Study setting
Tigray is one of the nine Regional States of Ethiopia with an estimated 5.3 million population (21). There are 712 health posts, 214 health centers and 38 hospitals (1 specialized hospital, 15 general hospitals, 22 primary hospitals) in the region. The study was conducted in 21 health facilities (five hospitals and 16 health centers) in two zones of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. The two study Zones (Eastern and Mekelle) harbor an estimated 2 million people (21). During the data collection period almost all health facilities were providing directly observed short-course tuberculosis treatment by trained health workers (TB focal persons). The program was introduced in all hospitals, health centers and in most of the health posts (21).
Diagnosis and treatment of all forms of TB across Ethiopia has been based on the national TB control guidelines that specify case definitions, diagnostic and treatment standards (18). Thus all TB cases enrolled for this study were diagnosed using Genexpert, sputum smear microcopy or clinical signs aided with x-ray (18). The treatment regimens for all new adult cases of TB were treated with combination of Ethambutol(E), Rifampicin(R), Isoniazid(H) and pyrazinamide(Z) for the first two months (2ERHZ) followed by Rifampicin(R) and Isoniazid (H) combinations for the remaining six months (4RH) (18).
Study design, aim and period
A follow-up study with the aim of investigating the effect delayed treatment initiation of PTB on treatment outcome was conducted from October 2018 to April 2020 in 21 health facilities (five hospitals and 16 health centers) in Eastern and Mekelle zones of Tigray Regional State of Ethiopia that harbor an estimated 2 million people.
Reference population
All newly diagnosed PTB patients and initiated treatment in all health facilities in Tigray Regional State of Ethiopia.
Study population
All newly diagnosed PTB cases who initiated treatment from October 2018 to April 2020 in the 21 health facilities selected for the current study.
Inclusion criteria
All newly diagnosed PTB patients whose age is 18 years or more, with no previous treatment history of TB, were eligible for the study. All Patients who were diagnosed and initiated treatment within the study settings but moved to another place inside the study area were eligible. However; patients diagnosed and started treatment out of the study area but transferred in to the study area were not eligible.
Sample size and sampling technique
The sample size was computed using StatCalc program of Epi-Info at 95% significance level, 80% power, considering design effect of 1.5. This is assuming that a unit change in time to initiate PTB treatment results in increment of risk of unsuccessful treatment outcome by 2.02 (risk ratio) and 5.8% of the patients with unsuccessful treatment outcome (22), the required sample size at the end of the follow-up was 489. However, the sample size for assessing predictors of delay computed using 95% significance level, 80% power, expected frequency of exposure (visit to non-DOTS center) among controls of 43% and odds ratio (OR) 1.63 (11) with design effect of 1.5 and 4% non-response rate; provided a total of 875 new cases. Hence, the same cases were followed for the outcome; the larger sample of 875 was taken the final sample size.
The total sample size was proportionally allocated to each health facility based on the average number of TB cases reported by the facility in the previous 2 years. List of eligible patients extracted from daily list of TB patient clinic in each facility was used as our sampling frame to select study participants allocated to that facility (8, 15). Each TB patient’s registration numbers of TB patients written on the TB registration book in clinical management was used in the random sampling process and the patients were recruited prospectively during treatment initiation. The number of patients selected from each health facility was obtained by dividing the number of study participants allocated to each of health facility to the total number of data collection time (one year).
Data collection
A structured questionnaire was used to collect the data which was adapted from tools used elsewhere (22–24) and standard TB register book (25). Besides, eligible cases were interviewed for socio-demographic, health care seeking, and lifestyle. The following data were also collected from the study participants:
Exposure and outcome data
The main exposure variable was delay to initiate treatment (total delay) measured by number of days elapsed between onsets of illness and time to initiation of anti-TB treatment. This delay was computed as a sum of patient and health system delay. The main outcome variable was treatment outcome which was ascertained based on standard definitions (26, 27). For the purpose of this paper this outcome was categorized as binary (favorable versus non-favorable outcome)
Treatment adherence data
was collected using a 10 points linear visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging from 0%= no single dose taken; to 100%= no single dose missed) at the end month of treatment, where patients were asked ‘How much of your prescribed TB medications have you taken until now in the course of your treatment?’ The VAS method was chosen because I) it can be used to assess TB treatment adherence for the whole duration of anti-tuberculosis treatment rather than at a specific time. II) VAS was used to assess adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment in another study conducted in the same study area, and was found to be accurate (29). Study participants with adherence level above 90% were considered as adherent based on the World Health Organization (WHO) adherence definition (30) and national guideline (27).
Clinical data
symptoms (respiratory symptoms, constitutional symptoms, or both), and the time duration from onset of symptom up to treatment initiation. Respiratory symptoms included dyspnea, hemoptysis, cough, or expectoration while constitutional symptoms included malaise, loss of appetite, weight loss, fatigue, fever, chills, chest pain or night sweats.
Laboratory investigation
Smear status of all study participants was determined. This was done during treatment initiation, 2nd and 6th month of treatment initiation. One spot sputum specimen (about 5 ml) was collected. Two direct smears were prepared from the specimens for Ziehl-Nielsen (Z-N) staining. The smear preparation and Ziehl-Nielsen (Z-N) staining were performed according to the standard operating procedure (25, 26).
Data quality and management
A total of 18 nurses with BSc degrees collected the data and 3 Senior BSc degree nurses supervised the field data collection process. These data collectors and supervisors were trained on the objectives of the study, the importance of the findings and on how to collect the data from study participants. The training also included description of questionnaire, interviewing techniques. Pretest was done at nearby health facilities not included in the study. The PI cross checked the interview for 10% of the study participants. Efforts were made to minimize recall bias by using local calendars listing main religious and national days to define the perceived date of onset of cough (TB symptoms) and time of first health seeking. The questionnaire was translated into regional language (Tigrigna) spoken by almost all residents in the study area.
Data analysis
Data was entered, cleaned and analyzed using SPSS software version 21 (29). The data were described using frequency, proportions, measures of location and dispersion (to calculate the mean and median. As total delay was not normally distributed; the data was transformed before analysis. During analysis delay was considered as continuous variable. Association between the exposure and outcome (unsuccessful vs successful) was determined by log binomial regression model. Accordingly, both simple and multiple log-binomial models were fitted to estimate crude and adjusted relative risk (RR) of the outcome variables. The goodness of fit of the model was assessed using Pearson chi-square and Deviance tests. In all the statistical tests, statistical significance was judged at p < 0.05.
Operational definitions
Total delay
is the time from the onset of TB symptoms to the first start of anti-TB treatment.
Treatment outcomes
were categorized into successful or favorable and unsuccessful or unfavorable treatment outcomes.
Successful treatment outcome
includes treatment completed with or without the evidence of cure.
Unsuccessful treatment outcome
includes treatment failure cases, patients who died and defaulted patients.
Cured
if he/she became smear or culture negative in the last month of treatment and on at least one previous occasion; including, a patient with a positive Xpert MTB/RIF test at baseline can be declared cured if a negative smear result is recorded at the end of treatment.
Treatment completed
if he/she completed treatment with resolution of symptoms (26).
Treatment failure
a patient, who becomes smear or culture positive at five months or later during treatment or harbors a multi-drug resistant (MDR) strain at any point of time during the treatment.
Died
a patient who died for any reason while he/she were on treatment for TB.
Defaulter
a defaulter is a patient who has been on treatment for at least four weeks (26).