A total of 2,156 hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with bronchiectasis were enrolled in the study. 367 patients were finally included in this study, including 181 cases in the Drug group and 186 cases in the Control group (Fig 1).
The baseline data of the patients in the two groups during exacerbation
The baseline data of the patients in the two groups during exacerbation are shown in Table 1. Although PaO2 in the Drug group was significantly lower than that in the Control group (p<0.05), the mean values of the two groups were both greater than 80mmHg and there was no difference between the two groups in blood oxygen saturation (p>0.05), which suggested that the baseline levels of PaO2 in the two groups were comparable. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the past medical history and the comorbidities (Supplementary Table 3; all p>0.05). A large amount of purulent or foamy secretions under the bronchoscope (Fig 2) was mainly found in 240 patients (65.40%) with exacerbation of bronchiectasis. At the same time, there was no significant difference between 123 cases (67.96%) in the Drug group and 117 cases (62.90%) in the Control group (χ2=1.035, P=0.309). Mucous plugging was found under the bronchoscope in 11 patients (3.00%), and no significant difference was found between the Drug group (7 cases (3.87%) and the Control group (4 cases (2.15%) (χ2=0.930, P=0.335). There was a small amount of hemorrhage with one case under the bronchoscope in each group.
There were no significant differences in the clinical symptoms in the two groups during exacerbation (Table 2; p>0.05).
The chest HRCT during exacerbation was compared between the two groups. There were no significant differences in all the items of the Bhalla score (Supplementary Table 4; all p>0.05).
The detection of pathogenic bacteria during exacerbation was analyzed. The isolation rates of PA in the two groups (including sputum and/BALF) were 28.18% (51/181) and 19.89% (37/186), respectively (P=0.063). The detection rates of non-tuberculous mycobacteria were 9.94% (18/181) and 6.45% (12/186), respectively (P=0.222), and the isolation rates of other pathogenic bacteria were 6.63% (12/181) and 8.06% (15/186), respectively (P=0.599). There were no significant differences in pathogenic microorganisms between the two groups during exacerbation.
Changes of clinical symptoms, chest HRCT and pulmonary function
The clinical symptoms of all the patients were reassessed 3 months after discharge (all P<0.05; Table 2 and Fig 3). And some patients took chest CT (105 patients) and pulmonary function (24 patients) again within 12 months after discharge ( Table 3, Fig 4 and Supplementary Table 5).
The re-exacerbation and antibiotics usage
Within 12 months after discharge, 119 re-exacerbation events occurred in the Drug group, which was significantly less than (171) in the Control group (Table 4 and Fig 5). The time to first re-exacerbation was highly significant prolonged in the Drug group compared with the Control group (6.35±3.13 months vs. 5.33±3.00 months, P=0.017) and the frequency of re-exacerbation was significantly lower in the Drug group (χ2=7.162, P=0.007) (Fig 6a). After adjusting for age, gender, smoking history, BMI, duration of bronchiectasis and the PaO2, oxygen saturation, hemoglobin, the total clinical symptom score, the Bhalla score, and the detection rate of PA during an exacerbation, the multiple Cox regression model result showed that the risk of the first re-exacerbation in the Drug group was 70.3% that of the Control group (HR=0.703, 95% CI 0.516 - 0.956, P =0.025). The risk was reduced by 29.7% because of the airway drugs (Fig 6b).
The number of cumulative months of the antibiotics used in the Drug group was significantly lower than that in the Control group within one year after discharge (P<0.05). Moreover, 93 (51.38%) patients did not use oral antibiotics, and 127 patients (70.17%) in the Drug group did not use antibiotics intravenously, which were both significantly less than those in the Control group (Table 4).
Adverse events
During the bronchoscopy procedure, six patients (1.63%) altogether experienced bronchoscopy-related bleeding, including 4 patients in the Drug group and 2 patients in the Control group (P=0.692). The bleeding stopped after local instillation of hemagglutinin or epinephrine, and there was no persistent bleeding. No other adverse event occurred during the operation procedures.