(1) Barthelat, F.; Yin, Z.; Buehler, M. J. Structure and Mechanics of Interfaces in Biological Materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16007.
(2) Ling, S.; Kaplan, D. L.; Buehler, M. J. Nanofibrils in Nature and Materials Engineering. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3 (4), 1–15.
(3) Porter, D.; Guan, J.; Vollrath, F. Spider Silk: Super Material or Thin Fibre? Adv Mater 2013, 25 (9), 1275–1279. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201204158.
(4) Heim, M.; Keerl, D.; Scheibel, T. Spider Silk: From Soluble Protein to Extraordinary Fiber. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2009, 48 (20), 3584–3596. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200803341.
(5) Askarieh, G.; Hedhammar, M.; Nordling, K.; Saenz, A.; Casals, C.; Rising, A.; Johansson, J.; Knight, S. D. Self-Assembly of Spider Silk Proteins Is Controlled by a PH-Sensitive Relay. Nature 2010, 465 (7295), 236–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08962.
(6) Hagn, F.; Eisoldt, L.; Hardy, J. G.; Vendrely, C.; Coles, M.; Scheibel, T.; Kessler, H. A Conserved Spider Silk Domain Acts as a Molecular Switch That Controls Fibre Assembly. Nature 2010, 465 (7295), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08936.
(7) Andersson, M.; Jia, Q.; Abella, A.; Lee, X.; Landreh, M. Biomimetic Spinning of Artificial Spider Silk from an Extremely Concentrated Chimeric Minispidroin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13 (January), 1–22.
(8) Wohlrab, S.; Muller, S.; Schmidt, A.; Neubauer, S.; Kessler, H.; Leal-Egana, A.; Scheibel, T. Cell Adhesion and Proliferation on RGD-Modified Recombinant Spider Silk Proteins. Biomaterials 2012, 33 (28), 6650–6659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.069.
(9) Andersson, M.; Jia, Q.; Abella, A.; Lee, X.-Y.; Landreh, M.; Purhonen, P.; Hebert, H.; Tenje, M.; Robinson, C. V; Meng, Q. Biomimetic Spinning of Artificial Spider Silk from a Chimeric Minispidroin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13 (1), 262–264.
(10) Mohammadi, P.; Aranko, A. S.; Landowski, C. P.; Ikkala, O.; Jaudzems, K.; Wagermaier, W.; Linder, M. Biomimetic Composites with Enhanced Tougheningusing Silk-Inspired Triblock Proteins and Alignednanocellulose Reinforcements. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5.
(11) Chung, H.; Kim, T. Y.; Lee, S. Y. Recent Advances in Production of Recombinant Spider Silk Proteins. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012, 23 (6), 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.03.013.
(12) Heidebrecht, A.; Eisoldt, L.; Diehl, J.; Schmidt, A.; Geffers, M.; Lang, G.; Scheibel, T. Biomimetic Fibers Made of Recombinant Spidroins with the Same Toughness as Natural Spider Silk. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (13), 2189–2194. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201404234.
(13) Riekel, C.; Vollrath, F. Spider Silk Fibre Extrusion: Combined Wide-and Small-Angle X-Ray Microdiffraction Experiments. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2001, 29 (3), 203–210.
(14) Riekel, C.; Madsen, B.; Knight, D.; Vollrath, F. X-Ray Diffraction on Spider Silk during Controlled Extrusion under a Synchrotron Radiation X-Ray Beam. Biomacromolecules 2000, 1 (4), 622–626.
(15) Rabotyagova, O. S.; Cebe, P.; Kaplan, D. L. Role of Polyalanine Domains in Beta-Sheet Formation in Spider Silk Block Copolymers. Macromol Biosci 2010, 10 (1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200900203.
(16) Gong, Z.; Huang, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X.; Shao, Z. Two Distinct Beta-Sheet Fibrils from Silk Protein. Chem. Commun. (Camb). 2009, No. D, 7506–7508. https://doi.org/10.1039/b914218e.
(17) Ulrich, S.; Glisovic, A.; Salditt, T.; Zippelius, A. Diffraction from the Beta-Sheet Crystallites in Spider Silk. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 2008, 27 (3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2008-10374-7.
(18) An, B.; Hinman, M. B.; Holland, G. P.; Yarger, J. L.; Lewis, R. V. Inducing Beta-Sheets Formation in Synthetic Spider Silk Fibers by Aqueous Post-Spin Stretching. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12 (6), 2375–2381. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm200463e.
(19) Vendrely, C.; Scheibel, T. Biotechnological Production of Spider-Silk Proteins Enables New Applications. Macromol Biosci 2007, 7 (4), 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200600255.
(20) Mohammadi, P.; Beaune, G.; Stokke, B. T.; Timonen, J. V. I.; Linder, M. B. Self-Coacervation of a Silk-Like Protein and Its Use As an Adhesive for Cellulosic Materials. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 1120–1125. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00527.
(21) Mohammadi, P.; Aranko, A. S.; Lemetti, L.; Cenev, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Virtanen, S.; Landowski, C. P.; Penttilä, M.; Fischer, W. J.; Wagermaier, W.; et al. Phase Transitions as Intermediate Steps in the Formation of Molecularly Engineered Protein Fibers. Commun. Biol. 2018, 1 (1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0090-y.
(22) Mohammadi, P.; Christopher, J.; Beaune, G.; Engelhardt, P.; Kamada, A.; Timonen, J. V. I.; Knowles, T. P. J.; Penttila, M.; Linder, M. B. Controllable Coacervation of Recombinantly Produced Spider Silk Protein Using Kosmotropic Salts. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.10.058.
(23) Mohammadi, P.; Aranko, A. S.; Landowski, C. P.; Ikkala, O.; Jaudzems, K.; Wagermaier, W.; Linder, M. Biomimetic Composites with Enhanced Toughening Using Silk Inspired Triblock Proteins and Aligned Nanocellulose Reinforcements. Sci. Adv. 2019, No. September, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw2541.
(24) Renault, A. Structure and Mechanical Properties of Spider Silk Films at the Air − Water Interface. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1021/la401104m.
(25) Wang, L.; Xie, H.; Qiao, X.; Go, A.; Hodgkinson, T.; Yuan, X.; Sun, K.; Fuller, G. G. Interfacial Rheology of Natural Silk Fibroin at Air / Water and Oil / Water Interfaces. 2012, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1021/la2041373.
(26) Tormo, J.; Lamed, R.; Chirino, A. J.; Morag, E.; Bayer, E. A.; Shoham, Y.; Steitz, T. A. Crystal Structure of a Bacterial Family-III Cellulose-Binding Domain: A General Mechanism for Attachment to Cellulose. EMBO J. 1996, 15 (21), 5739.
(27) Huemmerich, D.; Helsen, C. W.; Quedzuweit, S.; Oschmann, J.; Rudolph, R.; Scheibel, T. Primary Structure Elements of Spider Dragline Silks and Their Contribution to Protein Solubility. Biochemistry 2004, 43 (42), 13604–13612. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi048983q.
(28) Guerette, P. a; Ginzinger, D. G.; Weber, B. H.; Gosline, J. M. Silk Properties Determined by Gland-Specific Expression of a Spider Fibroin Gene Family. Science 1996, 272 (5258), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5258.112.
(29) Gosline, J. M.; Guerette, P. a; Ortlepp, C. S.; Savage, K. N. The Mechanical Design of Spider Silks: From Fibroin Sequence to Mechanical Function. J. Exp. Biol. 1999, 202 (Pt 23), 3295–3303.
(30) Engler, C.; Kandzia, R.; Marillonnet, S. A One Pot, One Step, Precision Cloning Method with High Throughput Capability. PLoS One 2008, 3 (11), e3647.
(31) Sanjana, N. E.; Cong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Cunniff, M. M.; Feng, G.; Zhang, F. A Transcription Activator-like Effector Toolbox for Genome Engineering. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7 (1), 171–192.
(32) Yan, P.; Gao, X.; Shen, W.; Zhou, P.; Duan, J. Parallel Assembly for Multiple Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Plasmids. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 430 (1), 65–67.
(33) Schneider, C. A.; Rasband, W. S.; Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9 (7), 671–675.
(34) Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B. Fiji: An Open-Source Platform for Biological-Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9 (7), 676–682.
(35) Gao, L.; McCarthy, T. J. How Wenzel and Cassie Were Wrong. Langmuir 2007, 23 (7), 3762–3765.
(36) Gao, L.; McCarthy, T. J. Wetting 101°. Langmuir 2009, 25 (24), 14105–14115.
(37) Benecke, G.; Wagermaier, W.; Li, C.; Schwartzkopf, M.; Flucke, G.; Hoerth, R.; Zizak, I.; Burghammer, M.; Metwalli, E.; Muller-Buschbaum, P.; et al. A Customizable Software for Fast Reduction and Analysis of Large X-Ray Scattering Data Sets: Applications of the New DPDAK Package to Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering and Grazing-Incidence Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2014, 47 (5), 1797–1803.
(38) Kim, K. H.; Pathak, H.; Späh, A.; Perakis, F.; Mariedahl, D.; Sellberg, J. A.; Katayama, T.; Harada, Y.; Ogasawara, H.; Pettersson, L. G. M. Temperature-Independent Nuclear Quantum Effects on the Structure of Water. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119 (7), 75502.
(39) Liu, Y.; Stoeckel, D.; Gordeyeva, K.; Agthe, M.; Schutz, C.; Fall, A. B.; Bergström, L. Nanoscale Assembly of Cellulose Nanocrystals during Drying and Redispersion. ACS Macro Lett. 2018, 7 (2), 172–177.
(40) Seidel, A.; Liivak, O.; Calve, S.; Adaska, J.; Ji, G.; Yang, Z.; Grubb, D.; Zax, D. B.; Jelinski, L. W. Regenerated Spider Silk: Processing, Properties, and Structure. Macromolecules 2000, 33 (3), 775–780.
(41) Martel, A.; Burghammer, M.; Davies, R. J.; Di Cola, E.; Vendrely, C.; Riekel, C. Silk Fiber Assembly Studied by Synchrotron Radiation SAXS/WAXS and Raman Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (50), 17070–17074.
(42) Hinman, M. B.; Lewis, R. V. Isolation of a Clone Encoding a Second Dragline Silk Fibroin. Nephila Clavipes Dragline Silk Is a Two-Protein Fiber. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267 (27), 19320–19324.
(43) Lefevre, T.; Paquet‐Mercier, F.; Rioux‐Dubé, J.; Pézolet, M. Structure of Silk by Raman Spectromicroscopy: From the Spinning Glands to the Fibers. Biopolymers 2012, 97 (6), 322–336.
(44) Lefèvre, T.; Boudreault, S.; Cloutier, C.; Pézolet, M. Conformational and Orientational Transformation of Silk Proteins in the Major Ampullate Gland of Nephila Clavipes Spiders. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9 (9), 2399–2407.
(45) Song, P.; Xu, Z.; Guo, Q. Bioinspired Strategy to Reinforce PVA with Improved Toughness and Thermal Properties via Hydrogen-Bond Self-Assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2 (12), 1100–1104.
(46) Szilvay, G. R.; Paananen, A.; Laurikainen, K.; Vuorimaa, E.; Lemmetyinen, H.; Peltonen, J.; Linder, M. B. Self-Assembled Hydrophobin Protein Films at the Air− Water Interface: Structural Analysis and Molecular Engineering. Biochemistry 2007, 46 (9), 2345–2354.
(47) Bromley, K. M.; Morris, R. J.; Hobley, L.; Brandani, G.; Gillespie, R. M. C.; McCluskey, M.; Zachariae, U.; Marenduzzo, D.; Stanley-Wall, N. R.; MacPhee, C. E. Interfacial Self-Assembly of a Bacterial Hydrophobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2015, 112 (17), 5419–5424.
(48) Liu, Y.; Shao, Z.; Vollrath, F. Relationships between Supercontraction and Mechanical Properties of Spider Silk. Nat. Mater. 2005, 4 (12), 901–905. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1534.