Isolation, characterization and culture of hucMSCs and HUVECs
All experiment protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (KYLL-2017-106) as we have described14. Human umbilical cords were collected from informed, consenting delivery woman and processed as we have previously described14. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hucMSCs) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs )were isolated, cultured ,thawed and expanded following the established method15.The hucMSCs were cultured in alpha-minimum essential medium (α-MEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO2. Different passages of hucMSCs were characterized by cell surface markers (CD29,CD34,CD44,CD45,CD90, CD105,CD166,and HLA-DR) using flow cytometric analysis, and multi-lineage differentiation potential were tested using osteogenic medium and adipogenic medium. The HUVECs were cultured in Endothelial Cell Growth Medium (ECM) supplemented with 5% FBS in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Endothelial phenotype was analyzed by CD31 and VWF immunofluorescence staining.
Transfection of hucMSCs with miRNA-126-3p by Lentiviral Vector
The hucMSCs were transfected with miRNA-126-3p by lentiviral vector as previously described 16. Briefly, a lentiviral vector expressing both the miRNA-126-3p and green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used for gene delivery. Primary hucMSCs were incubated with recombinant miRNA-126-3p-GFP or miRNA-126-3p NC-GFP lentiviral vectors at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0,25,50,75,100 respectively. The cells were infected with the lentivirus medium for 6h and replaced with fresh medium for another 48h. The green fluorescent protein signal was detected by a fluorescence microscope and gene transfection efficiency was verified by PCR.
Co-culture of hucMSCs and HUVECs
HUVECs and hucMSCs were co-cultured using Transwells (0.4µm pore size, Corning, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, HUVECs suspended in ECM stimulate with 100 ng/mL VEGF was added to the upper chamber with 0.4µm diameter pores. Then, the transfected hucMSCs (miRNA-126-3p- hucMSCs or GFP-hucMSCs) were cultured with α-MEM in the lower chamber. After the 24h incubation period, the HUVECs were collected for subsequent functional and mechanism analysis.
Endothelial migration assay
Migration of co-cultured HUVECs were examined by scratching assay and transwell analysis. For scratching assay, HUVECs co-cultured as afore mentioned were harvested and seeded in 6-well plates. Scratching was mechanically made 6h later using a 200μl pipette tip. After 24 h, defect closing images were taken by using a microscopy and the migrated cells was counted for the cells in three field per well of each group. For transwell analysis, co-cultured HUVECs were seeded to the upper chamber and the lower chamber was filled with ECM by using a 24-well transwell cell culture chamber (8μm pores). After 24h, HUVECs on the upper surface were erased and migrated cells on the underside of chamber were fixed and stained with crystal violet. The transmembrane cells were imaged and counted using an inverted microscope in 5 randomly selected 200 fields per transwell.
Endothelial proliferation assay
Proliferation of co-cultured HUVECs were examined by EDU incorporation assay with an EDU Imaging Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The co-cultured HUVECs in 24-well plates were preincubated with EDU-containing medium and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The cells were then treated with TrionX-100 and EDU reaction buffer. Lastly, the nuclei were stained with DAPI. The proliferation rate was evaluated by the percentage of EDU stained cells divided by DAPI stained cells.
In vitro angiogenesis assay
HUVECs were incubated in 24-well plates containing Coster Matrigel TM matrix (354234) under the same conditions as mentioned above. After cells were incubated in ECM for 24 h, the tube-like structures were formed and the tube morphology was analyzed under an inverted microscope. Image J was applied for quantifying the statistics of tube number and length.
Extraction and identification of hucMSC-exosomes
hucMSCs-exosomes were extracted from supernatants of cell cultures by ultracentrifugation method as we have described17. The morphology hucMSCs-exosomes were observed under a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi,Japan) by an experienced engineer. Western blot analysis was performed to identify the representative marker of exosomes, including CD63, HSP70 and TSG10118. To explore whether hucMSCs-exosomes can be uptake by HUVECs, hucMSCs-exosomes were labeled with a fluorescent dye CM-Dil and incubated with HUVECs for 12 h at 37°C. The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and observed under the confocal laser microscopy (Zeiss, Germany).
Surgical procedure and therapeutic interventions of rat vein grafting model
Male wistar rats weighing 250-300g purchased from the animal experimental center of Shandong University, with approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Qilu hospital of Shandong University, were used in this experiment. The vein graft model and hucMSCs transplantation were performed by using our previously described methods19, 20. Briefly, rats were randomly divided into 5 groups as follows: (1)sham group;(2)vein graft group;(3)vein graft+hucMSCs group(hucMSCs group);(4)vein graft+GFP-hucMSCs group(GFP-hucMSCs group);(5)vein graft+miRNA-126-3p-hucMSCs group (miRNA-126-3p-hucMSCs group). End-to-end anastomosis using “cuff technology” was performed to establish arteriovenous bypass grafting model in the vein graft group and all three hucMSCs transplantation groups. .
Homing of transplanted MSCs to vein grafts
Vascular ultrasound examinations were performed on all rats before and after operation, luminal diameter and blood flow were measured using a small animal ultrasound scanner with a linear array transducer at 4 weeks after operation. CM-Dil labeled hucMSCs observed by a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan) was used to examine the homing of transplanted hucMSCs to the site of the vein grafts 3 days after transplantation. Endothelial regeneration was evaluated by CD34 immunofluorescence 14 days after vein grafting as we have previously described13.All the remaining animals were then humanely killed and the vein grafts samples were harvested. The therapeutic effects of hucMSCs was evaluated by subsequent histological and immunohistochemical examination.
Histological and immunohistochemical examination of vein grafts
For histological study, the grafted veins were collected, fixed and embedded. Paraffin-embedded sections (5µm) were processed for morphometrical analyses after hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and masson’s trichrome staining13. The thickness of the intima in the vein grafts were used to estimate neointimal hyperplasia in different groups. Immunohistochemistry was performed by using a detection kits according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Vein graft sections were incubated with markers for cell proliferation (Ki67), macrophage infiltration (CD68), cytokines infiltration(TNF-α) and counterstained with hematoxylin and viewed under a microscope13.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed according to standard protocol as we have previously described13. In brief, total proteins were extracted from cells by treating with RIPA buffer. The extracts were quantified using a BCA protein assay kit and separated by SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto a PVDF membrane. After blocking, the protein blots were incubated with the following antibodies: PIK3R2, SPRED-1, AKT, p-AK, ERK1/2, p-ERK1/2 and GAPDH, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit.
RNA extraction and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
For analysis of miRNA-126-3p expression, total RNA was extracted using RNA Isolation Kit and reverse-transcribed using All-in-One TM miRNA First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. For analysis of SPRED-1 and PIK3R2 expression, a ReverTra Ace q-PCR RT Kit was used to synthesize the first-strand. PCR was performed in triplicate using a Real-time Detection System (BioRad, USA) and gene transcripts were analyzed using the delta-delta CT method.
Statistical analysis
The experiments were performed 3 times and the values were expressed as mean ±standard deviation. The results were assessed statistically using Student’s t test between two groups, or analyzed by one-way analysis of variance between three or more groups. Statistical analysis was performed by using GraphPad Prism Software. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.