Long noncoding RNA DPP10-AS1 promotes malignant processes through epigenetically activating its cognate gene DPP10 to predict poor prognosis in lung cancer patients

Background: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) play oncogenic or tumor-suppressive roles in various cancers. However, the epigenetic modification of lncRNA and its cognate sense gene in lung cancer remain largely unknown. Methods : qRT-PCR and Western blot were conducted to detect the expressions of DDP10-AS1 and DPP10 expression in lung cancer cell lines and tissues. The impact of DDP10-AS1 on DPP10 expression, cell growth, invasion, apoptosis and in vivo tumor growth were investigated in lung cancer cells by Western blot, rescue experiments, colony formation, flow cytometry and xenograft animal experiment. Results: A novel antisense lncRNA, DPP10-AS1, is found to be highly expressed in cancer tissues and the upregulation of DPP10-AS1 predicts poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Notably, DPP10-AS1 promotes lung cancer cell growth, colony formation, cell cycle progression and represses apoptosis in lung cancer cells by upregulating DPP10 expression. Additionally, DPP10-AS1 facilitates lung tumor growth via upregulation of DPP10 protein in xenograft mouse model. Importantly, DPP10-AS1 positively regulates DPP10 gene expression and they are coordinately upregulated in lung cancer tissues. Mechanically, DPP10-AS1 associates with DPP10 mRNA but does not enhance DPP10 mRNA stability. Hypomethylation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 contributes to their coordinate upregulation in lung cancer. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the upregulated antisense lncRNA DPP10-AS1 promotes lung cancer malignant processes and facilitates tumorigenesis by epigenetically regulating its cognate sense gene DPP10 , and DPP10-AS1 may act as a candidate prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target in lung cancer. diagnosis Mann-Whitney U test used to assess the differential expression levels of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 in patient cohorts. The relationship between DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 expression was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation. For patients with different levels of DPP10-AS1 expression, the survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The multivariate survival analysis was performed on all parameters that were found to be significant in univariate analysis using the Cox regression model. For all analyses, a P -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All P -values are two sided. the upregulation of DPP10-AS1 is coordinately correlated with DPP10 mRNA expression in

2q14.1. However, the biological function of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer is unknown. In this study, we found that the upregulated DPP10-AS1 was significantly correlated with the higher serum CYFRA21-1, larger tumor size, advanced TNM stage and predicted poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Further assays revealed that DPP10-AS1 promoted cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and inhibited apoptosis by regulating its target gene DPP10. The results suggest that DPP10-AS1 may serve as an oncogenic lncRNA that participates in lung cancer development and aggressive progression. In addition, DPP10-AS1 has the potential to become a new biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Patients and tissue preparation.
During the period from January 2014 to December 2017, lung primary cancer tissue specimens and cancer-adjacent tissues were collected from the patients underwent the radical surgery of lung cancer or palliative resection of lung cancer at the Affiliated

Hospital of Medical School of Ningbo University and Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Eastern
Hospital. The cancer-adjacent tissues must be at least 5 centimeters apart from the edge of the cancer tissues. We have collected 94 specimens, where patients were all diagnosed as primary lung cancer, and were not treated by preoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Meanwhile, the general clinical information and detailed pathological records were collected. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Medical School of Ningbo University. The overall survivals of these patients were followed up with a median period of 20 months. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of mortality or the last follow-up.
Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of first recurrence or the last follow-up.

Cell cultures and transient transfection.
The normal human bronchial epithelial cell BEAS-2B and the human lung cancer cell lines A549, H446, SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 were obtained from a cell bank at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). All human lung cancer cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (HyClone, USA), with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAN, Germany). They were maintained in a humidified chamber/incubator containing 5% CO 2 at 37°C. BEAS-2B was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) that was supplemented with 10% FBS. All oligonucleotides and plasmids were transfected into SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299  Table S1.

RNA Extraction and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).
Total RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA), followed by cDNA synthesis using PrimeScript™ II 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Japan) following the standard protocol. qRT-PCR was subsequently carried out with SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa, Japan) according to manufacturer's instructions, and was run on a PCR device Mx3005P (Stratagene, USA) and were normalized to levels of β-actin mRNA. The comparative 2 -ΔCt method was used for relative quantification and statistical analysis. To account for the assessment of technical variability, the assays was performed in triplicate for each case. Primer sequences are shown in Additional File 1, Table S2.

Recombinant plasmid construction.
The sequences of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 were amplified by PCR from the genomic DNA of SPC-A1 or NCI-H1299 cell lines, and were cloned into linearized pcDNA 3.1plasmid (Biogle, China) as described in our previous work [15]. Primer sequences are shown in Additional File 1, Table S2.

Protein isolation and Western blot.
Cells were firstly lysed in RIPA protein extraction regent (Beyotime, China) plus 1mM phosphatase inhibitor PMSF (Beyotime, China). Protein concentration was measured with BCA protein assay kit (Abcam, USA). Western blot was performed as previously described [16]. Briefly, equal amounts (40µg) of protein were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, USA).

Nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA fractionation analysis.
Nuclear and cytosolic fractions were separated using the PARIS kit (Am1921, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, the expression levels of β-actin, U6 and DPP10-AS1 in nuclear and cytoplasm SPC-A1 cells were detected using qRT-PCR assays.

RNase protection assay.
pcDNA3.1-DPP10-AS1, pcDNA3.1, siNC and siDPP10-AS1 were cotransfected into SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells. Forty-eight hours later, the RNA was extracted from the cells, and then treated with RNase A+T (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for 1 hour at 37℃. Singlestranded RNA was digested with RNase A+T, and remaining double-stranded RNA was extracted and analyzed by real-time qPCR.

MTT assay.
Briefly, SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at an initial concentration of 5ⅹ103 cells/well in 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS .Cells were allowed to grow for 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. And then 20 µl of 5 mg/ml MTT (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added into each well and cultured at 37℃ for 4 h. Following the incubation, cells were lysed with 150 µl DMSO. Formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. A microplate reader (Labsystems, Finland) was used to measure the OD values at a wavelength of 490 nm. Each experimental group contained three replicate wells, and the experiment was repeated three times.

Colony formation assay.
After transfection with siRNAs or constructed plasmids, cells were collected and resuspended in cell culture medium. Five hundred cells were seeded into 6-well plate and cultured at 37℃ with 5% CO 2 . Following incubation for 13 days, cell colonies were washed with 1×PBS for 3 times. The colonies were fixed with pre-iced methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet at room temperature for 10 min.

Cell cycle analysis.
Cells were cultured in 6-well plates overnight and then transfected with siRNAs or constructed plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 after hunger treatment for 24 hours. After 24-h transfection, cells were collected and washed with cold 1×PBS. Next, cells were rewashed with cold 1×PBS and incubated with PI/RNase staining buffer (Multisciences, USA). Cells were analyzed with a FACS calibur flow cytometer (BD, USA).

Cell apoptosis assay.
Cell apoptosis was measured using Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (Multisciences, USA). In brief, cells were seeded in 6-well plates one day before transfection. After 24 h, cells were collected and washed with cold 1×PBS. Before analysis, cells were resuspended with 500 µl binding buffer plus 5 µl PI and 5 µl FITC-conjugated anti-Annexin V antibody. After the incubation in the dark for 15 min at room temperature, cells were analyzed by FACS calibur flow cytometer (BD, USA) equipped with Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences).

In vivo tumorigenesis assay.
The experiments were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines by the Laboratory Animal Ethical Committee at Ningbo University. Four-week-old male nude mice were purchased at Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animals Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). We screened lung cancer cells that can stable expression DPP10-AS1 with Geneticin (G418), and injected 5×10 6 experimental cells or empty vector cells into mice by subcutaneous tumor formation (8 mice for each group) The tumor dimensions were measured every two days, and after 4 weeks, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the tumor were excised for weighing. The tumor volume was calculated with the formula: (length × width 2 )/2.

Statistical analysis.
The statistical analyses were performed by using GraphPad 7.0 (GraphPad, USA). Data were presented as mean ±SD from at least three separate experiments. The differences between DPP10-AS1 or DPP10 expression levels in lung cancer tissues and pair-matched noncancerous tissues were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The Chi-squared test (χ 2 test) was used to evaluate the relationship between the clinicopathological features and DPP10-AS1 expression. Two sample comparisons were applied with Student's t-test for equal or unequal variance or Pearson correlation test.
Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the differential expression levels of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 in patient cohorts. The relationship between DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 expression was analyzed by Pearson's correlation. For patients with different levels of DPP10-AS1 expression, the survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The multivariate survival analysis was performed on all parameters that were found to be significant in univariate analysis using the Cox regression model. For all analyses, a P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All P-values are two sided.

DPP10-AS1 is upregulated in lung cancer and predicts poor prognosis in patients.
To confirm the expression of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer tissues, we performed qRT-PCR to detect DPP10-AS1 in 94 pairs of lung cancer tissues and adjacent noncancerous tissues.
The result showed that the expression of DPP10-AS1 in tumor tissues of lung cancer patients was significantly higher than that in corresponding normal tissues (P<0.0001, Figure 1A). More specifically, 72% (68/94) of lung cancer patients showed an increase of DPP10-AS1 in tumor tissues compared to adjacent noncancerous tissues ( Figure 1B). To further investigate the association between the DPP10-AS1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics, 94 lung cancer samples were divided into two subgroups according to the relative DPP10-AS1 expression with median ratio: high DPP10-AS1 group (n=47, DPP10-AS1 ratio ≥ median ratio) and low DPP10-AS1 group (n=47, DPP10-AS1 ratio < median ratio). Correlation regression analysis showed that high DPP10-AS1 expression in lung cancer patients was closely related to serum high CYFRA21-1 level (P=0.014), large tumor size (P=0.0079), and advanced TNM stage (P=0.0406). However, age (P=0.3279), gender (P=0.0988), tumor number (P=0.1438), microvascular invasion (P=0.4532), and smoking history (P=0.2049) were not correlated with DPP10-AS1 expression ( Table 1). To further evaluate the prognostic value of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer patients, we analyzed the association between DPP10-AS1 expression and survival duration using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test. The results revealed that lung cancer patients with higher DPP10-AS1 expression had a significantly poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to those with lower DPP10-AS1 expression (log rank=9.329, P=0.0025, Figure 1C). Similarly, the lung cancer patients with higher DPP10-AS1 expression predicted a poorer overall survival (OS) compared to those with lower DPP10-AS1 expression (log rank=9.333, P=0.036, Figure 1D). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis further showed that high DPP10-AS1 expression in lung cancer tissues was an independent predictor for worse RFS ( Table 2) and OS ( Table 3). These results indicated that DPP10-AS1 expression is upregulated in lung cancer tissues and predicts poor prognosis in lung cancer patients.
We also measured the DPP10-AS1 expression levels in 5 lung cancer cell lines and human normal bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) by qRT-PCR. As shown in Figure 1E, the relative DPP10-AS1 expression in lung cancer cells (A549, SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299) were significantly upregulated (5~57-fold change) compared to that in human normal bronchial epithelial cells. Thus, SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cell lines were selected for the subsequent assays. Collectively, these results indicate that DPP10-AS1 is elevated in vivo and in vitro, and is considered as an independent prognostic factor of outcomes in patients with lung cancer.

DPP10-AS1 promotes lung cancer cell proliferation in vitro and facilitates tumor growth in xenograft animal model.
Since the results indicated that the significant upregulation of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer specimens was associated with larger tumor size, the effect of DPP10-AS1 on lung cancer cell growth needs to be explored. To regulate DPP10-AS1 expression in lung cancer cells, the endogenous expression of DPP10-AS1 was inhibited by transfection of siRNA and overexpressed by transfection of pcDNA3.1-DPP10-AS1, respectively. The results showed that DPP10-AS1 was downregulated up to 50~60% by siRNA knockdown (Additional File 2, Figure S1A), and was upregulated up to 250~300 fold by overexpression (Additional File 2, Figure S1B). The MTT assays indicated that knockdown of endogenous DPP10-AS1 expression dramatically inhibited the growth of SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells (Figure 2A Figure 2R). Thus, the data suggest that DPP10-AS1 promotes lung cancer cell growth and colony formation in vitro, and facilitates lung tumor growth via upregulation of DPP10 protein in xenograft animal model.

DPP10-AS1 promotes cell cycle progression and represses apoptosis of lung cancer cells.
To probe the potential mechanisms by which DPP10-AS1 enhanced lung cancer cell proliferation, we assessed cell cycle and apoptosis in SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells after the treatment of DPP10-AS1 knockdown or overexpression. Flow cytometric cell cycle assays demonstrated that knockdown of DPP10-AS1 led to a significant accumulation at G0/G1 phase and a significant decrease at G2/M-phase in both two cell lines ( Figure 3A).
Conversely, overexpression of DPP10-AS1 mainly resulted in a remarkable reduction in the G0/G1 population and an increase at G2/M phase in the two cell lines ( Figure 3B).
Moreover, the cell apoptosis assays indicated that knockdown of DPP10-AS1 significantly increased the early and late apoptosis in both SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells (Figure 3C

DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 are coordinately upregulated in lung cancer cells and tissues.
Based on the positive regulation of DPP10 by DPP10-AS1, we also detected the expression of DPP10 mRNA in the same cohort of 94 paired lung cancer tissue samples using qRT-PCR.
The results indicated that DPP10 expression in lung cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in corresponding adjacent tissues (P<0.01, Figure 5A, B). We also measured the DPP10 expression in a panel of lung cancer cell lines, and found that there was an increase of DPP10 mRNA expression of in 4 lung cancer cell lines compared to human normal bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) ( Figure 5C). Similarly, the protein expression of DPP10 was confirmed by Western blotting in lung cancer cells ( Figure 5D). Moreover, the relative expression of DPP10 mRNA had a good positive correlation with DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer tissues (r=0.7335, P<0.0001, Figure 5E) and lung cancer cell lines (r=0.8737, P=0.0010, Figure 5F). Together, these results indicate that the upregulation of DPP10-AS1 is coordinately correlated with DPP10 mRNA expression in lung cancer cell lines and in the tissues of lung cancer patients.

DPP10-AS1 promotes malignant processes and inhibits apoptosis through upregulating DPP10 expression.
To investigate whether the coordinate upregulation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 could affect malignant processes of lung cancer cells, we detected the cell behavior by overexpression of DPP-10 as well as knockdown of DPP10-AS1. In both SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells, the MTT assays showed that knockdown of DPP10-AS1 inhibited lung cancer cell growth, while simultaneous overexpression of DPP10 could abolish the suppressive effect mediated by knockdown of DPP10-AS1 ( Figure 6A). Conversely, overexpression of DPP10-AS1 promoted lung cancer cell growth, while simultaneous knockdown of DPP10 could abrogate the promotional effect mediated by overexpression of DPP10-AS1 ( Figure 6B). In addition, cell cycle analysis showed that knockdown of DPP10-AS1 induced cell cycle arrest at G0/G1 phase and a decrease of cell population at G2/M phase, this effect was abolished by the overexpression of DPP10 in SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells ( Figure 7A).
Meanwhile, overexpression of DPP10-AS1 resulted in a decrease of cell population at G0/G1 phase and cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase. However, this effect was also abolished by the depletion of DPP10 ( Figure 7B). Furthermore, the apoptosis analysis showed that overexpression of DPP10 abolished the DPP10-AS1 knockdown-mediated increase of early and late apoptotic cells in both two lung cancer cell lines ( Figure 7C). Conversely, the depletion of DPP10 rescued the DPP10-AS1 overexpression-mediated decrease of early and late apoptotic cells in lung cancer cells (Figure 7D). Collectively, the data suggests that DPP10-AS1 promotes cell growth and proliferation, induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits apoptosis through upregulating DPP10 gene expression in lung cancer cells.
DPP10-AS1 associates with DPP10 mRNA but does not enhance DPP10 mRNA stability.
To study whether DPP10-AS1 could enhance the stability of its sense-cognate gene DPP10, we determined the nucleoplasmic localization of DPP10-AS1. The nuclear and cytoplasmic fractionation analysis showed that DPP10-AS1 were mainly located in the nucleus ( Figure   8A). Next, RNase protection assay was performed to examine the RNA duplex formation between DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 mRNA. The results showed that DPP10 mRNA was totally digested and no difference of protected DPP10 mRNA was found upon the conditions of DPP10-AS1 knockdown ( Figure 8B) or DPP10-AS1 overexpression (Figure 8C), suggesting DPP10 mRNA cannot form RNA duplex with DPP10-AS1 to protect against RNase digestion.
These results indicate DPP10-AS1 associates with DPP10 mRNA but does not enhance DPP10 mRNA stability by formation of RNA duplex.

Hypomethylation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 contributes to their coordinate upregulation in lung cancer.
To further reveal the underlying mechanism that contributes to the coordinate upregulation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 in lung cancer, we used the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine to determine the effect of methylation on the expression of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10. The results showed that the relative expression of DPP10-AS1 was remarkably upregulated with the increase of 5-azacytidine concentration in both SPC-A1 and NCI-H1299 cells ( Figure 8D). Likewise, the relative expression of DPP10 mRNA was also significantly increased in a 5-azacytidine dose-dependent manner in the same two cell lines (Figure 8E). These results suggest that hypomethylation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 may contribute to the coordinate upregulation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 in lung cancer. Interestingly, hypomethylation of DPP10 was found in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients compared to that in normal controls according to the LUAD dataset of the TCGA database ( Figure 8F). Furthermore, one CpG island for DPP10-AS1 methylation and three CpG islands for DPP10 methylation were predicted by an epigenetic algorithm ( Figure   8G). Taken together, the data indicate that the coordinate upregulation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 is epigenetically modulated by their hypomethylations, and the upregulation of DPP 10 positively regulated by DPP10-AS1 is a key event in lung cancer progression ( Figure   8H).

Discussion
It has now become widely accepted that mammalian genomes encode numerous lncRNAs [17]. Dysregulation of some lncRNAs has been shown in various type of cancers, including lung cancer [18,19]. However, the functions and mechanisms behind antisense lncRNAs in lung cancer remain obscure. Based on our previous lncRNA microarray data, we identified a novel antisense lncRNA DPP10-AS1, was highly expressed in lung cancer tissues than that in adjacent noncancerous tissues. In addition, we explored the role of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer malignant processes. We found the upregulation of DPP10-AS1 in cancer tissues was associated with serum CYFRA21-1 level, tumor size, TNM stage, RFS, as well as OS of the patients. It could be served as an independent prognostic factor for lung cancer patients. Moreover, in vitro experiments showed that inhibition of DPP10-AS1 could repress lung cancer cell proliferation and induce cell cycle arrest at G1/G0 phase and cell apoptosis. Thus, the data confirmed the hypothesis that as a novel lncRNA, DPP10-AS1 exerts tumor oncogenic activity to promote malignant processes in lung cancer. We also found that the hypo-methylation of both DPP10 and lncRNA DPP10-AS1 might contribute to their stabilization. Therefore, this study proved a novel insight into the role of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer.
It is noteworthy some lncRNAs oriented in antisense direction with respect to a protein . Genome-wide screen identified the differentially methylated Esrp2-as which was significantly upregulated in human breast cancer and associated with poor prognosis [39]. In the current study, we found that both DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 were coordinately methylated using the treatment with 5-azacytidine.
Interestingly, DPP10 methylation level in lung squamous cell carcinoma was significantly lower than that in healthy controls from the methylation database (MethHC). Furthermore, computational analysis predicted three CpG islands in the promoter of DPP10, as well as one CpG island in DPP10-AS1 spanning the transcription initiation site. These results indicate that differential methylations of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 may be responsible for their coordinate upregulation in lung cancer.
The recent application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to a growing number of cancer transcriptomes has indeed revealed thousands of lncRNAs whose aberrant expression is associated with different cancer types. Among the few that have been functionally characterized, several have been linked to malignant transformation. Notably, these lncRNAs have key roles in gene regulation and thus affect various aspects of cellular behaviors, including differentiation, proliferation, invasion, migration or genomic stability [40]. In addition, the highly expressed lncRNAs function as oncogenes to activate oncogenic signal pathways and promote the carcinogenesis [41][42][43]. Importantly, the potential values of lncRNAs in cancer diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy has been also shown [14,44,45]. Interestingly, DPP10 was originally identified as prognostic marker and a therapeutic gene in cancer patients [46,47]. However, the potential regulatory mode and carcinogenic mechanism of DPP10 in cancers remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that DPP10-AS1 acts as a positive regulator of DPP10, which in turn exerts an oncogenic effect. In this study, we evaluated the biological function of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer.
DPP10-AS1 is widely involved in lung cancer pathophysiology by increasing cell growth, proliferation, promoting cell cycle progression, and inhibiting apoptosis. Meanwhile, the data indicate that DPP10-AS1 is an independent prognostic predictor for both overall survival and recurrence-free survival, suggesting the potential role of DPP10-AS1 in lung cancer diagnosis and prognosis. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the physical interaction of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 gene needs further investigation for better understanding of lncRNA DPP10-AS1 in lung carcinogenesis.

Conclusions
In summary, we identified a novel lncRNA DPP10-AS1, which was highly expressed in lung cancer and the upregulation of DPP10-AS1 predicted poor prognosis in lung cancer patients. Notably, knockdown of DPP10-AS1 could inhibit cell proliferation, promote cell cycle progression and trigger early and late apoptosis. Whereas overexpression of DPP10-AS1 showed the opposite effects. Importantly, DPP10-AS1 promoted the lung cancer malignant processes by positively regulating DPP10 gene expression. The coordinate upregulation of DPP10-AS1 and DPP10 is mediated by epigenetically hypomethylation.
Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into DPP10-AS1 as a candidate prognostic biomarker and as a potential therapeutic target in lung cancer.        DPP10-AS1 does not increase DPP10 mRNA stability, but they are regulated by