DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.14837/v1
The results of the fourth National Oral Health Epidemiology Survey of China conducted in 2015–2017 found that the prevalence of permanent dental caries in children aged 12 to 15 years was 41.9%, the mean DFMT was 1.04, and the caries filling rate was 17.5% [1]. These data suggest that the prevention of dental caries in Chinese children is still a problem worthy of attention. This paper considers the age group of 6 to 7 years, since children of these ages are in the early mixed dentition that permanent incisors and molars start to erupt and the deciduous teeth remain [2].
In China, 6 to 7 years of age is especially important as it is generally the age at which children begin primary school, which makes reliable samples accessible through the school system. Also, children of these ages are able to acquire knowledge efficiently, which is a critical period for the development of oral hygiene habits [3]. The performance of adequate oral hygiene practices is not only important in the prevention of oral diseases [4], but also in children’s physical and mental health [5]. School-based oral health education programs have been widely conducted in many countries, as these interventions are effective in increasing oral health knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among children [6]. It is notable that parental effects on children’s knowledge, attitudes and behaviors towards oral health are also significant [7].
Previous studies have discussed the effect of the socio-economic status of parents on the prevalence of dental caries and oral health behaviors of children [8–10]. Socio-economic status are mainly measured by mother’s education level [11, 12] and household income [13, 14]. Although parental education level has a certain correlation with the indicators of parental occupations and household income [15, 16], their essences are distinct. The use of education level attempts to capture the knowledge and skills related assets of an individual, while the household income directly measures the material resources component of the family. Among previous researches, the relationship between children’s oral health behaviors (COB), parents’ oral health knowledge (POK), and parental education level has not been examined by research with large sample size.
Pit and fissure sealant (PFS) is a treatment that has been well proven to be effective in preventing dental caries [17–19]. It is suggested by the World Health Organization and health guidelines in the majority of countries [20]. Additionally, free PFS treatment is widely provided by governments over the world [21]. In this study, we collected information on parents’ PFS-related choices and consider it as an extension of parents’ attitudes towards oral health care.
The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between COB, POK, parents’ PFS-related choices and patents’ education levels, based on a large sample size for the first time, and to compare the influence of mother and father on COB, POK and PFS-related choices. An additional aim was to identify potential risk factors that might affect children’s oral health, in order to provide evidences for stakeholders when planning and conducting public health programs.
Funded by the Hongshan District Government, the Hongshan Longitudinal Study on Pit and Fissure Sealant Application (HoLSPA) aimed to provide free oral examination and pit and fissure sealants (PFS) for the first and second graders in Hongshan District, Wuhan, China. Families of the first and second graders in Hongshan District were all eligible for this study. Participants whose parents have psychiatric or cognitive dysfunctions were excluded. The HoLSPA consist of oral examinations, PFS and online surveys.
As part of the HoLSPA, survey data were collected through parental questionnaires issued by the Education Bureau. Electronic questionnaires were sent to parents of 11,000 eligible families through WeChat (a Chinese multi-purpose messaging and social media app) by head teachers. Each family was required to fill out one questionnaire and return it via WeChat. The survey was completed before the clinical part of HoLSPA project started. In the questionnaires, information on children’s family situation, COB, POK and parents’ PFS-related choice were collected.
The Medical Ethics Committee of Wuhan University Stomatological Hospital approved this study (2018. B13). All participants of this study gave written informed consent.
The socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents included the number of children in the family, father’s education level and mother’s education level. Father’s and mother’s educational attainments were grouped into four categories: "Middle school and below“, “High school”, “College degree”, “Undergraduate degree or above”.
We designed 5 questions to analyze the relationship between COB and parents’ education level. The measures of COB included: (1) Does the child usually brush their teeth; (2) Does the child brush the teeth twice a day or more; (3) Has the child ever visited a dentist, (4) Was the last dental visit within past 12 months; (5) The main reason of the last dental visit. The first four questions were answered as “yes” or “no”, and the last question defined as “treatment” or “consultation”.
Eight items were focused on the relationship between POK and parental education level. POK was measured by the response to following true-false statements: (1) Gingival bleeding is normal when brushing teeth; (2) Gingivitis is caused by bacteria; (3) Tooth-brushing is useful for preventing gingivitis; (4) Bacteria can cause dental caries; (5) Eating sugar can cause dental caries; (6) Fluoride is useful in protecting teeth; (7) Pit and fissure sealant can protect teeth; (8) Oral diseases is related to general health. The answers were grouped into two categories: “correct” and “wrong and do not know”.
Three questions explored the relationship between parents’ opinions of PFS and their education. Questions on parents’ opinions of PFS included: (1) Whether you have heard of PFS (“yes” or “no”); (2) Where do you prefer to let your child receive PFS (“dental hospital” or “school”); (3) What are the determinants of choosing PFS location (“Treatment location distance”, “Control of hospital cross-infection”, “Therapeutic equipment perfection”, “Emergency response measures”, “Children’s willingness and cooperation degree” and “Other reasons”).
To begin with, the crude associations between family characteristics, COB, POK, parents’ PFS-related choices and parental education level were analyzed through Chi-square tests. Then, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between COB and parents’ education level. In the univariate logistic regression model, we assessed the association between mother’s and father’s education level independently. In the multivariate model, mothers’ education level and fathers’ education level were added into the regression model simultaneously. Associations between children’s oral health and parents’ education level are not always consistent for the father and the mother [22]. Thus, we first conducted analyses separately for both parents, and then observe them together.
In the third part, we examined the association between POK and parental education level through logistic regression analysis. The choice related to PFS, as a proxy of parents’ choices of oral health care, was assessed in the last part. We conducted logistic regression to examine the association between parental education and their understanding of PFS. EpiData 3.0 was used for data entry and SPSS 25.0 was used for data analysis. A significant level of 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. Additionally, histograms drew by SPSSAU were used to demonstrate the relationship between the determinants of PFS location choice and parents’ education separately.
The distribution of family characteristics, oral health behaviors of children, oral health literacy of parents, and parents’ PFS-related choices by parental education level were presented in Table 1. The response rates among families of first and second graders from 43 primary schools in Wuhan Hongshan District (n = 8,446) was 76.78%.
The proportion of families had only one child was slightly higher (50.82%) than that of families had two or more children (49.18%). As can be seen from the table, parents who received less education were more likely to have more than one child. A large number of fathers (36.06%) and mothers (29.12%) had education up to undergraduate degree or above. Less than one fifth of fathers (18.23%) and mothers (19.65%) had college degree. While some fathers (21.12%) and mother (25.04%) had only completed nine-year compulsory education or lower. According to the results of the chi-square test, the answers of all the questions were significantly related to the parents’ academic background (P < 0.001). Overall, parents belonged to the higher education levels groups had better oral health knowledge and their children reported more favorable behaviors than their counterparts.
Table 2 demonstrates logistic regression results of the effects of mother’s and father’s educational attainments on COB, respectively. In the univariate model, mother’s and father’s education level were all associated with children’s tooth-brushing behavior. When adjusted for education level of counterpart parent, children’s tooth-brushing behavior can be predicted by mother’s education level rather than father’s education level. Participants whose mother had college degree (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.62, 95% Confidential Interval [CI] = 1.57–4.35) and undergraduate or above degree (OR = 1.72, 95%CI = 1.03–2.85) were more likely to brush their teeth than those whose mother with middle school education or below. A clear increased gradient in the effects of parental education level on tooth-brushing frequency was found, showing that participants whose parents with higher education level were more likely to brush their teeth twice a day or more. For example, children whose mother with university degree were 2.47 (95%CI = 2.01–3.02) more likely to brush teeth at least twice a day than those whose mother in the lowest education group, and the effect size of father’s education (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.68–2.51) was slightly smaller than that of mother’s. Similarly, the proportion of children ever had dental visit was steadily increasing as the parental education level rose. The odds of children ever had dental visit was 1.79 (95%CI = 2.45–3.32) times and 1.52 (95%CI = 1.24–1.87) times higher among mothers with university degree and fathers with university degree than their counterparts with middle school education or lower, respectively. When further exploring the last dental visit, participants whose father ever attended university were 1.41 (95CI% = 1.09–1.83) times more likely to had dental visit in the past 12 months than those whose father with lowest education background. Additionally, those whose mother with higher education level were more likely visit dentists for dental treatment (OR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.02–1.61 for high school degree; OR = 1.61, 95%CI = 1.22–2.11 for college degree; OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.35–2.37 for university degree). Reason for dental visit was associated with the father’s education level in the univariate model, however, this association was eliminated after adjusted for mother’s education level.
Table 3 shows the answers of mothers and fathers with different education levels to oral health-related questions, as well as the correlation between the education levels and the correct answer rates obtained by binary analysis. The multivariate regression results showed that 7 of 8 oral health-related common-sense questions were significantly related to mother’s academic qualifications, and 4 of them were significantly related to father’s education level.
The accuracies of answers to “gingival bleeding is normal when brushing teeth”, “tooth-brushing is useful for preventing gingivitis”, “bacteria can cause dental caries”, “eating sugar can cause dental caries”, “fluoride protect teeth”, “PFS protect teeth” and “oral diseases is related to general health” significantly lower among mothers with lower level of education as compared with those of higher education. Regarding to fathers’ responses, the accuracies of answers to “fluoride protect teeth”, “PFS protect teeth” and “oral diseases is related to general health” were significantly higher among fathers with undergraduate degree or above than fathers with lowest education background (OR = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.06–1.58; OR = 2.03, 95%CI = 1.49–2.76; OR = 2.03, 95%CI = 1.43–2.89, respectively). Moreover, fathers ever attended high school and college were 1.19 (95%CI = 1.01–1.40) and 1.26 (95%CI = 1.03–1.55) times more likely to report correct answer to “gingival bleeding is normal when brushing teeth” than those with lowest level of education.
Table 4 presents the results of logical regression analysis between parents’ education levels and their PFS-related choices. The odds of PFS awareness rate increased with both mother’s and father’s education level. Compared with mothers attended nine-year education, having high school, college and undergraduate or above degree yielded ORs of 1.29 (95% CI = 1.09–1.53), 1.65 (95% CI = 1.31–2.08), and 2.15 (95% CI = 1.67–2.78), respectively. The effect size of father’s education level on PFS awareness is similar to mother’s.
Regarding to “the preference of PFS location for children”, the proportion of choosing dental specialist hospitals were increased as the higher academic qualifications gained among both mothers and fathers. The effect size of education level on PFS location preference was stronger among fathers than mothers.
Fig1 A and B present the distribution of parental education levels and the determinants that will be considered when selecting the location of PFS. The trends shown in the two figures were generally alike. As the figures demonstrate, with the rose of parental education level, the proportion of “therapeutic equipment perfection” and “treatment location distance” were increasing, while the proportion of parents considering “children’s willingness and cooperation degree” was decreasing.
This is the first study carried out in China to assess the relationship between COB, POK, parents’ choice of PFS and parental education level among first and second graders’ families.
The statistical results of this research demonstrated three aspects of information. Firstly, among households with lower parental education, children’s oral health behaviors were poorer than those from well-educated families, specifically, no brushing teeth, brushing teeth less often, visiting the dentist less frequent, and have not check their teeth for a long time. These findings indicate that children were more likely to practice oral hygiene care with the increase of parental education levels. Secondly, oral health knowledge was increased with education level among parents. Thirdly, parents with higher educational background not only had a better understanding of PFS, but also placed greater emphasis on the hospital’s professionalism, equipment perfection and treatment location distance, while less consideration was given to children’s wishes and cooperation.
When it comes to COB, mother’s education level significantly affected 4 of 5 indicators, while father’s education level only affected 3 of them. In terms of POK, mother’s education was significantly associated with accuracies of 7 questions, 3 more than that of father’s. Moreover, the PFS-related choices were significantly correlated to both mother’s and father’s education level. It appeared that the mother’s education background may play a more important role than father’s in the development of family’s oral health knowledge and behaviors.
Previous studies have indicated that children dental caries is closely related to socio-economic backgrounds [23]. Poor oral health conditions are widely present among individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds [24], such as lower parental education level [25], and lower household income [26]. Common socio-economic indicators include mother’s education level [27], household income [28], and parents’ occupation [29]. Less commonly used research indicators include medical insurance [30], single parenting [31], type of school [32], teenage pregnancy [13] and the Index of Multiple Deprivation [33]. Because that different studies used diverse socio-economic indicators, this reduces the comparability between studies.
In agreement with the opinion of Schwendicke et al. [26], parents with lower education levels would have poorer health literacy, poorer dietary and oral health behaviors, which lead to a higher prevalence of caries. The conclusions of our study could complement and confirm each other with his research results [26, 34]. Our study suggests that parents with lower academic backgrounds have poorer oral health knowledge, which in turn leads to poorer oral health behaviors. Van der Tas et al. [13] believed that mother’s education level was the most important index that affect dental caries than household income and parents’ occupation in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. In addition, Van den Branden et al. [25] found that 5-year-old children in Belgium whose mothers with higher education level were more likely to consume less sugary drinks, brush teeth more frequently, have more dental visits, and have lower prevalence of dental caries. In line with the study conducted by Khami MR et al. [35] showing that the Iranian children’s smoking habits was associated with their father’s education background, our findings demonstrate that father’s education has a significant influence on COB.
Nunez L et al. [36] and Camargo MB et al. [37] both suggested that higher parental education level was associated with the more frequent use of dental service, which was revalidated in our study. Interestingly, our findings show that higher educated parents are more likely to visit dentist for the purpose of dental treatment rather than dental consultation. This might because of the higher internet use for health information acquisition among higher educated groups when encountering health problems. In disagreement with other studies, our project further investigated and analyzed parents’ understanding and choices on PFS. AI Agili ED et al. [38] claimed that higher parental education and family income were independently associated with higher sealant prevalence. Our research adds that higher educated parents pay more attention to PFS location, quality of equipment, and doctors’ professionalism. However, interestingly, they pay less attention to children’s willingness and cooperation degree than the lower educated counterparts. It can be inferred that highly educated parents may be more uncompromising and autocratic as for dental health care.
The limitation of this study is that the survey was carried out in Wuhan Hongshan District, Hubei Province, where 38 high level colleges and universities are located in this district. Because of the great density and quality of educational resources, the local parents’ education levels are generally higher than most other cities in China. Therefore, our sample cannot represent the Chinese population to certain degree.
Based on the findings of this study, concerted efforts to improve the Wuhan government’s arrangement in HoLSPA project are recommended (1) to public more oral health knowledge through mass media, (2) to arrange the PFS location close to children’s home address, to improve the integrity of PFS equipment, and to enhance the professionalism of the doctors.
In the early mixed dentition of children, the parent with higher education pose better oral health knowledge and have higher needs for oral health care, such as PFS. As a result, their children behave better to maintain good oral health.
COB: children’s oral health behaviors
POK: parents’ oral health knowledge
PFS: pit and fissure sealing
Approval for this study (2018. B13) was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee of Wuhan University Stomatological Hospital. Prior to the questionnaire survey, researchers had obtained permission from headmasters in all participating schools, and written informed consent was sent to parents of each migrant child to explain the content of the survey. Each family returned a consent form.
Consent for publicationNot applicable.
Availability of data and materialsThe patients’ data will not be shared. However, the datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81870756) and the Wuhan Young and Middle-aged Medical Talents Training Program (No. [2019] 87).
Authors’ contributionsLiangwen Chen contributed to data analysis and manuscript drafting.
Jialan Hong contributed to data analysis and manuscript revision.
Dian Xiong and Luyi Zhang contributed to data collection.
Yuhong Li contributed to study design, and data collection.
Shengfu Huang congtributed to study design, data interpretation, and manuscript revision.
Fang Hua contributed to study design, data interpretation and manuscript revision.
All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the paper.
The authors gratefully thank the Wuhan Hongshan District Health and Family Planning Commission for facilitating the data collection, and the participating schools (including teachers and staff) for their support.
1.Quan JK, Wang XZ, Sun XY, Yuan C, Liu XN, Wang X, Feng XP, Tai BJ, Hu Y, Lin HC et al: Permanent Teeth Caries Status of 12- to 15-year-olds in China: Findings from the 4th National Oral Health Survey. Chin J Dent Res 2018, 21(3):181–193.
2.Ahiko N, Baba Y, Tsuji M, Horikawa R, Moriyama K: Investigation of maxillofacial morphology and oral characteristics with Turner syndrome and early mixed dentition. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2019, 59(1):11–17.
3.Kaminska A, Szalewski L, Batkowska J, Wallner J, Wallner E, Szabelska A, Borowicz J: The dependence of dental caries on oral hygiene habits in preschool children from urban and rural areas in Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med 2016, 23(4):660–665.
4.De David SC, Mario TG, De Freitas GC, Kantorski KZ, Wikesjo UME, Moreira CHC: Correlation between plaque control and gingival health using short and extended oral hygiene intervals. Clin Oral Investig 2018, 22(7):2593–2597.
5.Kisely S: No Mental Health without Oral Health. Can J Psychiatry 2016, 61(5):277–282.
6.Angelopoulou MV, Kavvadia K, Taoufik K, Oulis CJ: Comparative clinical study testing the effectiveness of school based oral health education using experiential learning or traditional lecturing in 10 year-old children. BMC Oral Health 2015, 15:51.
7.Ji Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chang C: Association between family factors and children’s oral health behaviors—a cross-sectional comparative study of permanent resident and migrant children in large cities in China. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2016, 44(1):92–100.
8.Pieper K, Dressler S, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Neuhauser A, Krecker M, Wunderlich K, Jablonski-Momeni A: The influence of social status on pre-school children’s eating habits, caries experience and caries prevention behavior. Int J Public Health 2012, 57(1):207–215.
9.Kumar S, Tadakamadla J, Kroon J, Johnson NW: Impact of parent-related factors on dental caries in the permanent dentition of 6–12-year-old children: A systematic review. J Dent 2016, 46:1–11.
10.Boyce WT, Den Besten PK, Stamperdahl J, Zhan L, Jiang Y, Adler NE, Featherstone JD: Social inequalities in childhood dental caries: the convergent roles of stress, bacteria and disadvantage. Soc Sci Med 2010, 71(9):1644–1652.
11.Veerasamy A, Kirk R, Gage J: Epidemiology of dental caries among adolescents in Tamil Nadu, India. Int Dent J 2016, 66(3):169–177.
12.Pizzo G, Piscopo MR, Matranga D, Luparello M, Pizzo I, Giuliana G: Prevalence and socio-behavioral determinants of dental caries in Sicilian schoolchildren. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2010, 16(10):PH83–89.
13.van der Tas JT, Kragt L, Elfrink MEC, Bertens LCM, Jaddoe VWV, Moll HA, Ongkosuwito EM, Wolvius EB: Social inequalities and dental caries in six-year-old children from the Netherlands. J Dent 2017, 62:18–24.
14.Vettore MV, Ahmad SFH, Machuca C, Fontanini H: Socio-economic status, social support, social network, dental status, and oral health reported outcomes in adolescents. Eur J Oral Sci 2019, 127(2):139–146.
15.Hoque KE, Hoque KF, R APT: Relationships between parents’ academic backgrounds and incomes and building students’ healthy eating habits. PeerJ 2018, 6:e4563.
16.Kerkeni E, Monastiri K, Saket B, Rudan D, Zgaga L, Ben Cheikh H: Association among education level, occupation status, and consanguinity in Tunisia and Croatia. Croat Med J 2006, 47(4):656–661.
17.Chestnutt IG, Hutchings S, Playle R, Morgan-Trimmer S, Fitzsimmons D, Aawar N, Angel L, Derrick S, Drew C, Hoddell C et al: Seal or Varnish? A randomised controlled trial to determine the relative cost and effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant and fluoride varnish in preventing dental decay. Health Technol Assess 2017, 21(21):1–256.
18.Khouja T, Smith KJ: Cost-effectiveness analysis of two caries prevention methods in the first permanent molar in children. J Public Health Dent 2018, 78(2):118–126.
19.Chestnutt IG, Playle R, Hutchings S, Morgan-Trimmer S, Fitzsimmons D, Aawar N, Angel L, Derrick S, Drew C, Hoddell C et al: Fissure Seal or Fluoride Varnish? A Randomized Trial of Relative Effectiveness. J Dent Res 2017, 96(7):754–761.
20.Baldini V, Tagliaferro EP, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim Mde C, Pereira AC: Use of occlusal sealant in a community program and caries incidence in high- and low-risk children. J Appl Oral Sci 2011, 19(4):396–402.
21.Corbin SB, Kleinman DV, Lane JM: New opportunities for enhancing oral health: moving toward the 1990 objectives for the nation. Public Health Rep 1985, 100(5):515–524.
22.Blumer S, Ratson T, Peretz B, Dagon N: Parents’ Attitude towards the Use of Fluorides and Fissure Sealants and its Effect on their Children’s Oral Health. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018, 42(1):6–10.
23.Christensen LB, Twetman S, Sundby A: Oral health in children and adolescents with different socio-cultural and socio-economic backgrounds. Acta Odontol Scand 2010, 68(1):34–42.
24.Conway DI, Quarrell I, McCall DR, Gilmour H, Bedi R, Macpherson LM: Dental caries in 5-year-old children attending multi-ethnic schools in Greater Glasgow—the impact of ethnic background and levels of deprivation. Community Dent Health 2007, 24(3):161–165.
25.Van den Branden S, Van den Broucke S, Leroy R, Declerck D, Hoppenbrouwers K: Oral health and oral health-related behaviour in preschool children: evidence for a social gradient. Eur J Pediatr 2013, 172(2):231–237.
26.Schwendicke F, Dorfer CE, Schlattmann P, Foster Page L, Thomson WM, Paris S: Socioeconomic inequality and caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015, 94(1):10–18.
27.Zhou Y, Lin HC, Lo EC, Wong MC: Risk indicators for early childhood caries in 2-year-old children in southern China. Aust Dent J 2011, 56(1):33–39.
28.Skinner J, Johnson G, Phelan C, Blinkhorn A: Dental caries in 14- and 15-year-olds in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:1060.
29.Falkstedt D, Moller J, Zeebari Z, Engstrom K: Prevalence, co-occurrence, and clustering of health-risk behaviors among people with different socio-economic trajectories: A population-based study. Prev Med 2016, 93:64–69.
30.Elias-Boneta AR, Toro MJ, Rivas-Tumanyan S, Murillo M, Orraca L, Encarnacion A, Cernigliaro D, Toro-Vizcarrondo C, Psoter WJ: Persistent oral health disparity in 12-year-old Hispanics: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2016, 16:10.
31.Hallett KB, O’Rourke PK: Early childhood caries and infant feeding practice. Community Dent Health 2002, 19(4):237–242.
32.Piovesan C, Padua MC, Ardenghi TM, Mendes FM, Bonini GC: Can type of school be used as an alternative indicator of socioeconomic status in dental caries studies? A cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011, 11:37.
33.Hong J, Whelton H, Douglas G, Kang J: Consumption frequency of added sugars and UK children’s dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2018, 46(5):457–464.
34.Reda SF, Reda SM, Thomson WM, Schwendicke F: Inequality in Utilization of Dental Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 2018, 108(2):e1-e7.
35.Khami MR, Murtomaa H, Razeghi S, Virtanen JI: Smoking and its determinants among Iranian dental students. Med Princ Pract 2010, 19(5):390–394.
36.Nunez L, Icaza G, Contreras V, Correa G, Canales T, Mejia G, Oxman-Martinez J, Moreau J: [Factors associated with dental consultation in children in Talca (Chile) and in Chilean immigrants in Montreal (Canada)]. Gac Sanit 2013, 27(4):344–349.
37.Camargo MB, Barros AJ, Frazao P, Matijasevich A, Santos IS, Peres MA, Peres KG: Predictors of dental visits for routine check-ups and for the resolution of problems among preschool children. Rev Saude Publica 2012, 46(1):87–97.
38.Al Agili DE, Griffin SO: Effect of Family Income on the Relationship Between Parental Education and Sealant Prevalence, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2015, 12:E138.