The frequency of endobronchial metastasis from non-pulmonary malignancies is known to range from about 2–50%, varying by the definition of metastasis used and the types of cancer included [7–9]. The overall incidence of tracheal metastasis was 0.44% in surgically resected NSCLC, and the incidence of tracheal metastasis was lower in primary lung cancers than in non-pulmonary malignancies [9]. Hemoptysis with coughing is the most common symptom of endobronchial metastasis, with an incidence of 41%-62% reported [9]. In our cases, all patients with endobronchial metastasis were free from symptoms despite the endobronchial nodule shown on postoperative follow-up CT. To determine whether or not these lesions are sputum, it is useful to examine the lesion uptake of FDG by PET-CT. In our cases, the uptake of FDG was revealed in endobronchial lesions, but there were no metastatic lesions noted outside the thorax, including in the brain.
Schoenbaum and Viamonte reported that metastatic spread of malignant tumors to bronchi occurs by direct extension from mediastinal lesion, invasion of bronchus by parenchymal mass, or direct metastasis to the wall of the bronchi [1]. In our cases, endobronchial metastasis occurred despite the absence of lymph node metastasis, and the metastatic pathway was suspected of being the bronchial arteries in the bronchial wall.
Surgery was not indicated in the present cases because extensive adhesions were expected on the postoperative side and recurrence near the tracheal bifurcation might require extremely invasive and difficult surgery, such as carinal reconstruction or pneumonectomy. Therefore, we performed a combination of EBRT and EBBT as definitive treatment, and none of our patients experienced local recurrence. The most serious adverse events of EBBT are fatal hemoptysis and severe bronchitis due to over-irradiation. These adverse events are caused by the radioactive source being placed at eccentric locations in the bronchial lumen, thereby leading to localized hot spots on the bronchial mucous membrane [2]. We therefore used a special source-centralizing applicator to avoid eccentric distribution of the radiation dose. None of our patients experienced such severe adverse events, and none needed extensive outpatient treatment. This applicator was also used to protect the bronchial mucosa from high-dose irradiation in the reports of Kawamura et al. [10], Hosni et al. [5], and Nomoto et al. [4].
There have been several reports regarding the combination of EBRT and EBBT therapy in either a curative or palliative setting. Nomoto et al. reported that the 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 79% and 77%, respectively, in 15 patients [4]. In addition, Hosni et al. reported that the 2-year overall survival and local control rates were 67% and 89%, respectively, in 23 patients [5]. While these reports described relatively few patients, these outcomes suggested that EBBT may be expected to achieve excellent tumor control.
In conclusion, EBBT is possibly a promising treatment with curative intent for endobronchial metastasis after surgery of NSCLC.