There are various prognostic factors of NMIBC such as old age, female sex, presence of CIS, tumor size, tumor multifocality, tumor stage, and tumor grade. Some studies have shown that BPH is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; an epidemiological case-control study reported that previous prostatic surgery due to BPH was associated with increased risk of bladder cancer (relative risk = 2.38).9 A recent study reported that moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) were associated with poor prognosis of NMIBC.15 It has also been reported that the International Prostate Symptom Score was a significant predictor of recurrence of NMIBC (odds ratio = 1.26, p = 0.005). LUTSs are commonly associated with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), which is often caused by benign prostatic enlargement.16 Therefore, it is possible that the high PV is also related to the prognosis; hence, this study focused on PV.
We reviewed another study that gave a glimpse of the possible link between prostate and bladder cancer. Izumi et al. reported that the 5-year RFS was higher in the ADT group than in the control group (76% vs 40%, p < 0.001). They also showed that ADT was an independent prognostic factor for bladder cancer recurrence (HR = 0.29, p < 0.001).12 Other studies have reported that androgen suppression therapies such as 5-ARI and ADT reduce the risk of intravesical recurrence of bladder cancer (HR = 0.36, p = 0.024).11 The authors explain that the results of these studies could be related to androgen receptors (ARs). In fact, many studies have reported that AR signaling in bladder cancer cases was associated with recurrence and progression of bladder cancer.17,18 Wang et al. also reported that 5-ARI might lower mortality related with bladder cancer.19 Based on these results, we concur that recurrence of bladder cancer is more likely to be due to AR signaling. However, given that both 5-ARI and ADT reduce the size of the prostate, the size of the prostate may also have some influence on the prognosis of bladder cancer.
Although there are many modalities to measure PV, transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) with the elliptical volume formula is most frequently used. However, we measured the PV using preoperative computed tomography (CT) performed for staging because TRUS was not available to all patients who had undergone TURBT. TRUS has clear advantages, including less radiation, ready availability, and cost-effectiveness.20 On the other hand, it has the significant disadvantage of intra-operator variability. Zlotta et al. 21 reported that the variability in the PV measurement ranges from − 21–30%. Although some previous studies had reported PV was measured to be larger in CT than TRUS, more recent studies showed no differences.22 We also found no significant difference in PV between TRUS and CT (28.8 mL vs 28.3 mL, p = 0.260) in 77 patients who received TRUS before surgery in our study.
Our study showed that high PV was associated with both recurrence and progression. RFS and PFS were higher in group 1 than in group 2. Multivariable cox analysis showed that a greater PV was associated with worse RFS and PFS. A possible explanation for the results is the effect of residual urine. In a previous animal study, Kadlubar et al. reported that as the frequency of urination increased, the level of calcinogens in the urothelium decreased.23 Another study showed that the higher the fluid intake, the lower the risk of bladder cancer.24 These studies suggest that the risk and recurrence of bladder cancer increase with higher calcinogen exposure.
Our study has some limitations. Although we established the relationship between PV and prognosis of NMIBC, the mechanism is still unknown. Moreover, we have not been able to determine how therapeutic measures and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for prostatic hyperplasia affect the prognosis of bladder cancer. Ham et al.25 reported that simultaneous TURP with TURBT reduces recurrence rate in men with BOO. They reported concomitant TURP was a significant factor in predicting recurrence of NMIBC without increased risk of recurrences in the bladder neck or prostatic urethra. However, subsequent studies did not increase the risk of recurrence of the bladder neck or prostatic urethra, but reported that it did not significantly affect the recurrence of the bladder. Randomized control study demonstrated concurrent TURP was associated with better RFS, although it was not statistically significant (HR = 0.294, p = 0.083).26 A study on how treatment of large PV affects the recurrence of bladder cancer in appropriate patient groups will help to better understand the relationship between prostate size and the prognosis of bladder cancer.
Another drawback is that our results might be sensitive to selection bias because this study was retrospective and non-randomized in nature. The number of patients included in this study was also relatively small, and the follow-up duration could have been longer. These could reason out why prognostic factors previously known to affect prognosis were found not to be associated. Only PV and tumor grade were especially associated with progression of NMIBC.
Despite of those drawbacks, our study showed that PV is an independent prognostic factor of NMIBC. High PV was found to be associated with worse RFS and PFS. Our study suggested that PV reduction could be helpful for prevention of recurrence and progression in patients with NMIBC.