3.1. B.coagulans Treatment Reduces Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression
The analyses of anti-inflammatory cytokines are shown in Fig. 1. IL-4’s graph shows that there are significant differences between Group 2 as a Cuprizone Control with Group 4, 5, and 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05). Also, it shows that there is a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 6 (P = 0.043 < 0.05) and between Group 3 and Group 4 (P = 0.022 < 0.05).
According to TFG-β’s graph, there are significant differences between Group 2 as a Cuprizone Control with Group 4, 5, and 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05). No significant differences were also found in serum TFG-β of other experimental groups.
3.2. B.coagulans Treatment modulates anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression
The analyses of inflammatory cytokines are shown in Fig. 1. The graph of IL-17 demonstrates that there are significant differences between Group 2 as a Cuprizone Control with Group 4, 5, and 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05). Although, there are some significant differences between Group 3 and Group 5 (P = 0.004 < 0.05) and Group 3 and Group 6 (P = 0.001 < 0.05).
The graph of IFN-γ shows that there are significant differences between Group 2 as a Cuprizone Control with Group 4, 5, and 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05). It demonstrates that there is a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 4 (P = 0.004 < 0.05). This graph also shows that there is a significant difference between Group 3 and Group 4 (P = 0.010 < 0.05).
3.3. Analysis of Genes Expression Data in Different groups
The effects of probiotic administration on the expression of genes are shown in Fig. 2. The relative expression of the IDO-1 gene was significantly decreased in the experimental groups compared to the Cuprizone Control Group (P = 0.000 < 0.05). No significant differences were found in IDO-1 gene expression between Normal and Probiotic Control Groups with experimental Groups.
The relative expression of CYP27B1gene was significantly decreased in the experimental groups. Group 4 (P = 0.001 < 0.05), Group 5 (P = 0.000 < 0.05), and Group 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05) compared to the Cuprizone Control Group.
The relative expression of NLRP1gene was significantly decreased in the experimental groups. Group 4 (P = 0.019 < 0.05), Group 5 (P = 0.025 < 0.05), and Group 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05) compared to the Cuprizone Control Group.
The relative expression of the NLRP3 gene was significantly decreased in the experimental groups. Group 4 (P = 0.006 < 0.05), Group 5 (P = 0.013 < 0.05), and Group 6 (P = 0.008 < 0.05) compared to the Cuprizone Control Group.
The graph of AIM2 shows that there is a significant difference between Group 1 and Group 4 (P = 0.049 < 0.05). It also demonstrates that there are some significant differences between Group 4 (P = 0.002 < 0.05), Group 5 (P = 0.000 < 0.05), and Group 6 (P = 0.000 < 0.05) compared to the Cuprizone Control Group.
3.4. Assessing Short-Term Spatial Memory Using Y-Maze
According to the obtained results shown in Fig. 3, there is a significant difference between the Cuprizone Control Group and experimental groups (P = 0.000 < 0.05).
3.5. Confirmation of Demyelination
The analysis of IHC staining (Fig. 4) demonstrates that there is an acceptable rate of demyelination after 4 weeks of cuprizone administration in 5 and 6 experimental groups in comparison with the normal group (Fig. 5).
3.6. Rate of Remyelination
The study of LFB staining indicates that there is an acceptable rate of Myelin Decomposition in experimental groups compared with the cuprizone group (Fig. 6).