1. Lunny, C., et al., Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’ of health interventions: evaluation of prevalence, citation and journal impact factor. Research Synthesis Methods, 2021. n/a(n/a).
2. Ioannidis, J.P., The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q, 2016. 94(3): p. 485-514.
3. Siontis, K.C. and J.P.A. Ioannidis, Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2018. 11(12): p. e005212.
4. Moher, D., The problem of duplicate systematic reviews. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 2013. 347: p. f5040.
5. Ioannidis, J.P.A., The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The Milbank quarterly, 2016. 94(3): p. 485-514.
6. Zhang, W., et al., OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2007. 15(9): p. 981-1000.
7. NHMRC, The Australian government's natural therapies review 2019-20 and the role of the national health and medical research council's natural therapies working committee. Australian Journal of Herbal and Naturopathic Medicine, 2019. 31(4): p. 140-141.
8. Caird, J., et al., Mediating policy-relevant evidence at speed: are systematic reviews of systematic reviews a useful approach? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2015. 11(1): p. 81-97.
9. Chalmers, P.N., et al., Do arthroscopic and open stabilization techniques restore equivalent stability to the shoulder in the setting of anterior glenohumeral instability? a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Arthroscopy, 2015. 31(2): p. 355-63.
10. Fountoulakis, K.N., R.S. McIntyre, and A.F. Carvalho, From Randomized Controlled Trials of Antidepressant Drugs to the Meta-Analytic Synthesis of Evidence: Methodological Aspects Lead to Discrepant Findings. Curr Neuropharmacol, 2015. 13(5): p. 605-15.
11. Lucenteforte, E., et al., Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol, 2015. 68(3): p. 246-56.
12. Osnabrugge, R.L., et al., A systematic review and critical assessment of 11 discordant meta-analyses on reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in clopidogrel users. Genetics in Medicine, 2015. 17(1): p. 3-11.
13. Pantoja T, O.N., Ciaponni A, Herrera C, Lewin S, Oxman A, Paulsen E, Rada G, Wiysonge C Strategies for improving health systems in low-income countries: lessons learnt from four overviews of systematic reviews of health systems interventions. in Cochrane Colloquium. 2015. Vienna.
14. Pollock A, F.S., Brady M, Langhorne P, Mead G, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F Completing the first Cochrane overview of stroke reviews: experiences of the Cochrane Stroke Group in Cochrane Colloquium. 2015. Vienna.
15. Useem, J., et al., Systematic Differences between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Meta-Analyses on the Same Topic: A Matched Pair Analysis. PLoS One, 2015. 10(12): p. e0144980.
16. Zhao, J.G., J. Wang, and L. Long, Surgical Versus Conservative Treatments for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015. 94(26): p. e1057.
17. Zhao, J.G., et al., Intramedullary nail versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015. 94(11): p. e599.
18. Siontis, K.C., T. Hernandez-Boussard, and J.P.A. Ioannidis, Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 2013. 347: p. f4501.
19. Gurevitch, J., et al., Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis. Nature, 2018. 555(7695): p. 175-182.
20. Ding, D., et al., Duplicate and salami publication: a prevalence study of journal policies. International journal of epidemiology, 2020. 49(1): p. 281-288.
21. Lunny, C., et al., Bibliometric study of ‘overviews of systematic reviews’: evaluation of prevalence, citation and impact factor (preprint). 2021: Researchsquare.com.
22. Ioannidis, J.P., et al., Meta-research: evaluation and improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS biology, 2015. 13(10): p. e1002264.
23. Higgins, J.P.T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M.J., Welch, V.A. (editors). , Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0. . 2019, Cochrane. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook: London, United Kingdom.
24. Lunny, C., J.E. McKenzie, and S. McDonald, Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016. 74: p. 107-18.
25. Lunny, C., et al., Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020. 118: p. 69-85.
26. Wells, C., et al., Effectiveness of Pilates exercise in treating people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC medical research methodology, 2013. 13(1): p. 1-12.
27. Geneen, L.J., et al., Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(4).
28. Swinkels, A., et al., Exercise interventions for non-specific low back pain: an overview of systematic reviews. Physical Therapy Reviews, 2009. 14(4): p. 247-259.
29. Hasuike, A., et al., Systematic review and assessment of systematic reviews examining the effect of periodontal treatment on glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2017. 22(2): p. e167.
30. Botero, J., C. Rodríguez, and A. Agudelo‐Suarez, Periodontal treatment and glycaemic control in patients with diabetes and periodontitis: an umbrella review. Australian Dental Journal, 2016. 61(2): p. 134-148.
31. Pittler, M.H. and E. Ernst, Dietary supplements for body-weight reduction: a systematic review. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2004. 79(4): p. 529-536.
32. Onakpoya, I.J., et al., Food supplements for body weight reduction: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Obesity, 2011. 19(2): p. 239.
33. Ernst, E., M.S. Lee, and T.-Y. Choi, Acupuncture: does it alleviate pain and are there serious risks? A review of reviews. PAIN®, 2011. 152(4): p. 755-764.
34. Lee, M.S. and E. Ernst, Acupuncture for pain: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 2011. 17(3): p. 187-189.
35. Autier, P., et al., Effect of vitamin D supplementation on non-skeletal disorders: a systematic review of meta-analyses and randomised trials. The lancet Diabetes & endocrinology, 2017. 5(12): p. 986-1004.
36. Mateussi, M.V., et al., What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation? Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 2017. 135: p. 497-507.
37. Rejnmark, L., et al., Non-skeletal health effects of vitamin D supplementation: A systematic review on findings from meta-analyses summarizing trial data. PloS one, 2017. 12(7): p. e0180512.
38. Chen, Y., et al., Treatment for lupus nephritis: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Rheumatology international, 2017. 37(7): p. 1089-1099.
39. Mac-Namara, M. and G. Rada, Is rituximab effective for induction of remission in lupus nephritis? Medwave, 2014. 14(7): p. e6010-e6010.
40. Posadzki, P., Is spinal manipulation effective for pain? An overview of systematic reviews. Pain Medicine, 2012. 13(6): p. 754-761.
41. Posadzki, P. and E. Ernst, Systematic reviews of spinal manipulations for headaches: an attempt to clear up the confusion. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 2011. 51(9): p. 1419-1425.
42. Posadzki, P. and E. Ernst, Spinal manipulation: an update of a systematic review of systematic reviews. NZ Med J, 2011. 124(1340): p. 55-71.
43. Moore, R.A., et al., Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults‐an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(9).
44. Moore, R.A., et al., Non‐prescription (OTC) oral analgesics for acute pain‐an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(11).
45. Els, C., et al., Adverse events associated with medium‐and long‐term use of opioids for chronic non‐cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(10).
46. Doll, M., et al., Safety and effectiveness of neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza treatment, prophylaxis, and outbreak control: a systematic review of systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2017. 72(11): p. 2990-3007.
47. Michiels, B., et al., The value of neuraminidase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PloS one, 2013. 8(4): p. e60348.
48. Popper, K., The logic of scientific discovery. 2005: Routledge.
49. Karunananthan, S., et al., When and how to replicate systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(2).
50. Moher, D., The problem of duplicate systematic reviews. 2013, British Medical Journal Publishing Group.
51. Bornmann, L. and R. Mutz, Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. JASIST, 2015. 66(11): p. 2215-2222.
52. Page, M.J., et al., Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS Med, 2016. 13(5): p. e1002028.
53. Lau, J., Systematic review automation thematic series. Systematic reviews, 2019. 8(1): p. 1-2.
54. Allen, I.E. and I. Olkin, Estimating time to conduct a meta-analysis from number of citations retrieved. Jama, 1999. 282(7): p. 634-635.
55. Borah, R., et al., Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ open, 2017. 7(2): p. e012545.
56. Michelson, M. and K. Reuter, The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun, 2019. 16: p. 100443.
57. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Pre-announcement: Indigenous Peoples and COVID-19 Knowledge Synthesis, Evaluation and Assessment Grants Rapid Research Funding Opportunity. 2020.
58. Lucenteforte, E., et al., Discordances originated by multiple meta-analyses on interventions for myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015. 68(3): p. 246-256.
59. Augustin, G., et al., Discordant outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy in published meta-analyses: an overview of systematic reviews. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020. 34(10): p. 4245-4256.
60. Dettori, J.R. and D.C. Norvell, Discordant Systematic Reviews: Which to Believe? Global Spine Journal, 2020. 10(2): p. 237-239.
61. Houck, D.A., et al., Early versus delayed motion after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. The American journal of sports medicine, 2017. 45(12): p. 2911-2915.
62. Mazuquin, B.F., et al., Effectiveness of early compared with conservative rehabilitation for patients having rotator cuff repair surgery: an overview of systematic reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2018. 52(2): p. 111-121.
63. Trinquart, L., D.M. Johns, and S. Galea, Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. International Journal of Epidemiology, 2016. 45(1): p. 251-260.
64. Pieper, D., et al., Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014. 67(4): p. 368-375.
65. Pollock, M., et al., Chapter V: overviews of reviews. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version, 2018. 6.
66. Pollock, M., Fernandes, R.M., Becker, L.A., Pieper, D., Hartling, L.C, Chapter V: Overviews of Reviews. , in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook, T.J. In: Higgins JPT, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). , Editor. 2020, Cochrane: UK.
67. Lunny, C., et al., Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design. Syst Rev, 2016. 5: p. 4.
68. Lunny, C., et al., Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1-purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction. Syst Rev, 2017. 6(1): p. 231.
69. Lunny, C., et al., Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence. Syst Rev, 2018. 7(1): p. 159.
70. Lunny, C., et al., Overviews of reviews incompletely report methods for handling overlapping, discordant, and problematic data. J Clin Epidemiol, 2020. 118: p. 69-85.
71. COPE Council, COPE Retraction guidelines — English. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4 Committee on Publication Ethics.