Ninety-eight postmenopausal women aged from 49 to 75 (mean age 60.7 years, median 60.0 years) were recruited, 50 of them suffered of POP; the other 48 were weight-matched controls of the same age span. All women were of good health. Thirteen patients had well controlled hypertension, as did 11 controls (p = 0.72). Five patients and 1 control had type 2 diabetes (p = 0.09), on oral medication without any significant diabetic complications. 6 participants had osteoporosis and were treated in the past.
Their menopausal age was 1 to 30 yrs (mean 10.5, median 10.0) and did not differ significantly between the test and control group. Personal anthropometric characteristics of our patients are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Personal characteristics of participants.
| POP patients (No = 50) | Controls (No = 48) | P -value |
AGE (yrs +/- SD) | 62.6 +/- 9.3 | 58.7 +/- 7.2 | 0.024 |
BMI (kg/m2 +/- SD) | 27.6 +/- 3.8 | 27.1 +/- 5.2 | 0.65 |
MENARCHE (age+/-SD) | 13.4 +/- 1.6 | 12.9 +/- 1.7 | 0.17 |
PARITY (no. +/-SD) | 2.3 +/- 0.8 | 1.8 +/- 0.7 | 0.005 |
Vaginal deliveries (no. +/-SD) | 2.2 +/- 0.8 | 1.7 +/- 0.9 | 0.02 |
Caesarean section (no.) | 0.02 +/- 0.1 | 0.1 +/- 0.4 | 0.15 |
MENOPAUSE (age +/- SD) | 50.5 +/- 3.6 | 50.1 +/- 3.2 | 0.53 |
POSTMENOP. AGE (yrs +/- SD) | 12.3 +/- 8.7 | 8.7 +/- 7.1 | 0.03 |
Due to a wide range of partcipants a statistically importrant difference resulted in the mean age between test and control group (62.6 vs. 58.7 years).
Mean 25-OH-D level in patients was 42.9 compared to 50.9 in controls, p = 0.049, reaching statistically significant difference. Table 2 include laboratory results of our participants: measurements of 25-OH-D, serum Ca and P.
Table 2
Results of vitamin D determination and bio-chemical measurements in participants.
| POP patients (No = 50) | Controls (No = 48) | P -value |
25-OH-D (nmol/l +/- SD) | 42.9 +/- 18.8 | 50.9 +/- 21.1 | 0.049 |
Ca (mmol/l +/- SD) | 2.32 +/- 0.13 | 2.33 +/- 0.1 | 0.69 |
P (mmol/l +/- SD) | 1.13 +/- 0.23 | 1.13 +/- 0.18 | 0.98 |
Values for Ca and P were all in a normal range |
Groups significantly differed in vitamin D levels: the test group had significantly lower blood vitamin D levels. However, we searched for the clinical significance of vitamin D levels and searched for vitamin D deficiency in our participants. Indeed, patients had a significantly higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 1. There were 33 (66.0%) patients with vitamin D deficiency compared to 21 (43.8%) in controls. In the study group there were also 15 (30.0%) vitamin D insufficient subjects and only 2 patients (4%) with normal vitamin D levels compared to 20 vitamin D insufficient controls (41.6%) and 7 controls (14.6%) with normal vitamin D levels (< 0.05).
Table 3
Results of anamnestic questionary on life facts and habits.
| POP patients YES/NO (No.) | Controls YES/NO (No.) | P-value |
Physical exercising | 28/22 | 26/22 | 0.85 |
Sexual intercourses | 16/14 | 21/27 | 0.23 |
Pelvic floor exercises of Kegl | 31/19 | 28/20 | 0.71 |
Hormone replacement therapy | 6/44 | 1/47 | 0.06 |
Smoking | 9/41 | 7/41 | 0.64 |
Coffee | 6/35//9* | 1/40//7* | 0.07 |
*high intake/moderate intake (3 coffees or less)//no coffee |
The results of POP-Q test showed that 15 patients had a stage 2 prolapse, 32 a stage 3 prolapse and 3 patients a stage 4 prolapse. The control group included 31 participants without prolapse as well as 17 participants with stage 1 asymptomatic physiological prolapse considered normal in women with parity history and evaluated for a condition other than pelvic floor disfunction (PFD) [17]. Participants did not differ significantly in the incidence of vitamin D deficiency at different prolapse stages (p = 0.21), but bivariate analyses between degree of POP (0 to 4) and vitamin D levels showed significant moderately high negative ccorelation (r= -0.24, p = 0.018, n = 98).
The results of the anamnestic questionnaire regarding personal habits, physical activity, pelvic floor muscle training, sexual activity and hormone replacement therapy are shown in Table 4. Physical activity was evaluated (from sedentary lifestyle to intensive physical excercise) and no important difference between the patients and controls were observed. Dividing the participants into two groups regarding sufficient and insufficient physical activity (Table 4) did not bring any significant difference between patients and controls, either. Smoking habits were comparable in both groups. However, more patients than controls were taking hormone replacement therapy, almost reaching statistical importance (p = 0.06).
Table 4
Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in POP patients vs. controls.
| POP patients No. (%) | Controls No. (%) |
Vitamin D deficiency YES (No.) | 33 (66.0%) | 21 (43.8%) |
Vitamin D deficiency NO (No.) | 17 (34.0%) | 27 (56%) |
Total (No.) | 50 | 48 |
Chi2 (1) = 4.90, p = 0.027 |
Regarding the pattern of POP, 28 patients had cytocele, 20 patiens the combination of cystocele and rectocele, but 1 patient had rectocele only. In 1 patient with POP there was an isolated apical prolapse without cysto- or rctocele. Patients with a cystocele were more prone to vitamin D deficiency (p < 0.05), but patients with a rectocele (p = 0.78) were not (Fig. 2, Fig. 3).
Multivariate discriminant analyses extracted two important predictive variables from the set of dependent variables (vitamin D, age, serum Ca, serum P, body mass index) to predict having POP or no. These are age and vitamin D. The multivariate discriminant analysis on these two variables and POP (Wilks ƛ = 0.905, p = 0.009, structure matrix koeficients regarding mathematical function of POP, are: for age = 0.72, for vitamin D= -0.63) showed, that vitamin D and age are predictive factors (without gynaecological examination) for correctly placing patient in POP group in 58%, and in 71% for predicting that women belong to control group.