Analysis of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in the crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis or healthy implants

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-57904/v2

Download PDF

Research article

Analysis of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in the crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis or healthy implants

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-57904/v2

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 16 Mar, 2021

Read the published version in BMC Oral Health →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background: Our study aimed to assess the level of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α in peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) collected from patients with no clinical symptoms of mucositis or peri-implantitis and compare them with cytokine concentration in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) acquired from patients with healthy periodontium and those with varying severity of periodontitis.

Methods: A total of 189 subjects were included in the study, and GCF/PISF samples were checked for IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels using an ELISA test.

Results: The IL-1β level in PISF in patients with implants was significantly lower than in GCF in patients with mild, moderate, or severe periodontitis. The CXCL8 level in PISF was considerably lower than in patients with moderate periodontitis. The TNF-α level in PISF in patients with implants was markedly higher compared to subjects with healthy periodontium or patients with mild periodontitis.

Conclusion: Analysis of cytokine levels may help describe the pathogenesis and early diagnosis of peri-implantitis and prevision in high-risk patients.

Dentistry

CXCL8

IL-1β

implants

periodontitis

TNF-α

Over the last decades, dental implants have rapidly become an indispensable therapy in dentistry to replace one (or more) missing tooth. Although they have a high success rate, some of these interventions can end in failure. The most frequent dental implants complication is peri-implantitis, which occurs with a frequency ranging from 1% to 47% at the implant level [1, 2]. Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory response that affects the tissue surrounding the osseointegrated dental implant and results in excessive marginal bone loss [2]. The causes of the peri-implantitis development and progression of inflammation are very different. Several limiting factors, such as poor oral hygiene, untreated periodontitis, untreated endodontic lesions, unfavorable osseous density, alcohol drinking, smoking, diabetes, or others, contribute to the therapy failure. Without any doubt, anatomical factors and appropriate attachment of connective tissue and epithelium to the implant surface influence the lifespan of the implant and the development of possible inflammatory processes. Another critical contributing factor is the implant surface's quality - its chemical, physical state, and mechanical features [3-5]. Peri-implantitis has been connected with a Gram-negative anaerobic microbiota, similar to that found in severe periodontitis around natural teeth [6, 7]. After implanting the implant, pathogenic bacteria migrate from periodontal pockets, tongue, tonsils, and inflamed gingiva to colonize the dental implant surface [8]. Bacterial dental plaque formation around dental implants leads to inflammatory reactions, which induce proliferation and an overgrowth of sulcular epithelium, the degeneration of connective tissue around the abutment, the loss of permucosal seal and an epithelial migration [9, 10].

As in periodontitis, pathogens and their virulence stimulate the release of several immunoinflammatory biomarkers in peri-implant cells. The most meaningful mediators of inflammation are cytokines, which play an essential role in the pathogenesis of periodontal diseases and act as intermediaries in peri-implantitis [11]. The inflammatory process in regards to bacterial infection is mediated by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukins (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-12, and IL-17, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), chemokines CXCL8, and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, and neutrophil lysosomal enzymes, reactive oxygen species (ROS) or eicosanoids (prostaglandins, leukotrienes). Those mediators elicit tissue destruction and bone resorption by stimulating collagenase and the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), which induces osteoclast differentiation [11-12]. Therefore, the evaluation of such cytokines level in the peri-implant sulcus fluid (PISF) has been suggested as a non-invasive method of monitoring the healthy or diseased states of the peri-implant tissues as well as the local response of peri-implant treatments [13, 14]. Using the cytokine assay in the analysis of PISF may help describe the pathogenesis stage more efficiently and predict an early diagnosis of peri-implantitis in high-risk patients. Despite investigative exertions to identify the levels of several cytokines in the PISF, the efficacy of these parameters to predict or contribute to the diagnosis of peri-implantitis is still undetermined.

Evaluation of the state of periodontal and peri-implant tissues is primarily based on clinical examination and imaging diagnostics. The measurement of humoral factors' concentrations after inflammation in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and PISF may be advantageous in assessing the severity of the inflammatory responses within the periodontal tissues, especially in the early stage periodontitis and/or peri-implantitis. The literature in this field, particularly in the case of peri-implantitis, is not sufficient. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in GCF in patients with different degrees of periodontitis and PISF in patients with healthy implants displaying no signs of mucositis or peri-implantitis.

2.1. Patients Study

The study group comprises 189 adult European Caucasian subjects: 85 men and 104 women between 20 and 71. Patients were selected and recruited from the Department of Periodontology at the Medical University of Lublin, and the study began on January 31, 2015, and ended on March 1, 2017. After a full explanation of this study's aim, written informed consent forms were obtained from all participants by the Helsinki Declaration. Medical and dental histories of each patient were gathered. Patient inclusion criteria were as follows: no treatment of periodontitis for the last 6 months that could affect periodontal treatment outcomes; no use of antibiotics and/or anti-inflammatory drugs for 3 months before taking part in the study. Criteria for exclusion from the study were as follows: pregnancy or breastfeeding for women. cigarette smoking, hormonal disorders or taking hormonal agents, infections (such as HIV, hepatitis, and tuberculosis), systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis, and immunological disorders, and patients with a history of oncological treatment).

The diagnosis of patients was based on clinical and radiographic criteria. The clinical examination included Löe and Silness gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP). Both PD and CAL measurements were performed using a WHO-621 periodontal probe. GI measurements were assessed at four surfaces per tooth/implant (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual, and palatal surface), while PD and CAL measurements were taken at six surfaces per tooth (stepping method) (mesiobuccal, mid-buccal, distobuccal, mesio-oral, mid-oral and disto-oral). GI, PD, and CAL are given as average values. One examiner assessed all clinical parameters. Based on the clinical data, patients were later divided into five clinical groups as follow: (1) a control group of periodontally healthy patients (group I), (2) patients with mild periodontitis (group II), (3) patients with moderate periodontitis (group III) (4) patients with severe periodontitis (group IV), (5) periodontally healthy subjects who received an implant treatment (implants with a new alternative hydrophilic surface SPI ELEMENT INICELL, Thommen Medical AG, Grenchen, Switzerland and Brånemark system implant, Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) (group V). In the study group of patients who have received dental implants, none showed any symptoms of peri-implantitis and had no prior history of periodontitis. The intraoral periapical radiographic method was used to evaluate each implant's bone condition and was obtained for each implant using the paralleling technique with a radiographic positioner. In the qualification, we also considered the type of prosthetic work performed on implants. In all patients from group V, the bone density grade was determined according to a scale of D1-D4 defined by Misch [15].

2.2. GCF/PISF Sampling and Processing

Before a GCF sampling, the supragingival plaque was carefully removed. The collection sites were isolated using cotton rolls and dried with air jets. The GCF samples were subsequently obtained from the mesiobuccal root using sterile Periopaper strips (Oraflow Inc., Plainview, NY, USA) that were overlaid and placed at the gingival crevice region until mild resistance was felt. The strips were left in place for 30 seconds to prevent any mechanical irritation. The strips contaminated with blood were discarded. Following the GCF collection, the strips were kept in sterile test tubes and stored in aliquots at -80°C until needed for analysis.

Clinical examinations in the group of patients with implants were performed after removal of the supra-constructions. PISF samples have been drawn, at least 18 months after the surgery, similarly using sterile Periopaper strips that were inserted into the gingival crevice until mild resistance was felt. For 30 seconds, the strips were left in place. After that, the paper points were transferred to a sterile test tube and then immediately stored in aliquots at a temperature of -80°C.

2.3. Cytokine measurements

For GCF/PISF extraction, paper strips were put in tubes containing 500 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.2) (Sigma Aldrich) and next gently shaken and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. After that, the strips were pulled, and the fluids were analyzed. Commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were used to measure the concentration of IL-1β (catalog no DLB50), CXCL8 (catalog no D8000C), and TNF-α (catalog no DTA00C) (Quantikine R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) on Thermo Scientific™ Multiskan™ FC Microplate Photometer. All ELISA procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instruction. All measurements were done in triplicate. The GCF/PISF IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α concentrations were equated to a standard calibration curve.

2.4. Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis for this study was conducted using Statistica 13.1 (Statsoft Inc., USA). Shapiro-Wilk test was used to analyze the normality of distribution, while the Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyzed differences in the levels of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α in GCF, and differences in the levels of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF between G1 and G2 bone density groups, as well. Associations between studied proteins were tested using linear regression (adjusted for age and sex. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to test correlations between IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α concentrations in G1 and G2 bone density groups. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.

The baseline characteristics of each study group are presented in Table 1. The control group of periodontally healthy patients consisted of 36 subjects (13 men and 23 women, aged 35 ± 8 years) with no clinical evidence of gingival inflammation, no radiographic evidence of alveolar bone loss, no tooth loss due to periodontitis, PD < 3 mm, CAL 0 - 4.5 mm, BOP < 10%; Group II consisted of 48 patients with mild periodontitis (18 men and 30 women, aged 38 ± 9 years) with PD 3 - 4 mm, CAL 0 - 4.5 mm, BOP > 10%, radiographic bone loss - coronal third <15%, no tooth loss due to periodontitis. Group III consisted of 43 subjects with moderate periodontitis (21 men and 22 women, aged 40 ± 9 years) with PD 4 - 6 mm, CAL 0 – 6 mm, 10% < BOP < 50%, radiographic bone loss - coronal third from 15% to 33%, tooth loss due to periodontitis of ≤ 4 teeth. Group IV consisted of 30 patients with severe periodontitis (18 men and 12 women, aged 42 ± 10 years) with PD > 6 mm, CAL 1.5 - 10 mm, BOP ≥ 50%, radiographic bone loss - extending to mid-third of root and beyond, tooth loss due to periodontitis ≥ 5 teeth. Group 5 consisted of 32 periodontally healthy subjects (15 men and 17 women) who received an implant treatment. The patients received a single tooth implant (15 subjects) or multiple units (17 subjects). The lifespan of a dental implant ranges from 36 to 147 months (Table 2). The patients enrolled in the study did not have any bone changes in the area of the implants.

IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in GCF/PISF in patients with healthy periodontium, patients with varying severity of periodontitis, and implants are presented in Table 3. As expected, we found that the mean concentration of IL-1β was the highest in patients with severe periodontitis (61.04 ± 41.41 pg/mL). IL-1β level in PISF in patients with implants reached 23.73 ± 27.07 pg/mL and was significantly lower than in GCF in patients with mild (p = 0.029), moderate (p = 0.0005), and severe (p = 0.000014) periodontitis. The statistical analysis also showed that the GCF concentration of IL-1β was greater in patients with mild (p = 0.0008), moderate (p = 0.000003), and severe (p = 0.0000001) periodontitis compared to patients with healthy periodontium, and higher in patients with severe than mild periodontitis (p = 0.003).

It was observed that the concentration of CXCL8 in each group of patients with periodontitis varied significantly according to the stage of the disease. The CXCL8 level in PISF was similar to the CXCL8 level in GCF in healthy patients and ranged from 3.1 to 296.3 pg/mL with a mean of 40.90 ± 56.63 pg/mL. Statistical analysis revealed that the CXCL8 level in PISF was significantly lower than in patients with moderate periodontitis (p = 0.011). Furthermore, in patients with moderate periodontitis, CXCL8 levels in GCF were statistically higher than in periodontally healthy subjects (p = 0.046).

TNF-α's mean concentration was the highest in patients with moderate periodontitis (5.41 ± 2.12 pg/mL) and significantly greater than in GCF of healthy subjects (p = 0.025). TNF-α level in PISF in patients with implants reached 5.71 ± 1.94 pg/mL and was markedly higher compared to subjects with healthy periodontium (p = 0.003) and patients with mild periodontitis (p = 0.010). Additionally, the statistical analysis showed no differences between the level of the studied cytokines/chemokines evaluated in terms of age, sex, or gingival index.

We have also evaluated whether there was any relationship between cytokine levels in PISF and the bone density grade (patients with bone density D1 and D2 formed group G1, n = 12; patients with bone density D3 and D4 formed group G2, n = 20); detailed characteristics of these groups are presented in Table 4. Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between G1 and G2 groups for any of the cytokine/chemokine levels (IL-1β p > 0.05; CXCL8 p > 0.05; TNF-α p > 0.05). Besides, a statistically significant positive correlation between IL-1β and CXCL8 levels in PISF was observed in the G1 group (r = 0.6827; p = 0.014). Linear regression adjusted for age and sex revealed no association between studied protein levels in the study groups.

Some data imply that inflammatory mediators' levels in GCF and PISF, including cytokines, chemokines, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), might help evaluate the periodontal condition peri-implant tissues and monitoring the development of inflammation. However, there is only a little information available on this issue, and the results are ambiguous. Hence, in this study, we have decided to evaluate the levels of the IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α in PISF obtained from patients with no clinical symptoms of mucositis or peri-implantitis and compared them with the level of mediators in GCF obtained from patients with healthy periodontium and those with varying degrees of periodontitis. We stated that the IL-1β level in PISF in patients with implants was significantly lower than in GCF in patients with mild, moderate, or severe periodontitis. In turn, the CXCL8 level in PISF was considerably lower than in patients with moderate periodontitis. Furthermore, the TNF-α level in PISF in patients with implants was markedly higher compared to subjects with healthy periodontium or patients with mild periodontitis.

IL-1β is a multifunctional cytokine with diverse biologic activities implicated in the pathophysiology of periodontitis and peri-implantitis. IL-1β is the primary cytokine that stimulates alveolar bone resorption. It increases the expression of collagenolytic enzymes, MMPs, which contribute to the extracellular matrix degradation and, in turn, lead to bone resorption and tissue destruction [16, 17]. Moreover, IL-1β strongly initiates inflammatory processes. In this study, we have found that the mean concentration of IL-1β was the highest in patients with severe periodontitis. Similar observations were made by Ramseier et al. [18]. They observed that levels of IL-1β are different in GCF according to the periodontal conditions, with the highest concentration found in mild-to-moderate periodontitis. Similar results were presented by Gonzales et al. [19], who found that IL-1β concentration in GCF increases with the intensification of gingivitis's clinical symptoms. Heasman et al. [20] found that IL-1β levels in GCF during the development of experimental gingivitis increased 8-times, compared to baseline, one week after the first measurement. Rawlinson et al. [21] also showed a strong relationship between the severity of inflammation in the periodontium and IL-1β in GCF. Interesting studies were conducted by Engebretson et al. [22]. Authors found that the level of IL-1β in GCF increases with the advancement of periodontitis, and in patients with the most severe form of the disease is almost 8-times higher than in patients from the control group. In turn, we stated that IL-1β level in PISF in patients with healthy implants was significantly lower than in GCF in patients with all stages of periodontitis. Yaghobee et al. [23] observed a significant difference between the level of IL-1β in GCF from the gingiva around the natural tooth (45.71 pg/μL) and PISF from the peri-implant tissue (75.26 pg/μL). In turn, Nowzari et al. [24], Recker et al. [25], and Teixeira et al. [26] stated a comparable level of this cytokine between GCF and PISF from healthy patients. Güncü et al. [27] observed a significantly higher level of IL-1β in patients with gingivitis/inflamed dental implants than in healthy patients without inflammation around the implant. Interestingly, Abduljabbar et al. [28] research showed that the level of IL-1β in PISF is statistically significantly higher among individuals smoking waterpipe compared with non-smokers. Morover, Renvert et al. [29] observed that in the presence of profuse bleeding and with a probing depth ≥6 mm, higher levels of IL-1β in PISF was found than in material from implant sites with minor bleeding on probing, no suppuration, and with a probing depth ≤5 mm.

Because CXCL8 is a potent chemoattractant cytokine and activator of neutrophils in inflammatory regions, which is released from gingival fibroblasts in the gingival crevice, we have also assessed the level of this cytokine. Literature data on the level of CXCL8 in GCF regarding the clinical condition are ambiguous and often even contradictory. Jin et al. [30] found lower CXCL8 levels in GCF in patients with periodontitis compared to healthy people. In turn, Chung et al. [31], when comparing CXCL8 concentration in GCF in periodontologically healthy people and patients with periodontitis, observed a significantly higher level of chemokine in people with a healthy periodontium. In our studies, the CXCL8 level in PISF was similar to the CXCL8 level in GCF in healthy patients. Furthermore, we have found that the CXCL8 level in PISF was significantly lower than in GCF from patients with moderate periodontitis. Our results confirmed the observations of Recker et al. [25], Severino et al. [32], and Ata-Ali et al. [33]. In turn, Hall et al. [34] and Lagdive et al. [35] observed that the level of CXCL8 was significantly upregulated in the peri-implantitis probes. In turn, Renvert et al. [29] showed higher levels of CXCL8 in PISF in the presence of profuse bleeding than in material from implant sites with minor bleeding on probing. It seems that the assessment of CXCL8 levels in GCF or PISF cannot be a measurable indicator of the dynamics of the inflammatory process in periodontal tissues. This is probably due to the fact that CXCL8 is present in GCF, even in people without any inflammatory changes within the periodontal tissues [36-38]. It is perhaps related to the defense process of "physiological" inflammation in the gingival gap, where neutrophils play a significant role.

TNF-α is considered a key cytokine involved with the innate response against the periodontopathogenic bacteria. Although no correlation could be found between the levels of TNF-α in GCF in different degrees of periodontitis, this molecule showed a strong correlation with the severity of periodontal destruction, and it could be used to compare the various stages of periodontal disease [39]. In our study, we have proved the presence of TNF-α in GCF of patients with periodontitis and PISF obtained from individuals without any clinical symptoms of developing mucositis or peri-implantitis. We have also established that this mediator's concentration was remarkably higher in patients with implants than subjects with healthy periodontium and patients with mild periodontitis. Significantly higher TNF-α levels were also noted in PISF compared with their levels in GCF by Recker et al. [25]. Interstingly, Renvert et al. [29] stated that profuse bleeding and/or suppuration in untreated peri-implantitis can be associated with higher concentrations of TNF- α in PISF. Postimplantation biological processes occurring in bone structures are the result of both resorption and osteogenesis. The process of osseointegration between an implant surface and the surrounding bone tissue goes in several stages, and its last phase is the interior reconstruction of the bone, called bone remodeling. Bone remodeling is an active and dynamic process that relies on the correct balance between bone resorption by osteoclasts and osteoblasts' bone deposition.

Moreover, these two functions must be tightly coupled not only quantitatively but also in time and space [40, 41]. It should be stressed that this continuous process of bone remodeling ensures long-term implant functionality. Bone turnover processes are regulated by various humoral factors, including a significant role of TNF. Undoubtedly, TNF is a multidirectional cytokine that exerts many different effects, but it is mostly known for its vigorous pro-inflammatory activity. Of note, TNF is also involved in the regulation of bone remodeling [42, 43]. Hence, increased TNF levels in PISF from patients with implants may constitute an indicator of ongoing remodeling processes. In turn, elevated TNF levels may also suggest the initiation of an inflammatory process within the tissues around the implant with no clinical symptoms.

It is well established that the initial stage of peri-implantitis is asymptomatic. Thus, our observation might imply that the monitoring of cytokine levels in PISF could help diagnose peri-implantitis in an early stage, before clinical manifestations, which may allow for a quick start of appropriate therapy. In our previous study, we have documented that scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with chronic periodontitis resulted in a significant decrease in MMP-8 concentration in GCF [44]. Moreover, we have indicated that the levels of MMP-8 in the GCF in patients with various severity of periodontitis were significantly higher than in patients with a healthy periodontium [45]. Additionally, we have documented that MMP-8 level in PISF obtained from the patients without any symptoms of mucositis or peri-implantitis was significantly higher than in GCF of periodontally healthy patients and, which seems to be very interesting, in GCF of patients with varying severity of periodontitis.

In conclusion, our observation might imply that the monitoring of TNF, CXCL8, and IL-1β levels in GCF and PISF can be considered as one of the diagnostic elements. Analysis of cytokine levels may help describe the pathogenesis and early diagnosis of peri-implantitis and prevision in high-risk patients. Especially, increased levels of TNF-α in PISF in patients with healthy implants may be an indicator of the ongoing process of tissue remodeling around the implant. Elevated TNF levels may also suggest the initiation of an inflammatory process within the tissues around the implant with no clinical symptoms. Nonetheless, our study has some limitations in the context in which our findings need to be interpreted carefully. Firstly, in this study, there were a relatively low number of subjects in each group. Secondly, there are only a few prior research studies on the issue. Finally, it was a cross-sectional study; therefore, we cannot compare the studied proteins' concentration in patients before inserting the implant.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Bioethics Commision of Medical University of Lublin. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants prior to their enrollment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the fndings of this study are available from the corresponding author, J Agier, upon reasonable request.

Competing interest

None conflicts of interest to declare. The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this study and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Funding

This work was supported by the Medical University of Lodz (grant number 503/6-164-01/503-61-001).

Authors’ contributions

PA: Contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript, EBB: Contributed to conception, design, and critically revised the manuscript, EK: Contributed to data analysis and critically revised the manuscript, PŻ: Contributed to analysis and interpretation, and critically revised the manuscript, AEB: Contributed to conception and design, JA: Contributed to conception, design, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, drafted and critically revised the manuscript, All authors gave their fnal approval and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the fnal manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Medical University of Lodz (grant number 503/6-164-01/503-61-001).

Hong DGK, Oh JH: Recent advances in dental implants. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2017,39:33.
Tallarico M, Monje A, Wang HL, Galindo Moreno P, Xhanari E, Canullo L: A systematic review on the definition of periimplantitis: limits related to the various diagnoses proposed. J Oral Science Rehabilitation 2016;2:42-53.
Smeets R, Henningsen A, Jung O, Heiland M, Hammächer C, Stein JM: Definition, etiology, prevention and treatment of peri-implantitis-a review. Head Face Med 2014,10:34.
Prathapachandran J, Suresh N: Management of peri-implantitis. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012,9:516-521.
Rösing CK, Fiorini T, Haas AN, Muniz FWMG, Oppermann RV, Susin C: The impact of maintenance on peri-implant health. Braz Oral Res 2019,33: 074.
Sahrmann P, Gilli F, Wiedemeier DB, Attin T, Schmidlin PR, Karygianni L. The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Microorganisms 2020,8:661.
Pokrowiecki R, Mielczarek A, Zaręba T, Tyski S: Oral microbiome and peri-implant diseases: where are we now? Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017,13:1529-1542.
Emrani J, Chee W, Slots J: Bacterial colonization of oral implants from nondental sources. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009,11:106-112.
Dhir S: Biofilm and dental implant: the microbial link. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013,17 5-11.
Saini R: Oral biofilm and dental implants: a brief. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2011,2:228-229.
Seymour GJ, Gemmell E: Cytokines in periodontal disease: where to from here? Acta Odontol Scand 2001, 59:167-173.
Pan W, Wang Q, Chen Q: The cytokine network involved in the host immune response to periodontitis. Int J Oral Sci 2019,11:30.
Xu C, Cw Yi M, Nb Cheung M, Dou D, Dou Y-D, Ty Loo W: Cytokines and Inflammatory Mediators for Monitoring the Status of Periodontitis. J Dent Oral Biol 2020,5:1157.
Jaedicke KM, Preshaw PM, Taylor JJ: Salivary cytokines as biomarkers of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000 2016,70:164-183.
Misch CE: The implant quality scale: a clinical assessment of the health-disease continuum. Oral Health 1998,88:15-26.
Kobayashi M, Squires GR, Mousa A, Tanzer M, Zukor D, Antoniou J: Role of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha in matrix degradation of human osteoarthritic cartilage. Arthritis Rheum 2005,52:128-135.
Amar S, Smith L, Fields GB: Matrix metalloproteinase collagenolysis in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2011, 864:1940-1951.
Ramseier CA, Eick S, Brönnimann C, Buser D, Brägger U, Salvi GE: Host-derived biomarkers at teeth and implants in partially edentulous patients. A 10-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016,27:211-217.
Gonzáles JR, Herrmann JM, Boedeker RH, Francz PI, Biesalski H, Meyle J: Concentration of interleukin-1beta and neutrophil elastase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during experimental gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 2001, 28:544-549.
Heasman PA, Collins JG, Offenbacher S: Changes in crevicular fluid levels of interleukin-1 beta, leukotriene B4, prostaglandin E2, thromboxane B2 and tumour necrosis factor alpha in experimental gingivitis in humans. J Periodontal Res 1993,28:241-247.
Rawlinson A, Dalati MH, Rahman S, Walsh TF, Fairclough AL: Interleukin-1 and IL-1 receptor antagonist in gingival crevicular fluid. J Clin Periodontol 2000,27:738-743.
Engebretson SP, Grbic JT, Singer R, Lamster IB: GCF IL-1beta profiles in periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 2002,29:48-53.
Yaghobee S, Khorsand A, Paknejad M: Comparison of interleukin-1β levels in gingival crevicular fluid and peri-implant crevicular fluid and its relationship with clinical indexes. J Dent (Tehran) 2013,10:1-9.
Nowzari H, Phamduong S, Botero JE, Villacres MC, Rich SK: The profile of inflammatory cytokines in gingival crevicular fluid around healthy osseointegrated implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012,14:546-552.
Recker EN, Avila-Ortiz G, Fischer CL, Pagan-Rivera K, Brogden A, Davson E,et al: A cross-sectional assessment of biomarker levels around implants versus natural teeth in periodontal maintenance patients.J Periodontol 2015,86:264-272.
Teixeira MKS, Lira-Junior R, Telles DM, Lourenço EJV, Figueredo CM: Th17-related cytokines in mucositis: is there any difference between peri-implantitis and periodontitis patients?Clin Oral Implants Res 2017,28:816-822.
Güncü G, Akman AC, Günday S, Yamalık N, Berker E: Effect of Inflammation on Cytokine Levels and Bone Remodelling Markers in Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid: A Preliminary Report. Cytokine 2012,59:313-316.
Abduljabbar T, Akram Z, Vohra F, Warnakulasuriya S, Javed F: Assessment of interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-Α levels in the peri-implant sulcular fluid among waterpipe (narghile) smokers and never-smokers with peri-implantitis.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018,20:144-150.
Renvert S, Widén C, Persson GR. Cytokine expression in peri-implant crevicular fluid in relation to bacterial presence. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:697-702.
Jin LJ, Leung WK, Corbet EF, Söder B: Relationship of changes in interleukin-8 levels and granulocyte elastase activity in gingival crevicular fluid to subgingival periodontopathogens following non-surgical periodontal therapy in subjects with chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2002,29:604-614.
Chung RM, Grbíc JT, Lamster IB: Interleukin-8 and beta-glucuronidase in gingival crevicular fluid. J Clin Periodontol 1997, 24:146-152.
Severino VO, Napimoga MH, de Lima Pereira SA: Expression of IL-6, IL-10, IL-17 and IL-8 in the peri-implant crevicular fluid of patients with peri-implantitis. Arch Oral Biol 2011,56:823-828.
Ata-Ali J, Flichy-Fernández AJ, Alegre-Domingo T, Ata-Ali F, Palacio J, Peñarrocha-Diago M: Clinical, microbiological, and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2015,15:43.
Hall J, Pehrson NG, Ekestubbe A, Jemt T, Friberg : A controlled, cross-sectional exploratory study on markers for the plasminogen system and inflammation in crevicular fluid samples from healthy, mucositis and peri-implantitis sites. Eur J Oral Implantol 2015,8:153-166.
Lagdive SS, Marawar PP, Byakod G, Lagdive SB: Evaluation and comparison of interleukin-8 (IL-8) level in gingival crevicular fluid in health and severity of periodontal disease: a clinico-biochemical study. Indian J Dent Res 2013,24:188-192.
Gamonal J, Acevedo A, Bascones A, Jorge O, Silva A: Levels of interleukin-1 beta, -8, and -10 and RANTES in gingival crevicular fluid and cell populations in adult periodontitis patients and the effect of periodontal treatment. J Periodontol 2000,71:1535-1545.
Gamonal J, Acevedo A, Bascones A, Jorge O, Silva A: Characterization of cellular infiltrate, detection of chemokine receptor CCR5 and interleukin-8 and RANTES chemokines in adult periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 2001,36:194-203.
Ozmeriç N, Bal B, Baloş K, Berker E, Bulut S: The correlation of gingival crevicular fluid interleukin-8 levels and periodontal status in localized juvenile periodontitis. J Periodontol 1998,69:1299-1304.
Madureira DF, Lucas De Abreu Lima I, Costa GC, Lages EMB, Martins CC, Aparecida Da Silva T: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha in Gingival Crevicular Fluid as a Diagnostic Marker for Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2018,18:315-331.
Mavrogenis AF, Dimitriou R, Parvizi J, Babis GC: Biology of implant osseointegration. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2009,9:61-71.
Parithimarkalaignan S, Padmanabhan TV: Osseointegration: an update. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013,13:2-6.
Zhao B: TNF and Bone Remodeling. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2017;15:126-134.
Marahleh A, Kitaura H, Ohori F, Kishikawa A, Ogawa S, Shen W-R, Qi J, Noguchi T, Nara Y, Mizoguchi I: TNF-α directly enhances osteocyte RANKL expression and promotes osteoclast formation. Front Immunol 2019;10:2925.
Konopka L, Pietrzak A, Brzezińska-Błaszczyk E: Effect of scaling and root planing on interleukin-1β, interleukin-8 and MMP-8 levels in gingival crevicular fluid from chronic periodontitis patients. J Periodontal Res 2012,47:681-688.
Aleksandrowicz P, Żelechowska P, Agier J: Evaluation of Metalloproteinase-8 Levels in Crevicular Fluid of Patients with Healthy Implants or Periodontitis. Mediators Inflamm 2017,2017:4920847.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of study population.

Control

(I)

Mild periodontitis

(II)

Moderate periodontitis

(III)

Severe

periodontitis

(IV)

Implant

(V)

Age (years)

mean ± SD

range

35 ± 8

20-51

38 ± 9

27-58

40 ± 9

27-60

42 ± 10

28-59

52 ± 16

20-71

Gender

Male

Female

Total natural teeth

mean ± SD

range

29 ± 3

24-32

28 ± 3

20-32

27 ± 3

22-32

26 ± 3

22-32

14 ± 11

0-29

Total implants

mean ± SD

range

6 ± 3

1-12

PD (mm)

mean ± SD

range

1.64 ± 0.61

0.2-2.5

3.34 ± 0.39

3-4

4.49 ± 0.23

4-5

5.55 ± 0.42

4-6

2.84 ± 0.57

1.9-4

CAL (mm)

mean ± SD

range

0.71 ± 1.20

0-4.5

1.14 ± 1.32

0-4.5

1.80 ± 1.60

0-6

6.48 ± 1.65

1.5-10

GI (mm)

mean ± SD

range

0.81 ± 0.98

0-3

1.27 ± 0.74

0-2

1.30 ± 0.6

0-2

1.67 ± 0.71

0-3

0.34 ± 0.55

0-2

SD, standard deviation.

Table 2. Characteristic of patients with implants and prosthodontics restoration.

Type of restoration	Patient	Examined sulcus implant position	Functioning period of restoration (months)	Gender	Bone density
Implant crown	R.H.	11	56	M	D3
	B.K.	13	55	F	D3
	R.D.	23	102	F	D4
	T.R.	11	58	M	D3
	K.M.	24	47	M	D3
	M.J.	44	83	F	D3
	H.P.	34	59	F	D3
	M.W.	14	36	M	D3
	E.C.	14	46	M	D4
	W.W.	34	46	M	D2
	A.N.	24	45	M	D4
	P.J.	14	45	M	D4
	J.S.	46	43	F	D2
	A.P.	36	79	M	D2
	J.A.	46	59	F	D2
Multiple units	P.Z.	24	55	F	D2
	R.L.	43	83	M	D1
	E.K.	43	84	F	D2
	E.B.	23	48	F	D3
	K.K.	14	42	M	D2
	K.S.	25	45	F	D3
	J.G.	15	74	M	D3
	D.C.	24	49	F	D3
	M.V.	42	49	F	D1
	R.A.	23	38	F	D3
	B.B.	34	147	F	D4
	O.D.	44	39	F	D1
	F.H.	23	48	F	D3
	Z.O.	44	48	F	D2
	P.A.	15	79	M	D3
	I.M.	23	114	F	D4
	P.R.	43	114	F	D1

Right side of maxilla 1; Left side of maxilla 2; Right side of mandibula 3; Left side of mandibula 4; 1: incisal; 2: incisal; 3: canine; 4: first premolar; 5: second premolar;
6: first molar. /FDI International Status Tooth Identification/

Table 3. The comparison of IL-1b, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in patients’ groups.

		control (I; n = 36)	mild periodontitis (II; n = 48)	moderate periodontitis (III; n = 43)	severe periodontitis (IV; n = 30)	implant (V; n = 32)
IL-1b (pg/mL)	Mean ± SD	16.90 ± 18.65	36.16 ± 33.98	46.76 ± 38.62	61.04 ± 41.41	23.73 ± 27.07
IL-1b (pg/mL)	Range	0.10-77.90	0.10-156.80	0.10-181.90	6.40-153.80	0.10-125.70
CXCL8 (pg/mL)	Mean ± SD	37.91 ± 34.06	44.10 ± 38.05	58.16 ± 55.26	51.94 ± 45.87	40.90 ± 56.63
CXCL8 (pg/mL)	Range	3.20-132.20	0.90-205.20	4.90-274.30	2.50-185.20	3.10-296.30
TNF-α (pg/mL)	Mean ± SD	4.31 ± 2.02	4.56 ± 2.15	5.41 ± 2.12	5.34 ± 2.39	5.71 ± 1.94
TNF-α (pg/mL)	Range	0.10-9.10	0.10-10.20	1.30-9.50	1.20-11.20	1.50-9.40

Table 4. IL-1b, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in PISF depending on bone density

	G1 (bone density D1+D2)	G2 (bone density D3+D4)
IL-1b (pg/mL)
Range	1.00 – 125.70	0.10 – 63.20
mean ± SD	35.44 ± 36.11	16.70 ± 17.40
CXCL8 (pg/mL)
Range	4.90 – 107.70	3.10 – 296.30
mean ± SD	33.99 ± 30.94	45.06 ± 68.04
TNF-α (pg/mL)
Range	1.50 – 9.40	3.10 – 9.40
mean ± SD	5.39 ± 2.41	5.91 ± 1.64

SD, standard deviation.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 16 Mar, 2021

Read the published version in BMC Oral Health →

Review #1 received at journal
15 Dec, 2020
Editorial decision: Minor revision
15 Dec, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
25 Nov, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
23 Nov, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
16 Nov, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
16 Nov, 2020
Editor invited by journal
16 Nov, 2020

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Analysis of IL-1β, CXCL8, and TNF-α levels in the crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis or healthy implants

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2

Abstract

1. Background

2. Methods

3. Results

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Declarations

References

Tables

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 2