The PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor inhibits the function of ICC cells in vitro
To evaluate the importance of the mTOR pathway in human cholangiocarcinogenesis, we compared the activated/phosphorylated proteins between a human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cell line (HIBEpiC) and a human cholangiocarcinoma cell line (RBE) by KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway enrichment analysis. KEGG pathway analysis established mTOR signaling among the most significantly affected pathways (Fig. 1A). To determine the treatment effect of BEZ235 on ICC cells in vitro, RBE cells were treated with DMSO or BEZ235 (100 nM) for 24 hours. Cell proliferation was assessed by an EdU assay and Cell Counting Kit-8 assay. The EdU assay showed a higher percentage of EdU-positive (proliferating) cells in the control group than in the BEZ235 treatment group (p = 0.0079) (Fig. 1B). CCK-8 assays showed a similar result to the EdU assay: BEZ235 significantly inhibited RBE cell proliferation (p = 0.0024) (Fig. 1C). In addition, a colony formation assay was performed, which showed a significant decrease in the BEZ235 treatment group compared to the control group (p = 0.0003) (Fig. 1D). Transwell assays revealed the inhibitory effect of BEZ235 treatment on RBE cells, including a significant decrease in cell migration (p = 0.0043) and invasion (p = 0.0012) (Fig. 1E and F). The above results validated that BEZ235 suppressed the proliferation of RBE cells in vitro.
Therapeutic efficacy of the PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor in the treatment of ICC in vivo
Based on the effective treatment of BEZ235 on RBE cells in vitro, we tested the therapeutic effect of BEZ235 in the transgenic ICC model. Due to the high expression of AKT and YAP in human ICC(19), we delivered plasmids (AKT/YAPS127A) for sleeping beauty transposase via hydrodynamic injection to generate the ICC model. Consistently, this model was confirmed by cytokeratin 19 (CK19) immunohistochemical staining and histological analysis (Fig. 2B). The experimental strategy for BEZ235 administration is shown in Fig. 1A. Six weeks after the hydrodynamic injection, mice were sacrificed. We examined liver tumours macroscopically and compared the liver weight/body weight (LW/BW) ratio and survival rate between the BEZ235 groups and control groups. To our surprise, however, the result was inconsistent with our expectation. We found no significant difference in treatment effect between the BEZ235 groups and the control groups by macroscopic examination and H&E staining of liver sections (Fig. 2B). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the liver weight to body weight (LW/BW) ratio (p = 0.1401) (Fig. 2C). There was a modest difference between the two groups in the survival rate (p = 0.0437) (Fig. 2D). However, the difference was not significant. Taken together, these results indicate that BEZ235 cannot effectively inhibit ICC progression in vivo.
The PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor increased c-Myc and YAP expression in vivo and in vitro
As BEZ235 did not effectively inhibit ICC progression in the primary ICC mouse model, this situation prompted us to explore a more effective treatment strategy. Accumulating evidence has suggested that the Hippo pathway plays an essential role in mediating resistance to cancer therapeutics(20). Then, we detected a significant increase in MYC and YAP expression in BEZ235-treated RBE cells by RNA-seq analysis (Fig. 3A). Concurrently, increased levels of c-Myc and YAP protein expression were measured in BEZ235-treated RBE cells compared to dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated RBE cells (Fig. 3B). The phosphorylation of LATS1 inhibits YAP/TAZ, which is the main effector of the Hippo pathway(21). YAP transcribes c-Myc and promotes the expression of metabolic enzymes(22). To further investigate the molecular mechanisms by which BEZ235 increased c-Myc and YAP expression, we subsequently compared the protein expression of LATS1 and p-LATS1 between BEZ235-treated RBE cells and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-treated RBE cells. We confirmed that BEZ235 downregulated the phosphorylation of LATS1 in RBE cells. However, there was no significant difference in the protein level of total LATS1 (Fig. 3C). This is a novel mechanism by which BEZ235 upregulates c-Myc and YAP expression by suppressing the phosphorylation of LATS1. Furthermore, in vivo, we found that the expression levels of YAP and c-Myc were more increased in the BEZ235 treatment group than in the control group by immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 3D and 3E). These results confirmed that BEZ235 upregulated c-Myc and YAP expression in vivo and in vitro.
YAP and c-Myc mediated resistance to the PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor
Since mTOR inhibition through BEZ235 results in the high expression of c-Myc and YAP, we further hypothesized that the high expression of c-Myc and YAP can cause tumour drug resistance in primary ICC. RBE cells were transfected with YAP or c-Myc overexpression plasmids to overexpress the protein. Subsequently, RBE cells were transfected with siRNA control, siRNA YAP and siRNA c-Myc. We then detected the expression of YAP and c-Myc after transfection by western blotting (Fig. 4A). To investigate potential resistance mechanisms, we conducted a series of cellular analyses. Transwell assays demonstrated that silencing YAP and c-Myc inhibited the invasion ability of BEZ235-treated RBE cells. Conversely, overexpression of YAP and c-Myc increased the invasion ability of BEZ235-treated RBE cells (Fig. 4B). This supports the conclusion that YAP and c-Myc increase BEZ235 resistance. To further validate this conclusion, we carried out colony formation assay experiments. Colony formation assays consistently confirmed that the overexpression of YAP and c-Myc increased BEZ235 resistance (Fig. 4C).
The combination of BET protein inhibition and PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition efficiently suppressed ICC progression in vitro
Given that JQ1-mediated inhibition of BRD4 decreased the levels of YAP and c-Myc(15, 18), we further detected the expression of YAP and c-Myc in JQ1-treated RBE cells. RBE cells were treated with DMSO or JQ1 (500 nM) for 24 hours. As expected, the mRNA and protein levels of YAP and c-Myc were significantly reduced in the JQ1 treatment group compared with the control group (Fig. 5A and 5B). JQ1-mediated inhibition of BRD4 function decreased the levels of YAP and c-Myc, which prompted us to explore a new therapeutic strategy for ICC by combined treatment with JQ1 and BEZ235. CCK-8 assays showed that the combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 significantly inhibited RBE cell proliferation compared to the control group or BEZ235 group (Fig. 5C). CFSE assays showed a similar result to CCK-8 assays, in which the combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 significantly inhibited RBE cell proliferation. In addition, Transwell assays were performed to detect cell invasion. The combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 exhibited significantly decreased effects (Fig. 5E). We next sought to examine the combined effect of JQ1 and BEZ235 on the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway using immunoblotting analysis. We examined a protein concentration gradient (Figure S1A) and time point experiments (Figure S1B). RBE cells were treated with DMSO, BEZ235 (100 nM), JQ1 (500 nM), BEZ235 (100 nM) and JQ1 (500 nM) for 24 hours, and the protein levels were measured by western blot. The results showed that the combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 inhibited the expression of p-PI3K, p-AKT, p-mTOR, p-p70S6K and p-4eBP1 compared to the control group or BEZ235 group (Fig. 5F). Therefore, a combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 more efficiently inhibited ICC progression in vitro.
The combination of BET protein inhibition and PI3K/mTOR dual inhibition efficiently suppressed ICC progression in vivo
Given that the combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 is an effective treatment for ICC cells in vitro, we tested the therapeutic effect of this combination in a transgenic ICC model. The experimental strategy for drug administration is shown in Fig. 6A. AKT/YAP-transfected mice were treated with BEZ235, JQ1 or a combination of BEZ235 and JQ1 starting 2 weeks after oncogene transfection. We failed to observe the inhibitory effect of treatment with either BEZ235 or JQ1 on tumour burden. However, the combination of BEZ235 and JQ1 significantly suppressed tumour progression, as evaluated by macroscopic view and H&E staining or by the LW/BW ratios and spleen weight/body weight (SW/BW) ratios (Fig. 6B and 6C). Moreover, compared to the survival time of the control group, the combination group showed a significant increase in survival time (Fig. 6D). Next, immunohistochemical or immunofluorescence staining images of Ki-67 and TUNEL were used to assess tumour proliferation. Compared to the control group and either the BEZ235 or JQ1 group, the combined treatment significantly decreased the Ki67 + ratios in the tumour areas but increased TUNEL staining (Fig. 6E). Overall, these data demonstrate that combined treatment with JQ1 and BEZ235 effectively suppresses the progression of AKT/YAPS127A ICC in mice.
The effect of combination therapy on the tumour immune microenvironment
In this study, we investigated the activated/phosphorylated protein changes between combination-treated RBE cells and DMSO-treated RBE cells with a protein chip array. To our surprise, in addition to the mTOR signaling pathway, HIF-1 signaling was the most significantly affected pathway by KEGG pathway analysis (Fig. 7A). Previous studies reported that the phosphorylation of 4EBP1 ultimately led to 4EBP1 binding to eIF4E and prevented protein synthesis(23, 24). We further monitored the phosphorylation protein of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway in the two ICC cell lines between the combination-treated groups and DMSO-treated groups (Fig. 7B). mTOR plays a central role in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway that regulates the translation of HIF-1α(25), whereas p-4E-BP1 is a direct target of mTOR (26). We found that the phosphorylation of 4EBP1 was significantly reduced in both combination-treated groups. Therefore, we hypothesize that the combination of BEZ235 and JQ1 regulates the HIF-1 pathway by directly reducing 4EBP1 phosphorylation. To confirm this notion, we selected mouse liver tumour samples from 4 experimental groups (control group, BEZ235 group, JQ1 group, combination group) and extracted total protein for western blotting analysis (Fig. 7C). The protein expression of HIF-1a was also detected by immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 7D). The results supported the findings of the protein microarray, which showed that the group receiving a combination of JQ1 and BEZ235 had significantly inhibited expression of HIF-1a compared to the control group or single-drug group. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1a (HIF-1a) enhances liver cancer progression by inducing M2 polarization and suppressing M1 polarization in macrophages(27). We further explored the tumour-associated macrophage polarization of this combined therapeutic strategy. AKT/YAPS127A ICC mice treated with BEZ235, JQ1 or a combination of BEZ235 and JQ1, as shown in Fig. 6A, were sacrificed 2 days after the last dose of JQ1 or BEZ235 administration. Nonparenchymal cell (NPC) perfusates were collected using in situ liver perfusion. The ratio of the macrophage subset to the total number of NPCs and the ratio of the type 1 macrophage subset to the total number of macrophages were analysed by flow cytometry. The ratio of the total number of macrophages to the number of NPCs was not significantly altered in the four experimental groups (Fig. 7E). Importantly, compared to the control group or single-drug group, the ratio of M1 macrophages to the total number of macrophages was significantly increased in the combination group (Fig. 7E). We further confirmed our findings with immunofluorescence staining of M1- and M2-type macrophages in liver tissue (Fig. 7F). As expected, the combination of BEZ235 and JQ1 induced M1 polarization and suppressed M2 polarization in macrophages. Given the complexity of small-molecule inhibitors in the tumour immune microenvironment, combination therapy might be indicated to efficiently suppress the progression of ICC by inducing M1 polarization and suppressing M2 polarization.