies
in the controls
|
Chi Square
|
P
|
XRCC6
|
TCGG
|
0.671
|
0.665
|
0.677
|
0.309
|
0.578
|
|
TGGG
|
0.237
|
0.233
|
0.241
|
0.175
|
0.675
|
CCAC
|
0.070
|
0.081
|
0.060
|
3.181
|
0.075
|
CCGC
|
0.021
|
0.021
|
0.022
|
0.012
|
0.912
|
XRCC5
|
Block 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GG
|
0.771
|
0.777
|
0.765
|
0.335
|
0.563
|
TA
|
0.223
|
0.219
|
0.227
|
0.169
|
0.681
|
Block 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
TG
|
0.468
|
0.470
|
0.466
|
0.040
|
0.841
|
AG
|
0.452
|
0.448
|
0.456
|
0.149
|
0.699
|
TA
|
0.080
|
0.082
|
0.078
|
0.115
|
0.735
|
Block 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
TA
|
0.693
|
0.705
|
0.683
|
1.101
|
0.294
|
CG
|
0.165
|
0.164
|
0.166
|
0.009
|
0.923
|
TG
|
0.142
|
0.132
|
0.152
|
1.649
|
0.199
|
XRCC4
|
Block 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TG
|
0.806
|
0.806
|
0.805
|
0.007
|
0.931
|
TT
|
0.141
|
0.135
|
0.147
|
0.597
|
0.440
|
GT
|
0.053
|
0.059
|
0.048
|
1.095
|
0.295
|
Block 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CT
|
0.555
|
0.536
|
0.573
|
2.552
|
0.110
|
TT
|
0.308
|
0.327
|
0.290
|
3.095
|
0.079
|
CC
|
0.133
|
0.132
|
0.134
|
0.020
|
0.888
|
LIG4
|
GG
|
0.814
|
0.815
|
0.812
|
0.035
|
0.852
|
|
AA
|
0.102
|
0.101
|
0.104
|
0.030
|
0.863
|
AG
|
0.084
|
0.084
|
0.084
|
0.005
|
0.941
|
The values in bold indicate a trend towards association. |
Association analysis for NHEJ gene SNPs with CD4 + T cell count and clinical phase in AIDS patients
In order to discover the relationship between the NHEJ gene polymorphisms and the progression of AIDS, differences in allele frequencies were analyzed between the case subgroups which were divided on CD4 + T-lymphocyte count and clinical stage as an index. The CD4 + T cell counts of the study participants ranged from 3 to 1038 cells/µl (mean ± SD, 335.57 ± 198.79). The associations between SNPs and CD4 + T cell counts were used to assess the influence of these polymorphisms on immunity status. As shown in Table 4, there were significant differences of genotype frequencies for XRCC5 rs16855458 and LIG4 rs1805388 between different case groups (P < 0.05). The subjects with AA or AC of rs16855458 have the significantly lower CD4 + T-lymphocyte count, compared to subjects with CC genotype (P = 0.025, OR = 1.538, 95% CI 1.054–2.243). In addition, the subjects with AA or AG of rs1805388 have the higher progression risk of AIDS, compared to subjects with GG genotype (P = 0.036, OR = 1.506, 95% CI 1.027–2.209). However, other SNPs were not associated with the CD4+ T-lymphocyte count and clinical stages (P > 0.05). These results suggest that rs16855458 and rs1805388 were associated with the clinical features and that the polymorphisms in XRCC5 and LIG4 genes likely play an important role in the progression of AIDS in the northern Chinese population.
Table 4
Association between the 22 SNPs and the clinical features of AIDS
gene
|
gene polymorphisms
|
Genotype
|
CD4+T-lymphocyte count a
|
P
|
OR (95%CI)
|
clinical stageb
|
P
|
OR (95%CI)
|
< 350 cells/µl
|
> 350 cells/µl
|
phase III + IV
|
phase I + II
|
XRCC7
|
rs7830743
|
GG + AG
|
37
|
35
|
0.550
|
0.858(0.519–1.418)
|
29
|
43
|
0.438
|
0.817(0.491–1.361)
|
|
|
AA
|
223
|
181
|
|
|
184
|
223
|
|
|
rs7003908
|
CC + CA
|
125
|
92
|
0.232
|
1.248(0.868–1.795)
|
100
|
118
|
0.572
|
1.110 (0.773–1.594)
|
|
AA
|
135
|
124
|
|
|
113
|
148
|
|
|
XRCC6
|
rs5751129
|
CC + CT
|
49
|
39
|
0.825
|
1.054(0.662–1.679)
|
40
|
48
|
0.837
|
1.050(0.660–1.671)
|
|
|
TT
|
211
|
177
|
|
|
173
|
218
|
|
|
rs2267437
|
GG + CG
|
118
|
82
|
0.103
|
1.358(0.940–1.961)
|
95
|
107
|
0.335
|
1.196(0.831–1.723)
|
|
CC
|
142
|
134
|
|
|
118
|
159
|
|
|
rs132770
|
AA + AG
|
38
|
31
|
0.908
|
1.031(0.617–1.722)
|
27
|
43
|
0.282
|
0.752(0.448–1.264)
|
|
GG
|
220
|
185
|
|
|
187
|
224
|
|
|
rs132774
|
CC + CG
|
50
|
39
|
0.743
|
1.081(0.679–1.719)
|
40
|
49
|
0.920
|
1.024(0.645–1.627)
|
|
GG
|
210
|
177
|
|
|
173
|
217
|
|
|
XRCC5
|
rs828907
|
TT + GT
|
104
|
86
|
0.967
|
1.008(0.697–1.457)
|
92
|
99
|
0.185
|
1.283(0.888–1.853)
|
|
|
GG
|
156
|
130
|
|
|
121
|
167
|
|
|
rs705649
|
AA + GA
|
105
|
85
|
0.819
|
1.044(0.722–1.509)
|
92
|
99
|
0.185
|
1.283(0.888–1.853)
|
|
GG
|
155
|
131
|
|
|
121
|
167
|
|
|
rs16855458
|
AA + AC
|
109
|
69
|
0.025
|
1.538(1.054–2.243)
|
87
|
92
|
0.160
|
1.306(0.900-1.895)
|
|
CC
|
151
|
147
|
|
|
126
|
174
|
|
|
rs3770502
|
TT + CT
|
81
|
61
|
0.489
|
1.150(0.774–1.708)
|
66
|
76
|
0.499
|
1.146(0.772-1.700)
|
|
CC
|
179
|
155
|
|
|
144
|
190
|
|
|
rs9288516
|
AA + TA
|
183
|
145
|
0.445
|
1.164(0.789–1.717)
|
144
|
185
|
0.649
|
0.914(0.620–1.347)
|
|
TT
|
77
|
71
|
|
|
69
|
81
|
|
|
rs3835
|
AA + AG
|
36
|
35
|
0.495
|
0.839(0.506–1.390)
|
33
|
39
|
0.804
|
1.066(0.645–1.763)
|
|
GG
|
222
|
181
|
|
|
181
|
228
|
|
|
rs1051677
|
CC + TC
|
83
|
61
|
0.384
|
1.192(0.803–1.768)
|
68
|
77
|
0.481
|
1.151(0.778–1.703)
|
|
TT
|
177
|
155
|
|
|
145
|
189
|
|
|
rs2440
|
GG + AG
|
127
|
113
|
0.451
|
0.870(0.607–1.249)
|
96
|
136
|
0.767
|
0.947(0.660–1.358)
|
|
AA
|
133
|
103
|
|
|
107
|
130
|
|
|
XRCC4
|
rs6869366
|
GG + GT
|
36
|
20
|
0.124
|
1.575(0.883–2.811)
|
23
|
33
|
0.587
|
0.855(0.485–1.505)
|
|
|
TT
|
224
|
196
|
|
|
190
|
233
|
|
|
rs2075685
|
TT + GT
|
77
|
80
|
0.087
|
0.715(0.487–1.050)
|
62
|
95
|
0.126
|
0.739(0.502–1.089)
|
|
GG
|
183
|
136
|
|
|
151
|
171
|
|
|
rs10040363
|
GG + AG
|
72
|
66
|
0.510
|
0.875(0.588–1.302)
|
59
|
79
|
0.613
|
0.902(0.605–1.345)
|
|
AA
|
187
|
150
|
|
|
154
|
186
|
|
|
rs963248
|
TT + TC
|
136
|
132
|
0.054
|
0.698(0.484–1.007)
|
114
|
155
|
0.298
|
0.825(0.574–1.186)
|
|
CC
|
124
|
84
|
|
|
99
|
111
|
|
|
rs35268
|
CC + TC
|
70
|
51
|
0.409
|
1.192(0.786–1.808)
|
60
|
61
|
0.191
|
1.318(0.872–1.992)
|
|
TT
|
190
|
165
|
|
|
153
|
205
|
|
|
rs1056503
|
TT + TG
|
128
|
118
|
0.241
|
0.805(0.561–1.156)
|
107
|
140
|
0.602
|
0.909(0.633–1.303)
|
|
GG
|
132
|
98
|
|
|
106
|
126
|
|
|
LIG4
|
rs1805388
|
AA + AG
|
87
|
69
|
0.726
|
1.071(0.729–1.574)
|
81
|
77
|
0.036
|
1.506(1.027–2.209)
|
|
|
GG
|
173
|
147
|
|
|
132
|
189
|
|
|
rs1805389
|
AA + AG
|
52
|
39
|
0.591
|
1.135(0.716–1.799)
|
48
|
45
|
0.124
|
1.429(0.907–2.249)
|
|
GG
|
208
|
177
|
|
|
165
|
221
|
|
|
Bold italic indicates statistical significance. |
a The CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were divided into two groups: Category 1, < 350 cells/µl; Category 2, > 350 cells/µl. |
b Clinical stage: Category A, Clinical phase III + IV; Category B, Clinical phase I + II. |