There were no side effects during the study, and most of the participants who participated in the training from the beginning completed the study.
The results of the composite variance analysis test in the post-test phase indicate that there is a significant difference between the test results in the post-test[F(21,56) = 8.531,p < 0.05]. The results of the intergroup comparison also show that there is a significant difference between the groups in the post-test walking speed scores[F(3,56) = 17.333,p < 0.05]. As you can see in diagram1; All three post-test training groups showed better walking speed than the control group (p < 0.05). Also, CM
training group compared to the ST training group; Indicates better walking speed in the post-test (p < 0.05). Also, there was no significant difference between the two groups of CM and MM training and the two groups of MM and ST in the post-test walking speed scores (p < 0.05).
Digram 1. Comparison diagram of the dependent variable of the path between the four control groups, MC task, MM task and ST in the pre-test and post-test stages.
The results of the composite variance analysis test in the post-test phase showed that there was a significant difference between the test results in the post-test [F (21,56) = 8,531, p < 0.05]. There is also a result of intergroup comparison showing a significant difference between groups in post-test equilibrium scores [F (3,56) = 44,840, p < 0.05]. As you can see in diagram2; All three post-test training groups showed better balance than the control group (p < 0.05). CM training group also showed better post-test balance than the other two training groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups of MM and ST training in post-test balance scores (p < 0.05).
Digram 2. Comparison Chart dependent variable balance between the four groups: control, MC tasks, task MM and ST on pre- and post-tests.
The results of the composite variance analysis test in the post-test phase showed that there was a significant difference between the test results in the post-test [F (21,56) = 8,531, p < 0.05]. Also in the intergroup comparison; There was no significant difference between the groups in the post-test accuracy, processing, and information scores [F (3.56) = 0.178, p > 0.05]. As you can see in diagram 3; Comparing the two groups of CM and MM training with the post-test control group, there was a significant difference in the accuracy of information processing and scoring scores compared to the control group (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed when compared to an ST group with the control group in post-test.
Diagram3. Comparison diagram of the dependent variable of processing accuracy between the four control groups, CM, MM task and ST in the pre-test and post-test stages
Also, in comparison with the CM training group compared to the other two training groups, a significant difference was observed in the post-test (p < 0.05). Also, there was no significant difference between the two groups
of MM and ST training in accuracy scores, processing, post-test information (p < 0.05).
The results of the composite variance analysis test in the post-test phase showed that there was a significant difference between the test results in the post-test [F (21,56) = 8,531, p < 0.05]. Also in the intergroup comparison; There was no significant difference between the groups in the scores of, information processing speed post-test [F (3,56) = 0.178, p > 0.05]. As you can see in Fig. 4; All three post-test practice groups did not show a significant difference in the speed, information processing speed scores compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Also, compared to the CM training group compared to the other two training groups, no significant difference was observed in the post-test (p < 0.05). Also, there was no significant difference between the two groups of MM and ST training in post-test information processing speed scores (p < 0.05).
Diagram 4. Comparison diagram of the dependent variable of processing speed between four control groups, CM task, MM task and ST in pre-test and post-test stages.
The results of the composite variance analysis test in the post-test phase showed that there was a significant difference between the test results in the post-test [F (21,56) = 8,531, p < 0.05]. Also, the result of the intergroup comparison shows a significant difference between groups in post-test quality of life scores. [F (3,56) = 44,840, p < 0.05]. As you can see in diagram5; All three post-test training groups showed a better quality of life score than the control group (p < 0.05). Also, the CM training group showed better quality of life scores in the post-test than the other two training groups (p < 0.05). Also, the CM training group showed better life quality scores in the pre-test (p < 0.05)than two other training groups. but there were no significant differences in the quality of life in the pre-test (p < 0.05).
Diagram 5 - Comparison chart of the dependent variable of quality of Life between the four control groups, CM, MM and ST in the pre-test and post-test stages.
The results of the composite variance analysis test in the post-test phase showed that there was a significant difference between the test results in the post-test [F (21,56) = 8,531, p < 0.05]. Also, the result of the intergroup comparison shows a significant difference between groups in post-test anxiety depression scores. [F (3,56) = 44,840, p < 0.05]. As you can see in diagram 6; The two post-test CM and post-test groups showed a better depression anxiety score than the control group (p < 0.05). But this was not the case in the MM group (p < 0.05). The CM training group also showed better depression anxiety scores in the post-test than the other two training groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the two groups of MM training and ST in anxiety scores Post-test depression was not observed (p < 0.05).
Diagram 6. Comparison chart of the dependent variable of anxiety, the depression between the four control groups, CM task, MM task and ST in the pre-test and post-test stages.