Relationship Between Surgical R0 Resectability and Findings of Peripancreatic Vascular Invasion on CT Imaging After Neoadjuvant S-1 and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
Background
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is frequently associated with positive surgical margins and a poor prognosis because the tumor is in contact with major vessels. This study evaluated the relationship between the margin-negative (R0) resection rate and findings indicating peripancreatic vascular invasion on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with BRPC.
Methods
Twenty-nine BRPC patients who underwent laparotomy after neoadjuvant S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. Peripancreatic major vessel invasion was evaluated based on the length of tumor-vessel contact on MDCT. The R0 resection rates were compared between the progression of vascular invasion (PVI) group and the non-progression of vascular invasion (NVI) group.
Results
There were 3 patients with partial responses (10%), 25 with stable disease (86%), and 1 with progressive disease (3%) according to the RECISTv1.1 criteria. Regarding vascular invasion, 9 patients (31%) were classified as having PVI, and 20 patients (69%) were classified as having NVI. Of the 29 patients, 27 (93%) received an R0 resection, and all the PVI patients received an R0 resection (9/9; R0 resection rate = 100%). The R0 resection rates did not differ significantly between the PVI and NVI groups (P = 1.000, 100% vs. 90%).
Conclusions
Patients with BRPC after NACRT achieved high R0 resection rates regardless of the vascular invasion status. BRPC patients can undergo R0 resections unless progressive disease is observed after NACRT.
Trial registration
UMIN-CTR, UMIN000009172. Registered 23 October 2012, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000010762
Figure 1
Posted 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Received 08 Nov, 2020
Received 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Posted 15 Sep, 2020
On 02 Dec, 2020
On 02 Dec, 2020
On 13 Oct, 2020
Received 12 Oct, 2020
Received 10 Oct, 2020
On 05 Oct, 2020
On 14 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 14 Sep, 2020
On 14 Sep, 2020
On 11 Sep, 2020
On 10 Sep, 2020
On 25 Aug, 2020
Relationship Between Surgical R0 Resectability and Findings of Peripancreatic Vascular Invasion on CT Imaging After Neoadjuvant S-1 and Concurrent Radiotherapy in Patients with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
Posted 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Invitations sent on 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Received 08 Nov, 2020
Received 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
On 08 Nov, 2020
Posted 15 Sep, 2020
On 02 Dec, 2020
On 02 Dec, 2020
On 13 Oct, 2020
Received 12 Oct, 2020
Received 10 Oct, 2020
On 05 Oct, 2020
On 14 Sep, 2020
Invitations sent on 14 Sep, 2020
On 14 Sep, 2020
On 11 Sep, 2020
On 10 Sep, 2020
On 25 Aug, 2020
Background
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is frequently associated with positive surgical margins and a poor prognosis because the tumor is in contact with major vessels. This study evaluated the relationship between the margin-negative (R0) resection rate and findings indicating peripancreatic vascular invasion on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with BRPC.
Methods
Twenty-nine BRPC patients who underwent laparotomy after neoadjuvant S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. Peripancreatic major vessel invasion was evaluated based on the length of tumor-vessel contact on MDCT. The R0 resection rates were compared between the progression of vascular invasion (PVI) group and the non-progression of vascular invasion (NVI) group.
Results
There were 3 patients with partial responses (10%), 25 with stable disease (86%), and 1 with progressive disease (3%) according to the RECISTv1.1 criteria. Regarding vascular invasion, 9 patients (31%) were classified as having PVI, and 20 patients (69%) were classified as having NVI. Of the 29 patients, 27 (93%) received an R0 resection, and all the PVI patients received an R0 resection (9/9; R0 resection rate = 100%). The R0 resection rates did not differ significantly between the PVI and NVI groups (P = 1.000, 100% vs. 90%).
Conclusions
Patients with BRPC after NACRT achieved high R0 resection rates regardless of the vascular invasion status. BRPC patients can undergo R0 resections unless progressive disease is observed after NACRT.
Trial registration
UMIN-CTR, UMIN000009172. Registered 23 October 2012, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000010762
Figure 1