Sex differences in a cohort of COVID-19 Italian patients hospitalized during the first and second pandemic waves.

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-543999/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Sex differences in a cohort of COVID-19 Italian patients hospitalized during the first and second pandemic waves.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-543999/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 11 Aug, 2021

Read the published version in Biology of Sex Differences →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity seems to be influenced by genetic background, sex, age, and presence of specific comorbidities. So far, little attention has been paid to sex-specific variations of demographic, clinical and laboratory features of COVID-19 patients referred to the same hospital in the two consecutive pandemic waves.

Methods: Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected in 1,000 COVID-19 patients (367 females and 633 males), 500 hospitalized in the first wave and 500 in the second one, at the ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from March to December 2020. Statistical analyses have been employed to compare data obtained in females and males, taking into account their age, and during the first and second COVID-19 waves.

Results: The mean age at the time of hospitalization was similar in females and males but was significantly higher for both in the second wave; the time elapsed from symptoms onset to hospital admission did not differ between sexes in the two waves and no correlation was observed between delayed hospital admission and length of hospitalization. The number of multi-symptomatic males was higher than that of females and patients with a higher number of comorbidities were more frequently admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and more frequently died. Older males remained in ICU longer than females and showed a longer disease duration, mainly the first wave. The highest levels of white blood cells, neutrophils, C-reactive protein and fibrinogen were significantly higher in males and in the first, and along with higher levels of D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase and procalcitonin which were preferentially documented in patients requiring ICU or died. While the ICU death rate was higher in males, the overall death rate did not differ between the sexes; however, the deceased women were older.

Conclusions: These data indicate that once patients were hospitalized, the risk of dying was similar between females and males. Therefore, future studies should aim at understanding the reasons why, for a given number of SARS-CoV-2 infection, less females develop the disease requiring hospitalization.

Infectious Diseases

Virology

COVID-19

sex-related differences

pandemic wave(s)

Intensive care unit (ICU)

SARS-CoV-2

Although, the hospitalized males were significantly more, the similar number of hospitalizations of the >75 years old females and males could be due to the fact that in our city elderly women are about twice as many as men.

Although males spent more days in hospital, had a longer disease duration, developed a critical illness more frequently, and were admitted and died in ICU more than females, the total rate of deaths among patients was not significantly different between sexes.

Overall, the most frequent comorbidities were cardiovascular diseases, which were preferentially seen among patients hospitalized in the second wave; it is possible that the knowledge gained in the first wave concerning the association between certain comorbidities and worse disease evolution has guided the preferential hospitalization of patients with these predominant comorbidities.

The ongoing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak, originated in China in 2019, rapidly spread worldwide and the associated Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. COVID-19 has inexorably affected all countries, with increasing relevant social, economic and health implications. In this global scenario, Italy was among the Countries with the highest number of COVID-19 cases and deaths [1] and Brescia, with 102,628 confirmed cases of COVID-19 by May 4th, 2021 [2], was one of the most affected Italian cities. As a consequence, the ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, one of the largest hospitals in Italy, has assigned more than 800 beds to manage the COVID-19 emergency.

It is now well recognized that all individuals can be infected by SARS-CoV-2, albeit with different susceptibility, influenced by various factors, including the genetic background [3, 4] and age. Indeed, an increased infection rate is observed among females during childbearing age [5] while elders develop a more severe disease and are considered the main risk group for COVID-19 [1, 6]. In addition, a higher proportion of adverse outcomes and death occur in males [7] and the male bias in COVID-19 mortality has been demonstrated in nearly all countries, with a risk of death in males about 1.7 times higher than in females [8]. This is consistent with what was observed in animals and in the prior epidemics caused by SARS-CoV and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome CoV (MERS-CoV) [8]. These differences in male–female response to infection are not just limited to new coronaviruses, but it has been previously reported that male patients have higher viral loads for hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency viruses, while females generally mount a more robust immune response to vaccines, such as influenza vaccines [9].

The observed higher risk of death among males, however, was present in all age groups and was associated to specific comorbidities, such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, some chronic lung diseases, obesity, metabolic diseases, rates of tobacco smoking and alcohol abuse that are more common among males than females [5, 10, 11]. Hence, differences in social and behavior gender-related factors may influence COVID-19 incidence and outcomes, though other biological mechanisms of male sex bias could affect the severity of COVID-19, particularly with respect to immune responses [12, 13].

While sex- and age-associated differences in COVID-19 patients have been previously investigated, most of the study published so far have involved small cohorts of patients, enrolled in a short period of time, or have been conducted by pooling results of multiple hospitals in the same region or from different Countries, or by performing a metanalysis [14–18]. In addition, not comprehensive clinical and laboratory parameters were analyzed in a single study. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the demographic, clinical and laboratory features of a large number of COVID-19 patients referred to the same hospital in the two pandemic waves, and to investigate sex-specific difference of disease severity and mortality.

Patients

The study cohort included 1,000 patients hospitalized at the ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from March 23rd to December 29th, 2020. Although there is no official date, the date of the COVID-19 second wave in Italy is considered October 1st, 2020, when 2,000 new daily cases were recorded for the first time in months [19].

The present study included patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction, had at least one clinical biochemistry laboratory test and were then hospitalized. Those with a positive laboratory test, but who required brief observation in the emergency room or who were dismissed from the hospital within a day, as well as those with doubtful positive swab or lacking a certain SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, were excluded.

The demographic data, clinical characteristics, complications, treatment, clinical outcomes and laboratory results were collected retrospectively.

In some cases, a comparison of patients’ age categories (< 45, 45–69, 60–74 and ≥ 75 years old) and an analysis of different features occurred during the COVID-19 “first wave” and “second wave” were performed.

The classification of COVID-19 severity was assigned to each patient per the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7), released by the National Health Commission & State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine on March 3, 2020 [20].

The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee (Comitato Etico Provinciale, Brescia, Italy); protocols NP 4000 –Studio CORONAlab and NP 4408 – Studio CORONAfollow-up).

Laboratory Testing

Blood samples were collected in microtubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for the complete blood count, lithium heparin for biochemistry tests and sodium citrate for hemostasis tests. Humoral and hemostasis parameters and complete blood count results were obtained by using automated CS-5100 (Siemens Healthcare s.r.l., Milan, Italy), COBAS 8000 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and XN 10 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) systems, respectively.

Reference values were those of the clinical laboratory of the ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia.

Statistical analysis

Demographic and clinical data were analyzed by means of a Chi square test for dichotomous variables, and by means of two independent samples t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables depending on whether data were or not normally distributed. The normal distribution of the data was assessed by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (d test), where d > 0.20 means that the data are not normally distributed.

To evaluate the impact on Sex and Wave on time elapsed from symptoms onset to hospital admission, a univariate ANOVA was performed using Sex and Wave as independent variables and Days from symptoms onset to hospital admission as dependent variables, and Age as covariate to rule out the influence of age on results. To assess the impact on Sex and Wave on dichotomous variables (e.g. comorbidities), logistic regressions were performed, using Sex and Wave as predictors and age as covariate of no interest.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves were performed 1) on all 1,000 patients, to investigate the influence of sex on length of hospitalization, using Sex as factor, Discharge (alive) from hospital as event and Days from hospital admission to hospital discharge as main time variable; 2) on patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), to investigate the influence of sex on ICU length of stay, using Sex as factor, Discharge (alive) from ICU as event and Days from ICU admission to ICU discharge as main time variable; 3) on the 813 patients with available data of symptom onset, to investigate the influence of sex on disease duration (defined as days from symptoms onset to hospital discharge) using Sex as factor, Discharge (alive) as event and Days from symptoms onset to hospital discharge as main time variable. Deaths were always censored. The difference in the curves was assessed through a log rank test.

To test the possible association between age and COVID-19 waves with 1) length of hospitalization, 2) ICU, length of stay 3) disease duration, a Cox-regression analysis was performed using Sex, Age and Waves as predictors and Days as main time variable. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are also reported.

Characteristics of female and male patients hospitalized for COVID-19

Among 1,000 patients included in this study, 367 (36.7%) were females and 633 (63.3%) males; out of them, 500 consecutive patients were hospitalized in the first wave and 500 consecutive patients in the second one. The number of hospitalized females during the second wave was significantly higher than that in the first wave [199 (39.8%) vs 168 (33.6%); P = 0.042]. Within the patient’s cohort, only 57 (15.5%) females and 88 (13.9%) males were not Caucasian, similarly distributed in the two waves [78 (15.6%) in the first vs 67 (13.4%) in the second wave; P = 0.323].

The mean age ± standard deviation at the time of hospital admission was 63.8 ± 16.9 years, being similar in both sexes (65.01 ± 9.3 in females vs 63.2 ± 15.3 in males; P = 0.106), but significantly different between the first and the second wave (61.2 ± 15.9 vs 67.5 ± 17.9; P = 0.001). The rate of hospitalized females aged 45–59 and 60–74 years was significantly lower than that of age-matched males in both waves, while no differences were observed in the other two age groups (Fig. 1 - A).

The mean number of days from symptoms onset to hospital admission was 6.5 ± 5.7 and it was similar in both sex (6.0 ± 5.5 days in females vs 6.7 ± 5.8 days in males; P = 0.085) and age groups (Fig. 1 - B, top right panel). Patients who were admitted to the emergency room soon after the onset of symptoms were males aged < 45 years who were hospitalized in the second wave (Fig. 1 – B, bottom right panel). However, although ANOVA test revealed a significant effect of the main variable Wave, a non-significant effect has been found for the main variable Sex (F = 2.11, P = 0.146). Similarly, given the Sex X Wave interaction not significant, the time elapsed from symptoms onset to hospital admission did not differ between sexes in the two waves.

The condition which mainly led to hospitalization was the presence of interstitial pneumonia, which, however, was more frequently observed in males than in females (P = 0.002), both in the first and in the second wave, as resulted by the logistic regression analysis (Sex X Wave interaction; Supplementary Table 1). In addition, the percentage of multi-symptomatic males (showing 3 or more symptoms) was higher than that of females in both waves. The main presenting symptom at the time of hospital admission was fever, which, in both waves, was more frequently mentioned by males than females. Cough was the second more frequent symptom, preferentially in the first wave in both sexes. Whereas the third more common sign was dyspnea, which was complained more by males than females and especially in the first wave. The symptom more frequently reported by females was vomiting, which appeared to be more frequent in the first wave. Loss of consciousness, which was reported significantly more in the first wave, and traumatic events were among the most frequent additional causes of hospitalizations in COVID-19 patients. These symptoms were not associated with a more severe outcome (data not shown).

The overall number of comorbidities was similar in females and males and no differences were observed in the number of COVID-19 patients with no comorbidities in both sexes, although this number was higher in the first wave. Likewise, there were no differences in patients with one comorbidity or simultaneously affected by 2, 3 or more concomitant pathologies (Supplementary Table 2).

The most common comorbidities identified in COVID-19 patients were those affecting cardiovascular and endocrine systems, with hypertension and diabetes being very common and present with similar incidence in the two sexes. Females were predominantly affected by psychiatric pathologies, autoimmune/immune-dysregulation disorders, and musculoskeletal and rheumatologic diseases, as well as by asthma. On the other hand, immunodeficiencies and infectious diseases were more common in males. In hospitalized patients significant differences were observed in many specific comorbid conditions, as such cardiovascular diseases, solid malignancy, venous thromboembolism, and musculoskeletal disorders which were mainly reported in the second wave. On the contrary, a higher number of COVID-19 patients with thyroid diseases, neurological disorders, malignant and non-malignant hematologic diseases, immunodeficiency and infectious diseases were hospitalized in the first wave. The logistic regression analysis, performed using the number of patients admitted to ICU as dependent variable and Sex, Wave and Comorbidity as independent variables as well as Age as variable of non-interest, demonstrated that the number of patients admitted to ICU differs depending by the number of comorbidities. Out of 218 patients with one comorbidity and 164 with 2 comorbidities, 51 (23.3%) and 35 (21.3%) were admitted to ICU, respectively. Amongst these two groups of patients there were more males than females. Lastly, out of 393 patients with more than 3 comorbidities, 59 (15%) were admitted to ICU.

Clinical outcome of female and male patients hospitalized for COVID-19

Kaplan-Meier-survival curve indicated that females and males differ in length of hospitalization (log rank P = 0.017), with males spending more days in hospital than females (mean 23.8 ± 0.9 days in males vs 20.2 ± 0.9 days in females; Fig. 2 - A). No correlation has been found between delayed hospital admission and length of hospitalization (r=-0.022, P = 0.549), not even splitting patients into females and males (females r = 0.031; P = 0.151, and males r=-0.066, P = 0.620).

When Age and Wave were entered as covariate in the Cox model, they were both significantly associated with hospitalization length (Age: P = 0.001, HR = 0.981; CI = 0.977–0.986; Wave: P = 0.001, HR = 0.790; CI = 0.688–0.907), denoting longer hospitalization for older individuals as well as longer hospitalization in the first wave compared with the second wave. However, despite the influence of age and waves on hospitalization length, the model having Sex as predictor still remained highly significant (P = 0.004, HR = 1.232, CI = 1.071–1.418).

The percentage of hospitalized females with mild disease was significantly and consistently higher in both waves, while patients with asymptomatic, moderate and severe COVID-19 were equally distributed in the two sexes (Table 1). The proportion of COVID-19 patients who required supplemental oxygen outside the ICU was similar in both sexes [196 (53.3%) in females vs 317 (50.1%) in males], but more female required low flow oxygenation.

Males developed critical illness more frequently as also reflected by the higher number of males who were admitted to ICU. Indeed, among the total number of patients managed in ICU (204, 20.4%), the rate of males was significantly higher than that of females. Moreover, significantly more patients were admitted to ICU in the first wave (Table 1).

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of hospitalized COVID-19 patients
		Females n = 367	Males n = 633	Effect size	P value	First wave n = 500	Second wave n = 500	Effect size	P value	Main effect of Sex	Main effect of Wave	Sex X Wave interaction
Severity
	Asymptomatic	22 (6.0)	30 (4.7)	0.742	0.389	25 (5.0)	27 (5.4)	0.081	0.776	0.378	0.986	0.192
	Mild	39 (10.6)	33 (5.2)	10.18	0.001	29 (5.8)	43 (8.6)	2.933	0.087	0.001	0.108	0.094
	Moderate	110 (30.0)	169 (26.7)	1.23	0.226	127 (25.4)	152 (30.4)	3.107	0.078	0.273	0.175	0.219
	Severe	60 (16.3)	117 (18.5)	0.727	0.394	110 (22.0)	67 (13.4)	12.693	0.000	0.69	0.004	0.085
	Critical	136 (37.1)	284 (44.9)	6.418	0.011	209 (41.8)	211 (42.2)	0.037	0.847	0.01	0.54	0.363
Types of oxygen supplementation
	No oxygen support needed	109 (29.6)	153 (24.2)	3.521	0.061	124 (24.8)	138 (27.6)	1.104	0.314	0.055	0.687	0.024
	Low flow cannula	67 (18.2)	79 (12.5)	6.074	0.014	57 (11.4)	89 (17.8)	8.213	0.004	0.017	0.01	0.461
	High Flow mask	71 (18.3)	136 (21.5)	0.702	0.402	126 (25.2)	81 (16.2)	12.336	0.000	0.626	0.003	0.283
	cPAP/BiPAP	58 (15.8)	102 (15.1)	0.025	0.875	63 (12.6)	97 (19.4)	8.601	0.003	0.464	0.001	0.106
ICU Admission
	Admission to ICU	51 (13.9)	153 (24.2)	15.1	< 0.001	120 (24.0)	84 (16.8)	7.981	0.005	0.000	0.019	0.967
	Age of patients admitted to ICU^a	56.9 (16.9)	63.0 (12.3)	2.752	0.006	59.3 (13.7)	64.5 (13.6)	-2.664	0.008	0.003	0.024	0.665
Outcome
	Deaths within patients admitted to ICU	6/51 (11.7)	53/153 (34.6)	9.737	0.002	37/120 (30.8)	22/84 (26.2)	0.518	0.472	0.004	0.969	0.607
	Overall deaths	51 (13.9)	96 (15.2)	0.299	0.585	71 (14.2)	76 (15.2)	0.199	0.655	0.462	0.331	0.099
Row numbers (percentages) and statistical significances, indicated as effect size (Chi square) and P value, are reported. Grey boxes indicate higher values for females rather than males, while bold numbers indicate higher values for males rather than females; the underlined numbers indicate the higher values observed in the first wave, while those in italic indicate the higher values observed in the second wave. The three columns at the right-hand side report the results of logistic regressions using Sex and Wave as predictors and Age as covariate of no interest. ^aThe mean age (standard deviation) of Covid-19-patients admitted to ICU is reported; statistical significance is indicated as effect size (t test) and P value. The normal distribution of this variable was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. BiPAP: bilevel positive airway pressure, cPAP: continuous positive airway Pressure, ICU: intensive care unit

Kaplan-Meier survival curve shows sex-specific differences in the number of days spent in the ICU, with males requiring critical care for a longer time (30.8 ± 3.5 days in males vs 14.1 ± 1.7 days in females; log rank P < 0.001; Fig. 2 - B). Since females and males admitted to ICU statistically differ in age (males were older than their counterpart; Table 1), the variable Age and Wave were entered as covariate in the Cox model. Despite both age and waves were significantly associated with days spent in ICU (Age: P = 0.001, HR = 0.976; CI = 0.966–0.986; Wave: P = 0.007. HR = 1.620; CI = 1.141–2.300), denoting longer time in ICU for older individuals and longer time in ICU in the first wave compared with the second wave, the model having Sex as predictor still remained highly significant (P = 0.014, HR = 1.589, CI = 1.096–2.303).

Kaplan-Meier survival curve also revealed a trend toward significance for a possible impact of sex on disease duration, suggesting a longer disease duration in males (30.1 ± 1.4 days) than in females (26.7 ± 1.3 days; log rank P = 0.056). When Age and Waves were entered as covariate in the Cox model, both age and wave were found to be significantly associated with disease duration (Age: P = 0.001, HR = 0.982; CI = 0.977–0.987; Wave: P = 0.001, HR = 0.706; CI = 0.602–0.827), denoting longer disease duration for older individuals and mainly in the first wave. In the Cox model, the predictor Sex was significant (P = 0.021, HR = 1.210, CI = 1.030–1.422; Fig. 2 - C). In addition, although the percentage of males who died in ICU was significantly higher, the total deaths’ rate among all patients included in the cohort was not significantly different between sexes (Table 1). While logistic regression analysis indicated that age has no influence of in the fatal cases of COVID-19 (Table 1), the mean age of deceased females was significantly higher (80.9 + 10.3 years in female vs 72.2 + 9.6 years in males; t = 5.071, P = 0.000).

During the first wave the proportion of patients who experienced pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications during their hospital course was higher though without differences between females and males (Supplementary Table 3).

Laboratory parameters of female and male patients hospitalized for COVID-19

Supplementary Table 4 reports the median and ranges found in both sexes and waves, of the highest values of these laboratory parameters, with the sole exception of platelets (PLT), of which the lowest values were identified. The number of white blood cells (WBC) and neutrophils, as well as the levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen were significantly more elevated in males than in females and in the first wave in comparison with the second one, and the effect of sex is stable along the two waves. Ferritin and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were also higher in males, but constant in the two waves, while lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were similar in females and males, but higher in patients hospitalized during the first wave. The lowest values of PLT were observed in males, in both waves. The number of patients with highest lymphocytes, monocytes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and procalcitonin values are equally represented in both sexes and waves.

Highest levels of WBC, neutrophils, CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer, ferritin, LDH, and procalcitonin were preferentially reported in patients admitted in ICU than in those that were managed in the other hospital units, or who died during the course of COVID-19 (Fig. 3, in which the laboratory data obtained in females and males were shown together with the “outlier” values and with the laboratory “reference” values, and Supplementary Table 5). Again, the lowest number of PLT were found in patients who did not survive.

We then checked whether the upper values of each parameter, identified as the furthest observations positioned within one and a half interquartile range of the upper end of the box, correlate with COVID-19 severity classes. Patients with COVID-19 and concomitant heme neoplasia had the most evident “outlier” blood cell count values and in particular males with critical disease. This feature was also observed for the other analytes; for instance, the total outlier values of CRP were found in critical male patients (vs 19.4% in females), that also had 83% of the outlier values of fibrinogen (vs 58% in females).

This investigation began with the announcement of the first cases of COVID-19 and involved the characterization of a first group of 500 patients; then the analysis was extended to other 500 subjects hospitalized during the second pandemic wave. The aim was to evaluate whether the clinical features of COVID-19 pandemic differ between sexes and waves, thus allowing the development of more precise diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic strategies. In this endeavor the study took advantage of the admission of patients enrolled during the two outbreaks in the same hospital, the largest of the city of Brescia, one of the most stricken by the pandemic in Italy.

It is now well known, since the very first published studies, that the vast majority of COVID-19 deaths were among men, across all age groups, and that, overall, women dying for SARS-CoV-2 infection were older than men [21, 22]. This feature has been documented worldwide because a male bias in COVID-19 mortality was reported in the 37 out of the 38 countries that have provided sex disaggregated data [8]. Other studies have also reported that a higher proportion of men were hospitalized than females [17, 23]. Our data showed that this is not the case for younger (< 45 years) and older patients (> 75 years), in whom the hospitalizations of females and males were similar. The similar number of hospitalizations of the > 75 years old patients could be due to the fact that in our city the number of elderly women is about twice as many as that of men (49,472 vs 26,914 ) [24].

In our cohort, the mean time from symptom onset to hospitalization was 6 days, therefore within the range of 2.62 to 9.7 days reported in different countries [25], but there were not significant differences in the time between symptom onset and hospitalization in regard to sex and age groups, and waves. Although sex differences exist in the timeliness and extent to which patients seek health care in response to physical concerns [26], this did not occur in our patients’ cohort, probably due to the great danger and attention given to this disease.

In both waves, more males showed interstitial pneumonia, fever and dyspnea at the time of hospitalization, while more females reported vomiting. An altered state of consciousness, equally reported by women and men and significantly more frequent in the first wave, was the principal no-COVID-19-related cause of hospitalization. Noteworthy, it has been reported that hospitalized COVID-19 patients who presented with altered mental state had significantly higher risk of in-hospital death, even when pulmonary problems were not severe [27]. We have not found this association, but it cannot be considered a discrepancy because in our patients this symptom was the cause of hospitalization with identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection being an accidental event, while in the work of Eskandar and collaborators [27], this neurologic symptom was linked to be a complication of COVID-19.

The presence of multiple comorbidities has been associated with a worse prognosis and higher mortality rate since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic [28]. As also reported by the most recent publications [17, 29], we confirmed that cardiovascular diseases and endocrinopathies, especially diabetes mellitus, are the most frequent comorbidities in patients admitted to our hospital, even though with no sex differences. This is in contrast with some recently published data obtained in 340 Italian and Spanish patients in whom cardiovascular disorders were more frequent in males [18]. Instead, our study confirms that asthma occurred more frequently in women [17, 29], together with psychiatric, musculoskeletal and rheumatic disorders, and autoimmunity/immune-dysregulation diseases. Of interest, we found a correlation between the presence of multiple comorbidities and a worse prognosis, especially in regard to deaths. However, surprisingly, patients with the highest number of comorbidities are less frequently admitted in ICU. The most plausible explanation could be that the unavailability of ICU beds, especially during the peak of the two waves, might have influenced the access to ICU, favoring patients with higher survival chances. Another plausible reason could be that many multi-pathological patients died before the admission to ICU.

The most frequent comorbidities, such as cardiovascular ones, mostly affected patients hospitalized in the second wave; it is possible that the knowledge gained in the first wave on the association between certain comorbidities and worse disease evolution has directed the preferential hospitalization of patients with these predominant comorbidities.

The complications occurred during the hospitalization were many, but equally distributed among both sexes and waves, with the sole exception of pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum cases which were less reported in the second wave, perhaps due to the accumulated experience of all clinicians in the use of non-invasive ventilation devices.

As it has already emerged worldwide that male patients have a high risk of requiring ICU admission [14], the rate of males admitted in ICU in our institution was higher than that of females. Males in ICU were older, had a longer ICU stay and a longer disease duration, especially in the first wave and deceased more frequently in ICU than females. However, the rate of total deaths for hospitalized patients was not significantly different for sex and waves. This indicates that not only the proportion of females and males who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 and become ill with COVID-19 is the same [14], but also that the rate of hospital deaths is comparable, indicating that once hospitalized, the risk of dying is comparable in females and males. This occurs despite the many clinical characteristics of male patients, such as more hospitalizations, higher percentage of multi-symptomatic patients, more days spent in hospital and in ICU, and more ICU deaths appeared to be to their disadvantage. In addition, males also had the highest values of several laboratory biomarkers (i.e. WBC, neutrophils, CRP, fibrinogen, ferritin, and ALT), especially in the first wave (higher levels of D-dimer, in the second wave, were due to the improvement of the analytic method). These higher levels were found mainly in patients who required ICU management and then deceased. The high number of neutrophils but not of lymphocytes may come from the physiological responses of the innate immune system to systemic inflammation which is more intense in critical patients [30].

Therefore, given the predominance of elderly women in our city [24] and that hospitalized female patients are older, their access to ICU could be disadvantaged, in favor of younger males, who are considered patients with greater surviving chances.

Thus, aging-related characteristics, which have been proposed to explain susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and progression to COVID-19 [31], could be the main reasons related to the fatal COVID-19 outcome observed in our cohort.

The reasons behind the sex differences in the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and in COVID-19 evolution have been sought mainly within the immune system. For instance, women produce a stronger type I interferon response upon stimulation [32], which is a critical determinant of disease severity during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection [3, 33]. Interestingly, autoantibodies that neutralize type I interferon are described in COVID-19 patients and their levels are higher in males than in females with severe disease [33]. Another important observation obtained in patients with moderate COVID-19 who had not received immunomodulatory medications suggests that a poor T-cell response negatively correlated with patients' age and was associated with worse disease outcome in males, but not in female patients [34].

Many of the differences we have observed between the first and second waves were totally unexpected, also considering that no available data have been delivered on this aspect yet. One plausible reason could be the different approaches to the disease in the two waves, such as the patient management skills, the training and experience acquired by healthcare personnel, the increased number of beds reserved for COVID-19 patients, with dedicated staff and adequate equipment, as well as the scientific knowledge acquired on this newly discovered viral infection. The explanation cannot be the onset of viral variants that although present since August 2020 [35] has become the prevalent SARS-CoV-2 strain in Brescia only after February 2021. It might be interesting to investigate further patients hospitalized after this date.

The “limitations” of this report include the fact that our hospital, being one of the largest health facilities in Italy, it is a reference center for some specific pathologies. As such, it is possible that hematologic patients, those with renal, neurological diseases and immunodeficiency could be preferentially hospitalized in this facility. Furthermore, thanks to the large number of ICU beds, it is likely that the most serious cases are sent to our hospital as a referral point for the entire province and the neighboring ones. An important aspect not investigated among our patients, is the therapy. However, an analysis of medications that were intended as therapeutics against COVID-19 revealed a similar pattern of usage between females and males for remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and steroids [17].

The "strength" of the study is that our cohort includes patients with a similar social context, the same access to care (because in Italy there is a free national health system, not based on private insurance, hence everyone has the same access to care and hospital admission), same ethnicity (almost all Caucasian), and enrolled within the same catchment area. In addition, all patients have been referred to a unique emergency department, therefore patients have been hospitalized on the basis of the same characteristics and guidelines, and since hospitalized in the same hospital, they all had the same opportunity to access the same facilities and treatments.

Perspectives And Significance

Although males spent more days in hospital, had a more critical and longer duration of the disease, and were admitted and died in ICU more than females, the rate of deaths among all patients of our study did not show sex differences. Therefore, once patients were hospitalized, the risk of dying is similar between females and males. The biggest difference seems to be related to the number of admissions to the hospital, significantly higher for males. Therefore, future studies should aim at understanding the reason why despite being infected by SARS-CoV-2 in the same number of males, less females develop the disease requiring hospitalization.

In conclusion, our findings provide a further piece in understanding the sex-related biases in COVID-19 and may provide an important basis for the development of a personalized approach to the treatment and care of female and male patients with COVID-19, including inclusion in clinical trials and vaccination.

ALT alanine aminotransferase

AST aspartate aminotransferase

COVID-19 Coronavirus disease 2019

CRP C-reactive protein

LDH lactate dehydrogenase

SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

WBC White blood cells

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Lucia Ronconi for statistical and technical support. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of all laboratory personnel of Diagnostic Department, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia (Italy).

Authors’ contributions

LI and EQR conceived, designed and supervised the study. VQ, SS, AS, LS, EQR, OD and CF assisted with data collection. CS and VQ performed the statistical analysis. All authors analyzed and interpreted the data. LI wrote the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by a grant from Regione Lombardia, Italy (project “Risposta immune in pazienti con COVID-19 e co-morbidità”).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Brescia (NP 4000 and NP 4408 – Studio CORONAlab and CORONAlabF).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:934-43.
WHO World Health Organization: World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Weekly Epidemiological Update - 6. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/ situation-reports/20200921-weekly-epi-update-6.pdf?sfvrsn=d9cf9496_6 (2020). Accessed 10 Oct 2020.
Zhang Q, Bastard P, Liu Z, Le Pen J, Moncada-Velez M, Chen J, Ogishi M, et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370:eabd4570.
Hou Y, Zhao J, Martin W, Kallianpur A, Chung MK, Jehi L et al. New insights into genetic susceptibility of COVID-19: an ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphism analysis. BMC Med. 2020;18:216.
Scavini M, Piemonti L. Gender and age effects on the rates of infection and deaths in individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in six European countries. SSRN Electron J. 2020; doi:10.2139/ssrn.3576790.
Liu K, Chen Y, Lin R, Han K. Clinical features of COVID-19 in elderly patients: a comparison with young and middle-aged patients. J Infect. 2020;80:e14-8.
Galbadage T, Peterson BM, Awada J, Buck AS, Ramirez DA, Wilson J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of sex-specific COVID-19 clinical outcomes. Front Med. 2020;7:348.
Scully EP, Haverfield J, Ursin RL, Tannenbaum C, Klein SL. Considering how biological sex impacts immune responses and COVID-19 outcomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:442-7.
Klein SL, Marriott I, Fish EN. Sex-based differences in immune function and responses to vaccination. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015;109:9-15.
Cai H. Sex difference and smoking predisposition in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e20.
Alberca RW, Oliveira LM, Branco ACCC, Pereira NZ, Sato MN. Obesity as a risk factor for COVID-19: an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;15:1-15.
Gausman J, Langer A. Sex and gender disparities in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Women’s Health. 2020;29:465-6.
Takahashi T, Ellingson MK, Wong P, Israelow B, Lucas C, Klein J, et al. Sex differences in immune responses that underlie COVID-19 disease outcomes. Nature. 2020;588:315-20.
Peckham H, de Gruijter NM, Raine C, Radziszewska A, Ciurtin C, Wedderburn LR, et al. Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6317.
Mussini C, Cozzi-Lepri A, Menozzi M, Meschiari M, Franceschini E, Rogati C, et al. Better prognosis in females with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: possible role of inflammation as potential mediator. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021; doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.010.
Jin JM, Bai P, He W, Wu F, Liu XF, Han DM, et al. Gender differences in patients with COVID-19: focus on severity and mortality. Front Public Health. 2020;8:152.
Scully EP, Schumock G, Fu M, Massaccesi G, Muschelli J, Betz J, et al. Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region. medRxiv. 2021; doi:10.1101/2021.04.05.21253827.
Banfi P, Garuti G, Diaz de Teran T, Ruiz J, Ferraioli G, Russo G, et al. Differences between sexes concerning COVID-19-related pneumonia. Panminerva Med. 2021; doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.21.04165-3.
Mantica G, Riccardi N, Terrone C, Gratarola A. Non-COVID-19 admissions to the emergency department during the pandemic second wave in Italy: What is changed from the first wave? Am J Emerg Med. 2020; doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.046.
Wei P-F. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (Trial Version 7). Chin Med J. 2020;133:1087-95.
Xie J, Tong Z, Guan X, Du B, Qiu H. Clinical characteristics of patients who died of Coronavirus disease 2019 in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3: e205619.
ISS Istituto Superiore di Sanità: Integrated surveillance of COVID-19 in Italy. https://www.epicentro.iss.it/en/coronavirus/sars-cov-2-dashboard. Accessed 27 Apr 2021.
Sha J, Qie G, Yao Q, Sun W, Wang C, Zhang Z, et al. Sex differences on clinical characteristics, severity, and mortality in adult patients with COVID-19: a multicentre retrospective study. Front Med. 2021;8:607059.
Lanfredini L, Barberis D, Bertocchi C, Chiappini R, Crisetig M, Ferri F, et al. Aspetti epidemiologici. In: Rapporto 2018 sulle attività si prevenzione e promozione della salute dell’ATS di Brescia. 2019. https://legacy.ats-brescia.it/media/documenti/comunicazione/ATS/pubblicazioni/2019/ATS%20BS Rapporto%202018 INTERATTIVO.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2021.
Pellis L, Scarabel F, Stage HB, Overton CE, Chappell LH, Lythgoe KA, et al. Challenges in control of COVID-19: short doubling time and long delay to effect of interventions. medRxiv. 2020;2020.04.12.20059972.
Thompson AE, Anisimowicz Y, Miedema B, Hogg W, Wodchis WP, Aubrey-Bassler K. The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: a QUALICOPC study. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:38.
Eskandar EN, Altschul DJ, de la Garza Ramos R, Cezayirli P, Unda SR, Benton J, et al. Neurologic syndromes predict higher in-hospital mortality in COVID-19. Neurology. 2021;96:e1527-38.
Sanyaolu A, Okorie C, Marinkovic A, Patidar R, Younis K, Desai P, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on patients with COVID-19. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;1-8.
Vahidy FS, Pan AP, Ahnstedt H, Munshi Y, Choi HA, Tiruneh Y, et al. Sex differences in susceptibility, severity, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019: cross-sectional analysis from a diverse US metropolitan area. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0245556.
Zhao Y, Yu C, Ni W, Shen H, Qiu M, Zhao Y. Peripheral blood inflammatory markers in predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19. Some differences with influenza A. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35:e23657.
Chen Y, Klein SL, Garibaldi BT, Li H, Wu C, Osevala NM, et al. Aging in COVID-19: vulnerability, immunity and intervention. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;65:101205.
Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:626-38.
Bastard P, Rosen LB, Zhang Q, Michailidis E, Hoffmann HH, Zhang Y et al. Auto-antibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370:eabd4585.
Takahashi T, Iwasaki A. Sex differences in immune responses. 2021;371:347-8.
Fiorentini S, Messali S, Zani A, Caccuri F, Giovanetti M, Ciccozzi M, et al. First detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein N501 mutation in Italy in August, 2020. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021; S1473-3099(21)00007-4.

SupplementaryTable1.xlsx
Supplementary Table 1.xls Symptoms reported by COVID-19 patients at the hospital admission.
Row numbers (percentages) and statistical significance, indicated as effect size (Chi square) and P value, are reported. Grey boxes indicate higher values for females rather than males, while bold numbers indicate higher values for males rather than females; the underlined numbers indicate the higher values observed in the first wave, while those in italic indicate the higher values observed in the second wave. The three columns at the right-hand side report the results of logistic regressions using Sex and Wave as predictors and Age as covariate of no interest. aThe mean number (standard deviation) of COVID-19-related symptoms is reported and statistical significance is indicated as effect size (t test) and P value. The normal distribution of this variable was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (d=0.058 and d=0.17 for Age and Total number of symptoms, respectively, meaning data normally distributed).
SupplementaryTable2.xlsx
Supplementary Table 2.xls Comorbidities affecting hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Row numbers (percentages) and statistical significance, indicated as effect size (Chi square) and P value, are reported. Grey boxes indicate the higher values in the first wave, while bold numbers indicate the higher values in the second wave; the underlined numbers indicate the higher values observed in the first wave, while those in italic indicate the higher values observed in the second wave. The three columns at the right-hand side report the results of logistic regressions using Sex and Wave as predictors and Age as covariate of no interest. aThe number of comorbidities is reported as mean (standard deviation) and the statistical significance is indicated as effect size (t test) and P value. The normal distribution of this variable was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV: human immunodeficiency virus
SupplementaryTable3.xlsx
Supplementary Table 3.xls Complications occurring to COVID-19 patients during hospitalization.
Row numbers (percentages) and statistical significance, indicated as effect size (Chi square) and P value, are reported. The underlined numbers indicate the higher values observed in the first wave, while those in italic indicate the higher values observed in the second wave. The three columns at the right-hand side report the results of logistic regressions using Sex and Wave as predictors and Age as covariate of no interest. aThe mean number (standard deviation) of complications is reported; statistical significance is indicated by effect size (t test) and P value. The normal distribution of this variable was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. bLaboratory findings not specifically associated with systemic inflammation and infections.
SupplementaryTable4.xlsx
Supplementary Table 4.xls Laboratory parameters of female and male COVID-19 patients who were hospitalized during the first and second pandemic waves.
Grey boxes indicate higher values for females rather than males, while bold numbers indicate higher values for males rather than females; the underlined numbers indicate the higher values observed in the first wave, while those in italic indicate the higher values observed in the second wave. The columns at the right-hand side report the results of logistic regressions using Sex and Wave as predictors and Age as covariate of no interest. Statistical significance is reported as effect size (F; ANOVA) and P value. ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, WBC: white blood cells
SupplementaryTable5.xlsx
Supplementary Table 5.xls Laboratory parameters of patients who were admitted to ICU and who recovered or deceased.
Statistical significance is reported as effect size (t test) and P value. Grey boxes indicate higher values for patients who were not admitted to ICU (No ICU) rather than those who required ICU, while bold numbers indicate higher values for patients admitted to ICU rather than those who did not require ICU; the underlined numbers indicate the higher values observed in patients who survived (Alive), while those in italic indicate the higher values observed in deceased patients. ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, ICU: intensive care unit, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, WBC: white blood cells.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 11 Aug, 2021

Read the published version in Biology of Sex Differences →

Editorial decision: Minor Revision
04 Jun, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
21 May, 2021
Reviews received at journal
20 May, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
19 May, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
19 May, 2021
First submitted to journal
19 May, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
18 May, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
18 May, 2021
Editor invited by journal
18 May, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Sex differences in a cohort of COVID-19 Italian patients hospitalized during the first and second pandemic waves.

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Highlights

Background

Patients And Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1