The previous analysis shows that there is a good correlation between the AM SSH over the CETP and the SEP and the summer drought in CA. Then, how is the connection established? Regression analyses between the AM SSH over the CETP and the bimonthly geopotential height fields at 500-hPa, 300-hPa and 100-hPa from April to August are conducted (Fig. 6). According to the thermal adaptation theory (Wu et al. 2007, 2016; Liu et al. 2017b), the anomalously enhanced thermal effect of the plateau surface will cause the lower atmosphere to be heated, converge and rise, forming a thermal low pressure at the lower layer over the TP. Accordingly, the geopotential height field will rise anomalously in the upper troposphere, forming a warm high pressure center. In Figure 6, with the anomalously enhanced sensible heat on the CETP in AM, the 500-hPa geopotential height is anomalously low in AM (Fig. 6a1), the 300-hPa geopotential height over the eastern TP is anomalously high (Fig. 6a2), and the 100-hPa geopotential height anomaly is further enhanced (Fig. 6a3). In MJ, the geopotential height anomaly at 300-hPa over the eastern plateau and the low-latitude areas is further intensified (Fig. 6b2), and it is significantly enhanced at 100-hPa (Fig. 6b3). In the following JJ and JA, the anomalous intensification of the 100-hPa geopotential height develops further, with the significant anomaly dominating in the south of 40°N. Previous studies indicated that the SSH transportation over the TP from spring to summer has a good persistence (Wang and Li, 2018). When the SSH is anomalously intense in spring, the SSH transportation in the following summer will be abnormally strong. Thus, the anomalously strong SSH on the TP in AM will be transmitted from the lower to the upper layers through the continuous heating to the atmosphere. It will eventually be preserved in the upper troposphere for a long time, resulting in an anomalously strong South Asia High (SAH) afterwards, and vice versa. The SAH, also known as the Tibetan high (Yeh and Gao,1979), is the strongest and most stable circulation system dominating at 100-hPa in the northern hemisphere in summer. Numerous studies have indicated that the formation and development of the SAH are closely related to the thermal effect of the TP. Both diagnostic analysis and numerical simulation have confirmed that the sensible and latent heating of the TP play an essential role in the formation and evolution of the SAH (Wu et al.1999; Liu et al. 2004; Ren et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019b). To verify whether the SSH anomalies over the CETP regulate the SEP in CA by influencing the SAH, the composite analysis is carried out for the atmospheric circulations in the northern hemisphere in summer, investigating the differences between strong and weak SSH years, providing an insight into the physical processes and the key circulation systems in which the plateau sensible heat influences the SEP and the summer drought in CA. According to the time series of AM SSH over the CETP with removing the Niño3.4 signal, and taking one standard deviation as the abnormal standard, 6 strong years (1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 2012 and 2014) and 6 weak years (1984, 1992, 1994, 2002, 2013 and 2016) are selected separately. Due to 1987, 1991, 1992 and 2016 are strong El Nino years, considering the possible influence of ENSO signal on atmospheric circulation, the cases in these years are removed. Finally, 4 strong years (1986, 1995, 2012 and 2014) and 4 weak years (1984, 1994, 2002 and 2013) are selected separately in the composite analysis.
Figure 7 shows the distribution of summer average geopotential height at 100-hPa during 1982–2018 and the composite geopotential height anomaly fields at 100-hPa in years with anomalously strong and anomalously weak SSH in AM. It shows that the summer average SAH is located over the TP and the Iranian plateau (Fig. 7a). When the SSH over the CETP is anomalously strong in late spring (AM), the100-hPa geopotential height in summer is significantly increased over the TP and the lower latitudes south of it (Fig. 7b), and the SAH is anomalously strong and eastward (Fig. 7a). Conversely, when the SSH is anomalously weak over the CETP, the geopotential height is anomalously low over the southern plateau and the low latitudes and anomalously high over CA, northern China and the Japanese archipelago (Fig. 7c), and the SAH is anomalously weak and westward (Fig. 7a). The results are consistent with that in Figure 6, that is, the strong SSH anomaly will result in an anomalously strong SAH afterwards, and vice versa.
Figure 8 illustrates the distribution of summer subtropical westerly jet. As shown in the distribution of summer average zonal wind at 200-hPa during 1982–2018 (Fig. 8a), the average subtropical westerly jet in summer is located in 36°N–45°N, with the jet center (U>25m/s) in the north of the TP. When the SSH over the CETP in late spring (AM) is anomalously strong, the westerly anomalies over the TP and the regions east of it strengthen, and easterly anomalies appear over CA (Fig. 8b2), so the subtropical westerly jet is anomalously weak over CA and anomalously strong over the north part of TP, and the location of the westerly jet is slightly southward (Fig. 8b1), compared with the climate mean (Fig. 8a). When the plateau SSH is anomalously weak in late spring (AM), there is an opposite situation. In 15°N–35°N, the easterly anomalies significantly strengthen over West Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, the Iranian plateau, the TP and its east, and the Japanese archipelago. In 35°N–50°N, the westerly anomalies intensify over the Mediterranean, the south of Ural Mountains, northern CA and northern China (Fig. 8c2). Thus, the subtropical westerly jet is anomalously strong and northward with the northern boundary of the jet center (U>25m/s) near to 48°N (Fig. 8c1). The variations of the subtropical westerly jet from April to July in strong and weak years are also investigated (figures not shown), and the results are similar to those in summer, that is, the strong (weak) SSH anomaly over the CETP facilitates the subtropical westerly jet to be anomalously weak (strong) and southward (northward) over CA.
The 500-hPa geopotential height and temperature fields (Fig. 9) show that, when the SSH over the CETP in late spring (AM) is anomalously strong (Fig. 9b1), the geopotential height is anomalously high over the south of 30°N and northern CA in summer. The subtropical high over northern Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and the western Pacific is anomalously strong, the Ural ridge strengthens and CA trough weakens (Fig. 9a, b1). The northern CA is controlled by an abnormal warm high-pressure ridge (Fig. 9b1, b2), which is not conducive to the generation of extreme precipitation in the region. Conversely, when the SSH over the CETP in late spring (AM) is anomalously weak (Fig. 9c1), the geopotential height is anomalously low over the south of 30°N and northern CA in summer. The subtropical high over northern Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and the western Pacific is anomalously weak, the Ural ridge weakens and the CA trough strengthens (Fig. 9a, c1). The northern CA and northern Xinjiang in China are controlled by an abnormal cold low-pressure trough (Fig. 9c1, c2), which is conducive to the generation of extreme precipitation in these regions. Moreover, the western TP and its vicinity are controlled by an abnormal warm high-pressure ridge, which is not conducive to the generation of extreme precipitation in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan of southeastern CA.
The 850-hPa wind field (Fig. 10) also indicates that when the SSH over the CETP is anomalously strong in late spring (AM), the anticyclonic circulation anomaly in northern CA is strengthened in summer (Fig. 10a, b). The distributions of the moisture fluxes at different altitudes in troposphere and the whole layer moisture flux and their moisture divergence flux indicate that the anomalous water vapor from the Mediterranean and the North Atlantic flows into CA at the northern and eastern boundaries via the Barents Sea and the West Siberian plain, diverging in northern CA (Fig. 11a1-d1), which is not conducive the generation to the extreme precipitation and intensifies the summer drought in the region. Whereas, when the plateau SSH is anomalously weak (Fig. 10c), the CA and its adjacent regions are controlled by abnormal cyclonic circulation, which weakens the Ural ridge and strengthens the CA trough, facilitating water vapor to enter CA through the western and southern boundaries. The distribution of the moisture flux at lower troposphere (925-hPa) indicates that the anomalous water vapor from the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic converges in southwestern CA through its western boundary (Fig. 11a2). Due to the terrain obstruction of the TP, Pamirs and Iranian plateaus, there is little water vapor entering the CA through the southern boundary in the lower troposphere. However, at the middle troposphere (700-hPa and 500-hPa), anomalous water vapor from the Western Pacific, the South China Sea and the Bay of Bengal entering CA through the southern boundary increases rapidly, and transported northward along the southwest airflow in front of the CA trough, then converges in the northern CA (Fig. 11b2-c2). The distribution of the whole layer moisture flux also shows that there are three water vapor sources entering CA, that is, the water vapor from the Arctic and North Atlantic entering CA through the western boundary and the water vapor from the western Pacific, the South China Sea and the Bay of Bengal entering CA through the southern boundary, these anomalous water vapor converges in northern CA and northern Xinjiang, China (Fig. 11d2), which is conducive to the generation of widespread extreme precipitation and alleviates the summer drought in these regions.
To sum up, The SSH anomalies over the CETP can affect the SEP and the summer drought in CA by regulating the location and strength of the SAH and the subtropical jet over CA. The strong SSH anomalies over the CETP in late spring (AM) can lead to the anomalously strong and eastward SAH in summer, anomalously weak subtropical westerly jet over CA and anomalously strong subtropical high over north Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and the western Pacific. In addition, the Ural ridge strengthens, the CA trough weakens, and the northern CA is controlled by an abnormal warm high-pressure ridge with less anomalous water vapor convergence. All these circulation characteristics are not conducive the generation to the extreme precipitation in the northern CA, so in situ the summer drought will intensify. Whereas, the weak SSH anomalies over the CETP in late spring (April–May) can result in the anomalously weak SAH in summer, anomalously strong and northward subtropical westerly jet, and the anomalously weak subtropical high in north Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and the western Pacific. In addition, the CA and its adjacent regions are controlled by abnormal cyclonic circulation, which weakens the Ural ridge and strengthens the CA trough, at the same time, the anomalous water vapor from the Arctic, North Atlantic, the western Pacific, the south China sea and the Bay of Bengal, converges in northern CA and northern Xinjiang, China, which is conducive to the generation of widespread extreme precipitation and alleviates the summer drought in these regions.