Study population and eligibility criteria
A cross-sectional study was conducted from March to November 2018 in four districts of Shanghai. After removing invalid data, a total of 304 participants were included in the analysis. The inclusion criteria were: biological males aged over 18 years who had engaged in sex with men over the past 6 months. The exclusion criterion was patients with severe mental disorders.
Recruitment and study procedure
The hidden nature of MSM and small proportion of the population prevented this study from conducting a large-scale investigation with random sampling; therefore, a snowball sampling method was used [24, 25]. First, 5–10 eligible MSM were selected as initial “seeds” in each district with the help of the local Center for Disease Control and Prevention and non-governmental organizations. Then, these participants were tasked with recruiting eligible subjects from the same sociocultural background. These second groups of participants were also asked to provide information on other potential subgroup participants, and this process continued until an adequate sample was obtained.
Unified training for the investigators was conducted that covered the survey content, methods, and relevant precautions. The investigators reached consensus on the health behavior questionnaire. Anonymous face-to-face interviews with participants were conducted as follows. First, the investigators explained the goal and procedure of the survey to participants in detail, answered any questions, and obtained their informed consent. Next, each participant was asked to independently complete a self-administered questionnaire in a private room. The questionnaire took around 30 minutes to complete. After completion of the questionnaires, the investigators checked the completeness and logicality of each questionnaire, and resolved any problems in a timely manner to ensure the accuracy of the collected data.
Entrapment Scale (ES)
With the permission of the author of the original scale, the ES was translated into Chinese by a bilingual translator. Another translator translated the Chinese version back into English to compare and correct any differences against the original scale to ensure equivalence. The final version was reviewed by the original author. Informal pretesting using a small sample of the MSM population was performed to check the intelligibility of the items and obtain feedback on the scale. The 16 items of the Chinese version of the ES are divided into external entrapment (items 1–10) and internal entrapment (items 11–16). The response options for each item are “not at all,” “a little bit,” “moderately,” “quite a bit,” and “extremely,’ which correspond to scores of 0–4. The total score ranges from 0 to 64. A higher score indicates a stronger sense of entrapment. The final Chinese version of the ES is detailed in Supplementary Material 1.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 was developed for criteria-based screening and diagnosis of depression [26]. The scale has been widely applied in primary care settings and demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties [27-29]. Compared with other commonly used clinical depression assessment tools, the PHQ-9 has the advantages of having fewer items, being easier to understand, and less time-consuming. The scale comprises nine items that evaluate the frequency of depressive symptoms in the previous 2 weeks. Each item is scored from 0 to 3 (representing “not at all,” “a few days,” “more than half a day,” and “nearly every day”). Total scores range from 0 to 27. The optimal cutoff point is ≥10, which was described as diagnostic in a systematic review [30]. Many studies have confirmed that the generation of feelings of entrapment and defeat may trigger depression and lead to poor psychological states such as lack of self-esteem and self-confidence [3, 6, 7, 31]. Therefore, this study used the PHQ-9 to assess depressive symptoms among MSM, consistent with previous studies [32, 33]. The internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficient) of the PHQ-9 in this study was 0.874.
Statistical analyses
Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics were calculated by numbers and proportions. The ES scores were described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and median (inter-quartile range, IQR). Differences between sample subgroups were tested with non-parametric tests. Participants were randomly divided into two groups using a random number generator to perform exploratory factor analysis (n = 143) and confirmatory factor analysis (n = 161) to evaluate the construct validity of the Chinese ES. The criterion validity was evaluated between ES and PHQ-9 scores using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Cronbach’s α and Spearman-Brown coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency reliability and split-half reliability, respectively. We performed hierarchical regression analysis to determine the contribution of entrapment to predicting depression after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics [3, 4]. Finally, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate optimal cut-off value of the ES for predicting depression [28]. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0.