DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-529333/v1
The present study utilized a biomarker response method to evaluate the effect of 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP) in artificial and natural soils on Eisenia fetida after 7, 14, 28, 42 and 56 days exposure. Biomarker responses were standardized to calculate the Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) index. The influence of soil type on TCP toxicity was assessed. Results indicated that TCP induced excessive reactive oxygen species, caused oxidative stress, DNA damage to earthworm, which is similar to its parent chemical chlorpyrifos. The IBR index of three enzymes activities showed that TCP induced the enzymes activities of earthworm in red clay was stronger than the other three soils. Specifically, chlorpyrifos exposure group showed a lower toxicity than TCP exposure group after 28 days exposure but a higher toxicity than TCP exposure group after 56 days exposure. Despite the deficiencies of this study, the above information is of great significance for assessing the risk of chlorpyrifos and its metabolite TCP pollution in soil ecosystems.
The extensive use of pesticides has brought great dividends to agricultural production, but also inevitably caused harm to non-target organisms. Chlorpyrifos, an organophosphate insecticide (Jhon and Shaike. 2015), was widely used during the past half century for pest control. However, chlorpyrifos was highly toxic to non-target organisms. The acute oral EC50 for rat and bird were 66 and 39.2 mg/kg, respectively. Chlorpyrifos is toxic to soil microorganisms (Dutta et al., 2010; Orts et al., 2017), plants (Bassey et al., 2015), aquatic system (Ali et al., 2009; Costa et al., 2015; Bonifacio et al., 2017) and even to the higher vertebrates (Sandal and Yilmaz, 2011; Wang et al., 2012; Ojha et al., 2013). Recently, García-Gómez et al. (2019) using earthworms (Eisenia andrei) demonstrated that chlorpyrifos exposure (40 mg/kg) reduces acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and impacts male reproductive abilities. Our previous study (Zhu et al., 2020) using a biomarkers response method demonstrated that chlorpyrifos caused oxidative and DNA damage to Eisenia fetida. The toxicological response varied depending on physicochemical properties. In red clay, the clay content affects the toxicity of chlorpyrifos to earthworms. In summary, previous studies have detailed the behavioral, neurological and reproductive effects on organisms thus providing a good knowledge regarding the chlorpyrifos’ environmental impact.
However, soil impact may be caused by both the parent compound and the metabolites, therefore, the toxicity of metabolites should also be considered when assessing ecological impact. 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol (TCP) is the primary metabolite of chlorpyrifos (Žabar et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019). TCP has a half-life in the soil of up to 360 days and an aqueous solubility of 80.9 mg/L, indicating its longer persistence in the environment and potential mobility (Deng et al., 2016). Research on TCP has focused on degradation or biodegradation (Bempelou et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019) as well as aquatic toxicity (Wang et al., 2014; Suvarchala and Philip, 2016; Echeverri-Jaramillo et al., 2020) and mice toxicity (Deng et al., 2016). Earthworms contributed greatly to soil improvement (Blakemore and Hochkirch, 2017). Eisenia fetida was recommended as a model soil organism in soil for toxicological assessment (OECD 222, 2016; Wen et al., 2020). However, to our best knowledge, there are no published literature on the effect of TCP on earthworms and particularly Eisenia fetida. Whether adverse effects can be induced by TCP to Eisenia fetida should be studied.
In this study, the effects on Eisenia fetida of TCP exposure were assessed by monitoring the response of biomarkers including reactive oxygen species (ROS), enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), as well as glutathione S-transferase (GST), lipid peroxidation (MDA content), and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG). Artificial soil and three different natural soils were selected to assess the soil type effects on TCP toxicological response. The Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) index (Samanta et al., 2018; Sanchez-Hernandez et al., 2019) was calculated to compare the effect of TCP exposure in different soils to earthworms and to compare the effect of TCP exposure with chlorpyrifos.
It was hypothesized that TCP was more toxic in red clay with high clay content and the toxicity of the metabolite TCP was greater than the parent compound chlorpyrifos.
TCP (CAS 6515-38-4; 99.0% purity) was purchased from AccuStandard Co., Ltd. (New Haven, USA). The ELISA kit used to assess the 8-OHdG content was purchased from Hengyuan biological technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Chromatographical grade acetonitrile was purchased from Tedia Co., Inc. (Ohio, USA). The other reagents involved in this study are all of analytical purity.
Soils involved in this study were in keep with our previously chlorpyrifos study. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development guideline (OECD 222, 2016), artificial soil consists of 10 per cent sphagnum peat, 20 per cent kaolin clay, 70 per cent air-dried quartz sand and a small amount of calcium carbonate for pH regulation (Zhang et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2020a). The fluvo-aquic soil was sampled from Dezhou, Shandong, China (36.78°N, 116.54°E). The black soil was sampled from Changchun, Jilin, China (43.80°N, 125.40°E). The red clay was sampled from Nanning, Guangxi, China (22.74°N, 109.31°E), respectively. Properties of three soils are shown in Table S1.
Adult Eisenia fetida were acquired from an earthworm farm (Shandong, China). Healthy, mature earthworms with weight 300 to 500 mg and possessed visible clitellum were randomly selected for biomarkers assessment (OECD 222, 2016).
As previously studied, the concentration of chlorpyrifos was set as 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/kg. To facilitate the comparison of toxicity of chlorpyrifos and TCP. Several TCP-acetonitrile solutions with different concentrations were used to contaminate 500 g soil with final concentrations of TCP in soil to be 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 mg/kg dry soil. A solvent control group (0 mg/kg) was included where only acetonitrile was added to the soil. Contaminated soil was fully mixed and adjusted moisture after acetonitrile had volatilized in the fume hood until completely dry. The prepared soil was then transferred to 1L glass breakers and twenty earthworms were then cultured with each soil/TCP concentration assessed using three replicates. Assays were conducted at 20°C, 80% humidity and a light-dark cycle of 16 hours light and 8 hours dark with illumination of 650 lux according to OECD 222, 2016 (Song, et al. 2019).
On day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 56, earthworms were sampled to assess biomarker response. To assess ROS, intestinal emptied earthworms were ice-bath homogenized (Jingxin, F6/10, China) at high speed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and centrifuged (Eppendorf, Centrifuge 5810 R, Germany) at 3000 g (4°C) for 10 min. The supernatant was collected then centrifuged at 20000 g (4°C) for 20 min after which the precipitate was resuspended in 1 mL PBS. To assess SOD, CAT, GST activity and MDA content, intestinal emptied earthworms were ice-bath homogenized at high speed with PBS and centrifuged at 10000 rpm (4°C) for 10 min. According to Bradford (1976), protein content of the above two samples was determined by Coomassie. To assess 8-OHdG content, intestinal emptied earthworms were ice-bath homogenized at high speed with PBS and centrifuged at 6500 rpm (4°C) for 15 min.
All biomarker assessment methods were in keeping with our previous study (Zhu et, al. 2020), the details of methods are shown in Table S2.
The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, V22.0) was used to analyze data and Origin (OriginPro, 2021, SR1) was used to plot. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the least significance differences (p < 0.05) between the control treatment and each TCP exposure group.
Data from this study (TCP exposure) and our previous study (chlorpyrifos exposure) (Zhu et, al. 2020) were used to calculate the IBR index. How the biomarker data was used to calculate IBR was detailed in supplementary material according to Sanchez et, al (2013).
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive chemical species formed due to the electron acceptability of oxygen. Excessive ROS has a destructive effect and promotes oxidative stress (Li et al., 2019). Over a 56-day period, the variation of ROS level was assessed following exposure to TCP (Fig. 1).
In all four soils, the ROS significantly increased in the TCP exposed group in different soils during the experimental period. In the OECD artificial soil and black soil, a dose-response relationship was observed whereby increasing ROS content was observed with increasing TCP concentration. In fluvo-aquic soil, a similar dose-response relationship was observed except at day 56 where ROS content of 0.5 mg/kg dose group decreased compared to 0.1 mg/kg dose group. In red clay, no significant difference in ROS response was observed between 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg dose groups at day 7, 14, 42 and 56 as well as 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg dose groups on day 28.
In the present study, the result indicates that TCP exposure induces excessive ROS production in Eisenia fetida and, in most cases, a dose-response relationship was observed. A similar result was observed in our previous study (Zhu et al., 2020) where TCP’s parent chlorpyrifos exposure resulted in excessive ROS production in earthworms in the same four soils. Excessive ROS production in Eisenia fetida after exposure to TCP and its parent chorpyrifos indicates that they caused oxidative stress to Eisenia fetida. From the point of inducing excessive ROS, the toxicity of TCP and chlorpyrifos was similar.
In order to mitigate oxidative stress caused by excessive ROS, Eisenia fetida could produce a battery of enzymes like SOD, CAT and GST. SOD and CAT, the first defense line of cellular protection (Wang et al., 2018), are produced by organisms to inactivate ROS preventing oxidative stress and consequent damage. SOD could transform O2− into H2O2, which could be detoxified by CAT (Liu et al., 2020b). These two enzymes (SOD and CAT) constitute the antioxidant enzyme system to jointly combat oxidative stress. GST contributes greatly to oxidation protection and xenobiotic metabolism, as it also detoxifies ROS in cells. (Zhu et al., 2011).
The detailed changes in SOD, CAT, GST enzyme activities are illustrated in Fig. S1-S3. Unlike with ROS content, the dose-response was not observed for the biomarkers SOD, CAT, and GST with some values higher than the control group following TCP exposure and some lower than the control group. The SOD activity was significantly activated in the early stage of exposure and gradually decreased to the control level in the later stage in all four soils. The CAT and GST activity was activated in most periods.
To clearly evaluate Eisenia fetida oxidative stress in different soils caused by TCP exposure, the IBR index calculated using SOD, CAT and GST (IBR index of SCG) activity was used to describe an integrate biomarkers responses. The IBR index could indicate the toxicity of pollutants and able to assess environmental pollution risk (Wang et al., 2011; Shao et al., 2019). The normalized calculated IBR index of SCG is illustrated in Fig. 2.
The variation of Eisenia fetida enzyme activities including SOD, CAT, and GST shows the early oxidative damage caused by TCP. The oxidative damages suffered by earthworms in 4 soils are different. During the experimental period, the IBR index of SCG in red clay were higer than that in the other three soils. On day 7 and 14, the IBR index of SCG in black soil was little higher than that in fluvo aquic soil and much higher than that in artificial soil. On day 28, 42 and 56, the IBR index of SCG in fluvo-aquic soil was much higher than that in artificial and black soil.
Organic matter (Gebremariam et al., 2012), pH, cation exchange capacity and clay content could interact with chemical substances (Stepnowski et al., 2007). The IBR index of SCG indicates that oxidative stress caused by TCP in red clay and fluvo-aquic soil was higher than that in artificial and black soil. This may due to that the organic carbon of red clay and fluvo-aquic soil is lower than that of artificial soil and black soil. Zhu et al. (2020) demonstrated that chlorpyrifos was more toxic to Eisenia Fetida in red clay with high clay content (71.3%). Xu et al. (2021) stated that azoxystrobin had more lasting adverse effects on earthworms in soils with low organic matter content and low pH. These results are consistent with that in the present study, TCP also has a greater influence on SCG in red clay than in the other three soils. In general, the higher toxicity of TCP in red clay than the other three soils may be due to the fact that red clay has lower organic matter and pH, and higher clay content (71.3%) than the other three soils.
Excessive ROS can cause lipid peroxidation (LPO), which damages cell membranes and causes cell damage. MDA content could reflect the degree of LPO (Box and Maccubbin, 1997). Figure 3 illustrates the changes in Eisenia fetida MDA content influenced by TCP in soils.
In artificial soil, the MDA contents of each concentration exposure group were significantly higher than that of control group except for 7th, 42nd day 0.01 mg/kg group. In fluvo-aquic soil, the same trend was observed but no significant discrepancy was observed between 7th, 14th day 0.01 mg/kg group and control group. In black soil, the MDA contents at diverse concentration were significantly higher than that of the control group except for 7th day 0.01 mg/kg group. In red clay, on day 7 and 28, the MDA contents of medium and high concentration (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg) group were significantly higher than that of control group but no significant discrepancy was observed between low concentration (0.01 mg/kg) and control group. On day 14, only the MDA contents of high concentration (0.5 mg/kg) group were significantly higher than that of control group. On day 42 and 56, the MDA contents of each concentration group were significantly higher than that of the control group.
As we previously studied (Zhu et, al., 2020), TCP’s parent chlorpyrifos exposure significantly increased the MDA content in Eisenia fetida over a 4 weeks exposure. Li et al. (2019) demonstrated that another organophosphorus insecticide tolclofos-methyl could also significantly incresed the MDA content in Eisenia fetida. Uniformly, the MDA content in Eisenia fetida was significantly increased after exposed to TCP and the increase was more obvious in the later stage of the experiment. This indicated that TCP exposure caused lipid peroxidation to Eisenia fetida.
The product generated when ROS attacking DNA (Guo et al., 2014), 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) could indicate the degree of oxidative and DNA damage (Zhang et al., 2014). Figure 4 illustrates changes in 8-OHdG content in different soils after exposure to TCP.
In artificial soil, the 8-OHdG contents of each concentration group were significantly higher than that of control group. However, the significant difference between the 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg exposure group was not observed on day 42. Furthermore, on day 28, the 8-OHdG content in the 0.1 mg/kg exposure was significantly lower than that of 0.01 and 0.5mg/kg exposure. In natural soils, the 8-OHdG in TCP concentration groups were significantly higher than that of 0 mg/kg. A dose-response relationship was observed.
The increase in 8-OHdG content indicates that TCP induced DNA damage to Eisenia fetida. As we previously studied (Zhu et, al., 2020), chlorpyrifos treatments also significantly increased the earthworm’s 8-OHdG content. Zhang et al. (2014) also demonstrated that Dechlorane Plus could induce an increase of earthworm’s 8-OHdG content. Besides, 1-methyl-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl) urea and 1-methyl-3-(tetrahydro-3-furylmethyl) guanidium dihydrogen, which are two main metabolites of the insecticide dinotefuran, were stated that induced DNA damage in Eisenia fetida cells (Liu et al., 2018). Based on the response of 8-OHdG content to TCP exposure, TCP has a certain effect on DNA oxidative damage to Eisenia fetida in all four soils.
In summary, the result shows that TCP is a toxic pollutant to earthworms because TCP can induce excessive ROS, alter enzyme activity and induce lipid peroxidation as well as DNA damage. In addition, the effects on Eisenia fetida of TCP in red clay was higher than that in the other three soils, followed by fluvo-aquic soil and black soil, the lowest was artificial soil. This may due to the low organic matter content in red clay and fluvo-auic soil and the high clay content in red clay. We believe that artificial soil toxic experiment may not correctly evaluate the toxicity of TCP in natural soil including fluvo-aquic soil and red clay.
TCP has a similar effect on earthworms compared to the parent chemical chlorpyrifos. However, the toxicity of TCP and chlorpyrifos to earthworms may further be elucidated by calculating the IBR index.
In the present study, IBR index of each exposure group was the sum of six biomarker responses (ROS, SOD, CAT, GST, MDA, 8-OHdG). Figure 5A illustrates the IBR index of chlorpyrifos (Zhu et, al., 2020) and TCP when Eisenia fetida was exposed to 0.1 mg/kg for 28 days and 56 days in different soils. Figure 5B illustrates the change in each biomarker over this time frame. Data on the effects of chlorpyrifos on earthworms (ROS, SOD, CAT, GST, MDA, 8-OHdG) were obtained from our previous study (Zhu et al., 2020).
As shown in Fig. 5A, on day 28, the IBR index of chlorpyrifos (Zhu et, al. 2020) and TCP toxicity to Eisenia fetida were 9.82 and 13.60, 10.23 and 18.62, 9.34 and 17.15, 12.21 and 14.88 in artificial, fluvo-aquic soil, black soil and red clay, respectively. On day 56, the IBR index of chlorpyrifos (Zhu et, al. 2020) and TCP toxicity to Eisenia fetida were 14.10 and 9.23, 15.30 and 14.50, 13.20 and 9.41, 16.30 and 7.83 in artificial, fluvo-aquic soil, black soil and red clay, respectively. In addition, as the hydrolysis metabolite compound of chlorpyrifos, TCP was more toxic than chlorpyrifos at the same dose (0.1 mg/kg) after 28 days exposure, which the toxicity of TCP was about 38, 82, 84 and 22 percent more than that of chlorpyrifos in artificial, fluvo-aquic soil, black soil and red clay, respectively. In contrast, TCP was less toxic than chlorpyrifos at the same dose (0.1 mg/kg) after 56 days exposure, which the toxicity of TCP was about 35, 5, 29 and 52 percent less than that of chlorpyrifos in artificial, fluvo-aquic soil, black soil and red clay, respectively. It is also worth mentioning that TCP was less toxic on day 56 than on day 28, but chlorpyrifos was more toxic. Figure 5B illustrates the degree of contribution of biomarkers to IBR index. In artificial soil, 8-OHdG content contributed the most to the IBR index of chlorpyrifos and TCP to Eisenia fetida. In fluvo-aquic soil, SOD activity contributed the most to the IBR index of chlorpyrifos while 8-OHdG content contributed the most to the IBR index of TCP to Eisenia fetida. In black soil, 8-OHdG content contributed the most to the IBR index of chlorpyrifos while MDA content contributed the most to the IBR index of TCP to Eisenia fetida. In red clay, MDA content contributed the most to the IBR index to chlorpyrifos while CAT activity contributed the most to the IBR index of TCP to Eisenia fetida. In general, the production of lipid peroxidation MDA content and the production of DNA damage 8-OHdG content were most sensitive to TCP contamination.
There have also been several reports comparing the toxicity of chlorpyrifos with its metabolite TCP. For aquatic organisms, TCP was found to be more toxic than chlorpyrifos to Daphnia carinata survival in cladoceran water but less toxic in natural water (Cáceres et al., 2007). Echeverri-Jaramillo et al. (2020) found that TCP was more toxic than chlorpyrifos to Aliivibrio fischeri and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata but less toxic than chlorpyrifos to Daphnia magna. This suggests that chlorpyrifos itself may be less toxic than TCP, but once degraded and converted to TCP or other transformation products, it becomes more toxic. Kharabsheh et al. (2017) demonstrated that the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa metabolized chlorpyrifos to TCP increasing the mortality of adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Besides, Li et al. (2020) demonstrated that TCP had a key role in chlorpyrifos-induced decrease in testosterone synthesis of mice. In combination with the present study, for terrestrial organisms especially earthworms (Eisenia fetida), TCP was more toxic than its parent chemical chlorpyrifos after 28 days exposure but less toxic after 56 days exposure.
In the present study, the chronic toxicity of TCP to Eisenia fetida was determined in artificial soil prepared according to the OECD and three natural soils (fluvo-aquic soil, black soil and red clay) by monitoring the change of biomarker responses (ROS, SOD, CAT, GST, MDA, 8-OHdG). The IBR index was calculated to compare the toxicity of TCP with chlorpyrifos to Eisenia fetida in different soils. The primary conclusions showed by the results are as follows:
(1) TCP caused oxidative stress and DNA damage to Eisenia fetida and artificial soil toxicity experiment may underestimate the TCP toxicity in natural soil.
(2) As the metabolite compound of chlorpyrifos, TCP was more toxic than chlorpyrifos after 28 days exposure but less toxic after 56 days at the same dose (0.1 mg/kg).
Based on previous studies, we speculate that this is due to chlorpyrifos metabolism to TCP and other metabolites after 56 days. Thus, an approach to monitor the concentration changes in chlorpyrifos and TCP should be established in future studies to demonstrating this. Despite the deficiencies of this study, the above information is of great significance for assessing the risk of chlorpyrifos and its metabolite TCP pollution in soil ecosystems.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Availability of data and materials
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and supplement materials.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Funding
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 42077042 and 41907357].
Authors' contributions
Kaixuan Hou: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, review and editing.
Yue Yang: Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing; Lei Zhu: Conceptualization, Investigation.
Ruolin Wu: Validation, Investigation; Albert Juhasz: Writing - review & editing; Jun Wang: Writing - review & editing; Jinhua Wang: Writing - review & editing; Zhongkun Du: Writing - review & editing; Bing Li: Writing - review & editing; Lusheng Zhu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing - review & editing.
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Jun Wang and Jinhua Wang for the Special Funds of Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province, China.