In this study, completion of IPT for child contacts of TB patients was associated with their caregivers’ knowledge about TB and their perceptions of the importance of IPT. IPT completion was also associated with the occurrence of adverse events, caregivers’ satisfaction with health services, and family environment. Our findings contrast with previous studies that did not find significant associations between caregivers’ knowledge about IPT and their children’s IPT completion (13, 18). However, our results are consistent with studies of adult patients, which have found that they are less likely to complete IPT if they lack knowledge about its purpose (19) or do not believe that they are at risk for TB (20). It is possible that the relationship between caregivers’ knowledge and perceptions and their willingness or ability to support their children’s treatment completion may vary across settings. Nevertheless, our findings suggest the importance of efforts on the part of the health system to educate, counsel, and build positive relationships with caregivers of children receiving IPT.
While we found that a large majority of caregivers were satisfied with the services they received from the health system, those who reported dissatisfaction were more likely to have children who did not complete IPT. Importantly, because the survey was administered after children had already stopped IPT, we cannot be sure whether dissatisfaction with the health services was a contributing cause of IPT non-completion, or whether dissatisfaction resulted from a situation that contributed to IPT non-completion (e.g. adverse events that went unattended by the health system). However, previous studies have also reported that positive support from health care providers is a facilitating factor for IPT adherence (13) and that negative relationships between caregivers and health care providers can adversely impact IPT adherence (21). Together, this evidence suggests that implementing strategies focused on fostering trusting relationships between caregivers and health care providers could encourage caregivers to return to the health facility for medication refills and inform providers about the occurrence of adverse events, and could encourage caregivers to promote IPT adherence in the home.
Few children in our study experienced adverse events, consistent with what has been observed internationally under clinical trial conditions (22) and under programmatic conditions in Peru (23). However, we found that the occurrence of adverse events was a risk factor for not completing IPT. This finding is consistent with other studies that have used interviews to identify adverse events (24, 25), but not with some studies that analyzed information from treatment registers (8, 26). This discrepancy could mean that contacts may stop taking IPT if an adverse event occurs without reporting it to the health services, or that the perception of adverse events from a patient or caregiver’s point of view may not be the same as the definition applied by health care providers. Moreover, studies based on recall may be subject to bias if patients who struggled to complete treatment are more likely to recall experiencing adverse events; on the other hand, studies based on treatment registers may be subject to the opposite bias if patients who remain in care are more likely to have their adverse events recorded by the health system. Notwithstanding these limitations, the results of our study and other interview-based studies suggests that concern over adverse events may present a challenge to IPT completion, and therefore, active monitoring of adverse events is important for supporting adherence.
Our observation that family function, as measured by the Family APGAR, was associated with IPT completion suggests that the family environment influences adherence behaviors. This finding is consistent with studies from other disease areas, which have found that the family function is associated with adherence to chronic disease treatments in children (27). Family support has also been shown to be associated with adherence to treatment for TB disease in adults (28). While the mechanisms may be similar, it is unknown how exactly the family environment affects IPT completion in child contacts, and future studies could help increase understanding in this area. This knowledge is important for developing strategies to support IPT adherence in households with challenging family environments.
Our study is subject to several limitation. Because the interviews were administered retrospectively, responses could have been affected by incomplete recall or recall bias. However, were able to verify some of the information, such as IPT completion and the occurrence of adverse events, from medical records. Also, because of the timing of the survey, the knowledge and perceptions reported during the survey may not reflect the situation while the children were taking IPT, so it is difficult to interpret potential mechanisms of causality based on observed associations. Social desirability bias could have made caregivers reluctant to express negative opinions about the importance of IPT or satisfaction with health services. We attempted to mitigate this risk by administering the surveys in participants’ homes rather than at health facilities, ensuring confidentiality of responses, and training the survey administrators to ask questions in a standardized manner. Finally, the exclusion of children whose families had moved could represent a source of bias, although these families represented a small percentage of the total.