Various tumor entities with elevated immune response, including MSI-H CRC, have dense CD8 pos T-cell infiltrates in common, which are responsible for a local production of interferon gamma (IFNγ) 33, 34. IFNγ, in turn, provokes the adaptive upregulation of PD-L1 on nearby tumor cells via NFκB35, thereby mediating a negative feedback mechanism that ultimately leads to T-cell exhaustion in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Emerging data in other tumor types suggest that negative immune checkpoint proteins are usually upregulated in tumor tissues with a "T cell inflamed phenotype" and that infiltration of tumours by effector T cells is necessary to drive upregulation of immune checkpoints36. Our results showed that PD-L1 expression in tumoral cells and stromal cells were positively correlated with CD8 + TILs density.
In this study, the expression of PD-L1 in tumour cells and immune stroma were associated with less aggressive tumor features and translated into favorable OS in patients with CRC cancer. however, only the association with immune stroma cell expression was statistically significant. Consistent with our findings, J Wyss et al showed that merely stromal PD-L1 were associated with less aggressive features of colon cancer and with better OS in colon cancer, although they had excluded rectal cancer patients given disease`s different tumor biology, treatment, and prognosis8. The association of PD-L1 expression with beneficial clinical outcome has been reported in a diverse set of tumour types, such as NSCLC37, melanoma38, breast cancer39, 40 and including CRC41. This might seem inconsistent with the immunosuppressive function of PD-L1. However, this might be explained that PD-L1 expression within tumor microenvironment is not only as a immunosuppression factor, but rather acts as a reflection of adaptive antitumor immunity, where tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are activated in response to tumor antigens. Contrary to our findings, Thompson et al42 showed that in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, both tumoral and stromal PD-L1 expression and CD8 + TILs were associated with unfavorable outcome. These opposite results might because the interaction between tumor and tumor-associated stroma and TILs might be different among different tumor types.
Our results showed that CD8 density was also associated with a good OS and it was also an independent predictor for CRC patients. CD8, which is predominantly expressed on cytotoxic T cells, is a crucial component of the cellular immune system and pivotal for cell-mediated anti-tumor immune response43, 44. Previous studies of association between CD8 and prognosis have reported that patients whose tumors contained infiltrating CD8 + TIL showed better survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)45–52. These results further suggest that PD-L1 expression may reflects an association with a TIL-mediated antitumour inflammatory response, rather than always being associated with tumour immune evasion53. Anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A elicited a response in patients with tumours expressing high levels of PD-L1 and tumor-infiltrating immune cells54, suggesting that patients who have PD-L1-positive tumors with CD8 + TILs might achieve a better outcome through blocking of PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. These results further confirmed that CD8 plays crucial role in the immune microenvironment, and the association of CD8 + TIL density with PD-L1 expression may be more important than PD-L1 expression alone predicting survival. Unexpectedly, there were no correlation between CD8 + TILs and PD-L1 and schistosomiasis. It was possible that the patients in the cohort with schistosomiasis are obviously older than patients without schistosomiasis. And the vigour of immunity of older people is weak55. In order to confirm this speculation, we excluded patients younger than 60 years old, then to analysis the relationship between schistosomiasis and CD8 + TILs. However, the small percentage of CRC-S patients did not allow us to perform further analysis stratified by age. Thus, further work in larger cohort are still needed to investigate the impact of s. japonicum on CD8 + TILs density and PD-L1 expression.
Our retrospective study had several limitations. First, we do recognized the limitation of utilizing a TMA approach to assess expression of a biomarker that may only be locally present in samples, raising the possibility of false negatives, which could possibly change the significance of PD-L1 expression in CRC. Second, we speculated that IFNγ which secreted by CD8 + T cells upregulated the expression of PD-L1. However, further studies needed to clarify the association between PD-L1 expression and CD8 + TILs, and to determine whether this combination has predictive relevance as a biomarker for selecting individual patients for treatment involving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade or for selection of certain tumour types for development. Third, determination of PD-L1 expression in tumour samples was generally performed by immunohistochemistry using various antibodies. Fifth, the threshold for positivity was not formally assessed.
In conclusion, results in present study demonstrated that stomal PD-L1 expression, but not tumoral PD-L1 expression in the whole cohort and in the CRC-NS set were associated with less aggressive tumor feature and translated into better OS. And the expression of PD-L1 was positively associated with CD8 + TILs density.