Intestinal Parasitic Infection and Its Associated Factors Among Primary School Students in Ethiopia; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-55595/v1

Abstract

Background: Intestinal parasitic infection (IPI) remains a major public health concern affecting both children and adolescents in Ethiopia. However, little attention has been given to intestinal parasitic infection within primary school children. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was done to determine pooled prevalence and associated factors of intestinal parasitic infection in this target group.

Method: We systematically retrieved available articles on the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in primary school children in Ethiopia. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Science Direct between September 1 and December 27, 2019. Two authors independently extracted all relevant data using a standardized Microsoft™ Excel data extraction form. Heterogeneity among included studies was assessed with the Higgins I2 tests. The pooled estimates and associated factors of primary school children’s intestinal parasitic infection  were assessed with a random-effects model using Stata/se Version 14.

Result: We have retrieved 30 eligible articles with pooled sample size of 14,445 primary school children with response rate of 97.8%. Entamoeba spp (16.11%), Ascaris lumbricoides (13.98%), Hookworm (12.51%) and Giardia lamblia (9.98%) were among the top four causes of intestinal parasitic infection among primary school children. The pooled prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection was found to be 46.09 (95% CI: 38.50, 53.68). Heterogeneity was assessed by doing subgroup analysis by study province/region, with the highest prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection being 66.6 % (95% CI: 55.5, 77.7) in Tigray region, followed by Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region at 50.8% (95% CI: 33.1, 68.5). Latrine availability (OR=4.39: 2.50,7.73), fingernail hygiene (OR= 2.37: 1.67, 3.35), place of defecation (OR=1.67:1.64,4.36), maternal education (OR=2.02: 1.18,3.47), residence (OR= 1.88: 1.46, 2.41), habit of wearing shoes (OR= 2.66: 1.79, 3.96), source of drinking water (OR=1.99: 1.42,2.76), hands washing practices (OR= 3.45:1.85,6.47), and habit of washing fruits and vegetables (OR=1.59:1.01,2.49) were found to be significantly associated with intestinal parasitic infection.

Conclusions: The prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection was high (46%) in the study population. Therefore, this finding warrants the need to design school children hygiene and sanitation service and expand school children deworming programs to decrease intestinal parasitic infections and improve academic performance in the country. In addition, attention should be given to promoting personal hygiene, latrine utilization, wearing shoes, avoiding eating raw food, and creating awareness for those mothers who lack formal education. Moreover, the researchers try to conduct research on province/regions which have no prior research.

Background

Intestinal parasitosis refers to a group of diseases caused by one or more species of protozoa, cestodes, trematodes and nematodes distributed throughout the world with high prevalence rates (1). Amoebiasis, ascariasis, hookworm infection and trichiasis are among most common infections in the world (2, 3). More than 550 million school children live in areas where intestinal parasitic infections (IPI) are endemic with 450 million of the illnesses occurring in sub-Saharan Africa (2, 47). Parasitic infections are among the most preventable neglected tropical infections in humans (8). Primary school children are more vulnerable to intestinal parasites in communities where socioeconomic status and hygienic condition are poor (2, 9). However, less emphasis is given for this age group. The effects of IPI were not limited to morbidity and mortality, extending to nutritional problems (i.e., stunted growth, low vitamin A, iron deficiency anemia, loss of weight, chronic blood loss) (10, 11), compromised mental development (i.e, impaired growth, decreased school attendance, cognitive impairment, decreased educational achievement and adult productivity) (12, 13). Additionally, IPI increases susceptibility for diarrhea, infections like HIV and other infectious disease(14).

Although there were many studies respecting prevalence of IPI among primary school children, the reported findings were inconsistent and highly variable (ranging from 14.4–81.0%) (1517). Moreover, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been done to enhance the quality and consistency of the evidence. Hence, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence of IPI and associated factors among primary school children in Ethiopia using available evidence. This study will inform policy makers and program planners in their efforts to design a school-centric survey and implement efficient interventions to decrease the burden and impacts of IPI among primary school children.

Methods

Search Strategy

Two authors (SDH and DS) were independently searched all articles that reported the prevalence of IPIs from Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, HINARI, and Cochrane Library. Our search was extended by hand searches for grey literature and retrieving reference lists of eligible articles. The literature search occurred between September 1 and December 27, 2019 using common balloon words: prevalence AND intestinal parastic infection OR parastic infection AND associated factors AND primary school children AND Ethiopia. We use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to present this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Criteria were established for eligibility before beginning the search. All observational published and unpublished articles reporting the prevalence of at least one IPI among primary school children in Ethiopia were included.

Exclusion criteria: Case reports, national reports, clinical studies, and reviews were excluded. Moreover, articles which were not fully accessible, after at least two email contacts with the primary authors, were excluded because of the inability to assess the quality of articles in the absence of full text.

Data extraction

Independently two authors (YH and MMA) extracted all data using a uniform extraction format prepared in Microsoft™ Excel. The data extraction format included first author, publication year, study area, sample size, age of participant, response rate, and prevalence of IPI. Any disagreements among authors during extractions were resolved by discussion and mutual agreement with the help of a third author (ATT).

Outcome measurements

This systematic review and meta-analysis has two main outcomes. The primary outcome was prevalence of IPI. The prevalence was calculated by dividing the number of infected children with the IPI to the total number of participants who have been included in the study (sample size) multiplied by 100. The secondary outcome of the study was to identify the factors associated with the IPI. The odds ratios of associated factors were calculated using the two by two tables with binary outcomes sex (male/female), residence (urban/rural), age of children (≤10years/>10years), family size (<5/ ≥5), habit of eating raw meat (always/sometimes), waste disposal (open/not open), defecation (latrine/open field), latrine availability (yes/no), maternal education (literate/illiterate), habit of eating raw vegetables (always/sometimes), habit of washing fruit and vegetables (yes/no), habit of swimming (yes/no), habit of washing hands after toilet (yes/no), hand washing before meal (yes/no), source of drinking water (pipe/not pipe), habit of wearing shoes (yes/no), and hygiene of fingernails (yes/no).

Quality assessment

To assess the quality of studies, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool adapted for cross-sectional studies. The tool has three main sections. The first section has the potential for five stars and assesses the methodological quality of each study. The second section of the tool evaluates the comparability of the studies and has potentially two stars. The last part of the tool which has a potential for three stars to measure the quality of the original articles with respect to their statistical analysis (18). Articles attaining the score of 5 and above out of 10 were considered as high quality and included for analysis.

Statistical data analysis

The analysis was done by STATA/se Version 14.0 statistical software. We presented results with tables and forest plots. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by calculating p-values for Higgins I2-statics. The pooled prevalence of IPI was estimated with a random effect model by generating the pooled 95% confidence interval using the Der Simonian and Laird's methods. Moreover, univariate meta-regression model was conducted by taking the publication year and the sample size of the studies to identify the possible source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was also assessed using funnel plot and Egger’s regression intercept tests at 5% significant level. In addition, to minimize the random variations between the point estimates of the primary studies, subgroup analysis was done based on region of studies, publication year, and/or sample size.

Results

Description of identified studies

The review of electronic databases and reference lists from relevant studies yielded 782 potential articles. After excluding 473 articles because of duplication, the remaining articles were screened based on the pre-set eligibility criteria. Then, after reviewing the titles and abstracts of 309 articles, 245 articles were excluded. From the remaining 64 articles, only 30 articles were found eligible and included in the final meta-analysis after reading the full texts and assessing for meeting the inclusion criteria (Figure 1).

Characteristics of original articles

As described in Table 1, summarizes the characteristics of 30 articles included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies included were cross-sectional design. The sample size of the included studies range from 172 (in Addis Ababa) (19) to 2372 (in Bahir Dar and Mecha District) (20). A total of 14,455 primary school children with a response rate of 97.8% participated to estimate the pooled prevalence of IPI. Of the total nine regions and two city administrations, five regions and one city administration were include; specifically, Addis Ababa (19), Amhara (15, 20-33), Oromia (34-37), Tigray (38, 39), SNNPR (40-45) and Benishangule Gumuz (46). The highest prevalence (81.0%) was reported in a study conducted in Chencha town, Gamo Gofa Zone (SNNPR) (41) while the lowest prevalence (10.9%) was noted from a study in Gondar town, North West Ethiopia (Amhara) (26). All articles were identified by exhaustive search and re-assessed all the studies before analysis.

Meta-analysis

Species of intestinal parasitic infection

The highest prevalent IPI species among primary school students were Entamoeba spp. with a prevalence of 16.11 % (95% CI: 10.79, 21.43) followed by Ascaris lumbricoides 13.98% (95% CI: 9.30, 18.67) whereas the least prevalent parasite reported was Strongloids stecolaris 1.56% (95% CI: 0.88, 2.24) (Table 2).

The pooled prevalence of at least one IPI among primary school children was found to be 46.09 (95% CI: 38.50, 53.68) (I2 = 99.0%, p<0.001) (Figure 2). Since there was high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.0%).

Subgroup analysis

We performed subgroup analysis by region where the study conducted to deal the source of heterogeneity. The highest prevalence was observed in Tigray region with a prevalence of 66.6 % (95% CI: 55.5, 77.7), followed by SNNPR 50.8% (95% CI: 33.1, 68.5) and the lowest was noted in Oromia region 27.58% (95% CI: 18.6, 36.6). In addition, we conducted subgroup analysis by sample size below and above mean. The prevalence of IPI was relatively similar to the overall pooled prevalence across the category above and below the mean sample size 45.99% (95% CI: 36.68, 61.48). Finally, subgroup analysis was done for publication year, with the finding that before 2017 higher prevalence was seen compared to studies published after 2017(inclusive) (Table 3). 

To determine the extent of publication bias, we performed the funnel plot for symmetry by visual inspection, and it appeared quite symmetrical (Figure 3) indicating the absence of publication bias. To confirm the status of publication bias we also performed Egger’s objectivity test, which also did not show presence of publication bias (p> 0.758).

Factors associated with intestinal parasite infection

In this systematic review and meta-analysis; hygiene of fingernail was reported from seven articles, place of defecation (6), latrine availability (7), maternal education (8), residence (4), habit of shoe wearing (11), source of drinking water (9), hands washing habit (7), and habit of washing fruit and vegetables (3) were statistically associated with IPI. However, family size reported from five articles, sex (15), age of children (11), habit of eating raw meat (4), habit of swimming (7), habit of eating raw vegetables (5), hand washing before meals (3) and waste disposal sites (3) were not significantly associated with IPI (Table 4).

The association between shoes wearing habit and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from elven articles with sample size of 6,229 (16, 17, 23, 29, 32, 33, 36, 37, 42, 43, 46, 50). Thus, we found those individual who do not regularly wear shoes was 2.7 times more likely to develop IPI (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.79, 3.97) as compared to those who habitually wear shoes (Table 4).

The association between fingernail hygiene and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from seven studies with a sample size of 5,155(16, 21, 23, 29, 37, 50, 51). The result of this analysis shows significant association between fingernail hygiene and IPI. The likelihood of parasitic infection is 2.4 times higher among students who had no fingernail hygiene as compared to their counterparts who have good fingernail hygiene (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.67, 3.35) (Table 4).

The association between washing fruits and vegetables and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from three papers with a sample size of 945 participants (33, 43, 52). The result of this analysis showed that significant association. Students not washing fruits and vegetables were 68% (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.30) more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites as compared to their counterparts (Table 4).

The association between maternal education and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from eight articles with sample of 3,279 participants(23, 32, 37, 41, 44, 46, 48, 52). The finding of meta-analysis indicates the significant association between maternal education and IPI. Those students who had an educated mother were two times less likely to be infected by intestinal parasite (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.48) as compared to uneducated one (Table 4).

The association between Defecation habit and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from six studies with 4,337 participants (17, 20, 29, 32, 33). The finding of meta-analysis indicated significant association between the defecation habits and IPI. Students who had open defecation was 2.7 times (OR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.64, 4.37) more likely to be infected by parasites as compared to those utilizing latrines (Table 4).

The association between hand washing habits and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from six studies with a sample size of 4,337 (16, 20, 21, 29, 32, 33). We had found significant association between hand washing and IPI. Students, who did not have regular hand washing habits, had more than a triple the likelihood (OR: 3.45, 95%CI: 1.85, 6.47) of being infected by intestinal parasite as compared to those participating in regular hand washing (Table 4).

The association between residence and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from four articles with 1,295 participants (17, 19, 32, 42). Those who live in the rural area were 87% (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.41) more likely to develop IPI as compared to those living in urban areas (Table 4).

The association between IPI and source of drinking water were determined from nine articles. Source of drinking water is statistically associated with IPI. Thus, students who drank water from non-pipe sources were 99% (OR=1.99, 95% CI: 1.99, 2.79) more likely to become infected with parasite as compared to pipe sources users (Table 4).

The association between IPI and latrine availability was determined from seven studies. We found latrine availability is statistically associated with IPI, with students who had no latrine being four times (OR=4.39, 95% CI: 2.50, 7.73) more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites as compared to those with latrine availability (Table 4).

Discussion

The findings obviously display the burden of intestinal parasite among the primary school children in the country Ethiopia. Entamoeba spp (16.11%), Ascaris lumbricoides (13.98), Hookworm (12.51%) and Giardia lamblia (9.98%) are among the top prevalent parasitic infections among primary school children.

The overall pooled prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection was 46.09%. This finding was in line with the studies conducted in Kenya (43%) (53), Nigeria (42.6%) (54), and Palestine (32.0-41.5%)(55). On the other hand, studies that showed higher prevalence than our findings were done in West Africa (63.1%) (56), South Africa (68%) (57), Tanzania (63.91%) (58), Nigeria (67.4%) (59, 60), and Mkhanyakude District, Burkina Faso (84.7%) (61). However, our results were higher than the studies conducted in South Africa (37.5%) (62), Eastern Region of Nepal (31.5%) (63), Northwestern Iran (10.6%) (64), Tehran, Iran (18.4%) (65), and Yemen (31.8%) (66). These variations could be due to socio-demographic characteristics, sample sizes, methodology used and economic status.

Primary school children wearing shoes regularly were less likely to develop IPI than those not wearing shoes. This finding was supported by different studies in different areas (6769), as a result of soil-transmitted helminthes infections being a common source of IPI in humans.

School children who did not maintain fingernail hygiene were more likely to be infected by IPI as supported by a study in Yemen (70). This finding links to IPI being transmitted by poor fingernail hygiene. Students belonging to uneducated mothers at a higher risk of IPI in our study, which is a similar finding to studies in Turkey and El Beheira, Egypt (71, 72). This finding could reflect that educated mothers had better knowledge about IPI prevention and potentially better economic status enabling them to embrace the entire prevention process. Additionally, in the current study, rural residents were 87% more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites, which is similar to findings from studies in Zambia and Nepal (73, 74). This situation may arise because be rural community dwellers had lower awareness and more frequent contact with soil as well limited access to safe water and latrine.

Like other studies we were also found fruit and vegetable washing affected the prevalence of IPI (75), which might relate to the level of cleanliness and soil transmission risks. Open defecation and the availability latrine were another potential cause of IPI in our findings, which is similar to a study done in Zambia (73). This could reflect that those communities who experience unclean environments due to open defecation are more likely to transmit parasites through soil, water, fomites, food or other means. Similar to other studies, hand washing habits, before meals, after toileting, and post-contact with dirty objects, were significantly associated with IPI (67, 76).

Limitations of the study

One of the limitations of this study was that it did not consider all the regions in Ethiopia due to lack of availability of articles. We did not register this paper in PROSPERO even though it might increase the credibility of the article.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in primary school children in Ethiopia was high (46%). Therefore, this finding warrants the need to design school children hygiene and sanitation services and expands school children’s deworming programs to decrease IPI and improve academic performance in the country. In addition, attention should be given to promoting personal hygiene, latrine utilization, wearing shoes, avoiding eating raw foods, and creating awareness for those mothers who lack formal education. Moreover, the researchers are encouraged to conduct research on province/regions not yet studied for their IPI status.

Abbreviations

IPI

Intestinal Parasitic Infection

BDR

Bahir Dar

SNNP

Southern Nations and Nationality and People

PRISMA

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Availability of data and material

All available data are within the paper and its supporting information files.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work

Author contributions

MAA: Conception of research protocol, study design, literature review, data analysis, interpretation and drafting the manuscript.

DS: Data extraction and manuscript review.

YH: Data extraction, data analysis and manuscript review

PMP: Contribute on critically review, editing, and validating

AMA: Data analysis, data extraction and manuscript review

ATT: Literature review, quality assessment and manuscript review.

MMA: Literature review, data extraction and review a manuscript.

DBK: Study design, data analysis and manuscript review

BT: data analysis, quality assessment, and manuscript review.

BM: Study design, data analysis and manuscript review

TG: Data analysis, quality assessment, and manuscript review.

SDH: Literature review, data extraction, data analysis, interpretation and manuscript review. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Authors of primary study

References

References

  1. Anteneh T, Giday A, Alano, A, Awoke, A, W/Chirkos, A, Dibisa, N, et al. Intestinal Parasitosis For the Ethiopian Health Center Team. In: Initiative EPHT, editor. Hawassa University: Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education.; 2008.
  2. World Health Organization. Helminth control in school age children: a guide for managers of control programmes - 2nd ed. In: World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland. 2011.
  3. World Health Organization. Public health significance of intestinal parasitic infections. In: Bulletin of the World Health Organization -, editor. The WHO Expert Committee on Prevention and Control of Intestinal Parasitic Infections met in Geneva, Switzerland, on 3-7 March 1986.
  4. World Health Organization. Guideline: Preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminth infections in at-risk population groups Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2017.
  5. World Health Organization. Investing to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases. World Health Organization Geneva , Switzerland. 2015.
  6. Tigabu A, Taye S, Aynalem M, Adane K. Prevalence and associated factors of intestinal parasitic infections among patients attending Shahura Health Center, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12(1):333.
  7. Pickering AJ, Njenga SM, Steinbaum L, Swarthout J, Lin A, Arnold BF, et al. Effects of single and integrated water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition interventions on child soil-transmitted helminth and Giardia infections: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Kenya. PLoS Medicine. 2019;16(6):e1002841.
  8. Ismail K.Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection among school children in Taif. Insights Biomed 2018;3(2:):10.
  9. Periago MV, García R, Astudillo OG, Cabrera M, Abril MC. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and the absence of soil-transmitted helminths in Añatuya, Santiago del Estero, Argentina. Parasites & Vectors. 2018;11(1):638.
  10. Nematian J NEGA, Asgari AA,. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and their relation with socio-economic factors and hygiene habits in Tehran primary school students. Acta Tropica. 2004.
  11. Casapia M JS, Nunez C, Rahme E, Gyorkos TW,\. Parasite risk factors for stunting in grade 5 students in a community of extreme poverty in Peru. International Journal of Parasitolgy. 2006.
  12. P. J. Hotez AF, L. Savioli, D. H. Molyneux. Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases The Lancet. 2009;373:1570.
  13. C. Nokes DAPB. Does helminth infection affect mental processing and educational achievement? Parasitology Today. 1994;10:14.
  14. UNICEF. The World Bank Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates: Levels and trends in child malnutrition. 2012.
  15. Alemu M, Anley A, Tedla K. Magnitude of Intestinal Parasitosis and Associated Factors in Rural School Children, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences. 2019;29(1):923-8.
  16. Sisay A, Lemma B. Assessment on the prevalence and risk factors of gastrointestinal parasites on schoolchildren at Bochesa Elementary School, around Lake Zwai, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12(1):410.
  17. Sitotaw B, Mekuriaw H, Damtie D. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among Jawi primary school children, Jawi town, north-west Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(1):341.
  18. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;25(9):603-5.
  19. Mengist HM, Taye B, Tsegaye A. Intestinal parasitosis in relation to CD4+ T cells levels and anemia among HAART initiated and HAART naive pediatric HIV patients in a model ART center in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PloS One. 2015;10(2).
  20. Feleke BE. Nutritional status and intestinal parasite in school age children: a comparative cross-sectional study. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;2016.
  21. Sitotaw B, Mekuriaw H, Damtie D. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among Jawi primary school children, Jawi town, north-west Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(1):341.
  22. Nguyen NL, Gelaye B, Aboset N, Kumie A, Williams MA, Berhane Y. Intestinal parasitic infection and nutritional status among school children in Angolela, Ethiopia. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene. 2012;53(3):157.
  23. Hailegebriel T. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among students at Dona Berber primary school, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017;17(1):362.
  24. Alelign T, Degarege A, Erko B. Prevalence and factors associated with undernutrition and anaemia among school children in Durbete Town, northwest Ethiopia. Archives of Public Health. 2015;73(1):34.
  25. Amare B, Ali J, Moges B, Yismaw G, Belyhun Y, Gebretsadik S, et al. Nutritional status, intestinal parasite infection and allergy among school children in Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pediatrics. 2013;13(1):7.
  26. Worku N, Erko B, Torben W, Belay M, Kasssu A, Fetene T, et al. Malnutrition and intestinal parasitic infections in school children of Gondar, North West Ethiopia. Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2009;47(1):9-16.
  27. Gashaw F, Aemero M, Legesse M, Petros B, Teklehaimanot T, Medhin G, et al. Prevalence of intestinal helminth infection among school children in Maksegnit and Enfranz Towns, northwestern Ethiopia, with emphasis on Schistosoma mansoni infection. Parasites & Vectors. 2015;8(1):567.
  28. Alemu M, Anley A, Tedla K. Magnitude of intestinal parasitosis and associated factors in rural school children, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences. 2019;29(1).
  29. Dessie A, Gebrehiwot TG, Kiros B, Wami SD, Chercos DH. Intestinal parasitic infections and determinant factors among school-age children in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12(1):777.
  30. Gelaw A, Anagaw B, Nigussie B, Silesh B, Yirga A, Alem M, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and risk factors among schoolchildren at the University of Gondar Community School, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):304.
  31. Yimer M. Performance evaluation of three laboratory diagnostic methods for intestinal parasitic infections at rural Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Health Sciences. 2019;9(1).
  32. Asemahagn MA. Parasitic infection and associated factors among the primary school children in Motta town, western Amhara, Ethiopia. American Journal of Public Heal.th. 2014;2:248-54.
  33. Abdi M, Nibret E, Munshea A. Prevalence of intestinal helminthic infections and malnutrition among schoolchildren of the Zegie Peninsula, northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Infection and Public health. 2017;10(1):84-92.
  34. Tefera E, Mohammed J, Mitiku H. Nutritional status of school children in Babile Town, Eastern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Health and Biomedical Sciences. 2017;1(2):1-10.
  35. Begna T, Solomon T, Yohannes ZENEBE EA. Intestinal parasitic infections and nutritional status among primary school children in Delo-mena district, South Eastern Ethiopia. Iranian Journal of Parasitology. 2016;11(4):549.
  36. Sisay A, Lemma B. Assessment on the prevalence and risk factors of gastrointestinal parasites on schoolchildren at Bochesa Elementary School, around Lake Zwai, Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12(1):410.
  37. Geleta A, Siraj Z, Lambiyo T, Azerefege E, Hailemariam M. Intestinal parasite infections among school children in Arsi Negelle Town, Southern Ethiopia.what journal??
  38. Mahmud MA, Spigt M, Mulugeta Bezabih A, Lopez Pavon I, Dinant G-J, Blanco Velasco R. Risk factors for intestinal parasitosis, anaemia, and malnutrition among school children in Ethiopia. Pathogens and Global Health. 2013;107(2):58-65.
  39. Kidane E, Menkir S, Kebede A, Desta M. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and their associations with anthropometric measurements of school children in selected primary schools, Wukro Town, Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia. International Journal Current of Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2014;3(3):11-29.
  40. Alemayehu B, Tomass Z, Wadilo F, Leja D, Liang S, Erko B. Epidemiology of intestinal helminthiasis among school children with emphasis on Schistosoma mansoni infection in Wolaita zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):587.
  41. Abossie A, Seid M. Assessment of the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis and associated risk factors among primary school children in Chencha town, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):166.
  42. Alemu G, Abossie A, Yohannes Z. Current status of intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among primary school children in Birbir town, Southern Ethiopia. BMCInfectious Diseases. 2019;19(1):270.
  43. Alemu G, Aschalew Z, Zerihun E. Burden of intestinal helminths and associated factors three years after initiation of mass drug administration in Arbaminch Zuria district, southern Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2018;18(1):435.
  44. Birmeka M. Intestinal parasitic infection and nutritional status of elementary schoolchildren aged 7-14 in Enemorena-Ener District, Gurage Zone, Ethiopia. EC Nutrition. 2017;9:129-41.
  45. Wolde M, Berhan Y, Chala A. Determinants of underweight, stunting and wasting among schoolchildren. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):8.
  46. Gebretsadik G. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors among schoolchildren of Homesha district (Woreda) in Benishangul-Gumuz regional state, western Ethiopia. Journal of Family Medicine and Health Care. 2016;2(4):57-64.
  47. Melaku M, Bayayibign B, Gelaye W. The Performance evaluation of three laboratory diagnostic methods for intestinal parasitic infections at rural Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Health Sciences. 2018.
  48. Reji P, Belay G, Erko B, Legesse M, Belay M. Intestinal parasitic infections and malnutrition amongst first-cycle primary schoolchildren in Adama, Ethiopia. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine. 2011;3(1).
  49. Zerdo Z, Yohanes T, Tariku B, Teshome T. Association between nutritional status and soil-transmitted helminthes re-infection among school-age children in Chencha district, southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Translational Biomedicine. 2017;8(2):111.
  50. Feleke DG, Wage EK, Getachew T, Gedefie A. Intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among street dwellers' in Dessie town, North-East Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Research Notes. 2019;12(1):262.
  51. Gebretsadik D, Metaferia Y, Seid A, Fenta GM, Gedefie A. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection among children under 5 years of age at Dessie Referral Hospital: cross sectional study. BMC Research Notes. 2018;11(1):771.
  52. Alemu G, Abossie A, Yohannes Z. Current status of intestinal parasitic infections and associated factors among primary school children in Birbir town, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019;19(1):270.
  53. Kiluu KS. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and transmission risk factors in primary school children in Mbeere North Sub-County, Embu County, Kenya: Kenyatta University; 2019.
  54. Dahal AS, Francis EO, Francis JE, Wamtas FI. Soil-transmitted helminths and associated risk factors among elementary school pupils in Dadin Kowa, Jos. Nigerian Medical Journal: Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association. 2019;60(4):181.
  55. Bdir S, Adwan G. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections in Jenin Governorate, Palestine: a 10–year retrospective study. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2010;3(9):745-7.
  56. Fan C-K, Lee L-W, Liao C-W, Huang Y-C, Lee Y-L, Chang Y-T, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection: relationship between seroprevalence and risk factors among primary schoolchildren in the capital areas of Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, West Africa. Parasites & Vectors. 2012;5(1):141.
  57. Samie A, Guerrant R, Barrett L, Bessong P, Igumbor E, Obi C. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic and bacterial pathogens in diarrhoeal and non-diarroeal human stools from Vhembe district, South Africa. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition. 2009;27(6):739.
  58. Mugono M, Konje E, Kuhn S, Mpogoro FJ, Morona D, Mazigo HD. Intestinal schistosomiasis and geohelminths of Ukara Island, North-Western Tanzania: prevalence, intensity of infection and associated risk factors among school children. Parasites & Vectors. 2014;7(1):612.
  59. Opara KN, Udoidung NI, Opara DC, Okon OE, Edosomwan EU, Udoh AJ. The impact of intestinal parasitic infections on the nutritional status of rural and urban school-aged children in Nigeria. International Journal of MCH and AIDS. 2012;1(1):73.
  60. Gyang VP, Chuang T-W, Liao C-W, Lee Y-L, Akinwale OP, Orok A, et al. Intestinal parasitic infections: current status and associated risk factors among school aged children in an archetypal African urban slum in Nigeria. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2019;52(1):106-13.
  61. Erismann S, Diagbouga S, Odermatt P, Knoblauch AM, Gerold J, Shrestha A, et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors among schoolchildren in the Plateau Central and Centre-Ouest regions of Burkina Faso. Parasites & Vectors. 2016;9(1):554.
  62. Kabuyaya M, Chimbari MJ, Manyangadze T, Mukaratirwa S. Schistosomiasis risk factors based on the infection status among school-going children in the Ndumo area, uMkhanyakude district, South Africa. Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;32(2):67-72.
  63. Sah RB, Bhattarai S, Yadav S, Baral R, Jha N, Pokharel PK. A study of prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors among the school children of Itahari, Eastern Region of Nepal. Tropical Parasitology. 2013;3(2):140.
  64. Salahi K, Javadi A, Saraei M. Prevalence of intestinal parasites and risk factors with emphasis on Enterobius vermicularis in children of daycares and preparatory schools of the city of Khodabandeh, Northwestern Iran. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities. 2019;10(2):89.
  65. Nematian J, Nematian E, Gholamrezanezhad A, Asgari AA. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and their relation with socio-economic factors and hygienic habits in Tehran primary school students. Acta Tropica. 2004;92(3):179-86.
  66. Sady H, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Mahdy MA, Lim YA, Mahmud R, Surin J. Prevalence and associated factors of schistosomiasis among children in Yemen: implications for an effective control programme. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2013;7(8).
  67. Bisht D, Verma AK, Bharadwaj HHD. Intestinal parasitic infestation among children in a semi-urban Indian population. Tropical Parasitology. 2011;1(2):104.
  68. Marques RC, Bernardi JV, Dorea CC, Dórea JG. Intestinal parasites, anemia and nutritional status in young children from transitioning Western Amazon. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(2):577.
  69. World Health Organization . Guideline: preventive chemotherapy to control soil-transmitted helminth infections in at-risk population groups: World Health Organization; 2017.
  70. Al-Mekhlafi HM. Giardia duodenalis infection among rural communities in Yemen: A community-based assessment of the prevalence and associated risk factors. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2017;10(10):987-95.
  71. Radwan EH, Hassan AAER, Lotfy WM, Abd El-Mawgood A, Mashaal HM. The prevalence of intestinal parasite infection in El Behara schoolchildren. International Journal of Limnology. 2019;1(1):33.
  72. Doni NY, Gurses G, Simsek Z, Zeyrek FY. Prevalence and associated risk factors of intestial parasites among children of farm workers in the southeastern Anatolian region of Turkey. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2015;22(3).
  73. Tembo S, Mubita P, Sitali L, Zgambo J. Prevalence, intensity, and factors associated with soil-transmitted helminths infection among children in Zambia: A cross-sectional study. The Open Public Health Journal. 2019;12(1).
  74. Kunwar R, Acharya L, Karki S. Decreasing prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among school-aged children in Nepal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2016;110(6):324-32.
  75. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. The Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521-32.
  76. Ziegelbauer K, Speich B, Mäusezahl D, Bos R, Keiser J, Utzinger J. Effect of sanitation on soil-transmitted helminth infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2012;9(1):e1001162.

Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of 30 studies reporting the prevalence of intestinal parasite infection

Authors

Pub/year

Area

Sample

Response rate (%)

Prevalence (%)

Sitotaw et al(21)

2019

Amhara (Jawi)

422

96.2

57.9

Nguyen et al(22)

2012

Amhara (Angolela)

664

100

37.2

Feleke(20)

2016

Amhara (Mecha & BDR)

2372

94.54

61.7

Alelign et al(24)

2015

Amhara (Durbete)

403

95.29

54.95

Amare et al(25)

2013

Amhara (Gondar)

405

100

22.7

Worku N et al(26)

2009

Amhara (Gondar)

322

100

10.9

Hailegebriel(23)

2017

Amhara (Bahir Dar)

390

92.1

65.5

Gashaw et al(27)

2015

Amhara (Enfranz)

550

100

66.4

Alemu et al (15)

2019

Amhara (Lay Gayint)

273

100

30.8

Dessie et al(29)

2019

Amhara (Glomekeda)

422

100

29.9

Gelaw et al(30)

2013

Amhara

326

93.25

34.2

Melaku et al(47)

2019

Amhara (Bahir dar)

211

100

60.2

Asemahagn(32)

2014

Amhara (Motta)

358

98.3

68.4

Abdi et al (33)

2017

Amhara (Zegie)

422

96.68

69.1

Sisay et al(16)

2019

Oromia (Zwai)

384

100

22.6

Tefera et al(34)

2017

Oromia (Babile)

632

100

14.4

Begna(35)

2016

Oromia (Bale zone)

492

100

26.6

Reji P et al(48)

2011

Oromia (Adama)

358

100

35.5

Geleta et al(37)

2018

Oromia (Arsi Negele)

295

100

39.6

Mengist et al(19)

2015

Addis Ababa

172

97.8

37.8

Gebretsadik(46)

2017

BG(Asossa )

404

97.77

35.44

Mahmud et al(38)

2013

Tigray(Mekele)

600

97.2

72

Kidane et al(39)

2014

Tigray (Wukro)

384

100

60.7

Zerdo et al(49)

2017

SNNP (Gamo Goffa)

406

100

36.8

Wolde et al(45)

2015

SNNP (Sidam zone)

450

98.8

64.3

Birmeka., et al(44)

2017

SNNP (Gurage zone)

641

100

40.2

Alemu et al(43)

2018

SNNP (Arbaminch)

405

96.54

46.5

Alemayehu et al (40)

2017

SNNP (Wolaita zone)

515

97.67

72.2

Alemu et al(42)

2019

SNNP (Birbir town)

355

98.87

27.1

Abossie et al(41)

2014

SNNP (Chencha town)

422

94.79

81

Table 2

Primary school children intestinal parasite species

Parasite species

Study Number

Participants

Prevalence with 95% CI

Entamoeba spp

15

6159

16.11(10.79, 21.43)

Ascaris lumbricoides

16

6550

13.98(9.30, 18.67)

Hook worm

16

6720

12.51(8.73, 16.28)

Giardia lamblia

13

5283

9.98(6.91, 13.05)

Hymenolepis nana

14

5770

7.82(5.24, 10.40)

Schistosoma mansonii

5

2189

5.37(1.86, 8.89)

Trichuris trichiura

14

5802

3.51(2.31, 4.70)

Enterobius vermicularis

10

4151

2.34(1.16, 3.52)

Taenia sp

8

3450

1.60(0.77, 2.44)

Strongloids stecolaris

8

3296

1.56(0.88, 2.24)

Table 3

Subgroup analysis of intestinal parasite infection

Variables

Characteristics

No. of Studies

Participants

Prevalence(95% CI)

Region

Amhara

14

7540

47.84 (37.14, 58.52)

SNNP

7

3194

50.84 (33.14, 68.53)

Oromia

5

2161

27.58 (18.62, 36.55)

Tigray

2

984

66.60 (55.54, 77.66)

Addis Ababa

1

172

37.80 (30.55, 45.05)

Benishangul Gumuz

1

404

35.44 (30.78, 40.10)

Sample size

Below mean(482)

22

7989

44.81 (36.69, 52.93)

Above mean(482)

8

6466

45.99 (36.68, 61.48)

Publication year

Before 2017

15

8278

48.97 (37.99, 59.95)

After 2017(inclusive)

15

6177

43.19 (33.07, 53.31)

Table 4

Variables

Number of articles

Odds ratio (95%CI)

I-squared (%)

p-value

Age of students

11

1.28(0.99, 1.65)

73.3

< 0.001

Sex

15

1.04(0.99, 1.20)

38.6

0.063

Latrine availability

7

4.39(2.50, 7.73)

64.8

0.009*

Fingernail hygiene

7

2.37(1.67, 3.35)

80.8

< 0.001*

Place of defecation

6

1.67(1.64, 4.36)

85.3

< 0.001*

Maternal education

8

2.02(1.18, 3.47)

89.3

< 0.001*

Residence

4

1.88(1.46, 2.41)

0

0.667*

Habit of shoes wearing

11

2.66(1.79, 3.96)

87.7

< 0.001*

Source of drinking water

9

1.99(1.42, 2.76)

60.8

0.009*

Hands washing habit

7

3.45(1.85, 6.47)

87.2

< 0.001*

Habit of washing fruit and vegetables

3

1.59(1.01, 2.49)

47.2

0.151*

Family size

5

160(0.70, 3.80)

78.8

0.001

Habit of eating raw meat

4

0.97(0.37 ,2.51)

92.9

< 0.001

Habit of swimming

7

1.19(0.61, 2.31)

93.2

< 0.001

Habit of eating raw vegetables

5

1.05(0.31, 3.53)

98.1

< 0.001

Hand washing before meal

3

3.31(0.70, 15.53)

92.7

< 0.001

Waste disposal site

3

1.08(0.16, 7.29)

98.1

< 0.001

*statistically significant variable