4-week eicosapentaenoic acid-rich fish oil supplementation partially protects muscular damage following eccentric contractions

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-55558/v1

Abstract

Background

We previously showed that the 8-week supplementation of fish oil attenuates muscle damage. However, the effect of a shorter period of fish oil supplementation is unclear. The present study investigates the effect of supplementation of fish oil in eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) for 4 weeks on muscular damage caused by eccentric contractions (ECCs) of the elbow flexors.

Methods

Twenty-two untrained men were recruited in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study and the subjects were randomly assigned to the EPA and DHA group (EPA, n = 11) and placebo group (PL, n = 11). They consumed either EPA 600 mg and DHA 260 mg per day or placebo supplement for 4 weeks prior to exercise. Subjects performed 60 ECCs at 100% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) using a dumbbell. Changes in MVC torque, range of motion (ROM), upper arm circumference, muscle soreness, echo intensity, muscle thickness, serum creatine kinase (CK), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were assessed before exercise; immediately after exercise; and 1, 2, 3, and 5 days after exercise.

Results

ROM was significantly higher in the EPA group than in the PL group immediately after performing ECCs (p < 0.05). No differences between groups were observed in terms of MVC torque, upper arm circumference, muscle soreness, echo intensity, and thickness. A significant difference was observed in serum CK 3 days after ECCs (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

We concluded that shorter period EPA and DHA supplementation benefits joint flexibility and protection of muscle fiber following ECCs.

Introduction

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids include of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5 n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6 n-3), which are mainly contained in fish oil. EPA and DHA are known to have anti-inflammatory effects and increased red blood cell (RBC) deformability as a consequence of incorporation of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid into RBC membrane phospholipids 1. Recently, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation has been proposed as an ergogenic aid for athletes 2.

Exhaustive eccentric contractions (ECCs) or unaccustomed exercise causes delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), reduction in maximal strength, limitation of range of motion (ROM), and muscle swelling 3. In addition, previous studies showed that after ECCs, serum myoglobin (Mb), creatine kinase (CK), and interleukin (IL)-6 increase 3–7. ECC-induced muscle damage is defined as morphological changes in the sarcomeres and endomysium and inflammatory responses in muscle fibers and connective tissues 8. Previous studies have reported that EPA and DHA supplementation positively affect these symptoms of muscle damage 7, 9–12.

We previously examined 30 ECCs in elbow flexors after an intake of both 600 mg/day of EPA and 260 mg/day of DHA for 8 weeks 7. Results showed that ingestion of 8-week EPA and DHA inhibits decreased muscle strength and reduces ROM 7. In addition, we showed that EPA and DHA ingestion reduce the levels of IL-6 as inflammatory response 7. Furthermore, other studies have reported that ingestion of 8-week EPA (600 mg/day) and DHA (260 mg/day) attenuates nerve dysfunction 9 and muscle stiffness 11 following 60 ECCs using a dumbbell at 100% 1RM. However, the study that conducted these experiments in shorter periods (< 8 weeks) is controversial and insufficient 10, 12, 13. Elucidating the efficacy of shorter period of EPA and DHA supplementation is important for athletes and resistance training enthusiasts.

Therefore, the present study examined whether 600 mg/day of EPA and 260 mg/day of DHA supplementation for 4 weeks reduce muscle damage following elbow flexors in ECCs. We hypothesized that short term period of EPA and DHA supplementation partially plays some positive roles in ECC-induced muscle damage.

Methods

Subjects

A total of 22 healthy untrained men were recruited for this study. The participants were not allergic to fish and had no resistance training. Thus, they were requested not to participate in other clinical trials and interventions, such as massage, stretching, strenuous exercise, excessive consumption of food or alcohol, and intake of supplementations or medications during the experimental period. All participants were provided with detailed explanations of the study protocol prior to participation, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The present study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee for human experiments of Teikyo Heisei University (ID: R01-040). Moreover, it has been registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR identifier: UMIN000038003).

Study design

The study used the double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial design. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups using a table of random numbers to minimize the intergroup differences in terms of age, body fat, and body mass index (BMI). The placebo (PL) group consumed daily placebo capsules for 4 weeks prior to an exercise experiment and for 5 days after the exercise experiment, whereas the EPA group consumed EPA supplement capsules 4 weeks prior exercise. The sequence allocation concealment and blinding of participants and researchers were maintained throughout this period. Medication adherence was assessed using the daily record of the patients and via pill count at the end of the study. On the day of exercise testing, muscle damage markers were assessed using the nondominant arm before exercise. Immediately after these baseline measurements, the participants performed ECCs using the same arm. All measurements were performed immediately before and after exercise and 1, 2, 3, and 5 days after exercise except for the measurement of blood markers, which was performed immediately after exercise. In addition, we assessed the nutrition status of all participants prior to supplement consumption and after the experimental testing on food frequency using a questionnaire based on food groups (FFQg version 3.5, Kenpakusha, Tokyo, Japan). Furthermore, we measured serum fatty acid levels, including EPA, DHA, arachidonic acid (AA), and dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) levels.

Supplements

The EPA group consumed eight 300-mg EPA-rich fish oil softgel capsules (Nippon Suisan Kaisha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) per day, and the total consumption was 2,400 mg per day (600-mg EPA and 260-mg DHA). The PL group consumed eight 300-mg corn oil softgel capsules per day (without EPA and DHA), and the total consumption was 2,400 mg. The participants consumed the capsules within 30 min after the meal.

Blood sample

The participants fasted for 8 h before a trained doctor obtained blood samples from their forearms [7]. The blood samples were allowed to clot at room temperature (25 °C) and were then centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The serum was extracted and stored at − 20 °C until analysis. The serum levels of DGLA, AA, EPA, and DHA were measured. In addition, we evaluated serum creatine kinase (CK) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) as muscle damage markers, as previously described 7.

Eccentric contractions

For the ECCs, the participant sat on a preacher curl bench with his shoulder joint angle at 45° flexion. For the use of the dumbbell, the value of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque measurement at 90° was converted to kilograms. The exercise comprised six sets of 10 maximal voluntary ECCs of the elbow flexors with a rest period of 90 s between each set, as described in our previous study 11. The dumbbell was handed to the participant at the elbow flexed position (90°), and the participant was instructed to lower it to a fully extended position (0°) at an approximately constant speed (30°/s) in time (3 s) with a metronome. The investigator then removed the dumbbell, and the participant returned his arm without the dumbbell to the start the position for the next ECCs.

Maximum voluntary contraction torque

For the measurement of MVC torque, the participant performed three 3-s MVCs at 90° and 110° of elbow joint angle with a 30-s rest during contractions. The peak torque of each angle contraction was used as the MVC torque. The torque signal was amplified using a strain amplifier (LUR-A-100NSA1; Kyowa Electronic Instruments, Tokyo, Japan). The analog torque signal was converted to digital signals using a 16-bit analog-to-digital converter (Power-Lab 16SP; AD Instruments, Bella Vista, Australia). The sampling frequency was set at 10 kHz.

Range of motion of the elbow joint

To examine the ROM of the elbow joint, two elbow joint angles (extended and flexed) were measured using a goniometer (Takase Medical, Tokyo, Japan). The extended joint angle was recorded while the participant attempted to fully extend the joint with the elbow held by his side and the hand in supination 7, 14, 15. The flexed joint angle was identified while the participant attempted to fully flex the joint from an equally fully extended position with the hand supinated. The ROM was calculated by subtracting the flexed joint angle from the extended joint angle.

Muscle soreness

Muscle soreness in the elbow flexors was assessed using a 10-cm visual analog scale in which 0 indicated “no pain” and 10 indicated “unbearable imaginable” 7, 14, 15. The participant relaxed his arm in a natural position. The investigator then palpated the upper arm using a thumb, and the participant indicated his pain level using the visual analogue scale. All tests were conducted by the same investigator who had been trained to use the same pressure over time between participants.

Upper arm circumference

Upper arm circumference was assessed at 9 cm above the elbow joint using a tape measure while the participants were standing with their arms relaxed by their side 9. The measurement marks were maintained during the experimental period using a semipermanent ink marker, and a well-trained investigator obtained the measurements. The average value of the three measurements was used for further analysis.

Muscle echo intensity and thickness

B-mode ultrasound pictures of the upper arm were obtained using the biceps brachii via an ultrasound (SONIMAGE HS1, Konika Minolta, Japan), and the probe was placed 9 cm from the elbow joint at the position marked for the measurement of the upper arm circumference. The same gains and contrast were used over the experimental period. The transverse images were transferred to a computer as bitmap (.bmp) files and analyzed using a computer. The average muscle echo intensity of the region of interest (20 × 20 mm) was calculated using the computer image analysis software that provided a grayscale histogram (0, black; 100, white) for the region, as described in a previous study (ImageJ, Maryland, USA) 9. Scanned images of each muscle were transferred to a personal computer and the thickness of biceps rachii was manually calculated via tracing using same software.

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using the SPSS software version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Values were expressed as means ± standard deviation. MVC torque, ROM, circumference, echo intensity, and thickness of values before exercise to 5 days post-exercise were calculated based on relative changes from the baseline. MVC, ROM, visual analogue scale (VAS), circumference, echo intensity, thickness, and blood data of the PL and EPA groups were compared using two-way repeated-measure analysis of variance. When a significant primary effect or interaction was found, Bonferroni’s correction was performed for post-hoc testing. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the EPA and PL groups in terms of age, weight, and BMI (PL group, n = 11; age, 19.8 ± 1.5 years; height, 169.0 ± 7.8 cm; weight, 65.4 ± 8.4 kg; body fat, 15.7 ± 7.6%; and BMI, 23.2 ± 3.3 kg/m2; EPA group, n = 11; age, 20.2 ± 0.4 years; height, 167.4 ± 5.4 cm; weight, 65.0 ± 8.9 kg; body fat, 17.2 ± 6.9%; and BMI, 23.2 ± 2.9 kg/m2). Based on the results of the food frequency survey, no difference was observed in the PL group between before (energy, 1953.6 ± 442.2; protein, 64.4 ± 16.9; fat, 64.6 ± 12.3; carbohydrate, 263.5 ± 72.5; and omega-3 fatty acid, 1.8 ± 0.2) and after supplementation (energy, 1991.0 ± 556.2; protein, 64.9 ± 22.2; fat, 68.3 ± 24.1; carbohydrate, 262.0 ± 77.4; and omega-3 fatty acid, 2.0 ± 0.7) and in the EPA group between before (energy, 1907.9 ± 349.7; protein, 70.9 ± 14.3; fat, 68.1 ± 12.7; carbohydrate, 243.8 ± 73.4; and omega-3 fatty acid, 2.1 ± 0.6) and after supplementation (energy, 1894.9 ± 431.4; protein, 70.7 ± 17.3; fat, 65.8 ± 13.7; carbohydrate, 244.1 ± 81.9; and omega-3 fatty acid, 2.0 ± 0.6). These data reveal that physical characteristics and nutrition status of the participants did not change during the experimental period.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids

As shown in Table 1, no significant changes were observed in the PL group before and after supplementation in terms of DGLA, AA, EPA, and DHA levels. In the EPA group, blood EPA level increased after 4 weeks (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed in the DGLA, AA, and DHA levels. For comparison between groups, the EPA level was significantly higher in the EPA group than in the PL group after the 4-week supplementation (p < 0.05).

Table 1

Changes of serum dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid at before and after 4-weeks supplementation

   

Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (µg/ml)

Arachidonic acid (µg/ml)

Eicosapentaenoic acid (µg/ml)

Docosahexaenoic acid (µg/ml)

Placebo

Before

49.0 ± 9.9

189.1 ± 40.6

20.9 ± 9.2

68.5 ± 24.6

After

42.9 ± 1.8

198.7 ± 39.5

14.2 ± 6.1

59.4 ± 22.3

EPA

Before

44.7 ± 9.3

201.6 ± 38.1

33.5 ± 21.2

70.9 ± 18.0

After

42.3 ± 10.5

186.8 ± 20.3

58.2 ± 25.7 *†

78.2 ± 17.7

* p < 0.05, Compare with placebo group for after supplementations, †p < 0.05, Compare with EPA group for before supplementations.

Maximal voluntary isometric contraction torque

For the MVC, although a times main effect was observed (p < 0.05), no interaction was detected between times and the group (Fig. 1).

Range of motion of the elbow joint

As shown in Fig. 2A, ANOVA revealed an interaction, times, and group effect for ROM (p < 0.05). Post-hoc analysis revealed that a significant decrease in ROM was observed in the PL group immediately after exercise, which remained lower than the baseline on days 1, 2, and 3 after exercise. The ROM in the EPA group decreased immediately after and 1 day after exercise compared with the pre-exercise value but returned to baseline on day 2 after exercise. The ROM in the EPA group was significantly higher than that of the PL group immediately after exercise (EPA group; 76.5 ± 16.7%, PL group; 53.1 ± 18.7%; p < 0.05).

Upper arm circumference and muscle soreness

For upper arm circumference and muscle soreness, although a times main effect was observed (p < 0.05), no interaction was detected between times and group (Fig. 2B and C).

Muscle thickness and echo intensity

For muscle thickness and echo intensity, although a times main effect was observed (p < 0.05), no interaction was detected between times and group (Fig. 2A and B).

Blood serum analysis

ANOVA revealed an interaction, times, and group effect for serum CK (p < 0.05). Serum CK levels in the PL group significantly increased 3 and 5 days after exercise compared with pre-exercise values (Fig. 4A, p < 0.05). However, no significant difference after exercise compared with pre-exercise values was observed in the EPA group. Serum CK levels were significantly higher in the PL group than the EPA group 3 days after exercise (PL, 12132.7 ± 13652.2 U/L vs EPA, 2575.2 ± 2798.9 U/L, p < 0.05). In contrast, no interaction, times, and group effect were detected between times and the group (Fig. 4B).

Discussion

This study investigated the effect of consuming EPA-enriched fish oil for 4 weeks on temporal muscular dysfunction and soreness following ECCs. As a result, the 4-week ingestion of 600-mg EPA and 260-mg DHA attenuated the loss of joint flexibility after 60 ECCs in the elbow flexors. Moreover, the present regimen reduced the blood CK level, suggesting increased owing to damage to muscle fibers. However, no effects were observed on loss of muscle strength, delayed onset muscle soreness, muscle swelling, echo intensity, and blood IL-6. These results suggest that supplementation with EPA-enriched fish oil for 4 weeks is effective to a certain extent for attenuating acute exercise-induced muscular damage. These results support our hypothesis.

Herein, we confirmed that EPA (600 mg/day) and DHA (260 mg/day) consumed for 4 weeks significantly attenuated reduced ROM after 60 ECCs in the elbow flexors. The decreased ROM after ECCs has been attributed to the increased passive muscle stiffness due to inflammatory response in myofibrils, elevated cytoplasmic calcium levels, and muscle swelling due to inflammatory reactions 16, 17. In our previous study, 30 isokinetic ECCs produced by elbow flexion with maximum effort were loaded after 600-mg EPA and 260-mg DHA per day for 8 weeks before exercise 7. As a result, the reduction of ROM in the elbow joint until 3 days after exercise in EPA and DHA group was significantly less compared with that in the placebo group 7. In a different study, the 8-week consumption of 600 mg/day EPA and 260 mg/day DHA significantly reduced elbow ROM until 5 days after 60 ECCs using dumbbells at 100% MVC 11. As a study investigating the effectiveness of supplementation for a period shorter than 8 weeks, Lenn et al. 13 tested the effect of 30-day consumption of 1,800-mg/day omega-3 fatty acids (398-mg EPA and 269-mg DHA) on muscle damage following 50 ECCs by elbow flexions in 21 untrained men and women. The results of that study show no differences in the loss of ROM in the elbow between the omega-3 fatty acid group and the placebo group. As consumption of 2,400-mg/day omega-3 fatty acids (600-mg EPA and 260-mg DHA) was effective in this study, the dose, rather than the duration of administration, appears to be a more important factor determining the preventive effect on joint flexibility. In addition, a study involving 24 healthy young men has reported that reduced ROM in the knee joint after loading ECCs of quadriceps through a 40-min bench stepping exercise was significantly reduced in those who consumed 324-mg/day EPA and 216-mg/day DHA for 30 days 10. In that study, ingestion of lower EPA and DHA was effective presumably because the multi-joint movement in lower limbs for a long period of time was a relatively low-intensity exercise. These data suggest that the effectiveness of short-term supplementation with EPA and DHA (28–30 days) on joint flexibility may differ depending on the omega-3 fatty acid dose, mode of exercise, and specific muscles involved.

In the present study, no differences in IL-6 between the groups were observed, and blood CK elevation in the EPA group was significantly reduced. The increase in CK following ECCs is attributable to micro-damage to muscle fibers 3, 5. A study involving mice has reported that the amount of omega-3 fatty acids in the cell membrane significantly increased after 3-week administration of omega-3 fatty acids 18. Therefore, a possible reason why the exercise-induced CK elevation was mitigated herein is that omega-3 fatty acids were incorporated into and protected cell membrane in muscle fiber. Similarly, Tartibian et al 10 have reported that consumption of EPA and DHA for 30 days reduced CK elevation after ECCs from 40 min of the bench stepping exercise. A different study has also showed that 2,000-mg/day DHA ingestion for 4 weeks reduced CK elevation after ECCs through elbow flexions using dumbbells 19. Some studies have reported controversial observations indicating that supplementation with EPA and DHA did not reduce the CK level in blood 7, 20, 21. Furthermore, some studies have demonstrated that consumption of EPA and DHA reduced the elevation of IL-6, an inflammatory cytokine 7, 12, 19, 20. Possible reasons why our results did not agree with these previous studies were used different modes and time points. Future studies considering these factors are necessary.

The present study also indicated no effect of 4-week supplementation with EPA and DHA on DOMS. A study has reported that the results of daily ingestion of 2,000-mg EPA and 1,000-mg DHA for 2 weeks significantly mitigated DOMS in the upper arm after two sets of ECCs (until exhaustion) via elbow flexions using dumbbells at an intensity of 120% 1RM 22. Similarly, as a result of 3,600 mg of EPA and DHA ingested for 2 weeks have also been reported to mitigate DOMS in the upper arm and thigh after 10 sets of ECCs (until exhaustion) through elbow flexions and knee extensions at an intensity of 50% 1RM 23. Studies using 8-week consumption of EPA and DHA at lower doses (600 mg/day of EPA and 260 mg/day of DHA) have reported significant mitigation of DOMS after 30 isokinetic ECCs by elbow flexions 7 and DOMS after isotonic ECCs using dumbbells at an intensity of 40% 1RM 9. In contrast, 30-day consumption of 287-mg/day EPA and 194-mg/day DHA 13 and 6-week consumption of 1,300-mg/day EPA and 300-mg/day DHA 24 have been demonstrated to be ineffective for DOMS following isokinetic ECCs. Therefore, we suggest that ingestion at a high daily dose or for a long period of time appears to be important for EPA and DHA to exert the mitigation effect on DOMS.

Herein, loss of muscle strength, muscle swelling, and increased echo intensity after exercise were not prevented by the 4-week ingestion of EPA and DHA. In a previous study, we have reported that the results of 8-week ingestion at similar doses to those used in the present study reduced the loss of muscle strength 7, 9, 11. Furthermore, 30-day ingestion of 287-mg/day EPA and 194-mg/day DHA 13 and 6-week ingestion of 1,300-mg EPA and 300-mg DHA 24 have been shown to be ineffective against loss of muscle strength. Considering the results of our present and previous studies, the duration of EPA and DHA intake is an important determinant of the effectiveness for muscle strength after exercise. In addition, no consensus has been obtained thus far on the swelling of muscles. Consumption of EPA (600 mg/day) and DHA (260 mg/day) for 8 weeks has been reported to attenuate muscle swelling after ECCs through elbow flexions at an intensity of 100% MVC 11. Ingestion of 324-mg EPA and 216-mg DHA per day for 30 days has been reported to mitigate muscle swelling after ECCs in lower limbs 10. Several previous studies show that consumption of EPA and DHA for 2–8 weeks did not attenuate muscle swelling after ECCs 7, 9, 22, 23. In many studies, muscle swelling was not evaluated directly and was measured using a measuring tape. The use of MRI or ultrasonography may be necessary for evaluation in the future. In the ultrasound measurement, an increased echo intensity reflects the amount of free water or edema due to disintegration of the extracellular matrix 6. Our previous study has shown that consumption of EPA and DHA for 8 weeks resulted in a smaller increase in echo intensity following elbow flexions 11. Therefore, more studies are needed to clarify the effect on echo intensity after ECCs because pf the paucity of data; regardless, the available data suggest the importance of the duration of consumption.

Conclusion

Herein, we confirmed that 4-week supplementation with EPA and DHA at daily doses of 600 mg of 260 mg, respectively, alleviated the loss of joint flexibility after ECCs through elbow flexions. Moreover, our results suggest that the duration of 4 weeks was enough for EPA and DHA supplementation to demonstrate the protective effect on muscle cell membrane as indicated by reduction of the blood CK elevation. However, the observed mitigation effect on ECC-induced muscle damage was limited compared with that of 8-week consumption of EPA and DHA 7, 11. Therefore, we can conclude that 4-week EPA and DHA supplementation produces a certain level of attenuating effect on muscle damage after ECCs. We believe that these results will help athletes and training enthusiasts acquire efficient training.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee for Human Experiments at Teikyo Heisei University (ID: R01-040) in compliance in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material

Please contact author for data requests.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was supported by Nippon Suisan Kaisha ltd. However, the sponsor was not involved in data collection or data entry and there were no restrictions on publication.

Authors' contributions

EO and KY conceived the study. YT, AK, and EO participated in the design and coordination of the study. YT, HU, and EO carried out the data collection and performed the statistical analysis. YT, and EO drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express the deepest appreciation to all our subjects.

References

  1. Andersson A, Nalsen C, Tengblad S, et al. Fatty acid composition of skeletal muscle reflects dietary fat composition in humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:1222–9.
  2. Heileson JL, Funderburk LK. The effect of fish oil supplementation on the promotion and preservation of lean body mass, strength, and recovery from physiological stress in young, healthy adults: A systematic review. Nutr Rev 2020.
  3. Clarkson PM, Nosaka K, Braun B. Muscle function after exercise-induced muscle damage and rapid adaptation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:512–20.
  4. Clarkson PM, Hubal MJ. Exercise-induced muscle damage in humans. American journal of physical medicine rehabilitation. 2002;81:52–69.
  5. Clarkson PM, Sayers SP. Etiology of exercise-induced muscle damage. Can J Appl Physiol. 1999;24:234–48.
  6. Nosaka K, Clarkson PM. Changes in indicators of inflammation after eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28:953–61.
  7. Tsuchiya Y, Yanagimoto K, Nakazato K, et al. Eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids-rich fish oil supplementation attenuates strength loss and limited joint range of motion after eccentric contractions: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. European journal of applied physiology. 2016;116:1179–88.
  8. Peake J, Nosaka K, Suzuki K. Characterization of inflammatory responses to eccentric exercise in humans. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2005;11:64–85.
  9. Ochi E, Tsuchiya Y, Yanagimoto K. Effect of eicosapentaenoic acids-rich fish oil supplementation on motor nerve function after eccentric contractions. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017;14:23.
  10. Tartibian B, Maleki BH, Abbasi A. The effects of ingestion of omega-3 fatty acids on perceived pain and external symptoms of delayed onset muscle soreness in untrained men. Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 2009;19:115–9.
  11. Tsuchiya Y, Yanagimoto K, Ueda H, et al. Supplementation of eicosapentaenoic acid-rich fish oil attenuates muscle stiffness after eccentric contractions of human elbow flexors. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2019;16:19.
  12. Tartibian B, Maleki BH, Abbasi A. Omega-3 fatty acids supplementation attenuates inflammatory markers after eccentric exercise in untrained men. Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 2011;21:131–7.
  13. Lenn J, Uhl T, Mattacola C, et al. The effects of fish oil and isoflavones on delayed onset muscle soreness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1605–13.
  14. Ochi E, Tsuchiya Y, Nosaka K. Differences in post-exercise t2 relaxation time changes between eccentric and concentric contractions of the elbow flexors. European journal of applied physiology. 2016;116:2145–54.
  15. Tsuchiya Y, Kikuchi N, Shirato M, et al. Differences of activation pattern and damage in elbow flexor muscle after isokinetic eccentric contractions. Isokinetics Exercise Science. 2015;23:169–75.
  16. Chleboun GS, Howell JN, Conatser RR, et al. Relationship between muscle swelling and stiffness after eccentric exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:529–35.
  17. McKune A, Semple S, Peters-Futre E. Acute exercise-induced muscle injury. Biology of Sport. 2012;29:3–10.
  18. Helge JW, Therkildsen KJ, Jørgensen TB, et al. Eccentric contractions affect muscle membrane phospholipid fatty acid composition in rats. Exp Physiol. 2001;86:599–604.
  19. DiLorenzo FM, Drager CJ, Rankin JW. Docosahexaenoic acid affects markers of inflammation and muscle damage after eccentric exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2014;28:2768–74.
  20. Phillips T, Childs AC, Dreon DM, et al. A dietary supplement attenuates il-6 and crp after eccentric exercise in untrained males. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:2032–7.
  21. Jakeman JR, Lambrick DM, Wooley B, et al. Effect of an acute dose of omega-3 fish oil following exercise-induced muscle damage. European journal of applied physiology. 2017;117:575–82.
  22. Jouris KB, McDaniel JL, Weiss EP. The effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on the inflammatory response to eccentric strength exercise. Journal of sports science medicine. 2011;10:432–8.
  23. Tinsley GM, Gann JJ, Huber SR, et al.: Effects of fish oil supplementation on postresistance exercise muscle soreness. Journal of dietary supplements 2016:1–12.
  24. Gray P, Chappell A, Jenkinson AM, et al. Fish oil supplementation reduces markers of oxidative stress but not muscle soreness after eccentric exercise. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2014;24:206–14.

Tables

Table 1. Changes of serum dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid, arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid at before and after 4-weeks supplementation

 

 

Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (μg/ml)

Arachidonic acid (μg/ml)

Eicosapentaenoic acid (μg/ml)

Docosahexaenoic acid (μg/ml)

Placebo

Before

49.0 ± 9.9

189.1 ± 40.6

20.9 ± 9.2

68.5 ± 24.6

After

42.9 ± 1.8

198.7 ± 39.5

14.2 ± 6.1

59.4 ± 22.3

EPA

Before

44.7 ± 9.3

201.6 ± 38.1

33.5 ± 21.2

70.9 ± 18.0

After

42.3 ± 10.5

186.8 ± 20.3

  58.2 ± 25.7 *†

78.2 ± 17.7

* p<0.05, Compare with placebo group for after supplementations, †p<0.05, Compare with EPA group for before supplementations.