Laboratory characteristics of the KD group and control group
All laboratory data used in this study were obtained at admission before the initiation of therapy. The variance of laboratory parameters between the control group and KD group were analyzed. The levels of L%, PA and CD8+, CD4+ T cell were lower in KD individuals. Higher levels of WBC, N%, CRP, ESR, NT-proBNP, ALT and CD4+/CD8+ in KD group. these differences were statistically significant (P<0.05 or P<0.01). There were no other statistically significant differences in indicators of PCT, TBIL, ALB and AST between the KD patients and control group (Table 2, Figure 1).
Demographic data
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 3. The acute infections among the normal control group were upper or lower respiratory tract infections or gastroenteritis. Of all the participants, 32 patients (25.40%) had CAL formation, and 53 patients (42.06%) were IVIG-resistant.
Detecting HMGB1 and S100A12 expression
Comparison with KD group, the relative expression levels of HMGB1 and S100A12 mRNA were higher than NC group (P<0.05, Figure3A). Subsequentely, compared with IVIG-responsive group, the mRNA levels of HMGB1 and S100A12 in IVIG-resistant group were markedly elevated (P<0.05, Figure3B). Moreover, the Real-time PCR melt curve indicated that the primers of S100A12 and HMGB1 were specific (Figure3C-D).
Serum IL-17A measurements by ELISA
IL-17A expression levels increased significantly in KD group (P< 0.01, Figure4A). Also, the serum level of IL-17A in IVIG-resistant group was higher than IVIG-responsive group (P< 0.01, Figure4B).
Laboratory characteristics in IVIG-responsive and IVIG-resistant group
In the KD group, the laboratory data of the IVIG-responsive patients and the IVIG-resistant patients were obtained before IVIG-treatment. The variance of laboratory parameters between the IVIG-responsive and the IVIG-resistant were analyzed. In terms of laboratory data of KD group, patients who were IVIG-resistant had higher levels of N%, CRP, NT-proBNP, TBIL, ALT and AST prior to IVIG therapy when compared with those who were IVIG-responsive. Meanwhile, compared with IVIG-responsive patients, the IVIG-resistant patients had lower levels both of L% and PLT. PCT, ESR, ALB, CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ expression levels remained higher than normal value. However, there had no significant difference when compared with IVIG-responsive patients and the IVIG-resistant patients (Table 4, Figure 2).
Improvement of clinical symptoms in the IVIG-resistant after different treatments
The recovery of clinical symptoms in the acute phase of the three groups of IVIG resistance after discharge were shown in Table 5. The study compared the effects of three adjunctive therapies from seven aspects: the pyrexia before starting treatment, average time of hospital stay, antipyretic time, mucosal congestion subsiding time, lymph node swelling subsiding time, redness and swelling of the hands and feet subsiding time and CALs formation before starting treatment. Among 53 IVIG resistance patients, 16 of them had CAL formation before treatment. The antipyretic time and mucosal congestion/redness and swelling of the hands and feet subsiding time of methylprednisolone group and infliximab group were all shorter than IVIG retreament group (P<0.05 or P<0.01). There had no difference between three treatment options in lymph node swelling subsiding time(P>0.05). All the follow up information was collected within 2 weeks and 2 months after discharge respectively.
Various laboratory characteristics in the IVIG-resistant after different treatments
Patients who were IVIG-resistant had no statistical difference in the following laboratory data before KD1 and KD2 when different drugs treatment during hospitalization. In KD3, compared with IVIG retreatment and infliximab group, methylprednisolone group showed more significant lowering CRP (P<0.05). The other laboratory characteristics after three adjunctive therapies, there had no significantly difference(P>0.05, Table 6). After discharge, we found that methylprednisolone group and infliximab group were more effective than IVIG retreatment group in alleviating inflammatory indexes (P<0.05 or P<0.01, Table 5). All the follow up information was collected within 2 weeks and 2 months after discharge respectively.