Table 1: Socio-demographic Characteristics of respondents
Age (Year)
|
n
|
%
|
p-value
|
Mean
|
Std devt
|
<40
40-49
>=50
|
17
62
31
|
15.5
56.4
28.2
|
0.043
|
45.36
|
6.734
|
Educational level
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary
Technical
Others
|
5
63
42
|
4.5
57.3
38.2
|
0.000
|
3.34
|
0.563
|
Designation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior CHEWs
Junior CHEWs
|
87
23
|
79.1
20.9
|
0.000
|
1.21
|
0.409
|
Years of experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
<10 years
10-19 years
20-29 years
>= 30 years
|
14
62
23
11
|
12.7
56.4
20.9
10.0
|
0.000
|
2.28
|
0.814
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male
Female
|
7
103
|
6.4
93.6
|
0.000
|
1.94
|
0.245
|
All participants completed the training, observed for immediate practice, involved in eight (8) and also sixteen (16) weeks practice observation. All respondents were trained in neonatal resuscitation, participated in the immediate post training test and observed at their different PHC centres eight (8) and sixteen weeks after training, giving a response rate of 100%. Although, all responded completed the questionnaires administered to them, which were described in another sub-set study with poor pre-test score. Less than 50% of them were below age 40 years (15.5%) and more than or equal to 50 years old (28.2%) with a mean age of 45.4 ± 2.1 years and median age of 45 years. Majority of them were senior CHEW (79.1%) with post-secondary education. Over half of them (56.4%) have spent between 10-19 years working as birth attendants at different PHC centres, out of which only 7 (6.4%) were male (p<0.000). This indicate that respondents are matured health care providers, educated with at least the lowest approved level of education in Nigeria. The profession is more female dominated, and been a community service based, culturally, community people feel secured and can entrust their own in the hands of female than male gender. They can only allow a female health providers take delivery of pregnant woman and visit their homes (Table 1).
Table 2: Age (n=110)
n
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Minimum
|
25th percentile
|
Median
|
75th percentile
|
Maximum
|
110
|
45.36
|
6.734
|
26
|
40.00
|
45
|
50.00
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2 showed the descriptive statistic of respondents, with mean age of 45.36 years and standard deviation of 6.734. The median is 45 years and the percentile range from 25% to 75% is 40 – 59 years with the youngest being 26 years and the oldest is 59 years (Table 2).
Table 3: Knowledge of neonatal resuscitation
|
Pre (%)
|
Post (%)
|
X2
|
p-value
|
Managing a baby born through meconium stained amniotic fluid.
|
12 (10.9)
|
94 (85.5)
|
|
0.000
|
What should you do in Golden minute
|
15 (13.6)
|
94 (85.5)
|
|
|
Managing a newborn baby who is quiet, limp and not crying. The baby does not respond to steps to stimulate breathing.
|
16 (14.5)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
Which of the following statements about ventilation with bag and masks is TRUE?
|
18 (16.4)
|
91 (82.7)
|
|
|
A baby’s chest is not moving with bag and mask ventilation. What should you do?
|
42 (38.2)
|
103 (93.6)
|
|
|
When do stop ventilation
|
15 (13.6)
|
96 (87.3)
|
|
|
What should you do to keep the baby warm
|
17 (15.5)
|
101 (91.8)
|
|
|
An appropriate way to stimulate a baby that is not breathing
|
16 (14.5)
|
109 (99.1)
|
|
|
The above showed the knowledge of CHEWs in critical areas of resuscitation before and after the training. Before the training, majority of them lacked knowledge of what to do when a baby is born with meconium stained liquor, what golden minute signified in neonatal resuscitation, when to begin ventilation of asphyxiated baby and how to stimulate baby that is not breathing. But post-training assessment showed that there was a significant improvement in their knowledge of newborn resuscitation (Table 3).
Table 4: Method of resuscitation
Method
|
Pre (%)
|
Post (%)
|
Std dvt
|
Slapping/ beating the buttocks
|
73 (66.4)
|
25 (22.7)
|
0.77
|
Head down
|
73 (66.4)
|
25 (2.7)
|
0.74
|
Vigorous shaking
|
43 (30.1)
|
13 (11.8)
|
0.57
|
Suctioning the airways
|
102 (92.7)
|
96 (87.3)
|
0.59
|
Mouth-to mouth breathing
|
93 (84.5)
|
68 (61.8)
|
0.68
|
Respondents’ previous practice of resuscitation showed that majority of them engaged in harmful resuscitation practices, while majority (66.4%) slap/beat the newborns’ buttocks and put babys’heads down as an alternative way of resuscitating asphyxiated neonates, while suctioning the airway is one of the routine care for every newborn, which they were trained to perform on every newborn (Table 4).
Table 5: Cumulative knowledge score by respondents age, level of education and years of experience before the training
Age
|
Knowledge of NR
|
X2
|
df
|
p-value
|
|
Good
|
Poor
|
1.290
|
2
|
0.525
|
<40
|
2 (1.8)
|
15 (13.6)
|
|
|
|
40-49
|
9 (8.2)
|
53 (48.2)
|
|
|
|
>=50
|
2 (1.8)
|
29 (26.4)
|
|
|
|
Education
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary
|
3 (2.7)
|
2 (1.8)
|
13.191
|
2
|
0.001
|
Technical
|
4 (3.6)
|
59 (53.6)
|
|
|
|
Others
|
6 (5.5)
|
36 (32.7)
|
|
|
|
Years of Experience
|
|
|
|
|
|
<10 years
|
2 (14.3)
|
12 (85.7)
|
0.210
|
3
|
0.976
|
10-19 years
|
7 (12.9)
|
55 (50.0)
|
|
|
|
20-29 years
|
3 (2.7)
|
20 (18.2)
|
|
|
|
>= 30 years
|
1 (0.9)
|
10 (9.1)
|
|
|
|
All respondents had deficient knowledge of NR, out of which majority were between the ages of 40-49 years, those with technical education 59 (53.6%) and with years of experience of 10-19 years. This implied that even though they have been working for so long with additional educational qualifications and matured ages, this does not translate to acquiring knowledge of resuscitating newborns since there was no evidence of in-service training education that can improve their neonatal resuscitation knowledge (Table 5).
Table 6: Area wise observation score, immediately and 8 weeks after training
|
Practice 1 (immediately after training)
|
Practice 2 (8 weeks for model testing)
|
Practice 4 (16 weeks for evaluation of model)
|
p-value
|
Observation
|
D (%)
|
ND (%)
|
D (%)
|
ND (%)
|
D (%)
|
ND (%)
|
|
How to prepares for birth/delivery
|
107 (97.4)
|
3 (2.7)
|
28 (25.5)
|
82 (74.5)
|
110 (100)
|
|
0.000
|
How can you recognize baby is not crying
|
107 (97.4)
|
3 (2.7)
|
14 (12.7)
|
96 (87.3)
|
107 (97.3)
|
3 (2.7)
|
|
Keep warm, positions head, clears airway
|
95 (86.4)
|
15 (13.6)
|
7 (6.4)
|
103 (93.6)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
Stimulates breathing by rubbing the back
|
105 (95.5)
|
5 (4.5)
|
6 (5.5)
|
104 (94.5)
|
105 (95.5)
|
5 (4.5)
|
|
Cuts cord and moves to area for ventilation
|
110 (100)
|
0
|
4 (3.6)
|
106 (96.4)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
Starts ventilation within the Golden Minute
|
110 (100)
|
0
|
24 (21.8)
|
86 (78.2)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
Looks for chest movement
|
110 (100)
|
0
|
5(4.5)
|
105 (95.5)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
Repositions head, clears secretions, opens mouth slightly, squeeze bag harder
|
110 (100)
|
0
|
15 (13.6)
|
95 (86.4)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
Stops ventilation; monitors baby and communicates with mother
|
109 (99.1)
|
1 (0.9)
|
11 (10.0)
|
99 (90.0)
|
110 (100)
|
|
|
*** 1st practice: Std dev of diff = 2.9; Mean diff = 3.3
2nd practice: Std dev. of diff= ; Mean diff= 2.37
4th practice: Std dev. of diff= ; Mean diff.= 3.27
The above showed the respondents’ observations scores immediately after training, eight (8) weeks after the initial training and sixteen (16) weeks when interventions were instituted. All of them performed very well immediately after the training in resuscitation using mannequins. Those that did not do well were re-trained on the aspect of deficiencies and reassessed. At eight (8) weeks, when they were assessed at their various PHCs centers, majority did not perform adequately well. At sixteen weeks, when the refined module had been used, almost all respondents performed adequately well (p<0.000) (Table 6).
Table 7: Cumulative knowledge score of neonatal resuscitation and newborn care before and after the training
Neonatal resuscitation
|
Pre-test
|
%
|
Post-test
|
%
|
p-value
|
Good
|
13
|
11.8
|
106
|
96.4
|
0.000
|
Poor
|
97
|
88.2
|
4
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newborn care
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good
|
13
|
11.8
|
104
|
94.5
|
0.000
|
Poor
|
97
|
88.2
|
6
|
5.5
|
|
Out of 110 that were trained, almost all had a very good knowledge of newborn care both before and after training. On the contrary, their knowledge of resuscitation was poor at pre training, but had improved knowledge at post training (Table 7).
Qualitative data
Table 8: demographic characteristics of FGD and IDI respondents
Demographic Characteristics
|
n
|
%
|
Age (Years)
|
|
|
25 -35
|
3
|
12
|
35 - 45
|
8
|
32
|
45 - 55
|
12
|
48
|
55 - 65
|
2
|
8
|
Educational Level
|
|
|
Secondary
|
4
|
16
|
Technical
|
15
|
60
|
Others
|
6
|
24
|
Years of experience
|
|
|
≤10
|
2
|
8
|
10-19
|
12
|
48
|
20-29
|
9
|
36
|
≥=30
|
2
|
8
|
Designation
|
|
|
Senior CHEW
|
20
|
80
|
Junior CHEW
|
5
|
20
|
Religion
|
|
|
Christianity
|
19
|
76
|
Islam
|
6
|
24
|
Others
|
-
|
|
The respondents shared their knowledge and experiences of neonatal resuscitation after intervention was instituted. The themes that emerged were knowledge of how to stimulate a newborn, knowledge of how to ventilate a compromised baby and perception of training received. The five main themes are shown in (Table 8).
Table 9: Qualitative themes
Themes
|
Knowledge of how to stimulate a newborn
|
Knowledge of how to ventilate a compromised baby
|
Perception of training received
|
Suggestions for improved neonatal resuscitation in PHCs in Nigeria
|
Challenges experienced in newborn care
|
In this qualitative strand, respondents shared their knowledge of newborn care and their insight of neonatal resuscitation. This theme is major focus of the refining of NRT model for the training of semi-skilled birth attendants. Under this theme, respondents’ reactions and responses were discussed following their knowledge of NR including how to stimulate a newborn, how to ventilate a compromised baby, their perception of training received, challenges they experienced in newborn care and their suggestions for improved NR in PHCs in Nigeria.
Knowledge of how to stimulate a newborn: Participants mentioned that prior to training; they stimulated a newborn by slapping the baby on the back or the buttocks. However, following the training they had received they rub the back of the baby gently as against slapping. This is evident in their quotes as expressed below:
Fifty-five year old senior CHEW, who has been working for 31 years said:
“Since you said we should not slap the buttocks or shake the baby but to rub them,
we have been rubbing them especially their back”. (IDI_SENIOR CHEW (31YOE) 55YEARS OLD)
Another respondent, a 45 year old senior CHEW with 17 years working experience said:
“We stimulate by rubbing the nose of the baby with spirit, the baby will sneeze and
start crying. We can also rub or tap the baby for him to cry”.
M- What about rubbing the back that we taught you or tapping the sole of his feet?
“Yes, it’s true, we rub the baby. I told you earlier that we rub, it is the back and
leg”.
M- Do you slap or shake the baby?
“Well, before now, we used to slap their buttocks but you told us that we should
not do it again, we have stopped. We only rub the baby”. (IDI SENIOR CHEW (17YRS) 45YEARS).
While a 54 year old senior CHEW responded that:
“Since you said we should not slap the buttocks or shake the baby but to rub them,
we have been rubbing them especially their backs. But some of us still use
methylated spirit cotton wool to rub the ridge of the nose, for baby to sneeze and
breathe well”. (IDI SENIOR CHEW (22YRS) 54YEARS)
Knowledge of ventilation of compromised newborn: Respondents’ reported that they do not have the equipment necessary for the ventilation of newborns. Therefore, following the training received, they have learnt to improvise by using mucous extractors. Participants also mentioned that sometimes they practice mouth-to-mouth ventilation for the newborns.
A senior CHEW with 31 years of working experience said:
“We don’t have ambu-bags, so what we do is to use mucous extractor to clear the
airway and do mouth-to-mouth for the baby”. (IDI - SENIOR CHEW (31YRS)
55YEARS)
While another respondent said that:
“Because we don’t have what we can use to ventilate, we normally use mucous
extractor to clear the airways and rub baby or we do mouth-to-mouth for the baby.
If it is not possible, we refer out to secondary facility for further treatment”.
(IDI - SENIOR CHEW (17YRS) 45YEARS)
In Oke- Adu PHC, a 56 year old Junior CHEW, with 15 years of working experience said;
“Ha, we stimulate through the use of mucous extractor. You know I mentioned it
earlier on that we don’t have ambu-bag. So for us in our PHC, we don’t want to
lose the baby, so we do all we could to revive the baby and to do it in a way that
will not injure or inflict injuring on the baby. When we have a compromised baby,
we will suck the airways again and do mouth-to-mouth ventilation, provided we
know her Hepatitis B and HIV statuses. This has been working for us since our last
training and we have not recorded any newborn death as a result of not breathing
or not breathing well”. (IDI - JUNIOR CHEW (15YRS)_ 56YEARS)
Perception of training received: All participants across the FGD and IDI agreed that the training received was important and useful in helping them carry out their responsibilities in caring for newborns and resuscitate compromised babies.
Each of them expressed themselves as follows:
“Yes ma it is useful” (R1, FGD)
“The training was useful and worth doing. Thank you very much ma for doing this
for us. (R1, FGD)
“This study and training was useful to me and my people at our center”. (R2, FGD)
“It is useful to me”. (R3, FGD)
“Very good training, very useful and worth it”. (R4, FGD)
“This study and training was useful and worth it”. (R5, FGD)
“Very good training ma”. (R6, FGD)
“Yes, it has been useful, but I want the organizer to do this training again”. (R7,
FGD)
FGD GROUP B
Participants described how they performed neonatal resuscitation prior to the training they had just received.
“Ha, ma, all of us have a way of taking care of those babies before we attend this
training”. (R4, FGD)
“In my center, we shake the babies upside down or we may give a slap at the
buttocks or we use cold water to touch the legs. We believe that the babies will
cry and they do cry after this, after which they start breathing very well. It works
for us anyway. But after the training we have been doing it the way we were taught”.
(R4, FGD)
“In my own case, at our center, before we came for this training, we normally
shook the baby upside down and slapped the buttock at the same time. So whenever
we saw an asphyxiated baby, this was what we did. We suctioned the airways too. But
since we were trained, we have been suctioning the airways gently, rub the back of the
baby and do mouth-to-mouth, since we don’t have ambu-bag to do this. (R1, FGD)
FGD GROUP A
Furthermore, respondents mentioned that apart from teaching them new methods in caring for newborns, they have learnt to improvise and use what is available in terms of equipment to achieve the care to be provided.
Suggestions for improved neonatal resuscitation in PHCs in Nigeria: Participants made several suggestions they believe would be important and helpful in improving the practice of neonatal resuscitation in PHCs across the country. The suggestions raised were provision of items of equipment such as Ambu-bags; employment of staff; training and re-training of staff; participants also asked for job aids in addition to employment of more staff.
From Oje, PHC, a 55 year old senior CHEW, with 31 years of working experience said
“My suggestion is that Government should provide enough instruments and employ more
staff. Then, the training you gave us, we need something that will enable us to remember
those steps in performing neonatal resuscitation”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (31YRS) 55YEARS)
A 45 year old from Idi-Ogungun PHC said,
“Eh, government should provide all necessary items of equipment and instruments for all
PHCs. Even those small but essential things like ambu-bag for adult and children should
be provided. For us to remember NR, we need something that will remind us of what to do
at every stage”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (17YRS) 45YEARS)
A 54 year old from Idi-ogungun PHC said.
“Although we have many PHCs in all our LGAs, there are no instruments nor items of equipment to work with. There are no drugs, gloves, methylated spirit, even electricity. So my suggestion is for government to provide all the necessary things to all PHCs. We need ambu-bags for resuscitation. Then, the training you gave us, we need something that will enable us to remember those steps in performing NR whenever need arises. It can be booklets or posters or both”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (22YRS) 54YEARS)
While a respondent from Agbowo PHC said that
“My suggestion starts from providing enough health workers. We are short-staffed and we don’t have enough staff to work in our PHCs, so government should employ more people. Another suggestion is to provide good, functioning and enough instruments and equipment”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (20YRS)48YEARS)
A respondent from Agbowo PHC said
“We want re-training. If we can be trained at least twice a year, I think it will be better. Apart from training and re-training, we can have booklets that we can refer to when we forget any of the steps. Then, we want something we can quickly consult, to be in our labour room, lying –in-ward and any other area that needs it, so that whenever we are doing the procedure, we can be looking at it and do the correct and acceptable procedure”.
“IDI SENIOR CHEW (20YRS) 48YEARS)
While from Iwo Road PHC a junior CHEW said
“They should employ more health workers including doctors. They should supply equipment that are essential and supply instruments to work with. Majority of outpatients believe health is free, as they (government) advertise on the media. So when they come and you ask them to buy virtually all things, they get annoyed. Some will even fight us that we are telling them lies. Government should wake up to their responsibilities”.
(IDI JUNIOR CHEW (12YRS) 35YEARS)
Challenges experienced in newborn care: Participants mentioned various challenges they face in caring for neonates. Some of the challenges mentioned by participants include lack of equipment (these were the most mentioned challenges faced by participants; lack of workspace; lack of or inadequate staff; poor training for staff and harmful cultural practices.
Lack of equipment:
From Oje PHC, a senior CHEW said
“In our PHC center, some the challenges we face is lack of equipment. Many of our equipment are old and not functioning well… Another major challenge is lack of staff. Many a times, we do two or double shift. So it is very strenuous for all of us”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (31YRS) 55YEARS)
While from Aremo PHC a respondent said
“Ha, We face a lot of challenges, one of them is that we have no equipment or let me say we don’t have enough important equipment. Some items of equipment are not available, and for the available ones, they are not enough, old and not good again”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (24YRS) 49YEARS)
Lack of workspace:
A respondent from Idi-Ogungun PHC said
“Another challenge is building. We want the government to quickly finish our building so
we can have big space. Most importantly, we don’t have enough staff to work in most of
our PHCs across the country. Then, government should make health care free for our
people, not to campaign and do propaganda on the Radio, but to do what they say and
promise”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (17YRS) 45YEARS)
While a 54 year old from Idi Ogungun PHC said
“Like in our PHC center, one of the biggest challenges as you can see is our building.
Government pulled down part of our building because it was dilapidated. They promised
to build a new one before pulling down the remaining part of the building. As you can see,
they started the new building but somehow abandoned it. So the other half of the old
building is what we are managing”.
(IDI SENIOR CHEW (22 YRS) 54YEARS)
Lack of inadequate staff:
A junior CHEW from Oke-Adu PHC said
“The challenges are many, but the first is shortage of staff. We are not many and
government is not employing health care providers. No enough staff. We don’t have a
doctor of our own. The local government has only one doctor and PHCs under a local
government are many. Some have 15 PHCs, some 7 PHCs, and some 8 PHCs (etc). So
you can imagine, a doctor can come to your centre maybe once in 2 weeks. So many things
we do on our own without a doctor. We normally use our initiatives and when we see that
we cannot handle a situation, we refer out”.
(IDI JUNIOR CHEW (15YRS) 56YEARS)
Poor staff training:
Another junior CHEW from Oke-Adu PHC said
“We need re-training to improve the care we render…”
(IDI JUNIOR CHEW (12YRS) 35YEARS)