Sample Selection
This study received approval from the Office of Human Research Ethics at the Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine (Ref: SH9H-2019-T350-1). Our research has been conducted in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
The Ninth People’s Hospital Department of Paediatric Dentistry has a prescribed methodology for VIPT, and every faculty member has been trained in standard operating procedure. The faculty were invited to submit consecutive VIPT cases treated by them, irrespective of outcome, during the period June 2014 to June 2016. The faculty members were asked to fill out the clinical records data with radiographic and other examination notes for submission; patient’s personal information was masked.
Each case that fulfilled the following criteria was included in the outcome analysis: (1) children in good general health with no systemic diseases and aged 7-12 at the time of treatment; (2) immature permanent teeth (stage 7-9 according to Nolla's criteria[22]) diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis with or without periapical pathology at the initial appointment; (3) the immature teeth were treated with VIPT and the final restoration placed; (4) patients were followed up for at least 12 months and their records were complete.
Data Extraction
Cases identified that met the inclusion criteria were assigned a research subject number, and data were extracted from their clinical record, and calibration exercises were blinded to the research purpose. Data collection was accomplished using a standardized electronic form, including history (patient’s sex, age, tooth number, Nolla's stage), etiology, preoperative signs and symptoms, presence or absence of periapical radiolucency (PARL), treatment, and follow-up periods. Details of the clinical procedure and any variation were also recorded, and the preoperative radiographs were checked for immature apices.
The final data set was exported to Excel and saved on a secure server for analysis. All radiographs related to study cases were collected and stored in a digital format on a secure server.
Clinical Protocol
The operators completed all the study procedures at the Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, China. The treatment was completed in two or three visits. At the first appointment, parallel periapical x-ray films were taken before the operation to examine the periapical tissue and root development. The protocol consisted of local anesthesia (lidocaine 2% without adrenaline), rubber dam isolation, gaining access to the pulp chamber, exploring the vital pulp tissue in the root canal with 25# K-file and recording the tissue’s depth, and irrigating with copious amounts of 2.5% NaOCl, 3% hydrogen peroxide solution, and 0.9% sterile saline solution (NS) without instrumentation (NS as last irrigation). After irrigating, the root canal was dried with sterile paper points, calcium hydroxide paste (Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China) was placed in the root canal, and the cavity was sealed with glass ionomer cement (GlasIonomer FX-II; Shofu Inc, Kyoto, Japan). Two weeks later, if clinical symptoms persisted, the initial treatment procedures were repeated. Otherwise, the tooth was isolated with a rubber dam for the next treatment. After local anesthesia and removal of the temporary restoration, the canal was irrigated with copious amounts of 2.5% NaOCl and 3% hydrogen peroxide solution and 0.9% NS (NS as last irrigation) and dried with sterile points. Calcium hydroxide paste or MTA (Pro-Root MTA White; Densply International, Inc, Konstanz, Germany) or i-Root BP Plus (Innovative BioCeramix Inc, Burnaby, Canada) was placed over the residual vital pulp tissue and covered by conventional glass ionomer cement and resin composite (Z350; 3M ESPE, St Paul, Minn., USA) were used to fill the access cavity. The patient was followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months, then at regular 6-month intervals after completion of VIPT. Follow-up included clinical assessment of pain or discomfort, swelling, sinus tract, mobility, and acquisition of a periapical radiograph.
Clinical Outcomes
Tooth survival and clinical success were evaluated as clinical outcomes [23]. Tooth survival was defined as the tooth’s remaining in the arch throughout the study period. While clinical success was defined as a tooth that survived and without any clinical assessment during the recall period [24].
Radiographic Outcomes and Analysis
Study investigators who were blinded to the research purpose evaluated the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The records included the presence or absence of PARL and root development changes (the changes in apical foramen width and root length). The changes in apical foramen width and root length were measured from the preoperative and postoperative images. The periapical X-ray films should be taken by the paralleling technique and standardization performed by using TurboReg (Biomedical Imaging Group, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland) [24], better than CBCT (cone-beam computed tomography) for the consideration of human ethics. For root length, the measurements were done on a straight line from the CEJ to the midpoint of the radiographic apex from both mesial and distal, while the apical diameter was measured as a straight line across the radiographic apical foramen. Then the results were measured by using NIH Image J (version 1.41; National Institutes of Health, USA). We present the data as percentage change from preoperative values rather than the actual millimetric data to eliminate one potential source of systematic error in the overall analysis of treatment outcome [25]. The same investigator collected all the measurements and repeated after 2 weeks, and the mean of the two replicates was reported as the final value.
Statistical Analysis
The Fisher test was used to compare the proportion of cases with or without PARL present and closure of the apical foramen at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups and the last recall time versus the baseline proportion of cases. While the changes in root length and apical diameter were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean. The data were summarized and analyzed by professional statistician using SPSS 13.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA) and P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Graphs were generated by using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc, Calif, USA).