This preprint is under consideration at The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: To assess the impact of regurgitant jet direction on left ventricular function and intraventricular hemodynamics in asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and mild aortic valve regurgitation (AR), using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking and 4D flow imaging.
Methods: Fifty BAV individuals were retrospectively selected: 15 with mild AR and posterior regurgitation jet (Group-PJ), 15 with regurgitant jet in other directions (Group-nPJ) and 20 with no regurgitation (Controls). CMR protocol included cine steady state free precession (SSFP) sequences and 4D Flow imaging covering the entire left ventricle (LV) cavity and the aortic root. Cine-SSFP images were analyzed to assess LV volumes, longitudinal and circumferential myocardial strain.
Results: Circumferential and longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate (PDSR) and peak diastolic velocity (PDV) were reduced in group PJ if compared to group nPJ and control group (PDSR = 1.10±0.2 s-1 vs 1.34±0.5 s-1 vs 1.53±0.3 s-1 , p:0.001 and 0.68±0.2 s-1 vs 1.17±0.2 s-1 vs 1.05±0.4 s-1 ; p<0.001, PDV = -101.6±28.1 deg/s vs -201.4±85.9 deg/s vs - 221.6±67.1 deg/s; p<0.001 and -28.1±8 mm/s vs -38.9±11.1 mm/s vs -43.6±14.3 mm/s, p<0.001, respectively), whereas no differences have been found in systolic strain values. 4D Flow images (available only in 9 patients) showed deformation of diastolic transmitral streamlines direction in group PJ compared to other groups.
Conclusion: In BAV patients with AR, the posterior direction of the regurgitant jet may hamper the complete mitral valve opening, disturbing transmitral flow and slowing the LV diastolic filling
Keywords
Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Regurgitation, Diastolic Dysfunction, myocardial strain, 4D Flow imaging
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 17 May, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Minor revisions
On 14 Jun, 2021
Reviews received
Received 16 May, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 May, 2021
Editor assigned
On 14 May, 2021
First submitted
On 13 May, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 17 May, 2021
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Minor revisions
On 14 Jun, 2021
Reviews received
Received 16 May, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 May, 2021
Editor assigned
On 14 May, 2021
First submitted
On 13 May, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Purpose: To assess the impact of regurgitant jet direction on left ventricular function and intraventricular hemodynamics in asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and mild aortic valve regurgitation (AR), using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking and 4D flow imaging.
Methods: Fifty BAV individuals were retrospectively selected: 15 with mild AR and posterior regurgitation jet (Group-PJ), 15 with regurgitant jet in other directions (Group-nPJ) and 20 with no regurgitation (Controls). CMR protocol included cine steady state free precession (SSFP) sequences and 4D Flow imaging covering the entire left ventricle (LV) cavity and the aortic root. Cine-SSFP images were analyzed to assess LV volumes, longitudinal and circumferential myocardial strain.
Results: Circumferential and longitudinal peak diastolic strain rate (PDSR) and peak diastolic velocity (PDV) were reduced in group PJ if compared to group nPJ and control group (PDSR = 1.10±0.2 s-1 vs 1.34±0.5 s-1 vs 1.53±0.3 s-1 , p:0.001 and 0.68±0.2 s-1 vs 1.17±0.2 s-1 vs 1.05±0.4 s-1 ; p<0.001, PDV = -101.6±28.1 deg/s vs -201.4±85.9 deg/s vs - 221.6±67.1 deg/s; p<0.001 and -28.1±8 mm/s vs -38.9±11.1 mm/s vs -43.6±14.3 mm/s, p<0.001, respectively), whereas no differences have been found in systolic strain values. 4D Flow images (available only in 9 patients) showed deformation of diastolic transmitral streamlines direction in group PJ compared to other groups.
Conclusion: In BAV patients with AR, the posterior direction of the regurgitant jet may hamper the complete mitral valve opening, disturbing transmitral flow and slowing the LV diastolic filling
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Loading...