DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-55595/v1
Background: Intestinal parasitic infection (IPI) remains a major public health concern affecting both children and adolescents in Ethiopia. However, little attention has been given to intestinal parasitic infection within primary school children. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was done to determine pooled prevalence and associated factors of intestinal parasitic infection in this target group.
Method: We systematically retrieved available articles on the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in primary school children in Ethiopia. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Science Direct between September 1 and December 27, 2019. Two authors independently extracted all relevant data using a standardized Microsoft™ Excel data extraction form. Heterogeneity among included studies was assessed with the Higgins I2 tests. The pooled estimates and associated factors of primary school children’s intestinal parasitic infection were assessed with a random-effects model using Stata/se Version 14.
Result: We have retrieved 30 eligible articles with pooled sample size of 14,445 primary school children with response rate of 97.8%. Entamoeba spp (16.11%), Ascaris lumbricoides (13.98%), Hookworm (12.51%) and Giardia lamblia (9.98%) were among the top four causes of intestinal parasitic infection among primary school children. The pooled prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection was found to be 46.09 (95% CI: 38.50, 53.68). Heterogeneity was assessed by doing subgroup analysis by study province/region, with the highest prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection being 66.6 % (95% CI: 55.5, 77.7) in Tigray region, followed by Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region at 50.8% (95% CI: 33.1, 68.5). Latrine availability (OR=4.39: 2.50,7.73), fingernail hygiene (OR= 2.37: 1.67, 3.35), place of defecation (OR=1.67:1.64,4.36), maternal education (OR=2.02: 1.18,3.47), residence (OR= 1.88: 1.46, 2.41), habit of wearing shoes (OR= 2.66: 1.79, 3.96), source of drinking water (OR=1.99: 1.42,2.76), hands washing practices (OR= 3.45:1.85,6.47), and habit of washing fruits and vegetables (OR=1.59:1.01,2.49) were found to be significantly associated with intestinal parasitic infection.
Conclusions: The prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection was high (46%) in the study population. Therefore, this finding warrants the need to design school children hygiene and sanitation service and expand school children deworming programs to decrease intestinal parasitic infections and improve academic performance in the country. In addition, attention should be given to promoting personal hygiene, latrine utilization, wearing shoes, avoiding eating raw food, and creating awareness for those mothers who lack formal education. Moreover, the researchers try to conduct research on province/regions which have no prior research.
Intestinal parasitosis refers to a group of diseases caused by one or more species of protozoa, cestodes, trematodes and nematodes distributed throughout the world with high prevalence rates (1). Amoebiasis, ascariasis, hookworm infection and trichiasis are among most common infections in the world (2, 3). More than 550 million school children live in areas where intestinal parasitic infections (IPI) are endemic with 450 million of the illnesses occurring in sub-Saharan Africa (2, 4–7). Parasitic infections are among the most preventable neglected tropical infections in humans (8). Primary school children are more vulnerable to intestinal parasites in communities where socioeconomic status and hygienic condition are poor (2, 9). However, less emphasis is given for this age group. The effects of IPI were not limited to morbidity and mortality, extending to nutritional problems (i.e., stunted growth, low vitamin A, iron deficiency anemia, loss of weight, chronic blood loss) (10, 11), compromised mental development (i.e, impaired growth, decreased school attendance, cognitive impairment, decreased educational achievement and adult productivity) (12, 13). Additionally, IPI increases susceptibility for diarrhea, infections like HIV and other infectious disease(14).
Although there were many studies respecting prevalence of IPI among primary school children, the reported findings were inconsistent and highly variable (ranging from 14.4–81.0%) (15–17). Moreover, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been done to enhance the quality and consistency of the evidence. Hence, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence of IPI and associated factors among primary school children in Ethiopia using available evidence. This study will inform policy makers and program planners in their efforts to design a school-centric survey and implement efficient interventions to decrease the burden and impacts of IPI among primary school children.
Search Strategy
Two authors (SDH and DS) were independently searched all articles that reported the prevalence of IPIs from Medline/PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, HINARI, and Cochrane Library. Our search was extended by hand searches for grey literature and retrieving reference lists of eligible articles. The literature search occurred between September 1 and December 27, 2019 using common balloon words: prevalence AND intestinal parastic infection OR parastic infection AND associated factors AND primary school children AND Ethiopia. We use the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to present this systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
Criteria were established for eligibility before beginning the search. All observational published and unpublished articles reporting the prevalence of at least one IPI among primary school children in Ethiopia were included.
Exclusion criteria: Case reports, national reports, clinical studies, and reviews were excluded. Moreover, articles which were not fully accessible, after at least two email contacts with the primary authors, were excluded because of the inability to assess the quality of articles in the absence of full text.
Data extraction
Independently two authors (YH and MMA) extracted all data using a uniform extraction format prepared in Microsoft™ Excel. The data extraction format included first author, publication year, study area, sample size, age of participant, response rate, and prevalence of IPI. Any disagreements among authors during extractions were resolved by discussion and mutual agreement with the help of a third author (ATT).
Outcome measurements
This systematic review and meta-analysis has two main outcomes. The primary outcome was prevalence of IPI. The prevalence was calculated by dividing the number of infected children with the IPI to the total number of participants who have been included in the study (sample size) multiplied by 100. The secondary outcome of the study was to identify the factors associated with the IPI. The odds ratios of associated factors were calculated using the two by two tables with binary outcomes sex (male/female), residence (urban/rural), age of children (≤10years/>10years), family size (<5/ ≥5), habit of eating raw meat (always/sometimes), waste disposal (open/not open), defecation (latrine/open field), latrine availability (yes/no), maternal education (literate/illiterate), habit of eating raw vegetables (always/sometimes), habit of washing fruit and vegetables (yes/no), habit of swimming (yes/no), habit of washing hands after toilet (yes/no), hand washing before meal (yes/no), source of drinking water (pipe/not pipe), habit of wearing shoes (yes/no), and hygiene of fingernails (yes/no).
Quality assessment
To assess the quality of studies, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality assessment tool adapted for cross-sectional studies. The tool has three main sections. The first section has the potential for five stars and assesses the methodological quality of each study. The second section of the tool evaluates the comparability of the studies and has potentially two stars. The last part of the tool which has a potential for three stars to measure the quality of the original articles with respect to their statistical analysis (18). Articles attaining the score of 5 and above out of 10 were considered as high quality and included for analysis.
Statistical data analysis
The analysis was done by STATA/se Version 14.0 statistical software. We presented results with tables and forest plots. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed by calculating p-values for Higgins I2-statics. The pooled prevalence of IPI was estimated with a random effect model by generating the pooled 95% confidence interval using the Der Simonian and Laird's methods. Moreover, univariate meta-regression model was conducted by taking the publication year and the sample size of the studies to identify the possible source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was also assessed using funnel plot and Egger’s regression intercept tests at 5% significant level. In addition, to minimize the random variations between the point estimates of the primary studies, subgroup analysis was done based on region of studies, publication year, and/or sample size.
Description of identified studies
The review of electronic databases and reference lists from relevant studies yielded 782 potential articles. After excluding 473 articles because of duplication, the remaining articles were screened based on the pre-set eligibility criteria. Then, after reviewing the titles and abstracts of 309 articles, 245 articles were excluded. From the remaining 64 articles, only 30 articles were found eligible and included in the final meta-analysis after reading the full texts and assessing for meeting the inclusion criteria (Figure 1).
Characteristics of original articles
As described in Table 1, summarizes the characteristics of 30 articles included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies included were cross-sectional design. The sample size of the included studies range from 172 (in Addis Ababa) (19) to 2372 (in Bahir Dar and Mecha District) (20). A total of 14,455 primary school children with a response rate of 97.8% participated to estimate the pooled prevalence of IPI. Of the total nine regions and two city administrations, five regions and one city administration were include; specifically, Addis Ababa (19), Amhara (15, 20-33), Oromia (34-37), Tigray (38, 39), SNNPR (40-45) and Benishangule Gumuz (46). The highest prevalence (81.0%) was reported in a study conducted in Chencha town, Gamo Gofa Zone (SNNPR) (41) while the lowest prevalence (10.9%) was noted from a study in Gondar town, North West Ethiopia (Amhara) (26). All articles were identified by exhaustive search and re-assessed all the studies before analysis.
Meta-analysis
Species of intestinal parasitic infection
The highest prevalent IPI species among primary school students were Entamoeba spp. with a prevalence of 16.11 % (95% CI: 10.79, 21.43) followed by Ascaris lumbricoides 13.98% (95% CI: 9.30, 18.67) whereas the least prevalent parasite reported was Strongloids stecolaris 1.56% (95% CI: 0.88, 2.24) (Table 2).
The pooled prevalence of at least one IPI among primary school children was found to be 46.09 (95% CI: 38.50, 53.68) (I2 = 99.0%, p<0.001) (Figure 2). Since there was high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.0%).
Subgroup analysis
We performed subgroup analysis by region where the study conducted to deal the source of heterogeneity. The highest prevalence was observed in Tigray region with a prevalence of 66.6 % (95% CI: 55.5, 77.7), followed by SNNPR 50.8% (95% CI: 33.1, 68.5) and the lowest was noted in Oromia region 27.58% (95% CI: 18.6, 36.6). In addition, we conducted subgroup analysis by sample size below and above mean. The prevalence of IPI was relatively similar to the overall pooled prevalence across the category above and below the mean sample size 45.99% (95% CI: 36.68, 61.48). Finally, subgroup analysis was done for publication year, with the finding that before 2017 higher prevalence was seen compared to studies published after 2017(inclusive) (Table 3).
To determine the extent of publication bias, we performed the funnel plot for symmetry by visual inspection, and it appeared quite symmetrical (Figure 3) indicating the absence of publication bias. To confirm the status of publication bias we also performed Egger’s objectivity test, which also did not show presence of publication bias (p> 0.758).
Factors associated with intestinal parasite infection
In this systematic review and meta-analysis; hygiene of fingernail was reported from seven articles, place of defecation (6), latrine availability (7), maternal education (8), residence (4), habit of shoe wearing (11), source of drinking water (9), hands washing habit (7), and habit of washing fruit and vegetables (3) were statistically associated with IPI. However, family size reported from five articles, sex (15), age of children (11), habit of eating raw meat (4), habit of swimming (7), habit of eating raw vegetables (5), hand washing before meals (3) and waste disposal sites (3) were not significantly associated with IPI (Table 4).
The association between shoes wearing habit and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from elven articles with sample size of 6,229 (16, 17, 23, 29, 32, 33, 36, 37, 42, 43, 46, 50). Thus, we found those individual who do not regularly wear shoes was 2.7 times more likely to develop IPI (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.79, 3.97) as compared to those who habitually wear shoes (Table 4).
The association between fingernail hygiene and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from seven studies with a sample size of 5,155(16, 21, 23, 29, 37, 50, 51). The result of this analysis shows significant association between fingernail hygiene and IPI. The likelihood of parasitic infection is 2.4 times higher among students who had no fingernail hygiene as compared to their counterparts who have good fingernail hygiene (OR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.67, 3.35) (Table 4).
The association between washing fruits and vegetables and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from three papers with a sample size of 945 participants (33, 43, 52). The result of this analysis showed that significant association. Students not washing fruits and vegetables were 68% (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.23, 2.30) more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites as compared to their counterparts (Table 4).
The association between maternal education and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from eight articles with sample of 3,279 participants(23, 32, 37, 41, 44, 46, 48, 52). The finding of meta-analysis indicates the significant association between maternal education and IPI. Those students who had an educated mother were two times less likely to be infected by intestinal parasite (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.17, 3.48) as compared to uneducated one (Table 4).
The association between Defecation habit and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from six studies with 4,337 participants (17, 20, 29, 32, 33). The finding of meta-analysis indicated significant association between the defecation habits and IPI. Students who had open defecation was 2.7 times (OR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.64, 4.37) more likely to be infected by parasites as compared to those utilizing latrines (Table 4).
The association between hand washing habits and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from six studies with a sample size of 4,337 (16, 20, 21, 29, 32, 33). We had found significant association between hand washing and IPI. Students, who did not have regular hand washing habits, had more than a triple the likelihood (OR: 3.45, 95%CI: 1.85, 6.47) of being infected by intestinal parasite as compared to those participating in regular hand washing (Table 4).
The association between residence and intestinal parasitic infection was determined from four articles with 1,295 participants (17, 19, 32, 42). Those who live in the rural area were 87% (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.45, 2.41) more likely to develop IPI as compared to those living in urban areas (Table 4).
The association between IPI and source of drinking water were determined from nine articles. Source of drinking water is statistically associated with IPI. Thus, students who drank water from non-pipe sources were 99% (OR=1.99, 95% CI: 1.99, 2.79) more likely to become infected with parasite as compared to pipe sources users (Table 4).
The association between IPI and latrine availability was determined from seven studies. We found latrine availability is statistically associated with IPI, with students who had no latrine being four times (OR=4.39, 95% CI: 2.50, 7.73) more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites as compared to those with latrine availability (Table 4).
The findings obviously display the burden of intestinal parasite among the primary school children in the country Ethiopia. Entamoeba spp (16.11%), Ascaris lumbricoides (13.98), Hookworm (12.51%) and Giardia lamblia (9.98%) are among the top prevalent parasitic infections among primary school children.
The overall pooled prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection was 46.09%. This finding was in line with the studies conducted in Kenya (43%) (53), Nigeria (42.6%) (54), and Palestine (32.0-41.5%)(55). On the other hand, studies that showed higher prevalence than our findings were done in West Africa (63.1%) (56), South Africa (68%) (57), Tanzania (63.91%) (58), Nigeria (67.4%) (59, 60), and Mkhanyakude District, Burkina Faso (84.7%) (61). However, our results were higher than the studies conducted in South Africa (37.5%) (62), Eastern Region of Nepal (31.5%) (63), Northwestern Iran (10.6%) (64), Tehran, Iran (18.4%) (65), and Yemen (31.8%) (66). These variations could be due to socio-demographic characteristics, sample sizes, methodology used and economic status.
Primary school children wearing shoes regularly were less likely to develop IPI than those not wearing shoes. This finding was supported by different studies in different areas (67–69), as a result of soil-transmitted helminthes infections being a common source of IPI in humans.
School children who did not maintain fingernail hygiene were more likely to be infected by IPI as supported by a study in Yemen (70). This finding links to IPI being transmitted by poor fingernail hygiene. Students belonging to uneducated mothers at a higher risk of IPI in our study, which is a similar finding to studies in Turkey and El Beheira, Egypt (71, 72). This finding could reflect that educated mothers had better knowledge about IPI prevention and potentially better economic status enabling them to embrace the entire prevention process. Additionally, in the current study, rural residents were 87% more likely to be infected by intestinal parasites, which is similar to findings from studies in Zambia and Nepal (73, 74). This situation may arise because be rural community dwellers had lower awareness and more frequent contact with soil as well limited access to safe water and latrine.
Like other studies we were also found fruit and vegetable washing affected the prevalence of IPI (75), which might relate to the level of cleanliness and soil transmission risks. Open defecation and the availability latrine were another potential cause of IPI in our findings, which is similar to a study done in Zambia (73). This could reflect that those communities who experience unclean environments due to open defecation are more likely to transmit parasites through soil, water, fomites, food or other means. Similar to other studies, hand washing habits, before meals, after toileting, and post-contact with dirty objects, were significantly associated with IPI (67, 76).
Limitations of the study
One of the limitations of this study was that it did not consider all the regions in Ethiopia due to lack of availability of articles. We did not register this paper in PROSPERO even though it might increase the credibility of the article.
In this meta-analysis, the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in primary school children in Ethiopia was high (46%). Therefore, this finding warrants the need to design school children hygiene and sanitation services and expands school children’s deworming programs to decrease IPI and improve academic performance in the country. In addition, attention should be given to promoting personal hygiene, latrine utilization, wearing shoes, avoiding eating raw foods, and creating awareness for those mothers who lack formal education. Moreover, the researchers are encouraged to conduct research on province/regions not yet studied for their IPI status.
IPI |
Intestinal Parasitic Infection |
BDR |
Bahir Dar |
SNNP |
Southern Nations and Nationality and People |
PRISMA |
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable
Availability of data and material
All available data are within the paper and its supporting information files.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Funding
The authors received no specific funding for this work
Author contributions
MAA: Conception of research protocol, study design, literature review, data analysis, interpretation and drafting the manuscript.
DS: Data extraction and manuscript review.
YH: Data extraction, data analysis and manuscript review
PMP: Contribute on critically review, editing, and validating
AMA: Data analysis, data extraction and manuscript review
ATT: Literature review, quality assessment and manuscript review.
MMA: Literature review, data extraction and review a manuscript.
DBK: Study design, data analysis and manuscript review
BT: data analysis, quality assessment, and manuscript review.
BM: Study design, data analysis and manuscript review
TG: Data analysis, quality assessment, and manuscript review.
SDH: Literature review, data extraction, data analysis, interpretation and manuscript review. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
Authors of primary study
References
Authors | Pub/year | Area | Sample | Response rate (%) | Prevalence (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sitotaw et al(21) | 2019 | Amhara (Jawi) | 422 | 96.2 | 57.9 |
Nguyen et al(22) | 2012 | Amhara (Angolela) | 664 | 100 | 37.2 |
Feleke(20) | 2016 | Amhara (Mecha & BDR) | 2372 | 94.54 | 61.7 |
Alelign et al(24) | 2015 | Amhara (Durbete) | 403 | 95.29 | 54.95 |
Amare et al(25) | 2013 | Amhara (Gondar) | 405 | 100 | 22.7 |
Worku N et al(26) | 2009 | Amhara (Gondar) | 322 | 100 | 10.9 |
Hailegebriel(23) | 2017 | Amhara (Bahir Dar) | 390 | 92.1 | 65.5 |
Gashaw et al(27) | 2015 | Amhara (Enfranz) | 550 | 100 | 66.4 |
Alemu et al (15) | 2019 | Amhara (Lay Gayint) | 273 | 100 | 30.8 |
Dessie et al(29) | 2019 | Amhara (Glomekeda) | 422 | 100 | 29.9 |
Gelaw et al(30) | 2013 | Amhara | 326 | 93.25 | 34.2 |
Melaku et al(47) | 2019 | Amhara (Bahir dar) | 211 | 100 | 60.2 |
Asemahagn(32) | 2014 | Amhara (Motta) | 358 | 98.3 | 68.4 |
Abdi et al (33) | 2017 | Amhara (Zegie) | 422 | 96.68 | 69.1 |
Sisay et al(16) | 2019 | Oromia (Zwai) | 384 | 100 | 22.6 |
Tefera et al(34) | 2017 | Oromia (Babile) | 632 | 100 | 14.4 |
Begna(35) | 2016 | Oromia (Bale zone) | 492 | 100 | 26.6 |
Reji P et al(48) | 2011 | Oromia (Adama) | 358 | 100 | 35.5 |
Geleta et al(37) | 2018 | Oromia (Arsi Negele) | 295 | 100 | 39.6 |
Mengist et al(19) | 2015 | Addis Ababa | 172 | 97.8 | 37.8 |
Gebretsadik(46) | 2017 | BG(Asossa ) | 404 | 97.77 | 35.44 |
Mahmud et al(38) | 2013 | Tigray(Mekele) | 600 | 97.2 | 72 |
Kidane et al(39) | 2014 | Tigray (Wukro) | 384 | 100 | 60.7 |
Zerdo et al(49) | 2017 | SNNP (Gamo Goffa) | 406 | 100 | 36.8 |
Wolde et al(45) | 2015 | SNNP (Sidam zone) | 450 | 98.8 | 64.3 |
Birmeka., et al(44) | 2017 | SNNP (Gurage zone) | 641 | 100 | 40.2 |
Alemu et al(43) | 2018 | SNNP (Arbaminch) | 405 | 96.54 | 46.5 |
Alemayehu et al (40) | 2017 | SNNP (Wolaita zone) | 515 | 97.67 | 72.2 |
Alemu et al(42) | 2019 | SNNP (Birbir town) | 355 | 98.87 | 27.1 |
Abossie et al(41) | 2014 | SNNP (Chencha town) | 422 | 94.79 | 81 |
Parasite species | Study Number | Participants | Prevalence with 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|
Entamoeba spp | 15 | 6159 | 16.11(10.79, 21.43) |
Ascaris lumbricoides | 16 | 6550 | 13.98(9.30, 18.67) |
Hook worm | 16 | 6720 | 12.51(8.73, 16.28) |
Giardia lamblia | 13 | 5283 | 9.98(6.91, 13.05) |
Hymenolepis nana | 14 | 5770 | 7.82(5.24, 10.40) |
Schistosoma mansonii | 5 | 2189 | 5.37(1.86, 8.89) |
Trichuris trichiura | 14 | 5802 | 3.51(2.31, 4.70) |
Enterobius vermicularis | 10 | 4151 | 2.34(1.16, 3.52) |
Taenia sp | 8 | 3450 | 1.60(0.77, 2.44) |
Strongloids stecolaris | 8 | 3296 | 1.56(0.88, 2.24) |
Variables | Characteristics | No. of Studies | Participants | Prevalence(95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Amhara | 14 | 7540 | 47.84 (37.14, 58.52) |
SNNP | 7 | 3194 | 50.84 (33.14, 68.53) | |
Oromia | 5 | 2161 | 27.58 (18.62, 36.55) | |
Tigray | 2 | 984 | 66.60 (55.54, 77.66) | |
Addis Ababa | 1 | 172 | 37.80 (30.55, 45.05) | |
Benishangul Gumuz | 1 | 404 | 35.44 (30.78, 40.10) | |
Sample size | Below mean(482) | 22 | 7989 | 44.81 (36.69, 52.93) |
Above mean(482) | 8 | 6466 | 45.99 (36.68, 61.48) | |
Publication year | Before 2017 | 15 | 8278 | 48.97 (37.99, 59.95) |
After 2017(inclusive) | 15 | 6177 | 43.19 (33.07, 53.31) |
Table 4
Variables | Number of articles | Odds ratio (95%CI) | I-squared (%) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age of students | 11 | 1.28(0.99, 1.65) | 73.3 | < 0.001 |
Sex | 15 | 1.04(0.99, 1.20) | 38.6 | 0.063 |
Latrine availability | 7 | 4.39(2.50, 7.73) | 64.8 | 0.009* |
Fingernail hygiene | 7 | 2.37(1.67, 3.35) | 80.8 | < 0.001* |
Place of defecation | 6 | 1.67(1.64, 4.36) | 85.3 | < 0.001* |
Maternal education | 8 | 2.02(1.18, 3.47) | 89.3 | < 0.001* |
Residence | 4 | 1.88(1.46, 2.41) | 0 | 0.667* |
Habit of shoes wearing | 11 | 2.66(1.79, 3.96) | 87.7 | < 0.001* |
Source of drinking water | 9 | 1.99(1.42, 2.76) | 60.8 | 0.009* |
Hands washing habit | 7 | 3.45(1.85, 6.47) | 87.2 | < 0.001* |
Habit of washing fruit and vegetables | 3 | 1.59(1.01, 2.49) | 47.2 | 0.151* |
Family size | 5 | 160(0.70, 3.80) | 78.8 | 0.001 |
Habit of eating raw meat | 4 | 0.97(0.37 ,2.51) | 92.9 | < 0.001 |
Habit of swimming | 7 | 1.19(0.61, 2.31) | 93.2 | < 0.001 |
Habit of eating raw vegetables | 5 | 1.05(0.31, 3.53) | 98.1 | < 0.001 |
Hand washing before meal | 3 | 3.31(0.70, 15.53) | 92.7 | < 0.001 |
Waste disposal site | 3 | 1.08(0.16, 7.29) | 98.1 | < 0.001 |
*statistically significant variable |