Followed the development of modern electrochemical technology and environmental protection, more and more researchers are gradually paying close attention to the utilization of electrode coating materials [1–3]. Lead dioxide (PbO2) is counted as such a kind of electrode coating material of superior performance and has been used in quite a few applications, especially in the wastewater treatment [4–6]. AYR wastewater is a typical representative azo dye wastewater, which has impacted the growth of aquatic creatures and human health for ages [7,8]. For the composition of benzene rings and azo bond of the AYR molecule, AYR wastewater is hard to be degraded. Former scholars' researches proved that electrocatalysis could be considered as an eco-friendly method in AYR wastewater treatment due to its high efficiency and little pollution [9,10]. Based on this, the application of PbO2 composite electrode in electrocatalysis, where reactive oxygen species are produced to degrade organics in effluent, is naturally recognized as of particular interest. However, previous studies mainly focus on PbO2 coatings obtained in situ on lead or lead alloys. Even later researches were only limited to single or stochastic phase structures of PbO2. All these electrodes were facing the problem of easy corrosion or other inefficiencies problems [11–13]. It is urgent to make full use of the phase structures composition of α- and β-PbO2 that separately show corresponding performance characteristics to finally possess longer service life and better removal efficiency of organic pollutant in AYR wastewater treatment.
Among the current preparation methods of PbO2, electrodeposition has always been favored for its advantages in obtaining stable coatings of different phase structures with minimum pollution [14,15]. Up to now, α- and β-PbO2 are mainly obtained in alkaline and acid solutions separately by electrodeposition. Orthorhombic α-PbO2 is relative compact and can promote longer life cycles of electrodes. Whereas tetragonal β-PbO2 is porous and provides more active surface area [16]. It’s rare to simultaneously prepare both phase structures of PbO2 in the same solution, as well as the crystal proportion be quantitatively controlled. Through a large number of researches and experiments, our previous study has worked out the problem and put forward a method of preparing PbO2 coating materials composed of two phase structures in the same methanesulfonic acid (MSA) solution by electrodeposition, which not only avoids the difficulty of preparing different phase structures in separate solutions, but also makes the PbO2 coating materials performance more stable since MSA is an environmentally friendly electrolyte for its chemical stability and excellent solubilisation of metal salts [17]. Based on this, the further promotion on chemical stability and oxidation activity of PbO2 coatings by introducing active particles (MnO2, CNTs etc.) appears to be of interest to practice [18–20].
In this connection, herein we first presented a thorough study of the temperature influence on the nucleation and growth process of α- or β-PbO2 obtained by electrodeposition in MSA solutions so as to judge the guiding factors for obtaining different crystal forms of PbO2 and prepare anodes with ideal crystal ratio. Afterwards, the co-deposition of MnO2 was realized and its content influence upon Pb-0.6%Sb/α-PbO2/β-PbO2-MnO2 electrodes in the electrocatalytic degradation of AYR, namely the oxygen evolution potentials, charge transfer resistances, corrosion potential and accelerated service life, were systematically studied. Ultimately, LC-MS was employed to identify the oxidization intermediates. The electrocatalytic degradation pathways of AYR on MnO2-co-doped PbO2 composite electrodes were accordingly elucidated.