In our randomized phase II study, PMR was planned to be an active control but was found to have more than a placebo effect on body image stress, our primary outcome, as measured by the Impact of Treatment Scale. Our qualitative findings support that we successfully blinded our hypothesis as comments from both groups revealed engagement and positive effects on stress, relaxation, connecting the mind and body and mood.
Evidence of stress reduction, relaxation, and improved mood among the PMR group should not be surprising given effects demonstrated by other research. For example, Allison et al. [15] studied the effectiveness of PMR as a self-care strategy among first year veterinary students and found all students showed improvements in basic relaxation and stress levels after completing PMR. In a narrative review by Raad et al [16] PMR was examined along with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and deep breathing (DB) among adults undergoing treatment for infertility and investigators concluded that each of these techniques was associated with improvements in mood and reduced stress levels. What is surprising is that progressive muscle relaxation could positively impact body image. Additionally surprising is that, at least in some women, these improved feelings would translate into feeling closer to their partner.
The results of this exploratory qualitative analysis led us to form some beginning hypotheses with respect to mechanisms that may improve body image. The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms [17] states that in a person experiencing unpleasant symptoms, there is a continual and reciprocal relationship between influencing factors (physiologic, psychologic and situational), symptoms and performance. Influencing factors (such as cancer status, anxiety and decrease in intimacy with one’s partner) affect a person’s experience with symptoms (such as negative body image). Symptoms affect performance, or in this case, the complex status of physical, emotional, mental, and social well-being in relation to sexuality, not merely the absence of disease, dysfunction or infirmity. We propose that mechanisms through which body image may be improved include improved sleep, which decreases cortisol and can help the stress response; coping well with stress, which may improve feelings of control; increasing positive mood, which can lead to more self-care activities; and the ability to connect one’s positive feelings to their physical body (mind-body connection) (see Fig. 1). Based on these qualitative findings, we propose that both Hypnosis and PMR may have improved body image through better sleep, more control over stress, positive mood and connecting the mind with the body. PMR accomplished this with overt instructions to tense and relax muscles from the top of the head down to the bottom of the feet while listening to pleasing nature sounds and hypnosis did this through suggestions provided to the subconscious during deep relaxation.
Several of the responses from the hypnosis group directly reflected the hypnotic suggestions used in the intervention. For example, Participant 1041 stated “more relaxation, noticeable sexual feelings, openness, interest.” Relaxation, sexual feelings and interest were part of the hypnotic suggestions. Additionally the hypnosis group included findings of improved sexual health. This may be the result of the specific hypnotic suggestions around sexual health and feeling empowered. During the final weeks of the intervention period, there was evidence in the hypnosis group of increased action to make changes. For example, participant 1043 stated that she "Felt good about myself. Starting to make changes and take control over my body." This shift into action was not seen in the PMR group’s responses. Similar to Jensen et al.[18] findings, where women in treatment and post treatment for breast cancer participated in self-hypnosis and an improvement was found for pain, fatigue and sleep problems, all symptoms targeted by hypnotic suggestions, we pose that the specific hypnotic suggestions made a difference that aided women to implement change in their behaviors and improve their sexual health, specifically [18]. These findings may explain the slightly higher but not statistically significant sexual satisfaction and sexual interest scores seen in the hypnosis group in the parent study [13].
One of the key limitations of this study is that participants self-selected by choosing to provide written comments on the questionnaires from the parent study. As such our findings represent women who were motivated to write comments and may not be a true representation of the entire study population. Even with this self-selection, well over half of the participants in each arm provided comments. It should also be emphasized again that comment analysis was not originally planned when this study was designed. It would have been helpful to have included a qualitative component of this study that was designed expressly for the purpose of understanding mechanisms of benefit.
Our study findings suggest that PMR and hypnosis both may improve women’s stress, ability to relax, sleep, mood, and mind-body connection and these factors may result in an improved body image. However, these comments also support the quantitative data [13] that the suggestions embedded in the hypnosis intervention did impact the women in a positive way related to sexual health. Future research should test the relationships we propose and better explore their directional and/or causal nature. Additionally, more research is needed to continue to determine which intervention (PMR or Hypnosis) is better suited to improve cancer survivors’ body image and subsequently their overall sexual health.