Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of postoperative bleeding following dentoalveolar surgery in patients with either continued vitamin K antagonist medication or perioperative bridging using heparin.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed analyzing patients who underwent tooth extraction between 2012 and 2017. Patients were retrospectively allocated into two comparative groups: un-paused vitamin K antagonist medication versus bridging using heparin. A healthy, non-anticoagulated cohort with equivalent surgery served as a control group. Main outcome measures were: the occurrence and frequency of postoperative bleeding, the number of removed teeth, the surgical technique of tooth removal (extraction/ osteotomy/ combined extraction and osteotomy) and the prothrombin time.
Results: In total, 475 patients were included in the study with 170 patients in the group of un-paused vitamin K antagonist medication VG, 135 patients in the Bridging group BG and 170 patients in the control group CG. Postoperative bleeding was significant: CG vs.VG p=0.004; CG vs. BG p<0.001, BG vs.VG p<0.001. A significant correlation of number of the extracted teeth in the BG (p=0.014) and no significance in VG (p=0.298) and CG (p=0.210) and in the BG vs. VG and CG with p<0.001 in terms of surgical intervention extraction. No difference observed in terms of prothrombin time.
Conclusion: Bridging with heparin increases the risk for bleeding compared to un-paused vitamin K antagonist medication. The perioperative management of anticoagulated patients requires a well- coordinated interdisciplinary teamwork to minimize or at best avoid both: postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic incidences. Key words:

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3
Loading...
Posted 21 Jan, 2021
On 19 Jan, 2021
Invitations sent on 14 Jan, 2021
On 14 Jan, 2021
Received 14 Jan, 2021
On 09 Jan, 2021
On 09 Jan, 2021
On 09 Jan, 2021
On 30 Dec, 2020
Received 23 Sep, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
On 14 Aug, 2020
Invitations sent on 14 Aug, 2020
On 13 Aug, 2020
On 13 Aug, 2020
On 06 Aug, 2020
Posted 21 Jan, 2021
On 19 Jan, 2021
Invitations sent on 14 Jan, 2021
On 14 Jan, 2021
Received 14 Jan, 2021
On 09 Jan, 2021
On 09 Jan, 2021
On 09 Jan, 2021
On 30 Dec, 2020
Received 23 Sep, 2020
On 02 Sep, 2020
On 14 Aug, 2020
Invitations sent on 14 Aug, 2020
On 13 Aug, 2020
On 13 Aug, 2020
On 06 Aug, 2020
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of postoperative bleeding following dentoalveolar surgery in patients with either continued vitamin K antagonist medication or perioperative bridging using heparin.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed analyzing patients who underwent tooth extraction between 2012 and 2017. Patients were retrospectively allocated into two comparative groups: un-paused vitamin K antagonist medication versus bridging using heparin. A healthy, non-anticoagulated cohort with equivalent surgery served as a control group. Main outcome measures were: the occurrence and frequency of postoperative bleeding, the number of removed teeth, the surgical technique of tooth removal (extraction/ osteotomy/ combined extraction and osteotomy) and the prothrombin time.
Results: In total, 475 patients were included in the study with 170 patients in the group of un-paused vitamin K antagonist medication VG, 135 patients in the Bridging group BG and 170 patients in the control group CG. Postoperative bleeding was significant: CG vs.VG p=0.004; CG vs. BG p<0.001, BG vs.VG p<0.001. A significant correlation of number of the extracted teeth in the BG (p=0.014) and no significance in VG (p=0.298) and CG (p=0.210) and in the BG vs. VG and CG with p<0.001 in terms of surgical intervention extraction. No difference observed in terms of prothrombin time.
Conclusion: Bridging with heparin increases the risk for bleeding compared to un-paused vitamin K antagonist medication. The perioperative management of anticoagulated patients requires a well- coordinated interdisciplinary teamwork to minimize or at best avoid both: postoperative bleeding and thromboembolic incidences. Key words:

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3
Loading...