Critique of methods
Our laboratory has induced experimental diabetes in previous studies by STZ injection at doses between 32-45 mg/kg so far (32 mg/kg i.v., (Onay-Besikci et al., 2007); 35 mg/kg i.v., (Hafez et al., 2014); 35 mg/kg i.v., (Gonulalan et al., 2012); 38 mg/kg i.p., (Arioglu-Inan et al., 2013); 40mg/kg i.v., (Ozakca et al., 2007); 40 mg/kg i.p., (Kayki-Mutlu et al., 2019); 45 mg/kg i.v., (Kayki-Mutlu et al., 2014)). Despite higher doses in many published studies (Arioglu Inan et al., 2018), we preferred to use low doses of STZ because we observed a greater mortality rate with higher doses. Besides, in all of our previous studies, we have confirmed the severity of diabetic status regarding metabolic parameters such as blood glucose level or body weight. Furthermore, β-AR mediated contractility of isolated papillary muscle was also markedly impaired at a STZ dose of 38 mg/kg (Arioglu-Inan et al., 2013). Supporting our results, it has been stated that 40 mg/kg dose of STZ induced a diabetic status with little mortality (Mostafavinia et al., 2016). In the current study, to induce diabetes, we injected the rats with 40 mg/kg STZ, which caused a major increase in blood glucose; however, this was not associated with the severe cardiac impairment that is normally seen in the STZ diabetic rat model.
We used crushed tablets for the treatment with EMPA, and the reduced blood glucose levels confirm that this resulted in efficacious delivery of the treatment. While we cannot exclude that excipients have contributed to that, we consider this unlikely. In a previous study crushed dapagliflozin tablets had also effectively decreased blood glucose (Yesilyurt et al., 2019). As we discussed also in that study, using tablets may enhance the translational value of the study as it better mimicks the clinical condition.
Some studies have reported that the effects of EMPA differ depending on the selected dose (Oelze et al., 2014, Steven et al., 2017, Zhou and Wu, 2017). The current study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of low-dose of EMPA (10 mg/kg) on cardiac function in an STZ-induced diabetes rat model to inform the design of a future study. This dose was consistently found to be effective on blood glucose, whereas only higher doses were effective on some echocardiographic parameters such as LAD (left atrial diameter), IVST (interventricular septum), LVPWT (left ventricular posterior wall) in another study (Shao et al., 2019). We had chosen the low dose as some previous studies have indicated that even the low dose of the drug is effective although both low and high doses of EMPA have been used in several studies in rats (Steven et al., 2017, Zhou and Wu, 2017, Shao et al., 2019). For instance, Zhou and Wu have reported that treatment with EMPA for 8 weeks reversed the deterioration of cardiac parameters in high-fat diet/low dose STZ-injected diabetic rats, even at the low dose of drug also used in that study. Nonetheless, blood glucose lowering activity and improvement in the cardiac function were more prominent in rats treated with high dose EMPA (Zhou and Wu, 2017). Moreover, presenting both diabetes and hypertension, Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats (CRDH) had improved left ventricle mass and systolic dilatation after 11-week of low dose EMPA treatment (Younis et al., 2018). However, we did not observe a beneficial effect of low dose EMPA on cardiac function in STZ diabetic rats.
Another reason for the lack of a remarkable difference between the groups may be the sample size. When we designed the study, we had set seven rats each for control groups, nine and eleven rats for diabetic and EMPA treated diabetic rats, respectively. However, more rats died than expected and we started the experiments with fewer animals than planned. In addition, we were unable to obtain data for some of the rats in both in vivo and in vitro studies. Especially, the sample size for control group in the papillary muscle experiments was so small which may have affected the results.
In vivo cardiac function
The relationship between diabetes and cardiovascular disease is well known (Kannel and McGee, 1979). Changes in the left ventricular (LV) structure and function are the prominent features of the diabetic heart. Although impaired diastolic function is an earlier finding of the diabetic heart, systolic dysfunction may also accompany in the later stages (Bugger and Abel, 2014). Many studies have demonstrated that diastolic and systolic function is disrupted in the experimental diabetes (Connelly et al., 2007, Kim et al., 2010, Arioglu-Inan et al., 2013). Left ventricular catheterization is a robust method to determine diastolic and systolic function. Analysing parameters such as EDP/EDV, -dp/dt or Tau values by left ventricle catheterization gives an idea on in vivo diastolic function of the animal. In the present study, we found that both –dp/dt and Tau value were impaired in the diabetic rats whereas no significant alteration was observed in EDP or EDV. Our finding is in line with the previous studies (Radovits et al., 2009, Arioglu-Inan et al., 2013). On the other hand, 8-week low dose EMPA treatment slightly increased and decreased –dp/dt and Tau, respectively. Nonetheless, it did not restore diastolic parameters significantly. Our results are not consistent with the ones of Hammoudi et al.; as they presented improved diastolic parameters such as Tau and EDPVR in leptin deficient ob/ob mice by EMPA treatment (Hammoudi et al., 2017). Similarly, Zhou and Wu have also found that both low dose (10 mg/kg/day) and high dose (30 mg/kg/day) EMPA corrected rate of relaxation and left ventricular end diastolic pressure in high fat fed and STZ injected rats (2017). The dose of EMPA was same in all studies with similar treatment periods. Thus, one possible explanation for the discrepency between ours and the other two studies may be the diabetes model as they used a model mimicking type 2 diabetes and we used STZ diabetic rats resembling type 1 diabetes.
The parameters on systolic function such as +dp/dt and ESP were reduced in the diabetic rats. The major indicator of the systolic function, EF was not altered in diabetic rats in the present study. However, in such cases as diastolic dysfunction, EF may be preserved despite impaired systolic parameters. Supporting our data, it has been indicated that diastolic function was deteriorated whereas EF was preserved in diabetic rats (Connelly et al., 2007). The effect of EMPA on systolic parameters were similar with the ones of diastolic function. It slightly increased ESP and +dp/dt in the diabetic rats. Similar to our findings, EMPA did not affect systolic parameters in leptin deficient ob/ob mice (Hammoudi et al., 2017) and db/db mice (Habibi et al., 2017). On the other hand, Zhou and Wu have showed that EMPA treatment at low and high doses improved LVSP and +dp/dt in high fat fed and STZ injected rats (2017). The fact that EMPA treatment did not alter systolic parameters in three different diabetes model may implicate that the drug is not effective on the systolic function in the diabetic heart in the first place. However, conflicting results between these three studies and the one by Zhou and Wu (2017) remain to be clarified.
Interestingly, EMPA exerts cardiac beneficial effect not only in the chronic treatment but also after acute administration. Pabel et al. tested the acute effect of the drug on cardiac contractility in BKS.Cg-Dock7m +/+ Leprdb/J mice. EMPA significantly reduced excessive diastolic tension by almost 19.1%, although it did not alter systolic force. Furthermore, intravenous injection of EMPA (25 mg/kg) resulted in shortened isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) and increased the peak early and late diastolic filling velocities (the E/A ratio) in Zucker diabetic fatty rats (Pabel et al., 2018). However, no alteration was observed in EF in these rats. Of note, the positive effects of EMPA is not limited to diabetes. Even though it did not affect systolic function, acute EMPA administration markedly reduced diastolic tension in nondiabetic mice. Besides, the diastolic tension was decreased in human trabeculae with heart failure in the presence of increasing concentrations of the drug (Pabel et al., 2018). Actually, the efficacy of EMPA in nondiabetic conditions has been also reported in other studies. EMPA treatment has been found to improve cardiac function in nondiabetic rats with MI (Yurista et al., 2019). Similarly, load independent parameters of cardiac contractility such as ESPVR and PRSW were ameliorated by EMPA in post MI rats (Connelly et al., 2020). Lee et al. have demonstrated that cardiac fibrosis was reduced after EMPA treatment in high fat fed spontaneous hypertensive rats (2019a). These data implicate a salutary effect independent of glucose excretion.
The beneficial effects of EMPA on cardiac function have been attributed to various mechanisms. One of them is the impact on Ca++ regulation. Activity of SERCA2a and suppressing effect of phospholamban (PLN) on SERCA2a is essential for relaxation and thereby contraction in the healthy heart (Koss and Kranias, 1996). Diastolic dysfunction has been often correlated with reduced activity of SERCA2a and SERCA2a/PLN ratio. Actually, this ratio was found to be increased after EMPA treatment in leptin deficient ob/ob diabetic mice (Hammoudi et al., 2017). In this study, improved diastolic function in the treated group was attributed to this effect. On the contrary, SERCA2a or PLN phosphorylation was not altered after EMPA treatment in post MI rats despite an improved contractility (Connelly et al., 2020). Mustroph et al. have indicated that the cardiac effect of EMPA is associated with reduced CaMKII activity. 24-hour EMPA exposure decreased CaMKII activity both in wild type and failing murine cardiomyocytes. It also attenuated CaMKII dependent RyR2 phosphorylation both in murine and human failing ventricular cardiomyoctes. Thus, EMPA ameliorated cardiac contraction by decreasing SR Ca++ leak (Mustroph et al., 2018). Another possible mechanism was suggested by Baartscheer et al. They have demonstrated that EMPA reduced cytoplasmic Na+ and Ca++ levels, and increased mitochondrial Ca++ levels through inhibiting Na+/H+ exchanger activity in cardiomyocytes (Baartscheer et al., 2017). Regarding their results, Mustroph et al. determined Na+ and diastolic Ca++ to explain reduced CaMKII activation due to EMPA exposure. In fact, cytosolic [Na+]i and diastolic [Ca++]i were decreased in the presence of the drug (2018).
There are many other hypotheses about the pleiotropic effects of EMPA. For instance, natriuretic or osmotic diuretic effect may have contributed to decreasing both cardiac preload and afterload (Lytvyn et al., 2017). Modulation on myocardial energy metabolism is another idea which has been related with EMPA (Ferrannini et al., 2016). However, more studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms of cardiac effects of EMPA. Unfortunately, we were unable to investigate the role of the drug on the underlying mechanisms or signaling pathways in this current study.
β-Adrenoceptor mediated responses
The second aim of the present study was to determine the possible effect of low dose EMPA on β-AR mediated contraction. We did not observe any effect on isoprenaline induced contractile response in the EMPA treated group. Maximum response to isoprenaline was similar in diabetic and EMPA treated diabetic rats. On the other hand, it may be inaccurate to evaluate the efficacy of the drug in the current study as the contractility was not markedly deteriorated in the diabetic state as we discussed in the “critique of methods” section, this may have resulted from the lack of a severe diabetic status. We are aware that the reduced β-AR responsiveness is a well-known characteristic of the diabetic rat heart (Dincer et al., 1998, Jiang et al., 2015). Positive inotropic and chronotropic effects by β-AR agonist stimulation have been reported to be markedly attenuated in diabetic animal models (Ramanadham and Tenner, 1987, Dincer et al., 1998, Jiang et al., 2015).
We have also demonstrated that isoprenaline induced contraction of isolated papillary muscle was reduced in STZ diabetic rats (Arioglu-Inan et al., 2013). Furthermore, in that study, we have found that reduced contraction was accompanied by decreased expression of β1-AR mRNA. Decreased expression of β-ARs due to diabetes has been reported in several studies (Dincer et al., 2001, Haley et al., 2015, Jiang et al., 2015, Okatan et al., 2015). Since we exclusively aimed to test the efficacy of low dose EMPA in the current study, we did not conduct further experiments on signaling pathway (mRNA, protein etc.) of β-AR mediated contractility. Therefore, we have no idea how receptors, second messengers or components in the Ca++ homeostasis were affected by low dose EMPA treatment. Thus, we need to investigate the effect of EMPA on β-adrenergic responsiveness by using a higher dose of EMPA in a severe diabetic condition.