This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research article
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Grapevine productivity is severely affected by fungal diseases worldwide and for the diseases control in eco-friendly way, it is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms of fungal resistance in grapes. Therefore, we performed genome-wide identification of various Resistance (R) genes expressed during PM and DM infection in grapevine. Consequently, we identified 6, 21, 2, 5, 3 and 48 EDS1, NDR1, PAD4, NPR, RAR and PR genes respectively in the grapevine genome. Further, differential expression analysis resulted in identification of 2, 4, 7, 2, 4, 1 and 7 differentially expressed PM-responsive Resistance (R) genes (NBS-LRR, EDS1, NDR1, PAD4, NPR, RAR1 and PR) and 28, 2, 5, 4, 1 and 19 differentially expressed DM-responsive Resistance (R) genes (NBS-LRR, EDS1, NDR1, NPR, RAR1 and PR) in V. vinifera. These genes are involved in salicylic acid mediated Effector-triggered immunity (ETI) pathway, therefore, we examined their co-expression to determine the sequence of events that occurs during a signaling cascade in order to respond against PM and DM-infection. Altogether, the PM and DM responsive R genes of ETI pathway found in this study can be used in future to produce new and improved grape varieties that are immune to biotic stresses.
Keywords
Grapevine, Fungal diseases, Mildew resistance, Resistance (R) genes, Expression, Salicylic acid
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 2
Posted 29 Apr, 2020
No community comments so far
No comments provided
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 2
Posted 29 Apr, 2020
No community comments so far
No comments provided
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Grapevine productivity is severely affected by fungal diseases worldwide and for the diseases control in eco-friendly way, it is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms of fungal resistance in grapes. Therefore, we performed genome-wide identification of various Resistance (R) genes expressed during PM and DM infection in grapevine. Consequently, we identified 6, 21, 2, 5, 3 and 48 EDS1, NDR1, PAD4, NPR, RAR and PR genes respectively in the grapevine genome. Further, differential expression analysis resulted in identification of 2, 4, 7, 2, 4, 1 and 7 differentially expressed PM-responsive Resistance (R) genes (NBS-LRR, EDS1, NDR1, PAD4, NPR, RAR1 and PR) and 28, 2, 5, 4, 1 and 19 differentially expressed DM-responsive Resistance (R) genes (NBS-LRR, EDS1, NDR1, NPR, RAR1 and PR) in V. vinifera. These genes are involved in salicylic acid mediated Effector-triggered immunity (ETI) pathway, therefore, we examined their co-expression to determine the sequence of events that occurs during a signaling cascade in order to respond against PM and DM-infection. Altogether, the PM and DM responsive R genes of ETI pathway found in this study can be used in future to produce new and improved grape varieties that are immune to biotic stresses.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...