See the published version of this preprint at BMC Oral Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
Research article
Yonghui Chen(New Corresponding Author)
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-2257
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the autogenous tooth bone and xenogenic bone grafted in immediate implant placement with bone defect. Methods: Thirty patients whose compromised anterior teeth need immediate implant placement were enrolled. Autogenous tooth bone made from the extracted teeth by chair-side or the xenogenic bone were used to repaired bone defect. Clinical examination, radiographic assessment about the horizontal bone change in the level of 0mm, 3mm and 6mm below the implant neck and the marginal bone loss were made immediately, 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Questionnaire of feeling was made at the time of removing the sutures. Results: All implants achieved the success criteria without any complications at the follow-up period. The percent of the horizontal bone change and the marginal bone loss at 6 and 12 months were almost the same between two groups (P>.05). The horizontal bone loss at the first or the latter 6 months is almost the same (P>.05). But the horizontal bone loss at the 6 mm level is less than the 0 mm and 3 mm levels at 6 and 12 months (P<.05). Meanwhile patients seem more satisfied with the autogenous tooth bone derived from the questionnaire. Conclusion: The bone volume change in the facial part of the implant after immediate placement is almost the same between two groups. Providing clinical evidence that the autogenous tooth bone made from compromised tooth can be an acceptable bone graft material.
Keywords
autogenous tooth, bone graft, immediate implant placement, implant dentistry
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Oral Health.
No community comments so far
Submission checks complete
On 22 Nov, 2019
Editorial decision: Accept
On 22 Nov, 2019
Version 3
Posted 19 Nov, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 19 Nov, 2019
Editor assigned
On 14 Nov, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 13 Nov, 2019
Editor invited
On 13 Nov, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 06 Nov, 2019
Editor assigned
On 04 Nov, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 03 Nov, 2019
Editor invited
On 03 Nov, 2019
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 21 Oct, 2019
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 21 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 17 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 09 Oct, 2019
Review #1 received
Received 08 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 04 Oct, 2019
Editor assigned
On 03 Oct, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 03 Oct, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 02 Oct, 2019
Editor invited
On 02 Oct, 2019
First submitted
On 27 Sep, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
A new preprint design is coming!
We have improved readability, clarity, accessibility, and opportunities for engagement.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Oral Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Yonghui Chen(New Corresponding Author)
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-2257
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Oral Health.
No community comments so far
Submission checks complete
On 22 Nov, 2019
Editorial decision: Accept
On 22 Nov, 2019
Version 3
Posted 19 Nov, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 19 Nov, 2019
Editor assigned
On 14 Nov, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 13 Nov, 2019
Editor invited
On 13 Nov, 2019
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor revision
On 06 Nov, 2019
Editor assigned
On 04 Nov, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 03 Nov, 2019
Editor invited
On 03 Nov, 2019
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 21 Oct, 2019
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 21 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 17 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 09 Oct, 2019
Review #1 received
Received 08 Oct, 2019
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 04 Oct, 2019
Editor assigned
On 03 Oct, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 03 Oct, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 02 Oct, 2019
Editor invited
On 02 Oct, 2019
First submitted
On 27 Sep, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Oral Health.
Background: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of the autogenous tooth bone and xenogenic bone grafted in immediate implant placement with bone defect. Methods: Thirty patients whose compromised anterior teeth need immediate implant placement were enrolled. Autogenous tooth bone made from the extracted teeth by chair-side or the xenogenic bone were used to repaired bone defect. Clinical examination, radiographic assessment about the horizontal bone change in the level of 0mm, 3mm and 6mm below the implant neck and the marginal bone loss were made immediately, 6 and 12 months after implant placement. Questionnaire of feeling was made at the time of removing the sutures. Results: All implants achieved the success criteria without any complications at the follow-up period. The percent of the horizontal bone change and the marginal bone loss at 6 and 12 months were almost the same between two groups (P>.05). The horizontal bone loss at the first or the latter 6 months is almost the same (P>.05). But the horizontal bone loss at the 6 mm level is less than the 0 mm and 3 mm levels at 6 and 12 months (P<.05). Meanwhile patients seem more satisfied with the autogenous tooth bone derived from the questionnaire. Conclusion: The bone volume change in the facial part of the implant after immediate placement is almost the same between two groups. Providing clinical evidence that the autogenous tooth bone made from compromised tooth can be an acceptable bone graft material.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Loading...