This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research article
Yuanzhen Qu
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated loss of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness in patients with chiasmal compression using optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study aimed to evaluate the cpRNFL and ganglion cell compound (GCC) thicknesses in patients suffering pituitary tumors with and without chiasmal compression.
Methods: forty-four patients with pituitary adenoma (PA) (twenty-one without chiasmal compression and twenty-three with chiasmal compression) and eighteen controls were enrolled. cpRNFL and GCC thickness were measured in both patients and controls by SD-OCT.
Results: three groups (PAs with optic chiasmal compression, PAs without optic chiasmal compression and controls) were closely matched in terms of mean age, sex and IOP (p=0.173, p=0.184 and P=0.343, respectively). The average cpRNFL and GCC thickness was significantly different among three groups (cpRNFL : 94.1±12.5µm, 106.4±7.3µm, 110.7±6.9µm, respectively; GCC: 85.8±6.9µm, 93.8±5.0µm, 97.2±5.6µm, respectively ). The cpRNFL was analyzed in different regions, and significant difference was found in nasal upper and nasal lower between PAs without optic chiasmal compression and controls.
Conclusion: Even there is no evidence of compression at the chiasm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GCC and cpRNFL thinning could still be detected in patients of pituitary tumor by SD-OCT. The loss of RNFL is more severe in patients with chiasmal compression.
Keywords
pituitary tumor, optical coherence tomography, retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion compound complex, optic chiasmal compression
Figure 1
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 07 Oct, 2019
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Ophthalmology
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research article
Yuanzhen Qu
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 07 Oct, 2019
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Ophthalmology
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated loss of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (cpRNFL) thickness in patients with chiasmal compression using optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study aimed to evaluate the cpRNFL and ganglion cell compound (GCC) thicknesses in patients suffering pituitary tumors with and without chiasmal compression.
Methods: forty-four patients with pituitary adenoma (PA) (twenty-one without chiasmal compression and twenty-three with chiasmal compression) and eighteen controls were enrolled. cpRNFL and GCC thickness were measured in both patients and controls by SD-OCT.
Results: three groups (PAs with optic chiasmal compression, PAs without optic chiasmal compression and controls) were closely matched in terms of mean age, sex and IOP (p=0.173, p=0.184 and P=0.343, respectively). The average cpRNFL and GCC thickness was significantly different among three groups (cpRNFL : 94.1±12.5µm, 106.4±7.3µm, 110.7±6.9µm, respectively; GCC: 85.8±6.9µm, 93.8±5.0µm, 97.2±5.6µm, respectively ). The cpRNFL was analyzed in different regions, and significant difference was found in nasal upper and nasal lower between PAs without optic chiasmal compression and controls.
Conclusion: Even there is no evidence of compression at the chiasm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), GCC and cpRNFL thinning could still be detected in patients of pituitary tumor by SD-OCT. The loss of RNFL is more severe in patients with chiasmal compression.
Figure 1
Loading...