The Preoperative and the Postoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Both Predict Prognosis in Gastric Cancer Patients

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-51658/v1

Abstract

Background: Both the preoperative and postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been proposed to predict the long-term prognosis in some cancers, including gastric cancer. The present study investigated the prognostic impact of postoperative NLR, and its preoperative to postoperative changes, in patients with gastric cancer.

Methods: From 2009 to 2012, 1,612 consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The optimal cut-off value for the postoperative 6-month NLR was 1.7, as determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Patients were categorized into low- and high-NLR groups based on their postoperative NLR. Four additional groups (low to low, low to high, high to low, and high to high groups) were defined based on the preoperative to postoperative change in the NLR.

Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the low- and high-NLR group were 90.7% and 83.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The differences in OS were significant in stage I and stage III gastric cancer patients. (P = 0.000 and 0.012, respectively). Postoperative NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.611; P = 0.005). The high to high NLR change was a significant predictor of OS (HR = 1.914; P = 0.001).

Conclusions: High preoperative and postoperative NLRs, and especially the persistent elevation of preoperative to postoperative NLR, were significant prognostic factors for OS in patients with gastric cancer. 

Introduction

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in men, and the fifth leading cause in women [1]. Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection remains the mainstay treatment for gastric cancer [2] but the prognosis differs among patients. This has led to increased interest in individualized therapy based on the specific characteristics of the tumor. The only reliable prognostic indicator at present is the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage; however, as patients with the same tumor stage have a heterogeneous prognosis, additional reliable prognostic factors are needed. Accurate prognostic indicators would improve the early management of gastric cancer patients, especially those with a poor prognosis.

Experimental studies have suggested that systemic inflammatory responses play a crucial role in promoting cancer, via pro-inflammatory molecules produced by innate immune cells. There is increasing evidence that the local immune response and systemic inflammation support tumor progression in patients with established cancer, adversely affecting their survival [3]. Recent investigations have shown a significant relationship between postoperative inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and poor survival in patients with various cancers [411]. However, a few studies have examined the association between markers of postoperative inflammation, especially the NLR, and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer [5, 911]. Instead, most studies have focused on preoperative measures [1218]. Therefore, in this study, we examined the clinical utility of postoperative NLR, and its preoperative to postoperative changes, as prognostic indicators of gastric cancer.

Patients And Methods

Prospectively collected data on 1,943 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital between 2009 and 2012 were reviewed. Of these patients, 1,612 who underwent curative-intent surgery for gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: remnant gastric cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous and metachronous malignancies, emergency surgery, liver cirrhosis, evidence of a severe inflammatory condition, coexisting hematological malignancies or disorders, autoimmune disorders and recent steroid therapy, and incomplete/inaccurate medical records. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study (KC17RESI0108).

Blood sample analysis

Blood samples were obtained 6 months postoperatively for determination of the white blood cell, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts.

Determination of the optimum NLR cut-offs

The NLR was defined as the neutrophil count divided by the lymphocyte count. Based on overall survival (OS) as an end point, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the postoperative 6-month NLR was 0.563. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off values of the NLR for OS were 44.0% and 73.3%, respectively (Fig. 1). The cut-off values for preoperative and postoperative 6-month NLR were 2.0 [12] and 1.7, respectively. Patients with an NLR above the cut-off value were assigned to the high-NLR (HNLR) group, and the others were assigned to the low-NLR (LNLR) group. In addition, the patients were categorized into four groups based on the preoperative to postoperative change in the NLR: low to low (LL), low to high (LH), high to low (HL), and high to high (HH) groups.

Statistical analysis

ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR with respect to OS, and the Youden index was estimated to determine the optimal NLR cut-off values. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to estimate OS and disease-free survival (DFS). The groups were compared in terms of survival using the log-rank test. A Cox regression model was used to identify variables influencing OS and DFS. Then multivariate analyses were performed including all variables showing significant independent relationships with OS and DFS. In all analyses, P < 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. Pairwise deletion was used for missing data. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics

The 1,612 patients enrolled in the study had a mean age of 59.0 years old (SD: 11.9) and 1,058 (65.6%) were male. The open approach method was used in 59.2% cases. Overall, 1,225 patients (76.0%) underwent partial gastrectomy, and most of the patients (n = 1,110; 68.9%) presented with stage I disease. There were 836 patients (51.9%) with undifferentiated type cancer.

Relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and the inflammation-based score

Based on OS as the end point, there were 875 LNLR and 352 HNLR patients. Older age, male sex, and differentiated cancer were significantly associated with a HNLR (Table 1).

Table 1

Associations of patient characteristics with the postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)

Factors

NLR

P value

LNLR

n = 875(%)

HNLR

n = 352(%)

Age in years, (mean ± SD)

57.5 ± 11.7

60.8 ± 11.7

< 0.001

Gender

   

0.021

Male

606 (69.3)

250(71.0)

 

Female

314 (35.9)

102 (29.0)

Approach method

   

0.636

Open

546 (62.4)

217 (61.7)

 

Laparoscopy

310 (35.4)

120 (36.9)

Robot

Extent of resection

19 (2.2)

5 (1.4)

0.173

Partial gastrectomy

646 (73.8)

273 (77.6)

 

Total gastrectomy

229 (26.2)

79 (22.4)

Histologic type

   

0.002

Differentiated

388 (44.3)

190 (54.0)

 

Undifferentiated

487 (55.7)

162 (46.0)

Depth of invasion*

   

0.428

T1

544 (62.2)

219 (62.2)

 

T2

87 (9.9)

45 (12.8)

T3

119 (13.6)

41 (11.7)

T4

125 (14.3)

47 (13.3)

Node status*

   

0.141

N0

588 (67.2)

241 (68.5)

 

N1

119 (13.6)

35 (9.9)

N2

89 (10.2)

33 (9.4)

N3

79 (9.0)

43 (12.2)

Stage*

   

0.282

I

567 (64.8)

237 (67.3)

 

II

157 (17.9)

50 (14.2)

III

151 (17.3)

65 (18.5)

*According to the AJCC TNM classification, 7th edition.
SD, standard deviation.

Prognostic factors for OS and DFS

The OS of the HNLR group was significantly lower than that of the LNLR group (Fig. 2a) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, older age, greater depth of invasion, and higher node status were significant independent risk factors for poorer OS. Preoperative HNLR, postoperative HNLR, and change in HH NLR were significant independent risk factors for poorer OS after adjusting the inflammatory markers for age, approach method, extent of resection, depth of invasion, node status, and stage (Table 2) (P = 0.012, 0.005, and 0.001, respectively). Older age, higher node status, and advanced stage were significant independent risk factors in terms of DFS. Preoperative HNLR, postoperative HNLR, and HH NLR change were not significant risk factors for DFS after adjusting the inflammatory markers for age, approach method, extent of resection, depth of invasion, node status, and stage (Table 3) (P = 0.067, 0.256, and 0.050, respectively).

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors predicting overall survival

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR(95% CI)

P value

Adjusted HR†(95% CI)

P value

Preoperative NLR

       

LNLR (NLR < 2)

Reference

 

Reference

 

HNLR (NLR ≥ 2)

1.719 (1.306–2.262)

0.000

1.431 (1.083–1.891)

0.012

Postoperative NLR

       

LNLR (NLR < 1.7)

Reference

 

Reference

 

HNLR (NLR ≥ 1.7)

1.946 (1.410–2.686)

0.000

1.611 (1.156–2.245)

0.005

NLR change

       

LL

(preoperative NLR < 2, postoperative NLR < 1.7)

Referenc

 

Reference

 

LH

(preoperative NLR < 2, postoperative NLR ≥ 1.7)

1.403 (0.791–2.490)

0.247

1.182 (0.661–2.112)

0.573

HL

(preoperative NLR ≥ 2, postoperative NLR < 1.7)

1.370 (0.894-2.100)

0.148

1.114 (0.720–1.722)

0.628

HH

(preoperative NLR ≥ 2, postoperative NLR ≥ 1.7)

2.600 (1.763–3.834)

< 0.001

1.914 (1.288–2.843)

0.001

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; LNLR, low NLR; HNLR, high NLR.
*According to the AJCC TNM classification, 7th edition.
†Adjusted for age, approach method, extent of resection, depth of invasion, node status, and stage

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors predicting disease-free survival

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR(95% CI)

P value

Adjusted HR(95% CI)

P value

Preoperative NLR

       

LNLR (NLR < 2)

Reference

 

Reference

 

HNLR (NLR ≥ 2)

1.829 (1.337–2.503)

0.000

1.347 (0.979–1.854)

0.067

Postoperative NLR

       

LNLR (NLR < 1.7)

Reference

 

Reference

 

HNLR (NLR ≥ 1.7)

1.224 (0.853–1.757)

0.273

1.239 (0.856–1.793)

0.256

NLR change

       

LL

(preoperative NLR < 2, postoperative NLR < 1.7)

Reference

 

Reference

 

LH

(preoperative NLR < 2, postoperative NLR ≥ 1.7)

0.795 (0.377–1.676)

0.546

0.860 (0.405–1.828)

0.696

HL

(preoperative NLR ≥ 2, postoperative NLR < 1.7)

1.806 (1.201–2.715)

0.005

1.236 (0.815–1.873)

0.319

HH

(preoperative NLR ≥ 2, postoperative NLR ≥ 1.7)

1.955 (1.269–3.011)

0.002

1.549 (1.000-2.400)

0.050

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; low NLR; HNLR, high NLR; LL, low to low; LH, low to high; HL, high to low; HH, high to high.
* According to the AJCC TNM classification, 7th edition.
† Adjusted for age, approach method, extent of resection, depth of invasion, node status, and stage.

Overall survival stratified by tumor stage

When the OS of the patients were stratified according to tumor stage, HNLR was significantly associated with poor prognosis in stage I and III but not in stage II disease (Fig. 2b, c, d). The 5-year OS rates of the NLR changes were significantly different in all stages (Table 4).

Table 4

Five-year overall survival based on tumor stage and the postoperative NLR

 

Stage I

Stage II

Stage III

number

5-YSR (%)

number

5-YSR

(%)

number

5-YSR

(%)

NLR

           

LNLR

875

97.5

567

88.5

157

67.6

HNLR

352

92.0

237

82.0

50

50.8

P value

 

0.000

 

0.241

 

0.006

NLR change

           

LL

(preoperative NLR < 2, postoperative NLR < 1.7)

416

97.1

87

85.1

80

73.8

LH

(preoperative NLR < 2, postoperative NLR ≥ 1.7)

93

93.6

14

100.0

16

56.3

HL

(preoperative NLR ≥ 2, postoperative NLR < 1.7)

150

98.7

68

92.7

71

60.6

HH

(preoperative NLR ≥ 2, postoperative NLR ≥ 1.7)

144

91.0

36

75.0

49

49.0

P value

 

0.002

 

0.034

 

0.011

5-YSR, 5-year survival rate; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; low NLR; HNLR, high NLR; LL, low to low; LH, low to high; HL, high to low; HH, high to high.

Discussion

This study examined the associations of postoperative NLR, and its preoperative to postoperative changes, with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients, as well as the clinical utility of these measurements. The results showed that postoperative NLR and changes in NLR are independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with gastric cancer.

Increasing evidence supports an association between cancer and inflammation [19]. In particular, inflammatory processes contribute to cancer initiation, promotion, progression, and invasion [20]. In addition, inflammation is one of the seven main characteristics of cancer [21]. However, the precise mechanism underlying the association between increased NLR and poor long-term outcome in cancer patients is unclear. As NLR depends on two factors (neutrophil and lymphocyte counts), a high NLR may contribute to postoperative prognosis through the following possible mechanism. First, tumor-associated neutrophils may play a role in cancer progression by releasing factors that modulate the extracellular matrix and inflammation in the tumor microenvironment [22]. In particular, they play important roles during the initial angiogenic process in experimental tumor models [23]. Second, lymphocytes are the immune cells most responsible for the body’s protective effector immune response and antitumor response. That is, a decrease in circulating lymphocytes indicates a reduction of immune surveillance, thus enabling tumor growth [24]. The results of our clinical study support previous basic research in the same area.

The main strength of this study was its use of reliable NLR cut-off values, based on a large pool of data for gastric cancer patients. In addition, because a complete blood count is routinely obtained in all cancer patients during follow-up, evaluation of the prognosis of these patients required no additional effort. Thus, our method based on measurements of a systemic inflammatory parameter is a simple, cost-effective, and reproducible technique for assessing the survival of gastric cancer patients. Although the present study had a similar setting to a previous study of preoperative NLR [12], our analysis focused on postoperative NLR and dynamic changes in NLR. It is useful to evaluate the postoperative NLR because it may reflect residual host immune activity [25]. The postoperative systemic inflammatory state plays an important role in preventing tumor recurrence. That is, a postoperative increase in NLR indicates a pro-tumor inflammatory response of the host, whereas a postoperative decrease shows an anti-tumor immune response of the host [6]. For clinicians, therapeutic decision-making during the routine follow-up of high-risk patients after surgery is challenging, where early intervention is crucial to prevent recurrence. In clinical fields, tumor markers such as CEA, CA 19 − 9, and CA 72 − 4 are widely evaluated as laboratory follow-up tools. However, there are certain limitations to using these markers to detect recurrence and predict survival after surgery, because these markers have low sensitivity. Marrelli et al. reported sensitivities of 44% for CEA, 56% for CA 19 − 9, and 51% for CA72-4 in patients with recurrence [26]. However, the use of postoperative NLR and changes in NLR combined with existing tumor makers may provide a novel postoperative risk stratification tumor marker model. In our study, although preoperative and postoperative NLR were not shown to be significant risk factors for recurrence, HH NLR was suggested to be associated with recurrence (P = 0.050).

The prognostic role of preoperative inflammatory markers has been well studied in gastric cancer patients [1218]. However, the prognostic role of postoperative NLR in such patients has attracted less research attention [5, 911]. Some researchers have evaluated the prognosis based on the simple postoperative value [5, 11], while others have evaluated it according to preoperative to postoperative changes in NLR [9, 10]. The prognostic importance of this change reflects a dynamic change in the balance between host inflammatory and immune responses rather than the simple preoperative or postoperative NLRs. In Korea, a few studies have examined the associations between postoperative inflammatory markers, especially the NLR, and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Kim et al. suggested that postoperative NLR predicts long-term recurrence after gastric cancer surgery. However, they used the postoperative day 3 NLR value and did not examine the dynamic change from preoperative to postoperative NLR, unlike our study [5]. Min et al. studied changes in NLR, similar to our study, but they divided the patients into two groups, i.e., negative and positive groups, according to the difference between preoperative and postoperative values. In addition, the postoperative NLR evaluation was performed at 3 to 6 month after surgery [10]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the prognostic value of both the postoperative NLR and NLR change in Korean gastric cancer patients. Another strength of our study was that these two prognostic indicators were identified using the same data.

Despite its strengths, our study also had some limitations. First, we performed retrospective analysis of data collected from a single institution.. Second, there was some bias because pairwise deletion was used for missing data. Therefore, some difference between the number of enrolled patients and sum of each group numbers was presented. Third, we did not evaluate changes in CRP, a representative inflammatory marker, together with those in the NLR, because CRP was not routinely measured during our daily follow-up practice. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the significance of our postoperative risk stratification model including NLR and other inflammatory markers, including CRP, and long-term outcomes. Fourth, our study only demonstrated the postoperative 6-month NLR after surgery due to its retrospective nature. There is no consensus regarding the appropriate timing for measurement of postoperative inflammatory markers as prognostic predictors, with time points to check postoperative NLR ranging from 3 days to 6 months in previous gastric cancer studies [5, 9, 10]. Surgery is a major event that induces an acute inflammatory response [27]. The acute inflammatory reaction caused by surgery resolves within a short time, and its effects on the tumor disappear completely by several months postoperatively. Although there have been no reports regarding the exact time when inflammation due to the surgical wound healing process ceases, several groups have suggested that 1 month postoperatively is an appropriate check-up point [29, 29]. Further studies are required to determine the optimal check-up time point for reflecting postoperative NLR as a prognostic predictor in gastric cancer patients.

Conclusion

Preoperative NLR, postoperative NLR, and changes in NLR were significant prognostic factors for OS in patients with gastric cancer. Patients with high preoperative and postoperative NLR, and especially with persistent elevation of preoperative to postoperative NLR, had poor prognosis with regard to OS. Based on these results, we suggest that the NLR should be included in the routine postoperative assessment of patients with gastric cancer. The identification of high-risk patients will allow early interventions that may reduce the risk of recurrence and improve oncological outcomes.

Declarations

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

Access to the database may be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Statistical consultation was supported by the Department of Biostatistics of the Catholic Research Coordinating Center. The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see:

http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/3FCXv5

FUNDING

None

Contributions

Eun Young Kim and Kyo Young Song designed the research; Eun Young Kim and Kyo Young Song performed the research; Eun Young Kim and Kyo Young Song analyzed the data; Eun Young Kim and Kyo Young Song wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Kyo Young Song

ETHICS DECLARATIONS

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Human Experimentation Committee of our institution (ethical approval number: KC17RESI0108).

Consent for publication

We simply extracted data and did not involve the private information of patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclosure:

The authors received no commercial, financial, or material support for this study.

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A: Global cancer statistics, 2012.CA Cancer J Clin 2015, 65:87-108.
  2. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).Gastric Cancer 2017, 20:1-19.
  3. Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, Clarke SJ: Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness.Lancet Oncol 2014, 15:e493-503.
  4. Kang M, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Ku JH: The Prognostic Significance of the Early Postoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Undergoing Radical Cystectomy.Ann Surg Oncol 2016, 23:335-342.
  5. Kim YH, Choi WJ: The effectiveness of postoperative neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio in predicting long-term recurrence after stomach cancer surgery.J Korean Surg Soc 2012, 83:352-359.
  6. Dan J, Zhang Y, Peng Z, Huang J, Gao H, Xu L, Chen M: Postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio change predicts survival of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radiofrequency ablation.PLoS One 2013, 8:e58184.
  7. Li C, Wen TF, Yan LN, Li B, Wang WT, Yang JY, Xu MQ: Postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio plus platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma.J Surg Res 2015, 198:73-79.
  8. Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, Gondo T, Hatano T, Tachibana M: Followup of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and recurrence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.J Urol 2012, 187:411-417.
  9. Miyatani K, Saito H, Kono Y, Murakami Y, Kuroda H, Matsunaga T, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, Ashida K, Fujiwara Y: Combined analysis of the pre- and postoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts the outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.Surg Today 2018, 48:300-307.
  10. Min KW, Kwon MJ, Kim DH, Son BK, Kim EK, Oh YH, Wi YC: Persistent elevation of postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A better predictor of survival in gastric cancer than elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.Sci Rep 2017, 7:13967.
  11. Tanaka H, Tamura T, Toyokawa T, Muguruma K, Miki Y, Kubo N, Sakurai K, Hirakawa K, Ohira M: Clinical Relevance of Postoperative Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) to Recurrence After Adjuvant Chemotherapy of S-1 for Gastric Cancer.Anticancer Res 2018, 38:3745-3751.
  12. Kim EY, Lee JW, Yoo HM, Park CH, Song KY: The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Versus Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: Which is Better as a Prognostic Factor in Gastric Cancer?Ann Surg Oncol 2015, 22:4363-4370.
  13. Lin JX, Wang ZK, Huang YQ, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Chen QY, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, et al: Dynamic Changes in Pre- and Postoperative Levels of Inflammatory Markers and Their Effects on the Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer. 2020.
  14. Miyamoto R, Inagawa S, Sano N, Tadano S, Adachi S, Yamamoto M: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts short-term and long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients.Eur J Surg Oncol 2018, 44:607-612.
  15. Yu L, Lv CY, Yuan AH, Chen W, Wu AW: Significance of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.World J Gastroenterol 2015, 21:6280-6286.
  16. Graziosi L, Marino E, De Angelis V, Rebonato A, Cavazzoni E, Donini A: Prognostic value of preoperative neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio in patients resected for gastric cancer.Am J Surg 2015, 209:333-337.
  17. Zhou D, Wu Y, Zhu Y, Lin Z, Yu D, Zhang T: The Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Monocyte-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Metastatic Gastric Cancer Treated with Systemic Chemotherapy.J Cancer 2020, 11:4205-4212.
  18. Hirahara T, Arigami T: Combined neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy response and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. 2019, 19:672.
  19. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F: Cancer-related inflammation.Nature 2008, 454:436-444.
  20. Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M: Immunity, inflammation, and cancer.Cell 2010, 140:883-899.
  21. Coussens LM WZ: Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002, 420:860-867.
  22. Powell DR, Huttenlocher A: Neutrophils in the Tumor Microenvironment.Trends Immunol 2016, 37:41-52.
  23. De Palma M, Biziato D, Petrova TV: Microenvironmental regulation of tumour angiogenesis.Nat Rev Cancer 2017, 17:457-474.
  24. Gonzalez H, Hagerling C, Werb Z: Roles of the immune system in cancer: from tumor initiation to metastatic progression. 2018, 32:1267-1284.
  25. Jang WS, Cho KS, Kim MS, Yoon CY, Kang DH, Kang YJ, Jeong WS, Ham WS, Choi YD: The prognostic significance of postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.Oncotarget 2017, 8:11778-11787.
  26. Marrelli D, Pinto E, De Stefano A, Farnetani M, Garosi L, Roviello F: Clinical utility of CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 in the follow-up of patients with resectable gastric cancer.Am J Surg 2001, 181:16-19.
  27. Dabrowska AM, Slotwinski R: The immune response to surgery and infection.Cent Eur J Immunol 2014, 39:532-537.
  28. Josa V, Krzystanek M, Eklund AC, Salamon F, Zarand A, Szallasi Z, Baranyai Z: Relationship of postoperative thrombocytosis and survival of patients with colorectal cancer.Int J Surg 2015, 18:1-6.
  29. Jin F, Han A, Shi F, Kong L, Yu J: The postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and changes in this ratio predict survival after the complete resection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.Onco Targets Ther 2016, 9:6529-6537.