4.1 Classification of debris flow events
The values of hydrometeorological variables at the event days were chosen from the observed and calculated time series. There were 6 days (DF 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9) with debris flows observed rainfall exceeded P = 43.2 mm d− 1, equivalent to a rainfall event with Pe ≤ 0.01 over the research duration. Besides, rainfall recorded of 4 events (DF 2, 4, 10, 14) reached moderate exceedance probability 0.01 < Pe < 0.1 (~ 23.4 mm d− 1). And 3 event days (DF 6, 11, 12) rainfall recorded with 0.1 < Pe < 0.5, while only 1 day (DF13) nearly no rainfall was recorded. For all calculated antecedent rainfall, most variables of antecedent rainfall were 0.1 < Pe < 0.5 and Pe > 0.5, and only the exceedance probability of DF7’s antecedent rainfalls reached Pe < 0.01.
About variables of daily mean air temperature, there were only 2 event days (DF4, DF13) with a high probability of 0.01 < Pe < 0.1 (14.6 ~ 16.4°C). Other exceedance probabilities of daily mean air temperature T not reached 0.01, especially DF5 occurred with Pe >0.5. However, it can be found that all the exceedance probabilities of MT3 were Pe < 0.5, among them, 3 events (DF 2, 6, 14) reached 0.01 < Pe< 0.1, and DF13 reached Pe < 0.01 from the calculated temperature variables. Other calculated variables of temperature like MT7, MT14, and MT30 corresponded to 3, 1, 2, respectively, times high exceedance probability events with 0.01 < Pe < 0.1.
The above exceedance probabilities of variables on the event days allowed us to identify the different relevance to different variables of rainfall and temperature for triggering the recorded events on the 14 event days and to classify the initiation class base on the variable which plays the most significant role in triggering debris flows (Table 1). The highest correlation between the observed and calculated variable of rainfall and temperature was taken as the main contributor, and the contribution degrees were expressed according to the different probability grades in the variable. Among them, Pe ≤ 0.01 represents extremely high correlation (+++), 0.01 < Pe ≤ 0.1 represents high correlation (++), 0.1 < Pe ≤ 0.5 represents medium correlation (+), and 0.5 < Pe ≤ 1 represents a low correlation.
By comparing the degree of contribution to different variables, it is found that the debris flow events dominated by rainfall accounted for 7 of the 14 event days (50%), while the temperature as the leading cause accounted for 2 event days (14%), 5 event days (36%) caused by the same contribution degree of rainfall and temperature. On the 6 of 7 event days, rainfalls caused most with daily rainfall R > 43.2 mm d− 1 observed probably to have an extremely high relevance to triggering the debris flows. Most of the exceedance probabilities of the values of T for these events reached 0.1 < Pe ≤ 0.5, indicate that there are some moderately relevant additional contributions to runoff and increase the initiate water of debris flows. For example, the rainfall on 12 July 1990 reached extremely 64.5 mm with falling temperature for a few days, a dramatic runoff was observed, and debris flow occurred (Fig. 2a). Another one of 7 event days caused by high rainfall R = 41.8 mm d− 1 (0.01 < Pe ≤ 0.1) and moderate temperatures (0.1 < Pe ≤ 0.5). High-intensity rainfall played the dominant role in those 7 events, while temperature played a minor role.
It is found that DF6 and DF13 occurred with little antecedent, which exceedance probabilities were 0.1 < Pe ≤ 0.5; however, the triggered water is also common rainfall, DF6 occurred with recorded daily rainfall R = 8.7 mm d− 1 and DF13 with R = 0.2 mm d− 1. Especially the daily rainfall of DF13 nearly no measured rainfall but debris flow also triggered (Fig. 2b). According to the recorded temperature variables of them, we found that the 3 days mean temperature MT3 of DF6 was 14.7°C (0.01 < Pe ≤ 0.1) and of DF13 was 16.1°C (Pe ≤ 0.01). Their recorded daily temperature was a medium and high correlation, respectively. Therefore, those two events were triggered by the meltwater caused by rising high temperatures, and the rainfall played only a minor role.
Besides, there were 5 events triggered by the same degree of rainfall and temperature, including DF2, 4, 11, 12, 14. Among them, DF11 and 12 occurred with medium rainfall and temperature. From Fig. 2c, we found that this event was triggered by the combination of long-lasting rainfall and rising temperature; variables with moderate exceedance probability (0.1 < Pe ≤ 0.5) can also cause debris flow. DF2, 4, 14 were triggered by the combination of high rainfall and temperature with low exceedance probability (0.01 < Pe ≤ 0.1). The antecedent rainfall of DF4 showed a low correlation of debris flow, but the daily rainfall and temperature, which reached 0.01 < Pe ≤ 0.1, caused debris flow (Fig. 2d).
It can be concluded that it is more difficult to trigger periglacial debris flows by the influence of high temperature than rainfall in this area, and debris flows triggered by the combination of rainfall and temperature tend to have a greater impact and faster speed. At the same time, we plot the distribution of variables to compare the difference between 3 triggering modes (Fig. 3). It is found that there are obvious distribution differences in daily rainfall (R), daily temperature (T), and 3 days mean temperature (MT3) of 3 different triggering modes.
Table 1
The 14 recorded debris flow events in Hailuogou since 1988. For each individual variable for a given event, bold and italic values indicate an extremely low occurrence probability (Pe ≤ 0.01) ,bold values as a low occurrence probability (0.01 < Pe≤0.1); italic values as moderate occurrence probability (0.1 < Pe ≤ 0.5) and normal values as a high occurrence probability (0.5 < Pe ≤ 1).
Event
No.
|
Date
|
Rainfall/mm d− 1
|
Temperature/°C
|
Contribution degree
|
rain_d
|
rain_3d
|
rain_7d
|
rain_14d
|
rain_30d
|
temp_d
|
temp_3d
|
temp_7d
|
temp_14d
|
temp_30d
|
R
|
T
|
1
|
1989/7/8
|
57.6
|
7.8
|
15.2
|
35.6
|
38.3
|
13.1
|
13.5
|
10.9
|
9.6
|
10.3
|
+++
|
+
|
3
|
1990/7/12
|
64.5
|
3.6
|
5.4
|
17.5
|
20.5
|
13.2
|
14.1
|
14.1
|
13.6
|
12.3
|
+++
|
++
|
5
|
1995/8/11
|
44.7
|
19.0
|
41.1
|
56.6
|
59.8
|
11.8
|
13.9
|
13.5
|
13.6
|
13.6
|
+++
|
++
|
7
|
1997/7/4
|
43.3
|
81.6
|
97.8
|
103.8
|
110.4
|
13.5
|
13.7
|
12.6
|
11.8
|
10.2
|
+++
|
+
|
8
|
1997/8/1
|
48.0
|
19.6
|
37.9
|
44.3
|
48.6
|
12.8
|
12.9
|
12.8
|
12.4
|
11.9
|
+++
|
+
|
9
|
1997/8/15
|
91.0
|
4.1
|
15.3
|
27.3
|
31.3
|
12.4
|
13.4
|
12.5
|
13.6
|
12.9
|
+++
|
+
|
10
|
2003/7/26
|
41.8
|
25.0
|
37.6
|
42.0
|
47.5
|
13.5
|
14.0
|
12.3
|
13.5
|
12.6
|
++
|
+
|
6
|
1996/7/27
|
8.7
|
17.6
|
34.1
|
47.3
|
52.9
|
14.5
|
14.7
|
12.8
|
12.2
|
11.8
|
+
|
++
|
13
|
2010/7/31
|
0.2
|
23.4
|
48.9
|
59.8
|
63.8
|
16.3
|
16.1
|
14.7
|
13.7
|
13.7
|
+
|
+++
|
2
|
1989/7/26
|
42.8
|
21.5
|
36.8
|
54.4
|
60.4
|
12.4
|
14.4
|
15.0
|
14.0
|
11.9
|
++
|
++
|
4
|
1995/7/28
|
31.6
|
0.9
|
20.4
|
36.3
|
39.2
|
15.2
|
14.2
|
13.8
|
13.6
|
12.3
|
++
|
++
|
11
|
2005/8/11
|
17.4
|
28.3
|
50.7
|
63.6
|
66.0
|
12.8
|
12.3
|
11.9
|
12.9
|
12.8
|
+
|
+
|
12
|
2010/7/17
|
15.6
|
13.2
|
31.3
|
41.2
|
49.3
|
12.7
|
14.0
|
12.9
|
13.5
|
12.6
|
+
|
+
|
14
|
2019/7/29
|
25.8
|
5.9
|
18.3
|
31.1
|
36.1
|
13.5
|
14.5
|
13.4
|
13.5
|
12.0
|
++
|
++
|
4.2 One-dimensional Bayesian probability
Our study has shown that periglacial debris flows are more sensitive to rainfall than temperature.
The results of the one-dimensional Bayesian analysis are shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5. The left side of the two figures (a, c, e, g, and i) compare the initial rainfall/temperature of the debris flows and the overall frequency distribution, namely P(B|A) and P(B), the right side of the figures (b, d, f, h, and j) shows the probability of debris flow occurrence P(A|B). The difference between P(B|A) and P(B) is large, and P(A|B) is higher, indicating that the significance of the variable under consideration is higher. The two figures show that the probability of debris flows increased with the event’s severity, and the rainfall variable is more significant than temperature. The triggers for debris flows can be ranked as follows: R > AR3 > AR14 > AR7 > AR30 > MT3 > MT30 > T > MT7 > MT14. Event daily rainfall R is the most significant explanatory variable among these 10 variables capable of triggering a debris flow event as a single variable. When R > 30 mm d− 1, P(A|B) gradually increases. When R > 40 mm d− 1, P(A| B) reaches 0.2, and when R > 60 mm d− 1, P(A|B) is as high as 0.33. Here, the P(A| B) reaches 100% when R > 90 mm d− 1, because there was only 1 rainfall event (DF7’s daily rainfall) recorded more than 90 mm d− 1 and no other rainfall events recorded between 70 to 90 mm d− 1. Among the temperature variables, MT3 is more significant in triggering debris flows confirming the finding of Paranunzio et al. (2014). When MT3 > 16°C, the P(A|B) value reaches the highest value of 0.06.
4.3 Two-Dimensional Bayesian probability
The rainfall–3 days mean temperature threshold of periglacial debris flows is dynamic, and P(A|R, MT3) ≈ 0.1 can be selected as the early warning threshold of debris flows.
Two-dimensional Bayesian analyses refers to the conditional probability analyses of debris flow events given by two control variables. The variables should be selected from the variables with the highest explanatory in the one-dimensional Bayesian analysis. In this paper, it should be the event rainfall and antecedent rainfall in the previous 3 days, but these two variables have a high degree of coincidence, and therefore, we chose the parameters of event rainfall and 3 days mean temperature for analysis.
We connected the points with equal posterior probability P(A|R, MT3) of debris flows under different parameters into contour lines and plotted them in Fig. 6. It can be seen that when the 3 days mean temperature is lower than 11°C and no rainfall event occurs, the probability of debris flows is 0. The probability of debris flows is also 0 when the rainfall is less than 8.7 mm d-1 and the 3 days mean temperature is 8°C. The debris-free area shown in Fig. 6 includes all the points where P(A|R, MT3) = 0 because there is no rainfall in this area in the recorded meteorological conditions of debris flow outbreaks when MT3 > 8°C and rainfall R > 50 mm d-1, the probability of a debris flow outbreak reaches the highest value of 0.4.
Figure 6 provides a series of rainfall–3 days mean temperature probability values. The key task is selecting a conditional probability value (if any) as the debris flow warning threshold. In our observation, we can define P(A|R,MT3) ≈ 0.1 as the threshold for debris flows warning because at least a single variable has reached the critical value to cause extreme events on this line (rainfall). For example, when MT3 ≈ 8, R is already higher than 23.4 mm d-1 of low exceedance probability 0.01 < Pe < 0.1 on this line.