CCR2-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Targeting Damaged Liver Enhances Recovery of Acute Liver Failure

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-581837/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

CCR2-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Targeting Damaged Liver Enhances Recovery of Acute Liver Failure

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-581837/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 05 Feb, 2022

Read the published version in Stem Cell Research & Therapy →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation is emerging as a promising cell therapeutic strategy in acute liver failure (ALF) clinical research. The potency of MSCs to migrate and engraft into targeted lesions could largely determine their clinical efficacy, in which chemokine/receptor axes play a crucial role. Unfortunately, the downregulation of chemokine receptors expression after in vitro expansion results in a poor homing capacity of MSCs.

Methods: By evaluating the chemokine expression profile in the liver of ALF patients and ALF mice, we found that CCL2 expression was highly upregulated in damaged livers, while the corresponding receptor, CCR2, was lacking in cultured MSCs. Thus, we genetically modified MSCs to overexpress CCR2 and investigated the targeted homing capacity and treatment efficacy of MSC^CCR2 compared to those of the MSC^vector control.

Results: In vivo and ex vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging showed that MSC^CCR2 rapidly migrated and localized to injured livers in remarkably greater numbers following systemic infusion, and these cells were retained in liver lesions for a longer time than MSC^vector. Furthermore, MSC^CCR2 exhibited significantly enhanced efficacy in the treatment of ALF in mice, which was indicated by a dramatically improved survival rate, the alleviation of liver injury with reduced inflammatory infiltration, and hepatic apoptosis, and the promotion of liver regeneration.

Conclusions: Altogether, these results indicate that CCR2 overexpression enhances the targeted migration of MSCs to damaged livers, improves their treatment effect, and may provide a novel strategy for improving the efficacy of cell therapy for ALF.

Stem Cell & Developmental Cell Biology

Molecular Biology

acute liver failure

mesenchymal stem cells

CCL2/CCR2

homing

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate caused by a variety of factors, such as viral infection, drug-induced hepatotoxicity, and autoimmune or metabolic disease; whereas, the available therapies are limited [1]. Currently, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is widely approved as the most effective therapy for patients with ALF. However, the shortage of donor livers, immune rejection response and complications caused by lifelong immunosuppressive treatment severely limit the clinical application of OLT. Thus, the investigation of alternative therapeutic strategies for ALF is highly desired.

Recently, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation has emerged as a promising candidate for cell therapy in regenerative medicine. Due to their self-renewal, multipotent differentiation, and immunoregulatory characteristics and because they can be easily isolated and expanded in vitro [2–5], MSCs can be infused as a potential alternative treatment for ALF. Several previous studies have shown that MSC transplantation can promote recovery from liver injury [6, 7]. However, there are still certain obstacles that restrict the clinical efficacy of MSCs [8].

It has been shown that the treatment efficacy of MSCs depends largely on their capacity to engraft into lesions [9–12]. After systemic infusion, only a small portion of MSCs enter damaged tissues; the majority would be entrapped in the capillary beds of the lungs [13–15]. Inadequate engraftment of MSCs in damaged tissues may impair their clinical efficacy [16, 17]. Thus, it is imperative to enhance the targeted migration of MSCs toward lesions.

MSC homing to the site of injury is mainly dependent on the interactions of chemokines from lesions with the corresponding chemokine receptors expressed by MSCs [18–20]. However, during continuous in vitro passaging, MSCs gradually lost their homing capacity as a result of the downregulation of chemokine receptors expression; in contrast, freshly isolated MSCs exhibit relatively good homing to damaged tissues [21, 22].

Therefore, modifying MSCs to overexpress chemokine receptors may be a strategy that improves the treatment effect of these cells. Several previous studies have genetically modified MSCs with specific chemokine receptors in an attempt to enhance their targeted homing capacity in different disease models. For instance, overexpression of CXCR5 markedly increased the homing of MSCs to the inflamed skin in mice and suppressed contact hypersensitivity [23]. Moreover, CXCR2-modified MSCs showed increased migration to inflamed mucosa and significantly accelerated ulcer healing in oral mucositis mice [24].

In this study, we found that CCL2 was intensely upregulated in the liver of ALF patients and ALF mice, while the corresponding receptor, CCR2, was lacking in MSCs. We hypothesized that genetically modifying MSCs to overexpress CCR2 would enhance the targeted migration of MSCs to the damaged liver, thereby improving their treatment effect. MSC migration and homing were dynamically monitored using in vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Human liver specimens

Six damaged liver specimens were obtained from ALF patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation in the Liver Transplantation Centre of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Three normal liver specimens were obtained from donation after brain death (DBD) during liver transplantations. All clinical procedures were approved by the ethical committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Informed consent was obtained from all individuals.

Experimental animals and an ALF model

Male C57BL/6 mice, 8 weeks old, were purchased from the Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University. The ALF model was induced by intraperitoneal injection of 300 mg/kg thioacetamide (TAA; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) as previously described [25]. Mice in the control group were intraperitoneally injected with an equal volume of saline. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sun Yat-sen University.

Transplantation procedures

Mice were randomized into 4 groups: group 1, healthy control; group 2, ALF + PBS; group 3, ALF + MSC^vector (1.0x10⁶); and group 4, ALF + MSC^CCR2 (1.0x10⁶). All infusions were performed 12 h after intraperitoneal injection of TAA, and cells suspended in 100 µl PBS were injected via the tail vein.

Isolation, culture and characterization of hUC-MSCs

Human umbilical cord samples were obtained from healthy donors who provided informed consent. MSCs were isolated from Wharton's jelly of the umbilical cord and cultured as described previously [26, 27]. Briefly, shortly after full-term infant delivery, the umbilical cord was collected and stored in saline. After removal of the umbilical vein and arteries, tissues were cut into 1-mm³ pieces and cultured by the tissue explants adherent method in 10-cm² culture dishes with complete medium consisting of low-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (L-DMEM; Gibco, USA) and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; BI, Israel). After 1 week, the remaining tissues were carefully removed, and the adherent cells were expanded for an additional 1–2 weeks. At subconfluence (80%), cells were detached with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and passaged at a ratio of 1:3. The final MSCs used were collected at passage 4. The harvested MSCs showed strong surface expression of CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166 (MSC markers) but lacked CD34 and CD45 (hematopoietic markers). The multilineage differentiation capacity of MSCs was confirmed by incubation in osteogenic induction medium or adipogenic induction medium (Cyagen, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from harvested liver tissue or cells using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Japan). qRT-PCR was performed using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche, Switzerland) on a LightCycler 480 detection system (Roche, Switzerland). Each target mRNA level was normalized to that of 18s or GAPDH. qRT-PCR was conducted in triplicate for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed. The sequences of the primers used in this study are listed in Table S1.

Transduction with lentiviral vectors

The lentiviral expression vectors applied in this study were constructed by and purchased from GeneCopoeia (USA) and included pLV/puro-EF1α-CCR2-SV40-eGFP and pLV/puro-EF1α-SV40-eGFP (Figure S1A). Lentiviruses were prepared by transient transfection of the 293FT packaging cell line using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The supernatants containing lentiviral particles were harvested at 48 h after transfection and then filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore filter membrane. For lentiviral transduction, MSCs were exposed to lentiviruses diluted in complete medium supplemented with 8 µg/mL polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 12 h.

Western blot assays

For western blotting, total protein was harvested by lysis of liver tissue or cells in lysis buffer (KeyGen Biotech, China) with protease inhibitors, phosphatase inhibitors and PMSF. After centrifugation at 12,000 g for 5 min at 4°C, the supernatant was collected as the protein lysate. The protein concentration was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (KeyGen Biotech, China). The protein lysate (40 µg) was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to a 0.2-µm-pore PVDF membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with appropriate primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After that, the membrane was incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, and then antigen-antibody complexes were detected with WesternBright ECL (Advansta, USA). The utilized primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Table S2.

Flow cytometry

The expression level of CCR2 on the surface of MSC^vector and MSC^CCR2 was analyzed by flow cytometry after incubation with APC-conjugated anti-human CCR2 antibody (BioLegend, USA) for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. APC-conjugated mouse IgG2a, κ isotype ctrl (BioLegend, USA), was used as a control. All flow cytometric analyses were performed with flow cytometers (BD, USA), and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.

Transwell migration assays

The migratory capacity of MSCs was assessed using a Transwell chamber system with an 8.0-µm pore size (Corning, USA). Serum-starved MSC^vector or MSC^CCR2 were seeded in the upper chamber (1.0 x 10⁵/well), and the lower chamber was loaded with serum-free medium with or without hCCL2 (100 ng/mL; PeproTech, USA) or mCCL2 (200 ng/mL; PeproTech, USA). After 8 h of coculture, the nonmigrated cells were gently removed with a cotton swab, and the filters were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min. The number of migrated cells was determined by counting five random fields per well under a microscope at 100×.

MSC labeling with DiR

MSCs were detached with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA, washed twice with PBS, and then incubated with 10 µg/ml 1,1-dioctadecyl-3,3,3,3-tetramethylindotricarbocyanine iodide (DiR; AAT Bioquest, USA), a near-infrared fluorescence imaging probe, for 15 min at 37°C according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the DiR-labeled MSCs were washed twice with PBS to ensure complete removal of any unbound dye.

In vivo and ex vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging

Fluorescence imaging was performed with the In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS Lumina 2, Caliper Life Sciences, USA) equipped with a standard CCD camera, and the data were analyzed with Living Image 4.5.5 software (PerkinElmer, USA).

For in vivo fluorescence imaging, mice were anesthetized with inhaled isoflurane and then placed in the imaging chamber. Fluorescence imaging was performed at 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 7 d after injection of DiR-labeled MSCs.

For ex vivo fluorescence imaging, mice were sacrificed at 24 h, 48 h, 96 h or 7 d after injection of DiR-labeled MSCs. The heart, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys were harvested and immediately subjected to fluorescence imaging.

Serum biochemical analysis

At the indicated time points, blood samples were harvested from each group. The serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TBil) were detected using an automated biochemical analyzer (HITACHI, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

The harvested liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and then cut into 3-µm sections. After deparaffinization and rehydration, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, after deparaffinization, rehydration and antigen retrieval, 3% H₂O₂ was used to inactivate endogenous peroxidases, and goat serum was used to block nonspecific binding sites. Then, the sections were incubated with appropriate primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, the Histostain-Plus BroadSpectrum Kit (Life Technologies, USA) was used for staining. Then, the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The number of positive cells was determined in high-power fields (200×) of each liver tissue section. The utilized primary antibodies are listed in Table S2.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test by SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

CCL2 expression is highly upregulated in the liver of ALF patients and ALF mice

To investigate the specific chemokine expression profile of ALF, we evaluated the mRNA expression levels of various chemokines associated with liver inflammation, including CXCL1, CXCL10, CXCL12, CXCL13, CXCL16, CCL2, CCL17, CCL19, CCL21, CCL22, and CCL27, in the liver of ALF patients undergoing liver transplantation and compared the levels with those in healthy donors [28, 29]. The results demonstrated that the CCL2 mRNA expression level showed the most marked upregulation among the tested chemokines in the injured livers (Fig. 1A). Western blotting and immunohistochemical staining confirmed that the CCL2 protein expression level was also intensely upregulated in the liver of ALF patients (Fig. 1B and 1C). Similarly, the CCL2 mRNA expression level exhibited the most significant change among the aforementioned chemokines in the liver of ALF mice, and the expression level of CCL2 protein was also highly upregulated (Fig. 1D–1F).

Collectively, these data indicated that CCL2 is the dominant chemokine expressed in the damaged liver.

Chemokine receptors exhibit low-level expression in hUC-MSCs

Chemokine receptors play a crucial role in MSC homing to injured sites by interacting with their corresponding chemokines [18–20]. Thus, we examined the expression of CC chemokine receptors (CCR1–10), CXC chemokine receptors (CXCR1–7) and a CX3C chemokine receptor (CX3CR1) through qRT-PCR analysis of MSCs from three independent donors. As shown in Fig. 2A, human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (hUC-MSCs) at the fourth passage expressed extremely low mRNA levels of chemokine receptors, including CCR2, which is the corresponding receptor of the chemokine that is highly expressed in the damaged liver, CCL2.

To confirm these data, we examined CCR2 expression on MSCs at passage 4 from an additional five independent donors. qRT-PCR analysis showed that the mRNA expression of CCR2 was low or absent in MSCs compared with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs) (Fig. 2B). In addition, flow cytometric analysis further confirmed that the expression of the cell-surface CCR2 protein on MSCs was almost undetectable compared with that on hPBMCs (Fig. 2C).

Taken together, these results demonstrated that the expression of CCR2 was extremely low in culture-expanded MSCs, further suggesting that MSCs might not effectively home to the damaged liver through the CCL2/CCR2 axis.

Genetic modification of MSCs to overexpress CCR2 without altering their intrinsic characteristics

Based on the above results, MSCs were transfected with lentiviral vectors encoding CCR2-eGFP (referred to as MSC^CCR2) to overexpress CCR2 or eGFP (referred to as MSC^vector) to serve as a control (Figure S1A and S1B). Three days after infection, we detected remarkably upregulated expression of CCR2 at the mRNA and protein levels in MSC^CCR2 through qRT-PCR and western blotting, respectively (Fig. 3A and 3B). Flow cytometric analysis also showed that the cell-surface level of CCR2 was 88.80% on MSC^CCR2 in comparison with 0.13% on MSC^vector (Fig. 3C).

Subsequently, we investigated whether genetic modification affected the biological characteristics of MSCs. We used flow cytometry to analyze the phenotype of MSCs, and the results showed that MSC surface markers (CD29, CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105, and CD166) were highly expressed and hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD34 and CD45) were absent in both MSC^vector and MSC^CCR2 (Figure S1C). To demonstrate the multilineage differentiation capacity of MSCs, genetically modified MSCs were cultured in osteogenic induction medium or adipogenic induction medium. As shown in Figure S1D, alizarin red S staining and oil red O staining confirmed that MSC^CCR2 exhibited no change in the osteogenic or adipogenic capacity compared with MSC^vector.

In summary, these results indicated that hUC-MSCs were successfully modified with CCR2 and that their intrinsic characteristics were not altered.

MSC^CCR2 exhibit enhanced migration toward CCL2 in vitro

We next examined whether overexpression of CCR2 in MSCs could increase their migration toward the corresponding ligand CCL2. In vitro Transwell migration assays showed that MSC^CCR2 but not MSC^vector forcefully responded to stimulation with recombinant human CCL2 (hCCL2) at 100 ng/mL or recombinant murine CCL2 (mCCL2) at 200 ng/ml. Additionally, in the absence of exogenous CCL2 treatment, MSC^vector and MSC^CCR2 exhibited similar relatively low migration levels (Fig. 3D and 3E).

MSC^CCR2 possess an increased capacity to home to liver lesions in ALF mice in vivo

To determine whether MSC^CCR2 have an enhanced ability to home to the injured liver in vivo, we infused DiR-labeled MSC^vector or MSC^CCR2 into ALF mice via the tail vein and used in vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging to examine the homing and distribution of the infused cells at 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h, and 7 d after transplantation.

At 1 h posttransplantation, a fluorescence signal was emitted from the liver region in the MSC^CCR2 group, suggesting that MSC^CCR2 rapidly migrated to the liver. In contrast, no signal could be detected in the liver region in the MSC^vector group until 6 h posttransplantation. The fluorescence signal intensity peaked at 48 h after transplantation in both groups and then faded with time. Furthermore, the signal intensity of the liver region in the MSC^CCR2 group was remarkably higher than that in the MSC^vector group at each time point until 7 d after transplantation, the endpoint of observation. These data suggested that MSC^CCR2 arrived in liver lesions at significantly greater numbers and a faster speed and were retained for a longer time than MSC^vector (Fig. 4A and 4B).

Then, the mice were sacrificed at 24 h, 48 h, 96 h or 7 d after transplantation to further evaluate the five major organs in which the MSCs accumulated. The heart, lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys were harvested, and ex vivo fluorescence imaging was performed immediately.

As shown in Fig. 4C-4E, we observed that fluorescence signals were emitted from the liver, lungs and spleen, while no signal could be detected in the heart or kidneys. The changes in the fluorescence signal intensities of the five major organs with time showed that the signal intensity of the liver in the MSC^CCR2 group increased more sharply than that in the MSC^vector group, peaked at 48 h after transplantation (60.07 ± 5.67 versus 36.03 ± 1.56; p < 0.01) and then gradually declined until 7 d after transplantation (29.31 ± 4.00 versus 17.66 ± 1.52; p < 0.01). In line with the results of the in vivo fluorescence imaging study, the intensity of the fluorescence signal from the liver was remarkably higher in the MSC^CCR2 group than in the MSC^vector group at each time point of observation. In addition, the signal intensities of the lungs and spleen peaked at 24 h after transplantation and then decreased over time. The intensity of the fluorescence signal from the lungs was significantly lower in the MSC^CCR2 group (47.24 ± 1.56) than in the MSC^vector group (61.27 ± 4.87; p < 0.05) at 24 h after transplantation, suggesting that the number of MSCs entrapped in the lungs was markedly decreased in the MSC^CCR2 group. The MSC^CCR2 group tended to have a lower signal intensity in the spleen than the MSC^vector group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, the signal intensities of the heart and kidneys were almost unchanged.

Altogether, these data demonstrated that CCR2 overexpression enhances the targeted migration of MSCs to liver lesions in vivo.

MSC^CCR2 infusion improves survival and alleviates liver injury in ALF mice

Next, we detected whether the enhanced migration of MSC^CCR2 to liver lesions improves the treatment effect. MSC^vector, MSC^CCR2, or PBS was injected into ALF mice 12 h after injection of TAA. In a survival analysis, 17/24 mice treated with MSC^CCR2 survived until the endpoint of observation (180 h), fewer mice (10/24) survived in the MSC^vector group, and only 3/24 mice survived in the PBS group (Fig. 5A). These data showed that MSC^CCR2 treatment significantly improved the survival rate of ALF mice.

To further evaluate the functional and histopathological changes in the liver of ALF mice, we collected serum and liver tissue samples from each group at multiple time points (0 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 60 h, 84 h and 180 h) after TAA injection. As shown in Fig. 5B, the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and total bilirubin (TBil) in both the MSC^vector group and the MSC^CCR2 group were markedly lower than those in the PBS group, and more significantly decreased levels were found in the MSC^CCR2 group at 24 h, 36 h, and 60 h after TAA injection.

Similarly, H&E staining of liver tissue sections showed that histopathological injury was more efficiently improved in MSC^CCR2-treated mice, which had remarkably ameliorated tissue necrosis, hepatocyte cytoplasm rarefaction, and hemorrhaging and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration, than in MSC^vector-treated mice (Suzike’s injury score: 2.8 ± 1.10 versus 4.8 ± 1.10; p < 0.05). Additionally, macroscopic injury to the liver, including swelling, congestion and necrosis, was dramatically ameliorated in the MSC^CCR2 group, which was consistent with the results of the histopathological study (Fig. 5C and 5D).

Taken together, these results indicated that MSC^CCR2 could home to sites of liver injury with enhanced potency and more effectively alleviate liver injury.

MSC ^CCR2 transplantation efficiently ameliorates inflammatory infiltration and hepatic apoptosis and promotes liver regeneration in the liver of ALF mice

Inflammatory infiltration contributing to the progression of liver injury, in which hepatic macrophages play an important role [30, 31]. Therefore, we examined the levels of macrophages in the liver of each group by anti-F4/80 immunohistochemical staining. As shown in Fig. 6A, the PBS group displayed massive macrophages infiltration at 36 h after TAA injection, Meanwhile, more significantly decreased levels of hepatic macrophages were found in the MSC^CCR2 group than in the MSC^vector group. Then, we examined the mRNA expression levels of the proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in livers from each group. The PBS group exhibited highly increased mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β at 36 h after TAA injection. In the meantime, the expression of the aforementioned cytokines was attenuated in both the MSC^vector group and MSC^CCR2 group, with the latter exhibiting more remarkable reductions (Fig. 6B).

Finally, we evaluated the levels of apoptosis and proliferation in livers from each group by immunohistochemical staining for Cleaved Caspase-3 and Ki-67, respectively. As expected, significantly decreased numbers of Cleaved Caspase-3⁺ cells and markedly increased numbers of Ki-67⁺ cells were observed in the MSC^CCR2 group compared with the MSC^vector group (Fig. 6C and 6D).

Collectively, these results demonstrated that MSC^CCR2 were preferentially able to alleviate liver injury over MSC^vector, presumably in part due to their ability to efficiently attenuate hepatic macrophages infiltration, suppress the production of proinflammatory factors, reduce hepatic apoptosis and promote liver regeneration.

ALF is characterized by rapid progression, extensive hepatocyte necrosis, severe deterioration of liver function and high mortality with limited therapeutic options [1]. Recently, accumulating preclinical and clinical investigations have indicated that treatment with MSCs could benefit liver injury recovery and improve survival rates [6, 7, 28].

It has been suggested that the ability of MSCs to migrate toward lesions could largely determine the treatment efficacy of these cells [9–12]. Several previous preclinical studies have indicated that intrahepatic portal vein transplantation is more beneficial than peripheral vein transplantation in ALF pigs [32, 33] and that intraperitoneal injection is superior to intravenous injection in treating colitis mice [34]. In clinical settings, some studies have directly infused MSCs into local lesions to treat patients (e.g., Crohn’s disease) and achieved good treatment efficacy [35, 36]. Compared to another transplantation approach, namely, systemic administration, local implantation can facilitate sufficient numbers of MSCs localizing to injured areas. This can be explained by the pulmonary first-pass effect; that is, the majority of systemically infused MSCs become entrapped in the lungs, and only a small portion can be detected in injured tissues [15].

However, local transplantation has some adverse effects, such as additional invasive injuries and inflammation and disruption of the local microenvironment [37]. As a relatively safe method, MSC treatment by systemic administration has been common in clinical studies, although sufficient homing potency for lesions is lacking.

Hence, enhancing the targeted migration of MSCs to damaged tissues may improve the therapeutic efficiency of these cells following systemic infusion. The interactions of specific chemokines from injured tissues with the corresponding chemokine receptors expressed on the MSC surface are vital in mediating MSC migration to target lesions. Therefore, clarifying the specific chemokine expression profiles of certain diseases will provide accurate clues for improving MSC homing. Previous studies have shown that upregulating the expression of corresponding chemokine receptors in MSCs can improve the homing of these cells to damaged sites. For instance, CCR1, CCR7, or CXCR4 modification was found to enhance the migration of MSCs to the injured myocardium [38], secondary lymphoid organs [39], and infarcted myocardium [40, 41], respectively, and to promote recovery in animal disease models.

In our study, we aimed to genetically modify MSCs with certain chemokine receptors, enhance the targeted migration of MSCs toward the damaged liver, and may provide new insights into MSC therapy for ALF. Thus, the chemokine expression profile of ALF was assessed, and chemokine receptor expression in MSCs was detected. The data showed that the expression of CCL2 was greatly upregulated in the liver of ALF patients and ALF mice. CCL2, also known as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), is the main ligand for CCR2. We hypothesized that the CCL2/CCR2 axis may play a role in MSC homing, similar to its role in monocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation. Next, we found that the expression of CCR2 was extremely low in culture-expanded MSCs, which gradually lost expression of chemokine receptors during continuous in vitro passaging. Therefore, we genetically modified MSCs to overexpress CCR2 without altering their intrinsic characteristics.

As expected, in vitro Transwell migration assays showed that MSC^CCR2 possessed a significantly enhanced ability to migrate toward CCL2 compared with MSC^vector. In vivo and ex vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging identified that systemically infused MSC^CCR2 could rapidly migrate and localize to the injured liver in remarkably greater numbers and be retained for a longer time than MSC^vector. Moreover, a significantly reduced level of lung entrapment was found in the MSC^CCR2 group. Subsequently, we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of MSC^CCR2 transplantation in ALF mice. Mice treated with MSC^CCR2 displayed a significantly improved survival rate, alleviated liver damage, and accelerated liver injury repair compared with mice in the MSC^vector group or PBS group. Finally, we found the infiltration of hepatic macrophage was significantly attenuated in the MSC^CCR2 group compared with the MSC^vector group. Meanwhile, the levels of proinflammatory factors including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in the liver of ALF mice were remarkably downregulated in the MSC^CCR2 group. Moreover, the apoptosis level in the liver was significantly decreased in the MSC^CCR2 group, while the hepatocyte proliferation level was markedly increased. As several published studies have shown that inflammatory infiltration plays an essential role in liver injury, ameliorating inflammatory infiltration is vital for promoting recovery following ALF [42–44].

With the development of nonviral transfection methods (e.g., nanocarrier and electrotransfection), 3D culture systems, and other new technologies, cell therapy has been greatly promoted [45, 46]. We believe that targeted therapeutic strategies for different chemokine expression profiles in various diseases should be developed.

In summary, we showed in this study that genetically modifying MSCs to overexpress CCR2 significantly enhanced MSC homing toward the damaged liver after systemic infusion, leading to a dramatically improved survival rate, alleviated liver injury, and accelerated liver injury recovery in ALF mice. This work may provide a strategy for targeted homing of systemically infused MSCs to liver lesions, thereby optimizing MSC treatment efficacy.

ALF

acute liver failure; OLT:orthotopic liver transplantation; hUC-MSCs:human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells; hPBMCs:human peripheral blood mononuclear cells; TAA:thioacetamide; ALT:alanine aminotransferase; AST:aspartate aminotransferase; TBIL:total bilirubin; H&E:hematoxylin and eosin; IHC:immunohistochemistry; qRT-PCR:quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; IL:interleukin; TNF:tumor necrosis factor.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All clinical procedures were approved by the ethical committee of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (2019-15). Informed consent was obtained from all individuals. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Sun Yat-sen University (IACUC-F3-20-1001).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81770651 and 81802411), and the National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX10302206).

Authors’ contributions

RXX designed experiments, performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. JRS and LJP performed the animal experiments. GL collected human liver specimens. HZL collected human umbilical cord samples. BBN analyzed data and edited the paper. QZ and WJC designed the study, analyzed data, and edited the paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Qi Zhang’s lab for their support.

Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Disease and Artificial Liver Group, Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of liver failure (2018). J Clin Hepatol. 2019; 35(1):38-44.
Barzilay R, Melamed E and Offen D. Introducing transcription factors to multipotent mesenchymal stem cells: making transdifferentiation possible. Stem cells. 2009; 27(10):2509-2515.
Porada CD, Zanjani ED and Almeida-Porad G. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: a pluripotent population with multiple applications. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2006; 1(3):365-369.
Aggarwal S and Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005; 105(4):1815-1822.
Salem HK and Thiemermann C. Mesenchymal stromal cells: current understanding and clinical status. Stem cells. 2010; 28(3):585-596.
Peng L, Xie DY, Lin BL, Liu J, Zhu HP, Xie C, Zheng YB and Gao ZL. Autologous bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in liver failure patients caused by hepatitis B: short-term and long-term outcomes. Hepatology. 2011; 54(3):820-828.
Lin BL, Chen JF, Qiu WH, Wang KW, Xie DY, Chen XY, Liu QL, Peng L, Li JG, Mei YY, Weng WZ, Peng YW, Cao HJ, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: A randomized controlled trial. Hepatology. 2017; 66(1):209-219.
Ankrum J and Karp JM. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy: Two steps forward, one step back. Trends in molecular medicine. 2010; 16(5):203-209.
Eggenhofer E, Luk F, Dahlke MH and Hoogduijn MJ. The life and fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol. 2014; 5:148.
Kang SK, Shin IS, Ko MS, Jo JY and Ra JC. Journey of mesenchymal stem cells for homing: strategies to enhance efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy. Stem cells international. 2012; 2012:342968.
Yagi H, Soto-Gutierrez A, Parekkadan B, Kitagawa Y, Tompkins RG, Kobayashi N and Yarmush ML. Mesenchymal stem cells: Mechanisms of immunomodulation and homing. Cell Transplant. 2010; 19(6):667-679.
Sohni A and Verfaillie CM. Mesenchymal stem cells migration homing and tracking. Stem cells international. 2013; 2013:130763.
Kraitchman DL, Tatsumi M, Gilson WD, Ishimori T, Kedziorek D, Walczak P, Segars WP, Chen HH, Fritzges D, Izbudak I, Young RG, Marcelino M, Pittenger MF, et al. Dynamic imaging of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells trafficking to myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005; 112(10):1451-1461.
Barbash IM, Chouraqui P, Baron J, Feinberg MS, Etzion S, Tessone A, Miller L, Guetta E, Zipori D, Kedes LH, Kloner RA and Leor J. Systemic delivery of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to the infarcted myocardium: feasibility, cell migration, and body distribution. Circulation. 2003; 108(7):863-868.
Fischer UM, Harting MT, Jimenez F, Monzon-Posadas WO, Xue H, Savitz SI, Laine GA and Cox CS, Jr. Pulmonary passage is a major obstacle for intravenous stem cell delivery: the pulmonary first-pass effect. Stem Cells Dev. 2009; 18(5):683-692.
Karp JM and Leng Teo GS. Mesenchymal stem cell homing: the devil is in the details. Cell stem cell. 2009; 4(3):206-216.
Yin JQ, Zhu J and Ankrum JA. Manufacturing of primed mesenchymal stromal cells for therapy. Nature biomedical engineering. 2019; 3(2):90-104.
Griffith JW, Sokol CL and Luster AD. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annual review of immunology. 2014; 32:659-702.
Wynn RF, Hart CA, Corradi-Perini C, O'Neill L, Evans CA, Wraith JE, Fairbairn LJ and Bellantuono I. A small proportion of mesenchymal stem cells strongly expresses functionally active CXCR4 receptor capable of promoting migration to bone marrow. Blood. 2004; 104(9):2643-2645.
Sordi V. Mesenchymal stem cell homing capacity. Transplantation. 2009; 87(9 Suppl):S42-45.
Rombouts WJ and Ploemacher RE. Primary murine MSC show highly efficient homing to the bone marrow but lose homing ability following culture. Leukemia. 2003; 17(1):160-170.
Honczarenko M, Le Y, Swierkowski M, Ghiran I, Glodek AM and Silberstein LE. Human bone marrow stromal cells express a distinct set of biologically functional chemokine receptors. Stem cells. 2006; 24(4):1030-1041.
Zhang X, Huang W, Chen X, Lian Y, Wang J, Cai C, Huang L, Wang T, Ren J and Xiang AP. CXCR5-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Exhibit Enhanced Homing and Can Decrease Contact Hypersensitivity. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2017; 25(6):1434-1447.
Shen Z, Wang J, Huang Q, Shi Y, Wei Z, Zhang X, Qiu Y, Zhang M, Wang Y, Qin W, Huang S, Huang Y, Liu X, et al. Genetic modification to induce CXCR2 overexpression in mesenchymal stem cells enhances treatment benefits in radiation-induced oral mucositis. Cell death & disease. 2018; 9(2):229.
Kolodziejczyk AA, Federici S, Zmora N, Mohapatra G, Dori-Bachash M, Hornstein S, Leshem A, Reuveni D, Zigmond E, Tobar A, Salame TM, Harmelin A, Shlomai A, et al. Acute liver failure is regulated by MYC- and microbiome-dependent programs. Nature medicine. 2020; 26(12):1899-1911.
Perico L, Morigi M, Rota C, Breno M, Mele C, Noris M, Introna M, Capelli C, Longaretti L, Rottoli D, Conti S, Corna D, Remuzzi G, et al. Human mesenchymal stromal cells transplanted into mice stimulate renal tubular cells and enhance mitochondrial function. Nature communications. 2017; 8(1):983.
Boissel L, Betancur M and Klingemann H. Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. Perinatal Stem Cells. 2009; 5:69-77.
Shi D, Zhang J, Zhou Q, Xin J, Jiang J, Jiang L, Wu T, Li J, Ding W, Li J, Sun S, Li J, Zhou N, et al. Quantitative evaluation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells rescuing fulminant hepatic failure in pigs. Gut. 2017; 66(5):955-964.
Li S, Zheng X, Li H, Zheng J, Chen X, Liu W, Tai Y, Zhang Y, Wang G and Yang Y. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Ameliorate Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via Inhibition of Neutrophil Recruitment. Journal of immunology research. 2018; 2018:7283703.
Krenkel O and Tacke F. Liver macrophages in tissue homeostasis and disease. Nature reviews Immunology. 2017; 17(5):306-321.
Shan Z and Ju C. Hepatic Macrophages in Liver Injury. Front Immunol. 2020; 11:322.
Li J, Zhang L, Xin J, Jiang L, Li J, Zhang T, Jin L, Li J, Zhou P, Hao S, Cao H and Li L. Immediate intraportal transplantation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells prevents death from fulminant hepatic failure in pigs. Hepatology. 2012; 56(3):1044-1052.
Cao H, Yang J, Yu J, Pan Q, Li J, Zhou P, Li Y, Pan X, Li J, Wang Y and Li L. Therapeutic potential of transplanted placental mesenchymal stem cells in treating Chinese miniature pigs with acute liver failure. BMC Med. 2012; 10:56.
Wang M, Liang C, Hu H, Zhou L, Xu B, Wang X, Han Y, Nie Y, Jia S, Liang J and Wu K. Intraperitoneal injection (IP), Intravenous injection (IV) or anal injection (AI)? Best way for mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for colitis. Scientific reports. 2016; 6:30696.
Ciccocioppo R, Bernardo ME, Sgarella A, Maccario R, Avanzini MA, Ubezio C, Minelli A, Alvisi C, Vanoli A, Calliada F, Dionigi P, Perotti C, Locatelli F, et al. Autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of fistulising Crohn's disease. Gut. 2011; 60(6):788-798.
Molendijk I, Bonsing BA, Roelofs H, Peeters KC, Wasser MN, Dijkstra G, van der Woude CJ, Duijvestein M, Veenendaal RA, Zwaginga JJ, Verspaget HW, Fibbe WE, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, et al. Allogeneic Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Healing of Refractory Perianal Fistulas in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149(4):918-927 e916.
Khaldoyanidi S. Directing stem cell homing. Cell stem cell. 2008; 2(3):198-200.
Huang J, Zhang Z, Guo J, Ni A, Deb A, Zhang L, Mirotsou M, Pratt RE and Dzau VJ. Genetic modification of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing CCR1 increases cell viability, migration, engraftment, and capillary density in the injured myocardium. Circulation research. 2010; 106(11):1753-1762.
Li H, Jiang Y, Jiang X, Guo X, Ning H, Li Y, Liao L, Yao H, Wang X, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Chen H and Mao N. CCR7 guides migration of mesenchymal stem cell to secondary lymphoid organs: a novel approach to separate GvHD from GvL effect. Stem cells. 2014; 32(7):1890-1903.
Cheng Z, Ou L, Zhou X, Li F, Jia X, Zhang Y, Liu X, Li Y, Ward CA, Melo LG and Kong D. Targeted migration of mesenchymal stem cells modified with CXCR4 gene to infarcted myocardium improves cardiac performance. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy. 2008; 16(3):571-579.
Zhang D, Fan GC, Zhou X, Zhao T, Pasha Z, Xu M, Zhu Y, Ashraf M and Wang Y. Over-expression of CXCR4 on mesenchymal stem cells augments myoangiogenesis in the infarcted myocardium. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2008; 44(2):281-292.
Brempelis KJ and Crispe IN. Infiltrating monocytes in liver injury and repair. Clinical & translational immunology. 2016; 5(11):e113.
Woolbright BL and Jaeschke H. The impact of sterile inflammation in acute liver injury. Journal of clinical and translational research. 2017; 3(Suppl 1):170-188.
Zimmermann HW, Trautwein C and Tacke F. Functional role of monocytes and macrophages for the inflammatory response in acute liver injury. Frontiers in physiology. 2012; 3:56.
De Laporte L, Cruz Rea J and Shea LD. Design of modular non-viral gene therapy vectors. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(7):947-954.
Raimondi MT, Eaton SM, Lagana M, Aprile V, Nava MM, Cerullo G and Osellame R. Three-dimensional structural niches engineered via two-photon laser polymerization promote stem cell homing. Acta biomaterialia. 2013; 9(1):4579-4584.

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 05 Feb, 2022

Read the published version in Stem Cell Research & Therapy →

Editorial decision: Major Revision
13 Jun, 2021
Review #1 received at journal
10 Jun, 2021
Review #2 received at journal
08 Jun, 2021
Review #3 received at journal
08 Jun, 2021
Reviewer #4 agreed at journal
06 Jun, 2021
Reviews received at journal
02 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
02 Jun, 2021
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
01 Jun, 2021
Reviewer #3 agreed at journal
01 Jun, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
01 Jun, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
01 Jun, 2021
First submitted to journal
31 May, 2021
Submission checks completed at journal
31 May, 2021
Editor invited by journal
31 May, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

CCR2-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Targeting Damaged Liver Enhances Recovery of Acute Liver Failure

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Human liver specimens

Experimental animals and an ALF model

Transplantation procedures

Isolation, culture and characterization of hUC-MSCs

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Transduction with lentiviral vectors

Western blot assays

Flow cytometry

Transwell migration assays

In vivo and ex vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging

Serum biochemical analysis

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

Statistical analysis

Results

CCL2 expression is highly upregulated in the liver of ALF patients and ALF mice

Chemokine receptors exhibit low-level expression in hUC-MSCs

Genetic modification of MSCs to overexpress CCR2 without altering their intrinsic characteristics

MSC^CCR2 exhibit enhanced migration toward CCL2 in vitro

MSC^CCR2 possess an increased capacity to home to liver lesions in ALF mice in vivo

MSC^CCR2 infusion improves survival and alleviates liver injury in ALF mice

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

CCR2-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Targeting Damaged Liver Enhances Recovery of Acute Liver Failure

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Human liver specimens

Experimental animals and an ALF model

Transplantation procedures

Isolation, culture and characterization of hUC-MSCs

RNA isolation, reverse transcription and quantitative real-time PCR

Transduction with lentiviral vectors

Western blot assays

Flow cytometry

Transwell migration assays

In vivo and ex vivo near-infrared fluorescence imaging

Serum biochemical analysis

Histopathology and immunohistochemistry

Statistical analysis

Results

CCL2 expression is highly upregulated in the liver of ALF patients and ALF mice

Chemokine receptors exhibit low-level expression in hUC-MSCs

Genetic modification of MSCs to overexpress CCR2 without altering their intrinsic characteristics

MSCCCR2 exhibit enhanced migration toward CCL2 in vitro

MSCCCR2 possess an increased capacity to home to liver lesions in ALF mice in vivo

MSCCCR2 infusion improves survival and alleviates liver injury in ALF mice

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

MSC^CCR2 exhibit enhanced migration toward CCL2 in vitro

MSC^CCR2 possess an increased capacity to home to liver lesions in ALF mice in vivo

MSC^CCR2 infusion improves survival and alleviates liver injury in ALF mice