1 United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2019/ (2019).
2 IPCC, 2018: Summary for Policymakers. (2018).
3 Lin, J.-T. et al. China’s international trade and air pollution in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1736-1741, doi:10.1073/pnas.1312860111 (2014).
4 Zhang, Q. et al. Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade. Nature 543, 705-709, doi:10.1038/nature21712 (2017).
5 Wiedmann, T. & Lenzen, M. Environmental and social footprints of international trade. Nature Geoscience 11, 314-321, doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0113-9 (2018).
6 Lin, J. et al. Global climate forcing of aerosols embodied in international trade. Nature Geoscience 9, 790-794, doi:10.1038/ngeo2798 (2016).
7 Wang, J.-X. et al. Socioeconomic and atmospheric factors affecting aerosol radiative forcing: Production-based versus consumption-based perspective. Atmospheric Environment 200, 197-207, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.012 (2019).
8 Yang, Y., Smith, S. J., Wang, H., Mills, C. M. & Rasch, P. J. Variability, timescales, and nonlinearity in climate responses to black carbon emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 19, 2405-2420, doi:10.5194/acp-19-2405-2019 (2019).
9 Lewinschal, A. et al. Local and remote temperature response of regional SO2 emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 19, 2385-2403, doi:10.5194/acp-19-2385-2019 (2019).
10 Shindell, D. & Faluvegi, G. Climate response to regional radiative forcing during the twentieth century. Nature Geoscience 2, 294-300, doi:10.1038/ngeo473 (2009).
11 Persad, G. G. & Caldeira, K. Divergent global-scale temperature effects from identical aerosols emitted in different regions. Nat Commun 9, 3289, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05838-6 (2018).
12 Sand, M., Berntsen, T. K., Ekman, A. M. L., Hansson, H.-C. & Lewinschal, A. Surface temperature response to regional black carbon emissions: do location and magnitude matter? Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20, 3079-3089, doi:10.5194/acp-20-3079-2020 (2020).
13 Liu, L. et al. A PDRMIP Multimodel Study on the Impacts of Regional Aerosol Forcings on Global and Regional Precipitation. Journal of Climate 31, 4429-4447, doi:10.1175/jcli-d-17-0439.1 (2018).
14 Westervelt, D. M., A. J. Conley, A. M. Fiore, J.-F. Lamarque, D. Shindell, M. Previdi, G. Faluvegi, G. Correa, and L. W. Horowitz. Multimodel precipitation responses to removal of U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research 122, 5024–5038,, doi:10.1002/ 2017JD026756. (2017).
15 Acosta Navarro, J. C. et al. Amplification of Arctic warming by past air pollution reductions in Europe. Nature Geoscience 9, 277-281, doi:10.1038/ngeo2673 (2016).
16 Li, B. et al. The contribution of China's emissions to global climate forcing. Nature 531, 357-361, doi:10.1038/nature17165 (2016).
17 Menon, S., Hansen, J., Nazarenko, L. & Luo, Y. Climate effects of black carbon aerosols in China and India. Science 297, 2250-2253, doi: 10.1126/science.1075159 (2002).
18 International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook. (2011).
19 Hoesly, R. M. et al. Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Geoscientific Model Development 11, 369-408, doi:10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018 (2018).
20 GTAP v10 Data Base (Pre-Released version). Available at: https://www.gtap. agecon.purdue.edu/about/project.asp. (2019).
21 Danabasoglu, G. et al. The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 12, doi:10.1029/2019ms001916 (2020).
22 Lin, J. et al. Carbon and health implications of trade restrictions. Nature Communications 10, 4947, doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12890-3 (2019).
23 Liu, X. et al. Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the Modal Aerosol Module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model. Geoscientific Model Development 9, 505-522, doi:10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016 (2016).
24 Conley, A. J. et al. Multimodel Surface Temperature Responses to Removal of U.S. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research 123, 2773-2796, doi:10.1002/2017jd027411 (2018).
25 Huang, Y., Y. Xia, and X. Tan. On the pattern of CO2 radiative forcing and poleward energy transport. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 10,578–510,593, doi:10.1002/2017JD027221 (2017).
26 Kang, S. M., Held, I. M., Frierson, D. M. W. & Zhao, M. The Response of the ITCZ to Extratropical Thermal Forcing: Idealized Slab-Ocean Experiments with a GCM. Journal of Climate 21, 3521-3532, doi:10.1175/2007jcli2146.1 (2008).
27 Schneider, T., Bischoff, T. & Haug, G. H. Migrations and dynamics of the intertropical convergence zone. Nature 513, 45-53, doi:10.1038/nature13636 (2014).
28 Ganguly, D., Rasch, P. J., Wang, H. & Yoon, J.-H. Climate response of the South Asian monsoon system to anthropogenic aerosols. Journal of Geophysical Research 117, doi:10.1029/2012jd017508 (2012).
29 Song, F., Zhou, T. & Qian, Y. Responses of East Asian summer monsoon to natural and anthropogenic forcings in the 17 latest CMIP5 models. Geophysical Research Letters 41, 596-603, doi:10.1002/2013gl058705 (2014).
30 Mueller, B. & Seneviratne, S. I. Hot days induced by precipitation deficits at the global scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 12398-12403, doi:10.1073/pnas.1204330109 (2012).
31 Held, I. M. & Soden, B. J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. Journal of Climate 19, 5686-5699 (2006).
32 Kanemoto, K., Moran, D., Lenzen, M. & Geschke, A. International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution. Global Environmental Change 24, 52-59, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.008 (2014).
33 Zheng, B. et al. Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18, 14095-14111, doi:10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018 (2018).
34 McDuffie, E. E., Smith, S. J., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E. A., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., and Martin, R. V. A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuel-specific sources (1970–2017): An application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., doi:10.5194/essd-2020-103 (2020).
35 Shindell, D. & Smith, C. J. Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels. Nature 573, 408-411, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1554-z (2019).
36 Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change 42, 153-168, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 (2017).
37 Knutti, R., Masson, D. & Gettelman, A. Climate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 1194-1199, doi:10.1002/grl.50256 (2013).
38 Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Bacmeister, J. T., Neale, R. B., Pendergrass, A. G., Danabasoglu, G., et al. High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 8329–8337, doi:10.1029/2019GL083978 (2019).
39 Zheng, Y., Davis, S. J., Persad, G. G. & Caldeira, K. Climate effects of aerosols reduce economic inequality. Nature Climate Change 10, 220-224, doi:10.1038/s41558-020-0699-y (2020).
40 Liu, X. et al. Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5. Geoscientific Model Development 5, 709-739, doi:10.5194/gmd-5-709-2012 (2012).
41 Emmons, L. K. et al. The Chemistry Mechanism in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 12, doi:10.1029/2019ms001882 (2020).
42 Tilmes, S. et al. Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1.2). Geoscientific Model Development 8, 1395-1426, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1395-2015 (2015).
43 Mills, M. J. et al. Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions, 1990-2014, using CESM1(WACCM). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 121, 2332-2348, doi:10.1002/2015jd024290 (2016).
44 Kasoar, M. et al. Regional and global temperature response to anthropogenic SO2 emissions from China in three climate models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 16, 9785-9804, doi:10.5194/acp-16-9785-2016 (2016).
45 Yang, Y., Wang, H., Smith, S. J., Easter, R. C. & Rasch, P. J. Sulfate Aerosol in the Arctic: Source Attribution and Radiative Forcing. Journal of Geophysical Research 123, 1899-1918, doi:10.1002/2017jd027298 (2018).
46 Westervelt, D. M. et al. Local and remote mean and extreme temperature response to regional aerosol emissions reductions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 20, 3009-3027, doi:10.5194/acp-20-3009-2020 (2020).
47 Undorf, S., Bollasina, M. A., Booth, B. B. B. & Hegerl, G. C. Contrasting the Effects of the 1850-1975 Increase in Sulphate Aerosols from North America and Europe on the Atlantic in the CESM. Geophysical Research Letters 45, 11,930-911,940, doi:10.1029/2018gl079970 (2018).
48 Jiang, Y., Yang, X.-Q. & Liu, X. Seasonality in anthropogenic aerosol effects on East Asian climate simulated with CAM5. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 120, 10,837-810,861, doi:10.1002/2015jd023451 (2015).
49 Zhao, A., Stevenson, D. S. & Bollasina, M. A. Climate Forcing and Response to Greenhouse Gases, Aerosols, and Ozone in CESM1. Journal of Geophysical Research 124, 13876-13894, doi:10.1029/2019jd030769 (2019).
50 Zhou, C. et al. The impact of secondary inorganic aerosol emissions change on surface air temperature in the Northern Hemisphere. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, doi:10.1007/s00704-020-03249-6 (2020).
51 Lawrence, D. M. et al. The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 11, 4245-4287, doi:10.1029/2018ms001583 (2019).
52 Smith, R. et al. The Parallel Ocean Program (POP) Reference Manual. Ocean component of the Community Climate System Model (CCSM) and Community Earth System Model (CESM). LANL Tech. Report LAUR‐10‐01853 (2010).
53 Hunke, E. C., Hebert, D. A. & Lecomte, O. Level‐ice melt ponds in the Los Alamos sea ice model, CICE. Ocean Modelling 71, 71,26–42, doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.11.008 (2015).
54 Huang, Y., Xia, Y. & Tan, X. On the pattern of CO2 radiative forcing and poleward energy transport. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 122, 10,578-510,593, doi:doi:10.1002/2017JD027221 (2017).
55 Xia, Y. et al. Significant Contribution of Severe Ozone Loss to the Siberian-Arctic Surface Warming in Spring 2020. Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2021GL092509, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092509 (2021).
56 Xia, Y. et al. Stratospheric ozone-induced cloud radiative effects on Antarctic sea ice. Advances in Atmos. Sci. 37, 505−514, doi:10.1007/s00376-019-8251-6 (2020).
57 Xia, Y., Huang, Y. & Hu, Y. On the climate impacts of upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 123, 730– 739, doi:10.1002/2017JD027398 (2018).
58 Zelinka, M. D. et al. Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models. Geophysical Research Letters 47, e2019GL085782, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782 (2020).
59 Sherwood, S. C. et al. An Assessment of Earth's Climate Sensitivity Using Multiple Lines of Evidence. Reviews of Geophysics 58, e2019RG000678, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000678 (2020).
60 Harrop, B. E., Lu, J., Liu, F., Garuba, O. A. & Leung, L. R. Sensitivity of the ITCZ Location to Ocean Forcing Via Q-Flux Green's Function Experiments. Geophysical Research Letters 45, 13,116-113,123, doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080772 (2018).
61 Xia, Y. & Huang, Y. Differential Radiative Heating Drives Tropical Atmospheric Circulation Weakening. Geophysical Research Letters 44, 10,592--510,600, doi:10.1002/2017GL075678 (2017).
62 Mlawer, E. J., Taubman, S. J., Brown, P. D., Iacono, M. J. & Clough, S. A. Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res-Atmos 102, 16663-16682 (1997).
63 Du, M. et al. Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives. Environmental Research Letters 15, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d5 (2020).